Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
We are planning our JVM configuration for an AEM 6.5 LTS on-premises environment and are evaluating whether to continue using G1 GC or move to Generational ZGC (JDK 21).Has anyone deployed AEM 6.5 LTS in production with Generational ZGC? If so:How has it performed compared to G1 GC? Did you observe any improvements in GC pause times, throughput, or overall system responsiveness? Were there any challenges related to AEM, Oak, workflows, indexing, replication, or large content repositories? Would Adobe recommend G1 GC or Generational ZGC for production AEM 6.5 LTS deployments on JDK 21?Any real-world experiences, recommendations, or Adobe guidance would be greatly appreciated.
We have an external system that needs to periodically access AEM Assets metadata multiple times per day. It’s only for assets matching certain pre-defined criteria (specific metadata values and folder structure) What's the recommended approach for this use case? Are there specific APIs, connectors, or export you'd recommend?
Hi all,We're setting up server-side conversion tracking for LinkedIn Conversions API (CAPI) in Adobe Experience Platform, and have run into two separate issues while exploring both integration paths. Would appreciate guidance on either. Question 1: Destination SDK — headers field not accepted in destination server configWe're building a custom streaming destination server via /authoring/destination-servers to call LinkedIn's Conversions API directly. LinkedIn's API requires several static headers beyond Authorization (X-Restli-Protocol-Version, X-RestLi-Method, Linkedin-Version), but adding a headers array inside httpTemplate causes a 400 Bad Request:"type": "http://ns.adobe.com/aep/errors/DEST-0007-400","title": "Unreadable request: Invalid JSON input at line: 18, column: 26.Incorrect type found for fields: [headers, httpTemplate, value]."payload attempted{ "name": "Dest_LinkedIn_ConversionsAPI", "destinationServerType": "URL_BASED", "urlBasedDestination": { "url": { "templ
Video is central to how organisations engage their audiences—personalised, accessible, and consistent across devices, channels, and regions. Adobe Experience Manager gives teams two ways to power those experiences: the proven Dynamic Media (Scene7) platform that thousands of organisations rely on every day, and Dynamic Media with OpenAPI, our API-first architecture for teams who want lightweight integrations and composable, developer-friendly workflows.Both are first-class parts of the Dynamic Media family, and we continue to invest in both. Which one a team chooses should come down to the architecture and integration model that fits them best—not a trade-off in what their content can do.That’s why this milestone matters. Over the past year, we’ve been bringing the rich video capabilities customers trust in Dynamic Media to the OpenAPI architecture. Today, we’re excited to share that core enterprise video capabilities have reached feature parity on Dynamic Media with OpenAPI.Rich Video
Hello,For my XT Activity in Target I assigned the Goal Metric to a calculated metric created in Analytics. When I use the A4T panel in Analytics conversions are always 0. When I view Reports in Target we see the conversionsAre calculated metrics unable to be used in A4T?Thank you
I’m in the midst of setting up Target Recommendations. We do not have an ecommerce site. Our use case is to recommend articles that visitors might want to read based on previous behaviours (e.g. previously viewed article categories, etc).I have reviewed the steps to set up the Catalog, i.e. Feeds, and currently working on that. This post is about the next step - Capturing user behaviour. I am using these instructions:How Do I Implement Recommendations Activities? | Adobe TargetHow Do I Use Adobe Analytics with Target Recommendations? | Adobe Targetproducts | Adobe AnalyticsFrom reviewing these and other instructions, I believe that I need to set up the products variable. We are using Wen SDK.Questions:I believe I need to add something to the schema to receive information about articles that visitors are reading. Which Field Group do I need to use?Commerce Details (Description: Commerce data such as product information (SKU, name, quantity), and standard cart operations (order, checkout
Hello Adobe Experience League team,I would like to submit an original Adobe Experience Manager case study for consideration in the Perspectives section:“When a new Oak index slows unrelated AEM queries”The article covers Oak index scope, unintended query-plan changes, SQL-2 EXPLAIN examples, and validation practices. It is written for AEM developers and administrators.Could you please share the correct editorial submission channel and preferred manuscript format? I can provide the complete DOCX or Markdown manuscript.Original reference:https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-oak-index-doesnt-know-your-query-santhan-b-dqwte/Regards,Santhan Battina
We’re excited to partner with the Adobe Workfront Product team for a 3-part event series to help you prepare and feel empowered for the changes coming to reviews and approvals in Workfront. Each session will offer live demonstrations, best practices, and more to help you with the transition to Unified Review and Approvals. Sessions include: August 11 – Everything You Need to Get Started with @Elise_Lawley September 15 – Making the Switch: Preparing for your Move with @Travis_Jordan October 28 – Making the Switch: Completing Your Move with @MikeEngel This post will serve as a central location for: Registration links for upcoming sessions Event recordings after they happen Related resources and documentation It’s not required, but if you’re interested, we did a session in March – Understanding Unified Approvals: Direction, Reporting, and What’s Next. You can catch the recording and resources here. Don’t forget to click the star at the bottom of this post to subscribe, so you’ll a
What is the core difference? Field based works only in one specific dataset and graph based between datasets??
