Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
If you have a follow-up question from the Skill Exchange session Workfront Product Keynote with Angela Zhang from Adobe that originally aired on August 5, 2026, you're in the right place! Leave your comment below and our speakers will do their best to reply. And if you see a question below that you know the answer to, don't be shy! We'd love for you to answer from your own experience and perspective. Have questions about another Skill Exchange session? You can see the full list of discussion threads here. On-Demand Viewing - This session is now available on-demand, you can find the recording here. (Tip: Use the links in the left navigation to watch other Skill Exchange sessions!)
Hi everyone,I have a question regarding **Adobe Experience Platform Data Streams and Adobe Analytics**.Suppose I have configured a Data Stream and under **Services** I have enabled **only Adobe Analytics** (with the required Report Suite).If I send an event using **Adobe Experience Platform Web SDK (`alloy.sendEvent()`)**, will that event/data also be ingested into **Adobe Experience Platform (AEP)** automatically, or will it only be sent to Adobe Analytics?In other words:**Scenario 1:*** Data Stream → Adobe Analytics = Enabled* Data Stream → Adobe Experience Platform = Not enabledWill the Web SDK event be available in an AEP Event Dataset?**Scenario 2:*** Data Stream → Adobe Analytics = Enabled* Data Stream → Adobe Experience Platform = Enabled + Event Dataset configuredI understand that in Scenario 2 the data can be ingested into the AEP dataset.What I'm specifically trying to clarify is **whether AEP ingestion happens automatically when only Adobe Analytics is enabled in the Data St
I added a Workfront Planning connection field to a custom form and now I want to see the field in a Report or View, however, I don’t see the field when I try to add a new column. Is this possible?Thank you!
I have a proof of concept to work on where we need to migrate around 2000 xdp forms to adaptive forms .I have tried with the AFCS service for the automated conversion but it's only converting the fields and some field validation like for email validation, but it's not converting all the rules present in the xdp form also the relatable sections , the add and remove buttons all these are not getting converted. My question is how to approach for this bulk migration where our conversion will be faster and kind of automated ? We have also tried AI for this but can't also Fully convert as it can't access the aem instance .Thank you
Hello,As a Workfront admin, I'm looking for a way to automatically notify new users when their Workfront account is created. We must have SSO because once they access their account they have access to Workfront.Is there a setting in Setup that sends an automated welcome or activation email to new users?Currently, I send each user a comment, which triggers an email with a link to Workfront, but I'm hoping there's a built-in automated notification option.Thank you.
Hi,I am having an issue where, we lost the keystore/trust store password which we used while configuring SSL setup on AEM higher instane.As we dont have crxde enabled, is there any way to update or create a new keystore/trust store password to update SSL certifications as it is getting expired soon.Any help is appreciated.
Is it possible to measure with AJO how much revenue particular email sendout generated?User opened email User went to web User bought something on a webI do not thinks so because I do not see such a metric in AJO but I would like to confirm
Happy to see the flow details of a smart campaign is now available in REST API. Much appreciated for considering our enhancement request and implementing it. Thank you very much on behalf of our company Ingram Micro. Few things to enhance it further. The Wait step details are too lengthy and it’s “bit tricky” to identify which option is the configured one through API. The “value” key can be considered for the identification, however it would have been great if there is any specific key that explicitly denotes which option is configured like “configured: true”, since instead looping through each “value” key, developers can depend on that explicit key. Sample Response for reference:{ "success": true, "errors": [], "requestId": "1234", "warnings": [], "result": [ { "id": 1234, "name": "Testing", "description": "", "flowId": 1234, "flow": { "steps": [ { "id
Source system is ingesting data to AEP-XDM dataset at specific time of the day.Data distiller copies the data from AEP-XDM to OCM-Relational tables at specific time of the dayData distiller performs transformation job on the data present in OCM-Relational tables at specific time of the dayAudience are evaluated at specific time of the day.Campaign which are using those audiences are evaluated at specific time of the day.How do we get E2E timeline view of this ? Are there set of APIs that can be called to get such a timeline view ?
Hi,I have to create a new schema which inherits the default schema and my custom schema means the newly created schema should have tabs from both default and custom one.how can we implement this. I tried granite:include but in schema editor it is not showing fileds and in image properties it is showing.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Content Hub Display Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Content Hub Display Labels on Filters Improved/Expected Behavior: The filter list in Content Hub currently shows technical values instead of display labels. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Are there known issues with proofs not generating today in Workfront? I have not seen any communication yet, and we have multiple people with the same problem. It just spins but never generates.
Attached/below. Keen to hear counterpoints and other considerations for use.
When creating a report, you have the Report Default view that is naturally created which works great for a lot of specific reports, but we find creating reporting for multiple teams challenging as they want to see different data elements (different columns) based on their role; looking for options to avoid creating multiple reports for basically the same thing and also increase the ease of using reports without having to team users which views go with which reports and also which ones simply are used potentially in project list views or somewhere else. Idea: Have the ability to create or associate specific views (columns/formatting) and tag them to a report. Ideally, this would be available in a section on top with predefined reporting views that users can quickly navigate between. Bonus: Have the option to select a view based off simple rules such as If TeamID = Leader then present the Leadership view (configured when creating the report!)
I just noticed this morning on one of my prompt based reports for our system that the Project Status Equates with filter is no longer available. Is anyone else noticing this within their instance? I don’t see any documentation stating this change.
