Product Communities

In the new approvals, I get emailed about everything - every approved/changes/needs work, when it is final decision, etc.  I can see all that in my notifications in WF and it is burying important emails.I can’t seem to find a place to turn it off - any one happen to know?

Lets assume I have 3 sites with different content structure each: SiteAServername sitea.example.com/content/sitea/Has statfileslevel 4 SiteBServername siteb.example.com/content/siteb/Has statfileslevel 3 SiteCServername sitec.example.com/content/sitec/Has statfileslevel 2 Lets also assume that all sites share some DAM assets and share design/layout assets (in /etc.clientlibs/*) so I want to use a common shared dispatcher cache folder for all sites. Now I have one *.vhost file per site, with the respective Servername. Reason being that I need different RewriteRules to map incoming requests to full content paths (that are externalized in markup based on /etc/hosts config, which differs due to different content structure).Now I have one additional flush.vhost file, which hasServerName "localhost"ServerAlias "\*.local" "127.0.0.1" "*.adobeaemcloud.net" "*.adobeaemcloud.com" "flush"this gets all the dispatcher flush requests as well as internal Adobe requests etc - it has no site-specific r

Hi, I need to find a way to show active projects per month (or ideally, every two weeks) for 2025 and start comparing it to this year. IE, how many projects were active in January 2025 vs January 2026. Not how many projects started or closed, but how many were still active. This seems like it should be an easy report to pull, but I have not been successful. This information is now required by our leadership, so the report is essential. Thanks in advance for any help and advice!

On our site we have the following :each evar below expires on visitcategory Level 1 page → evar1 is set on that pagecategory Level 2 page → evar1 and evar 2 are set on that pagecategory Level 3 page → evar1, evar2 and evar3 are set on that pagecategory Level 4 page→ evar 1, evar2, evar3 and evar4 are set on that pagecategory Level 5, up to 6 follow the same structure as aboveI want to see page views for category Level 3 pages only as well conversion rate for visits who have seen category Level 3 but not any of the other pages. i have tried building a hit segment with a container (hit) that includes evar3 exists and is set and within that same hit container, I added an exclude hit container(excludes evar 4, 5 and 6) but the data returned shows that my segment does not work. While I would expect to see only Level 3 pageNames in that segment , I am seeing all kinds of pages.What is the solution?  

Is it possible to create edge & streming audience definitions using segment API? Its not confirmed in the documentation ..

Has anyone used Segment and Adobe together? We’re bringing in Segment and want to know how other organizations use the two in tandem.  Thanks. peter.wolly@consumer.org

Sometime this week, Adobe CJA added text to my summary number visualizations, referencing the Dimension involved.  Sometimes, this reference.  Mostly it’s not - AND it shrinks the actual number displayed.  This can be fixed but I now have to do that fix to hundreds of dashboards.  I also can’t figure out how to turn it off/hide.  Anyone else notice this? 

I have setup alert and i get email around 12:40 but my data is not settled by that time so usually alert I get are not useful. How I can fix this

i have an exit intent pop up built in adobe target VEC custom code that loads Marketo form(single field - email) i need to capture country from adobe target and pass it into hidden marketo field (country) without showing it to the user. but the country sometimes empty. what is the recommended prod safe way to pass Target geo attributes into Marketo hidden field?

Hi Team,We currently have a process where an email is marked ineligible from Marketo after 5 soft bounces or a Category 2 hard bounce. However, we’re planning to use ZeroBounce to re-validate those email addresses after a defined period (for example, after several months of being ineligible).ZeroBounce provides results such as valid, invalid, and catch-all. Our intention is to carefully reintroduce only the valid email addresses through a separate warm-up campaign, rather than adding them directly back into regular marketing sends. The idea is to first monitor engagement and mailbox health before including them in standard campaigns. For example, emails that previously soft bounced due to mailbox full may become deliverable again over time.We would like guidance on the following: What are the best practices for safely re-engaging previously bounced emails without negatively impacting our IP and domain reputation? Since we use the same sending domain for a specific brand so bringing bac