Hi All, Getting the below issue - C:\Users\admin\AppData\Local\@adobe\aio-cli>aio aem-migration:dispatcher-converter -t=ams********** Executing Dispatcher Converter **********Converting Dispatcher Configurations...Found usage of undefined variable:target/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/aem_publish.vhost:${PUBLISH_DEFAULT_HOSTNAME}Apache configuration uses non-whitelisted directives:target/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/aem_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/projA_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/projB_portal_publish.vhost:64 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/projB_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/projC_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/brandD_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/brandE_publish.vhost:63 LogLeveltarget/dispatcher/src/conf.d/available_vhosts/brandF_publis
Hello Guys, We have oneTrust implemented with one of our client and By default we have “Pending” as Default Consent in WebSDK Extension within Launch. Now, Within one of the Rule, we check whether C0002 is added to OneTrustActiveGroups object and then accordingly we either opt-in or OptOut. Below is the custom code written for the same:(function () { if (typeof window.alloy !== "function") { console.warn("Adobe Web SDK (alloy) not available"); return; } var groups = String(window.OnetrustActiveGroups) .split(",") .map(function (s) { return s.trim(); }) .filter(Boolean); var allowed = groups.includes("C0002"); window.alloy("setConsent", { consent: [{ standard: "Adobe", version: "2.0", value: { collect: { val: allowed ? "y" : "n" } } }] }).then(function () { console.log("Adobe consent set to:", allowed ? "IN" : "OUT"); });})(); Now how do we handle pending interact calls with this scenario since when user is accepting the cookies
Is the new Unified Approval with Frame.io capable of interactive proofs? We use Workfront Proof for review and approval of email coding before deployment. Is that possible from Workfront using the Frame.io viewer?
Is there a way within fusion to check if a field is displayed or visible to a user? Scenario: Field 1 = “No”Field 2 has display logic if Field 1 = YesResult = Field 2 visible = false Looking for fusion to verify if display logic is showing or not.
We have a Fusion Scenario Watch Event module that filters in projects based on the category ID. We have recently discovered that, because the filter is set as “CategoryID Equal”, it’s only pulling in projects where that custom form is the first one on the project. Since the relevant custom form is not always listed first on projects, is there a way to update this filter to look through all of the custom forms on a project instead of just the first one? I’m not too well versed in Fusion but am not finding an option to manually change it to something like “CategoryID Exists”.
Is proofing down? I've got users saying they can't open any proofs.
