Product Communities

When users select the Search icon, it is natural to expect all relevant results to be visible on the first page. Currently, when our users are “searching” in Programs, the results are either not showing on the first page, or one is showing on the first page with the remainder displaying on different tabs/pages.WF Support has said that currently, this is due to the existing pagination behavior and is a product limitation. Unfortunately, this is causing confusion among our users.Thank you for your consideration.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide a notification functionality for translation projects which informs a defined group of the translation project about the completion of a translation, listing all pages that have been translated so that you just need to click on the link to open the pages, review and publish them. Use-case: As an editor which has started a translation job, I want to be informed once the translation is back in AEM in order to check and publish the page. Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no functionality inside the Translation Project, you have do a customization by yourself. Improved/Expected Behavior: As the information about completed translation jobs is essential and no editor wants to check frequently the status of the translations projects, especially when there are hundreds running, I would expect that there is an ootb functionality for that. In the project you already have the chance to add member - here you could simply define

When using the filter “Member of Program” in a smart campaign, the dropdown shows all program statuses. It would be much more useful if it only displayed the Program Statuses for the channel of the selected program. I can’t think of a reason why when you’ve chosen a specific program, filtering on statuses not tied to the program’s channel would be needed. 

Version 1 of the callable agent functionality is very cool.   It would be great as a follow to create a visual agent builder (think “drag & drop” or using the “journey metaphor”) that can be used natively inside of Marketo, similar to tools like n8n, and enable an “callable agent journey” to be able to interact with other agents in the system, in the same way that Marketo smart campaigns can engage with executable campaigns. 

I love the functionality that you have enabled with callable agents and the webhook (future flow step) application.  What I would like to see as a next step is the ability for agents to execute other functions in Marketo beyond sending back return attributes to populate fields.  Here are some recommendations for capabilities to add to callable agents:Add to List Insert/Upsert on lead database fields across objects (Program Member, Marketo Custom Object)  Change Program Status Add/Update to Salesforce Campaign. Conditional logic for change data value (rather than merely send back responses)

At present it is not possible to disable the 'Select All' function for checkbox fields. It would be very useful to be able to deselect/disable this functionality for each checkbox field in the Admin layer of the form builder.

A checkbox for "ALL" appears by default on custom forms when using the checkbox feature. It happens after a certain number of choices are listed. We don't want our clients to be able to click ALL as it will prevent the client from really thinking through what they need. We don't want our clients to be able to click ALL just because it's faster.

In the old SAINT data export user-interface, we had the ability to filter the results exported based on number of rows (which we can still do), dates (which we can still do) and key values (which we cannot do). When we are addressing data changes by our users and trying to update a subset of the page classification values, this ability to fetch only a subset of the data that needed to be addressed was critical. Sadly we no longer have that ability in the new classification set interface. If it could be added back, that would be a tremendous boon for us. I know we can get this via the API, so the underlying code is there, it would be great if it were added back to the user interface as well.Thanks! 

When updating the panel date ranges, the Comparison Dates stay the same. This means we as users have to delete the old comp dates and percentage change metrics, then create new ones. On bigger “recycled” dashboards, this takes FOREVER! This one improvement would save me hours and hours and hours every year.Thanks! RR

Event Forwarding governance and optimization are becoming increasingly difficult as implementations scale and additional rules are introduced. While the current monitoring experience provides an aggregate compute-time view, it lacks the visibility needed to understand which individual rules are responsible for overall resource consumption. This creates a significant operational challenge because teams can identify that compute-time usage has increased, but they cannot determine what is driving the increase, which rules are contributing the most, or where optimization efforts should be focused. As a result, troubleshooting becomes highly manual, requiring teams to review rules individually, make assumptions about potential bottlenecks, and perform extensive testing without any data-driven insights.To address this gap, the Event Forwarding monitoring UI should provide rule-level compute-time attribution that allows users to understand exactly how much compute time each rule consumes duri

