Product Communities

Hello!Clicks to CTAs aren't being sent on its own server call linkClicks eventType but on the pageview that loads after the CTA was clicked so there is no separate call for link click, just one containing both on an eventType pageViews on page load.Wondering if this could cause any issues and if its better or cleaner to fire each separately.Screenshot below.From what I see is acting the same way as ActivityMap which would be easier to implement and an overlap as ActivityMap is OOTB.Thanks,R 

Hi Crew!I’m working on strengthening bot filtering in Adobe Analytics.I'm able to identify and assign cookies to bot traffic (including those from the “allowed list”).Naturally, I need to exclude this traffic from reporting (using Virtual Report Suites).I’ve configured the system to pass the cookie value to an eVar that is set at the visit level and configured to "never expire".Then I’m filtering it out via a segment based on the "visitor" level that excludes matching the cookie value created for bots.Hi Crew!I’m working on strengthening bot filtering in Adobe Analytics.I'm able to identify and assign cookies to bot traffic (including those from the “allowed list”).Naturally, I need to exclude this traffic from reporting (using VRS).I’m passing the cookie value into an evar that is set to "never expire".Then I’m using a segment at the "visitor" level to exclude users whose evar matches the cookie value associated with bots. Does this sound like the right approach? Don't think

Hello Community,   I have created a sample job using postman using this endpoint:  POST /bulk/v1/leads/export/create.json   with this request body:  { "fields": [ "firstName", "lastName" ], "format": "CSV", "columnHeaderNames": { "firstName": "First Name", "lastName": "Last Name" }, "filter": { "createdAt": { "startAt": "2023-01-01T00:00:00Z", "endAt": "2023-01-31T00:00:00Z" } } }   I am getting this response:  { "requestId": "49f#196d2e99cbf", "result": [ { "exportId": {export_id}, "format": "CSV", "status": "Created", "createdAt": "2025-05-15T07:47:27Z" } ], "success": true }   I not able to start the job this is the end point i am using:  {{base_url}}/bulk/v1/leads/export/{{export_id}}/enqueue.json   The client_id, client_secret, and, base url and access token is correct but still gett

Hi there,I am working on an exit-intent pop-up using Unbounce for our website and embedded a Marketo Form to track email subscriptions. Unfortunately, once I fill out the subscription form on the pop-up it opens the Marketo Landing Page (Thank You page for subscribing) within the pop-up's iFrame instead of opening a new browser. Any ideas on how to adjust the form settings to push them to a new browser for the page after they subscribe? I'd like to be able to track conversions through Unbounce and have an external conversion tracking script added to this thank you landing page but so far it isn't showing as a conversion. As an added note, the conversion tracking script is working through other pages, so I know this is set up properly.

I would like to prompt project owners to provide a final status update when changing a project status to Dead, Rejected, Completed, or On Hold so I can report the 'why' in a dashboard.  Is there a way to do this in Workfront or is a Fusion scenario required?

Hello,After upgrading our environment to AEM 6.5.20, we've encountered a critical issue where Adaptive Forms fail to load. Attempting to access any Adaptive Form results in a blank page, and the following error appears in the logs:org.apache.sling.scripting.sightly.render.ObjectModel Cannot access property 'xyz' on null object java.lang.NullPointerException: null at org.apache.jsp.libs.cq.gui.components.common.table.table_jsp._jspService(table_jsp.java:56) ...This issue is impacting our form-based workflows significantly. Has anyone else experienced this problem after the upgrade? Any insights or workarounds would be greatly appreciated.

Hi WF Community,   I'd like to do the following, when creating a new calculated field on a project form, and wondering how to go about it:   Create a calculated field called ABC on a task form Create a calculated field called XYZ on a project form that aggregates field ABC from all related tasks I'm uncertain how to reference fields from a child object. Thanks, Nick  

I want to know if we have any backend AJO/AEP table that keeps track of who opens the email on Android or Apple devices

Our Marketo instance is over a decade old and has changed hands few times. As a result, we have a large number of active programs and campaigns that need review. To clean up we’re looking to archive outdated programs and deactivate inactive campaigns. Could you please advise on the best approach to identify:1. Programs to Archive - We are planning to request an export from Marketo Support that includes key metadata such as:Last modified dateMember countActivity historyAre there any additional fields or filters that someone can recommend to help narrow this list down more effectively? 2. Campaigns to Deactivate - I assume similar fields (last run date, campaign type, affected member count, etc.) would apply here. Is there anything else we should consider to help prioritize which campaigns can be safely deactivated? Thank you in advance!