Hi Everyone! I have set up a template using the new email builder. I made sure it looks good in both light mode and dark mode. However, when we use that template to create an actual email asset, the dark mode does not keep the styling that we originally dictated once we paste in new content. Sometimes I can paste in content and dark mode displays as I’ve set it to, but sometimes I paste in content and it just completely messes up dark mode. I have tried copying/pasting directly from the Excel file with the content. I’ve tried copying and selecting “paste and match style” to keep the style of the Marketo text box I’m pasting into. I’ve also tried copying/pasting into Sublime to strip the formatting, then copying/pasting from Sublime into Marketo. None of these processes made a difference. Dark mode always displays incorrectly. We shouldn’t have to (and it’s not sustainable to) re-style the dark mode for every single email. If there is a text block that’s already been styled in both ligh
Big news for the AEM community! 🎉 Adobe User Groups now have a unified home — and that means it's never been easier to find your people. Whether you're just getting started with AEM or you've been in the ecosystem for years, there's a local or virtual chapter where you can connect, learn, and grow alongside fellow users. What's new: ✅ One destination for all Adobe User Groups across Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Experience Platform, Adobe Analytics, Adobe Commerce, Adobe Marketo Engage, and Adobe Workfront ✅ Increased event options around a multitude of topics and global locations ✅ More community-building opportunities within the Adobe CX Enterprise ecosystem How to get started: Learn more about the new experience from our Community Pulse blog: Find an Adobe User Group chapter near you 👉 https://usergroups.adobe.com/?cgen=1K8FD178&mv=other
If the rule is on a prod environment there is no option to remove that rule? However its possible to disable it?
I would love to be able to edit the headline and body copy for each pop up window in the flow of the Book at Meeting.Window 1 - blank white pop-up (needs to edit copy please wait while we load calendars...something to that effect, can be editable (would also love some icons that have movement… show calendar or hour glass)...Window 2 -Headline and body copy - retrieving calenderWindow 3 - Shows calendar and rep availabilityWindow 4 - ConfirmationRight now the header that is editable shows up the same on all 4 pop-up windows above, not a great experience for user.
I am working on mapping Marketo fields to Dynamics fields. I’ve noticed that some fields are showing as options to map for contacts, but not for leads. The fields exist, I just can see them as an option to map for leads. Any suggestions on how to fix this?
We are experiencing an issue where a batch/scheduled Smart Campaign is failing to deliver emails to target leads, even though the exact same email asset delivers successfully when triggered by a live action (e.g., Form Fill).Technical Details & Findings:Campaign Configuration: The Smart Campaign is a Batch mode campaign. The qualification rules are set to "Each person can run through the flow every time" and Communication Limits are set to "Ignore limit". Asset Validation: The email asset is fully approved. Delivery works perfectly via trigger workflows, confirming the email asset and recipient mail servers are functioning correctly. The Issue: When triggering via "Run Once" or scheduling the batch, the campaign executes but does not deliver to the intended test leads. The Smart List Status currently shows it is only affecting a small subset of people (e.g., around 5 existing people), and our target test leads are being skipped or excluded from the batch run.I need support to analy
In our instance of Marketo, we have ~200 forms programs. These programs use a handful of forms (~10). Many “contact us” pages use the same form but with a unique querystring parameter appended (e.g., html://www.company,com/en/contact-us/html?cid=my-unique-product-page). These individual programs then fire off lead alerts to specific email addresses (~ 50 across all these programs) and sync into SFDC campaigns (sometimes multiple programs feed into a single SFDC campaign, sometime a unique SFDC campaign). Other forms programs might have 5 webpage references, since the same form is on all those pages and they can go to a common lead alert and SFDC campaign. We also try to record the referrer page (e.g., in my previous example, the contact form page html://www.company,com/en/contact-us/html?cid=my-unique-product-page might be linked from a referring product page, such as www.company.com/en/solutions/my-unique-product-page.html). Right now we’re using an Excel spreadsheet to record all th
Hi all,I’m trying to create a Marketo report showing where MQLs generated and handed over from our FY26 events sit in the funnel today.The requirement is for each regional marketer to select the event programs from their region and report on the current lifecycle status of the MQLs generated by those events.Program Membership would make selecting multiple events straightforward, but we specifically want to focus on leads whose MQL conversion was attributed to the event—not everyone who was a member of the program.I’ve therefore used Converting Campaign as the filter. However, Marketo doesn’t appear to support selecting multiple values within a single Converting Campaign filter, so I’ve had to add each event campaign individually. There are already 29 for EMEA, and this won’t scale well once we include NAM and other regions.Has anyone found a cleaner way to:Group or dynamically filter multiple Converting Campaigns Allow regional marketers to select their relevant event campaigns Report
The standard endpoints used to export results do not support returning the specific test variant details for A/B-tested emails. When an email is part of an A/B test, the API returns the generic value "Whole Emails Test."This value identifies that the email belongs to an A/B test group, but it does not indicate whether the email was Variant A or Variant B. As a result, the specific variant cannot be determined using the results.I understand that this information is important for your use case. However, at the moment, we do not have an API endpoint that can identify whether an email belongs to Variant A or Variant B.
Rules are the quiet workhorses of decisioning. They decide who’s eligible, who’s excluded, and which conditions have to line up before an offer, a message, or an experience is allowed through.They’re also, historically, one of the more technical things a marketer is asked to build — a careful stack of attributes, operators, values, and logic that has to be exactly right to work at all.The gap has always been the translation step. You know, in plain language, exactly who you want to target: “loyalty members in New York who haven’t opted out.” Turning that sentence into a valid rule expression — the right attribute paths, the right operators, the right nesting — is where the friction lives.AI-assisted rule authoring closes that gap. You describe the rule you want in everyday language, and the AI Assistant generates a ready-to-use rule suggestion, complete with the underlying expression, that you can apply to the builder with a single click. This post walks through where to start, how it
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.