There should be a setting in the new launch to be able to track s.products without going to the custom code to build the product string.Kind of like how the old GTM had a checkbox to enable e-commerce tracking and it would just read the dataLayer Enhanced Ecommerce (UA) Developer Guide  |  Google Tag Manager for Web Tracking  |  Google Developers

Current behavior allows an invalid, nonexistent, or blank Program Name value to be treated as "Is Any" rather than returning no results or generating an error. In my example, I have a list of program names provided to me by a team member. I put it in the Member of Program is and pasted them all in along with a constraint of status = Event > Registered. The smart list gave me thousands of results. In reality, none of those programs I put in the Member of Program criteria was even valid. So why would it show me any results?This behavior is counterintuitive and creates a significant risk for audience selection, reporting accuracy, and operational decision-making. If a user enters an invalid Program Name, the Smart List appears to function correctly while silently broadening the audience. As a result, configuration errors can go undetected and may lead to unintended campaign execution or inaccurate reporting.From a product usability and data integrity perspective, an invalid filter valu

I have several report builder reports that got out to many stakeholders. Anytime a change is made to one of the reports, it needs to be rescheduled so that the report will send with the changes. Simply going in to edit the schedule of the report and selecting “current workbook” does not actually update the file sent to the latest file with the changes. Because of this, the schedule needs to be set up from scratch again, which can be quite tedious when the recipient list is long and each individual needs to get re-entered because publishing lists are no longer an option.

We would like the ability to limit users from being able to delete a task assigned to them. We don’t log hours we we are unable to remove that ability from them in the Project Preferences. The issue is when we try to remove the delete functionality from them, it also removes the ability for them to complete the work on the task. We tried going a layout template route as well suggested by support. According to support, Layout Templates only control the Delete action in the task Details view; there isn't a way to hide that same action in the project's task list (grid) view, since that's tied directly to the Delete permission on the Access Level. Because unchecking Delete at the Access Level can also block completing multi-assignee tasks, there isn't a configuration that fully satisfies both goals (deletion blocked everywhere, completion always working) at the same time today. 

My organization manages dozens of SSL certificates across multiple AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS) websites and environments. Adobe notifications regarding certificate renewals do not identify the specific certificate that requires action, forcing administrators to manually search through the certificate list.I would like the SSL Certificates overview in Cloud Manager to support both ascending and descending sorting on the column headers, particularly the "Valid Until" column. This would enable administrators to quickly identify certificates that are nearing expiration and significantly improve operational efficiency when managing large numbers of certificates.The ability to sort certificates by expiration date would reduce the time spent searching for the affected certificate after receiving a renewal notification and help prevent overlooked renewals.

In a freeform table, I frequently want to put in a specific valued dimension, and then a second dimension.If you select a specific value from a dimension, you cannot put a second dimension side by side.Can you fix this?I know we could use breakdown. but I like the side by side.At the moment I use filter to filter on the value I want. So, there are work-arounds, but it is annoying.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEMAACS Enhancement Request to automate reports sending to other AEM Users Use-case: In other Adobe Products (ACS,etc.) there is the ability to send reports to other users with a login. Would like this automated functionality in AEMAACS. When you  Current/Experienced Behavior: Under Tools -> Assets -> Reports -> Create -> Upload (Report of uploaded assets) Unable to automate report to send to other AEM users. I realize this is currently not a feature that I would like included a future feature request. Improved/Expected Behavior: automate reports sending Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMAACS Customer-name/Organization name: Epsilon Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Problem StatementCurrently, AEM Sites only supports tenant-level distribution lists for proactive notifications and communications. This creates operational challenges for global organizations managing multiple regional instances, as there is no capability to:- Configure separate distribution lists per AEM instance/program- Differentiate notification recipients based on regional responsibility- Manage admin-level notifications independently for different instancesThis limitation forces organizations to either:1. Include all regional users in a single tenant-level list (resulting in irrelevant notifications)2. Remove regional users entirely and rely on global admins to manually redistribute communicationsProposed EnhancementImplement granular distribution list management at the program/instance level within AEM Sites, allowing:1. Instance-specific distribution lists: Configure separate recipient lists for each AEM instance (e.g., Instance X recipients ≠ Instance Y recipients)2. Role-bas