Hi, I'm using "Report Builder for CJA" and I'm having trouble limiting the number of rows (or results) returned by the report builder with certain dimensions. For some dimensions, I can filter using the "Most popular" filter and choose the number of rows I want to display. But in other cases, when I try to filter a dimension, I only get the "specific" option, and I'm not able to filter by the number of rows. For example, I can not display 5 rows for the "day" and "month" dimensions. Do you know what could be causing this?      

We've recently configured the Experience Cloud ID Service extension and have since seen inflation in unique visitor, visits and page view numbers.In addition we've seen an increase in the proportion of visitors being classified as first time visitors.The change we made was to configure Opt-In from No to Yes, and then selected just Analytics from the Pre Opt-In Approvals and toggled the Enable IAB option to Yes.Does anyone have an explanation as to why this would result in the inflation we've seen in our numbers and the shift in proportion counted as first time visitors?Any guidance would be much appreciated.

Fuel Mobile Growth with Customer-Centric Strategies Register Here: Fuel Mobile Growth with Customer-Centric Strategies    About the Session: Tap into Adobe’s latest research on consumer and practitioner trends with mobile app growth and real-time, personalized engagement. In this webinar, we’ll showcase how Adobe Lightroom product growth managers and marketing teams use Adobe Journey Optimizer to activate, monetize, and retain users.Join Adobe product experts as they share best practices for leveraging in-product personalized experiences to transform new and professional artists into photography experience makers. Discover how to streamline user onboarding, accelerate product adoption, and foster customer loyalty through community engagement.In this session, you’ll learn: How consumer and practitioner trends are impacting mobile growth How to get quicker insights using active listening and real-time signals to grow subscriptions The benefits of personalized in-app messa

Hello, a pleasure to greet you I have two sites, one is hosted at /content/site1 and the other at /content/site2. I have a role called author_site1 and another called author_site2. The error I'm experiencing is when I assign a user to both the author_site1 group and the author_site2 group, it removes the permission to view both contents.I have tried different ways to manage permissions:Allow everything in /content and, for author_site1, deny everything except /content/site1, and for author_site2, deny everything except /content/site2. When assigning a user to only one group, this works correctly, but when I assign both groups, I can't see anything.Deny everything in /content and only allow content from /content/site1 for author_site1. I do the same for author_site2: deny everything in /content and only allow content in /content/site2. When assigning only one group to the user, it doesn't allow me to see any content.Create an additional group responsible for denying everything

Hi Community! I am working on a use-case that allows external system to integrate to our Campaign instance in order to create push deliveries and schedule + execute them. Here I have a requirement where I need to be able to set a single application variable "path". However, I have been unable to succeed with that. I mostly get a silent error/exception - So the system does not output any errors. The only thing I can confirm is, that it is related to attempting to set this specific field in my code. If I remove it, everything works again (but without the application variable) Code snippet that is not working:  var deliveryDoc = nms.delivery.CreateFromModel(templateName, targetDef); var delivery = nms.delivery.create(deliveryDoc); delivery.label = label; delivery.content.iosTitle.source = payload.title; delivery.content.iosMessage.source = payload.body; delivery.scheduling.delayed = schedule.delayed; delivery.scheduling.contactDate = schedule.date; delivery.

I'm just trying to understand .stat files (specifically /statfileslevel) and I don't understand this example provided by Adobe. screenshot is from => https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-dispatcher/using/configuring/dispatcher-configuration#invalidating-files-by-folder-levelI actually thought that when if a page is republished/invalidated at level=4 (let's assume /statfileslevel = 6), then pages from level=4 and above are invalidated. The way I read Adobe's statement, it's says pages on levels 0 to 4 invalidated. Can you please explain? Thanks! PS: The way I understand "touched" is that the .stat file file modification date is updated to published date/time.  