Hi There, We have a requirement where several custom dropdown fields have been added to the metadata schema of our assets (DITA files). During the translation process, AEM currently picks up the dropdown key value (the stored value) instead of the display label. This key is then sent for translation and applied to the translated language copy. As a result, the translated copy fails to load the corresponding dropdown option correctly in its properties. Additionally, all dropdown labels and options remain in English after translation. We would like to explore whether there is an OOTB approach in AEM to automatically localize or translate these dropdown labels across language copies. Thanks,Ravi Joshi

Hello Team,When I am ingesting the data via HTTP API Source the data is getting ingested in dataset but not in profile store, however it was working fine earlier. Current Observations:When I check dataflow runs it show completed  But in the dataset I see two entries getting created for same record one with failed and other with success. The success records do not get ingested in Profile Store  Troubleshooting: I did following troubleshoot however no luck:Created a new HTTP API data flow as the earlier one was not working, the new worked well for the first time and next day it has stopped working I made sure that the dataset is profile enabled I validated the success dataset batch records via query services and they are appearing fine in the dataset however not reflecting in profile store I made sure the payload has all the mandatory fields such as primary and secondary keysCould anyone confirm how to fix this, this would be a help.Thanks in advance! Regards,Mustufa  

I have got such an error while building Dev4 library. Does this mean that every resource which is already upstream has to be changed in order to build dev library? Its not possible to only update only one resource in Dev library?  

Default checked state is not appearing for coral checkboxes"granite/ui/components/coral/foundation/form/checkbox"but it's working fine for granite foundation one. i.e. granite/ui/components/foundation/form/checkbox. I've tried many ways (e.g. checked (string) property setting as true, defaultChecked / uncheckedValue etc.) but nothing is working. One thing noticed that, "checked" property has type  ' booleanel ' while in JCR, only boolean is available;not the expression lang type. So,is it causing any issue?  Any pointers on this will be really helpful.

Hi All, I am using adaptive form core component in aem as a cloud. After create a new theme, i am creating a core component adaptive form buts its not visible and not available to select only the default theme Canvas is available. Can some the correct way to create theme for core component adaptive form and how to use it while creating the form, so use that on localhost aem server.

In my dispatcher_httpderror log, I keep getting the following messages. Fri Oct 10 23:59:24.646793 2025 [managed_rewrite_maps:debug] [pid 123] [cm-p123-e123-aem-publish-123] Managed rewrite maps check in progressFri Oct 10 23:59:24.650947 2025 [managed_rewrite_maps:debug] [pid123] [cm-p123-e123-aem-publish-123] No managed rewrite maps configuredFri Oct 10 23:59:24.655150 2025 [managed_rewrite_maps:debug] [pid123] [cm-p123-e123-aem-publish-123] Managed rewrite maps check DONEFri Oct 10 23:59:24.659466 2025 [managed_rewrite_maps:debug] [pid123] [cm-p123-e123-aem-publish-123] Waiting for 30 seconds for next managed rewrite maps check I am not using any Apache RewriteMap directive on my setup.These errors pollute my log and have no value, how can I get rid of them?And I want to keep the debug level, so that I can see the REAL errors 

Hi AEM Community, I'm working on migration project , migrating from classic UI to touch UI. we have one button on siteadmin navigation bar called "start workflow" when clicked content tree dialog will open first where user where dialog will open with selected page(s) will show along next and cancel button if user selects next button then workflow model screen will load where model will be prepopulated. To achieve same in touch UI I have create a button at /apps/wcm/core/content/sites/jcr:content/actions/secondary/wokflow-button and below is xml<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><jcr:root xmlns:sling="http://sling.apache.org/jcr/sling/1.0" xmlns:granite="http://www.adobe.com/jcr/granite/1.0" xmlns:cq="http://www.day.com/jcr/cq/1.0" xmlns:jcr="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0" xmlns:nt="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0"jcr:primaryType="cq:Page"><jcr:content jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"><actions jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"><secondary jcr:primaryTy

Hi Team, We are receiving CPU spike issues recently, so to troubleshoot we are planning to configure custom logger to capture gc.log. Could you please let us know some suggestions or class that captures gc.log, so that we can create loggers accordingly. We need to capture under crx-quickstart/logs folder. Kindly let us know some suggestions to proceed further. Thanks,Aishwarya Karthikeyan

I'm managing a couple of thousand pages across 2 websites and I want to automate the processes around identifying pages that haven't been updated recently i.e. by published date. I can output as an excel etc but are there any automations inside of AEM to assist with tasks like this?