I am trying to track videos on a webpage. if webpage has 1 video, its getting tracked, but more than 1 video, when i am clicking on 2nd video. Its not getting tracked.Scenario : When i click on 1st video, its tracked, but 2nd video is not tracked. when i refresh and click on 2nd video. Its tracked but now 2st is not tracked. (Whichever video i click first gets tracked) This is the rule for youtube playback enable tracking. I searched on AI tools and it suspecting that problem is in this rule onlyfor 2nd video...you tube start is not happening even though all seems correctNote : The above code is for pageload irc frame in events
Test age
I need to delete two XDM schemas in a development sandbox and I've hit what looks like a closed loop. Hoping someone has been here before.What I'm trying to doSome field paths in our dev sandbox differ from prod by character case only - for example campaignUseCase1 in dev versus CampaignUsecase1 in prod. Since XDM field paths are immutable once created, I understand the fix is to rebuild the field group and schemas correctly rather than edit them in place.Where it breaksI can't create the correctly-cased fields while the incorrect ones exist, because both paths would land in the same Profile union and AEP rejects paths that differ only by case. So the old objects have to go first.But:I can't delete the field group - two schemas compose it. I can't delete those schemas - both are Profile (union) enabled. I can't disable Profile in the UI - the toggle is there but Save stays greyed out. I can't remove the union tag via API. PATCH on the schema with {"op": "remove", "path": "/meta:immutab
Problem / Current Limitation:Currently, Content Fragment Models (CFMs) in AEM do not support version tracking. When a model's structure (fields, data types, validation rules, etc.) is modified, there is no way to see:What specifically changed (which field was added, removed, renamed, or had its type/config altered) Who made the change When the change was made Why the change was made (if a comment/reason was provided)This creates accountability and governance gaps, especially in environments where multiple authors/developers manage models that drive content used across channels. Untangling the impact of a model change (e.g., a breaking change to a field type) after the fact is difficult or impossible today.Proposed Enhancement:Introduce native version history for Content Fragment Models, similar to how AEM Pages already support versioning. Specifically: What to track: Model structure changes: field additions/removals/renames, data type changes, validation rule changes, default values.
I am changing the snowflake login from password to key-pair. I am following the steps in the user documentation and approved steps by a ticket opened with Adobe support.I created a key pair.The DBA created a new user and added the public key to the user. In the Adobe UI External Account I removed the password and added the new user and added the private key to the Keypair Auth tab. I am getting the error password not found. Here’s what I have tried: Added a dummy password - same errorCreated a new external account and add the needed information, user, private key - same error
Description - When a users share a segment with a group of users or individual, there should be an option to decide edit rights - edit copy or edit original. Why is this feature important to you - Our Analytics community is mixed with foundational to advance users and we are often sharing components based on expertise level. This feature would help us to democratize more of the IP across teams. How would you like the feature to work - The sharing prompt should work much like workspaces. Edit copy - Edit Original- Read Only. Current Behaviour - Today we can only ask the user to clone segments from the components section, if they want any specific universal segments OR work based on trust that the user wont make an update and would be careful.
I have been testing with the AI Assistant and I have been able to have it fill out a Request Form from an excel file. I am finding that it will not fill out the Typeahead fields, assuming the problem is that it needs something manually entered to get the choices to populate. Wanted to see if anyone else has tested this and found a workaround?
📣 Calling all CJA Hiring Managers 📣Are you hiring for Customer Journey Analytics talent? Adobe is hosting a special virtual career fair designed to connect hiring managers with emerging professionals who have already built a solid hands-on foundation of Adobe Customer Journey Analytics and have become AJO certified.Taking place on October 1, this virtual event will feature students from San Jose State University and the University of Virginia who have completed an Adobe CXO Bootcamp focused on CJA. These students have also completed the CJA Professional-level course AND earned their Adobe certification—making this an exclusive opportunity to meet candidates who are already developing job-ready Adobe Experience Cloud skills.If you’re hiring for an entry-level role or internship where CJA knowledge would make an immediate impact, this career fair is a great way to discover motivated, certified talent and support the next generation of Adobe practitioners.Interested in participating or
Our team has a need to make the filter selection in the My Approvals widget sticky. We have multiple team members that submit work to others for approval and receive work from others for approval. Having to reset the filter each time to show only “My Approvals” instead of “All” wastes a few clicks of time and makes it more difficult for us to work through time-sensitive approvals.
If you have just gotten access to Adobe CX Enterprise Coworker and want to learn more about analytics use cases, this session is for you. Coworker brings the power of agentic AI to CX Analytics — so your team can investigate business questions in plain language, automate analytical workflows, and uncover deeper insights, all grounded in the data you already trust.Join our product team on Thursday, September 17, 2026 for a live session on Coworker's analytics capabilities. In this session, you’ll: Discover key use cases for Coworker on CX Analytics Learn best practices and tips & tricks to get started See real world examples of Coworker's analytics capabilities being put to use[Webinar] Unlocking Analytics Use Cases in Adobe CX Enterprise CoworkerThursday, September 17, 20268am PTSave your seat here: https://events.teams.microsoft.com/event/58c38075-bcc5-4c31-8b03-d5ab51ff0bec@fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1?source=copyLinkLegacyShareEventDialog
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.