Hi everyone, I'm currently working with Adobe Edge Delivery Services and I have a question regarding site configuration using multiple branches from the same GitHub repository. We have the following setup: One GitHub repository (e.g., https://github.com/org/project-storefront)Several branches (main, pre-launch, dev)Different custom domains that need to be assigned to each environment (e.g., www.site.com, stg.site.com, dev.site.com)Our goal is to: Create a separate Edge Delivery site for each branch and associate a different custom domain with each site. However, when creating a new site in Cloud Manager, it seems the tool automatically links to the main branch, and we don’t see any UI option to specify another branch. As a result, even with different GitHub repositories or site names, the preview and production URLs resolve to the same main--repo--org.hlx.page endpoint. My questions: Is there a way to explicitly select the branch when creating an Edge

Hi Community,I needed to group a report chart by "Home Team Name" and found a previous page to help me do that by creating the value on custom form and using that to group on. That's great and works BUT.....For deactivated accounts, the value is blank ("No Value"), but the data is still needed on the report.Does anyone know how to include the Home Team from deactivated accounts please?ThanksMatt

I'll take a step back to approach the question. We are moving to WebSDK from at.js. While testing I see that the QA link returns the experience. But if I switch the QA link to audience mode, then nothing gets returned - the audience has a condition that checks certain profile attribute value, and the correct value is being passed from the client through events[0].data.__adobe.target object. It would help me to see what response tokens are returned for this user, but I’ve never seen them in the responses for some reason ... so then there's one more option - switch Target to debug mode and generate debugging token in Target UI. But the token generated in the Adobe Target interface no longer works because alloy.js doesn't accept mboxTrace parameter.  I know about an alternative way to view logs - to authorize in the extension, go to Logs > Edge, and create a debugging session, but I wasn’t able to find anything useful in those logs similar to what mboxTrace was retu

I'm building a block using EDS with XWalk, and I'm fetching content fragments via GraphQL in AEM as a Cloud Service. The image field in the response returns a DAM path like:"image": { "_path": "/content/dam/shared/en/contributor/ian_provo.jpg" }In my JavaScript, I'm using a helper (createOptimizedPicture) to render the image in a <picture> tag, which generates URLs like:<img src="/content/dam/shared/en/contributor/ian_provo.jpg?width=750&format=jpg&optimize=medium">The problem is: The base path /content/dam/... works fine, but adding query parameters like ?width=750&format=jpg causes a 404 error.What I’ve Verified:The image is published and accessible in DAM.The GraphQL response includes the correct _path.There don’t appear to be any permission issues. Looking for Guidance On:What’s the correct way to reference and optimize DAM images returned from a GraphQL query?Why do image URLs with query parameters like ?width=750&format=jpg result in 404 errors?Is

Hi, we've got Brand portal running and all is good with access controls, contribution folders etc.It includes several business created user groups (called Product profiles in Admin Console/BP)   However, I'd like to restrict access to some folders for some of these Product profiles. I can't do that in Brand Portal directly - so would need to do it in Assets then publish those folder changes to BP. But these BP user groups are not available in Assets when I try to set the Permissions in a folders properties. I can see the top level BP Editor/Admin roles to add eg  But not the BP user groups I've created. Anyway know if this is possible ? In all the material it implies it's possible. Eg 'Brand Portal Editor' role states:-A user with this role can login to Brand Portal and access permitted folders Does this mean just the folders published to BP, or is there a specific way of controlling folder access to specific user gr

Hi All,How could we possibly achieve the following email flow using Marketo Nurture stream?Here's how the email flow works:Week 1:Email 1 is sent with content about "Content 1"If the recipient opens Email 1, they progress to Email 2 in Week 3If they don't open Email 1, a resend of Email 1 is triggered after 1 weekWeek 3:Email 2 focuses on "Content 2"If the recipient opens Email 2, they move on to Email 3 in Week 5If they don't open Email 2, a resend of Email 2 is triggered after 1 weekWeek 5:Email 3 contains "Content 3" contentIf the recipient opens Email 3, they would presumably move to Email 4 (not shown)If they don't open Email 3, a resend of Email 3 is triggered after 1 week  

Is there any real advanced formatting capability for designing content card? Something similar to what is available for the in-app message content. We really need the ability to apply our branding to the content instead of the default Adobe styles. Thanks.