Hi Team,I am facing an issue during the Maven build and installation of an AEM package to my local instance.The build completes successfully for all modules, but the All-in-one package fails during the installation step.Environment:AEM Version: (add your version, e.g., AEM 6.5.20 or AEM Cloud SDK)Java Version: (example: Java 11)Maven Version: (example: Maven 3.8.8)OS: (Windows 10 / macOS, etc.)Local AEM running on: http://localhost:4502  Full Error Snippet:Request to http://localhost:4502/crx/packmgr/service.jsp failed, response=Moved Permanently...Error while installing package. Check log for details.

I am encountering an unexpected behavior in AEM during the Page Publish workflow rollback scenario.When a parent page is activated (using Replicator.replicate) using a custom replication agent, the replication framework correctly triggers one invocation of PackageContentBuilder.create(which is an implementation of ContentBuilder class, and is configured through serializationType in the agent) for the parent payload.However, when the same parent page is deactivated (as part of rollback), the replication framework triggers multiple implicit invocations of PackageContentBuilder.create() — first for the parent, then for each of its child pages.This occurs even though only the parent path is explicitly passed to the Replicator.replicate() call. Raised adobe ticket and they confirmed that this is the OOTB functionality and we want to implement  a custom replication deactivation flow. Can anyone please suggest  how to  implement that.

I have encountered an issue while updating the page properties. There is a deny rule for everyone group as shown in the below screenshot. Users belonging to a specific group are unable to update page properties, even though they have Read, Modify, Create, and Delete permissions for the required path. The necessary permissions for /content have been granted, but these users continue to receive an error.To resolve the issue, I added the jcr:modifyProperties privilege, after which the error was resolved. However, I noticed that jcr:modifyProperties was not listed among the original privileges, and I verified the rep:policy node as well.Interestingly, when I remove the rep:write privilege and add only jcr:modifyProperties, I can see the entry, which suggests that jcr:modifyProperties is an aggregate privilege of rep:write. This raises the question: why did it not work when rep:write was granted, and why wa

 I have a package that install the etc map entries on my Publishers.I currently have some mapping configs there that are obsolete, but must be removed because they break the new correct mapping.all my mappings are located underneath /etc/map.exampleThe rule in the filter.xml is<filter root="/etc/map.example" mode="replace"/>so I would expect the whole tree underneath to be wiped and replaced (according to https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/filter.html ), but this is clearly not what happens - I checked in the AEM cloud Publish Repository Browser and the old nodes are still there.Unfortunately the Repo Browser has no option to delete stuff. The nodes I need to delete are as follows:/etc/map.example/integration.publish/https/integration.example.com/redirect_old/etc/map.example/integration.publish/https/integration.example.fr/etc/map.example/integration.publish/https/integration.example.de/etc/map.example/integration.publish/https/integration.examp

Hi Everyone, We are currently encountering an issue with our AEM as a cloud setup. Our cloud instance is multi-tenant and includes five repositories. We have established Groups specific to our content paths, including an admin user group that has read, write, modify, delete, and replicate access to our content paths. The issue arises when any user who is part of this admin group attempts to move pages from one hierarchy to another. The move operation completes successfully, but it triggers a workflow called "Request to Complete Move Operation," which then accumulates in the workflow instances. However, when I, as the environment admin, perform the same move operation, the workflow mentioned above does not trigger. Could you please advise on how to ensure that the workflow does not trigger when users with all permissions (write, read, delete, modify, and replicate) perform the move operation? Thank you for your assistance in resolving this matter.

Hi All.Is there a risk in having more than 5k+ redirects managed by the Dispatcher? Is there any recommendation from Adobe to manage this specific scenario?Thanks.