Today: In the web UI, to create a new version of an existing asset, the uploaded file must have the same filename in the same folder. If the filename is different, AEM treats it as a new, separate asset, not as a version.Desired behaviour:New versions of an asset can be added regardless of the file name, e.g. by selecting the asset and clicking “add new version”.Reasoning:Updated files often come with new names but should still be stored as versions of existing assets. E.g. if a legacy asset was uploaded (or migrated from our old DAM) with the file name: coporate-presentation-2022-v1.ppt, I want to be able to upload a new version that is called hbk-coporate-presentation-2026.ppt We are not starting a DAM from scratch or renaming 30,000 files. That means that even though we can update to newer versions in AEM Assets, any errors, bad naming or typos in old file names get carried over into the new version. When users download the updated file, it has the file name of the first version, e.

 It would be very helpful to have the same Copy icon available in the Union Schema that is currently available when browsing attributes in the Schema menu. Why is this feature important?When working with schemas, it is very common to need the exact path of an attribute — for example, when configuring audiences, journeys, queries, or other Adobe Experience Platform components.In the Schema menu, the Copy icon makes this extremely convenient: you simply click the icon and the attribute path is copied to the clipboard.However, this functionality is currently missing from the Union Schema view. Since the Union Schema is also frequently used to inspect and identify attributes, having to manually select the entire path is a small but unnecessary friction point, especially for long or deeply nested paths. How I would like it to workI would like the Union Schema to have the same Copy icon next to each attribute/path, following the existing behavior in the Schema menu. Clicking the icon would c

Would love to have a button in WF that takes me to a text mode cheat code library vs. searching community or using AI. Any Workfront user could submit a cheat code and it gets added to a database behind the scenes. This would help all users be able to have quick access to effective text mode that works. This would speed up being able to implement solutions for reporting for businesses.

Hi Adobe Team, https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/support?support-tab=my-cases&case-id=E-002435848&org-id=231F22CE527850C40A490D4D%40AdobeOrg#homeWe're currently using the Adobe Target MCP tool (get_a4t_report) to pull A4T report data programmatically. The tool works well for retrieving activity-level metrics, but we'd like to request one enhancement:Request: Add a metric parameter to get_a4t_report so users can specify the counting method — e.g., visits, visitors, or entries — rather than having it hardcoded to entries.Current behavior: The tool always returns data based on metrics/entries with no option to change it.Desired behavior: Allow an optional metric parameter (e.g., metric: "visits") so we can retrieve visit-based or visitor-based reporting depending on the activity setup.This would make the tool significantly more flexible for teams who measure activity performance on a visit or visitor basis rather than entry-based.Please let me know if additional context or a u

Currently, the only time the pre-defined sorts in a view (ie: sorts specified and saved in a view) are utilized is in a report (ie: View = Report Default). a) If you change the view on the report - from Report Default to another view - and the newly selected view has its own sorts defined, the report uses the sorts from the Report Default view; the report does not use the sorts defined in the selected view. b) Pre-defined sorts in views are not utilized when using views in a project. All of the above was confirmed by Workfront Support. Would like the system to use the sorts defined in the selected view, both in reports and in the project. Thanks

Currently the Percent Complete roll up at the Program level only takes into account Projects that are in "Current" status. This does not make much sense as you are completely ignoring all projects that have been fully completed and marked as such. If all projects under a program have been marked as complete status, then the Percent Complete at the Program level should show 100%

Background:Currently if you start a translation for an existing page, a launch page of the target page will be created (under /content/launches). If editor recognizes that he picked up the wrong page, he will delete the project. An info box pops up and provides different options for clean up connected data related to the project.The created launches for update case is not included, so with deletion it will remain as orphaned ones (garbage) in the database as nobody will probably manually clean it up.Feature request:Just add a checkbox (default enable) which deletes connected launches pages. Benefit:No orphaned launches, no garbage in database, no manual todo for editors (which even do not know about the utilization of launches behind the scenes)