Product Communities

Let me start by noting this technique is only for people at your email domain, not for lead email addresses. Guessing leads’ names is what spammers do. If you forgot to require First Name and Last Name on a lead gen form, complete their profile responsibly.   Sometimes, due to technical gaps, you only have the email address of an account owner or other internal user. If your company used 100% predictable logic to generate the address, you can (fairly) safely synthesize a friendly name while waiting for CRM to do a proper field mapping.   That logic is:   Given a display name where (1) all characters are valid in an email address and (2) all words are in title case, convert spaces to dots and append the domain. For example, the name Sandy-Jo B. O'Shelley is converted to the email address sandy-jo.b.o'shelley@example.com. If an address was generated that way, this Velocity code — #set( $emailField = $lead.YourEmailField ) ## break down left-hand-side@right-hand-side #s

Hi,I’ve run into an issue with the Visual Experience Composer (VEC). Previously, I was able to use the “Add Before” and “Add After” features to insert multiple HTML elements at once (for example, multiple HTML elements added after an element).Recently, whenever I try this, Target throws an error saying that more than one element is being added. The only way to proceed is to split the HTML into separate insertions (one element at a time), which is tedious and error-prone.I’ve checked the latest Adobe Target release notes, but I couldn’t find any mention of this being an intentional deprecation or limitation.So my questions are:Has Adobe officially deprecated inserting multiple elements at once via “Add Before” / “Add After”?If yes, could you point me to the official documentation or release notes that confirm this change?If not, is this a bug in the new VEC, and should we open a support ticket?This change is impacting our workflow, so any clarification would be very helpful.Thanks in ad

Is it something configured in the Data Collection or something also has to be added into the source code of the app?https://developer.adobe.com/client-sdks/home/base/mobile-core/rules-engine/https://developer.adobe.com/client-sdks/home/base/mobile-core/platform-services/

Hi everyone,We’re on Cloud and when authors publish /content/acme/en/products.page.html, that URL updates right away, but the versions with selectors (like /content/acme/en/products.list.page.html) and the clean URL (/content/acme/en/products) stay stale for a few minutes behind the CDN/Dispatcher. How can I track down what’s caching what, and fix it so all variants invalidate together?

Implementation Details :-1. In Content Fragment Model Editor we are using Content Reference with type Image.    2. Now using this model we have added path to image. 3. Its getting stored in correct manner in crx/de.4. Graph QL Query returning null.Note - Its AEM as CS Local set up. 

HI All,When Testing a journey using test mode. The pre-req is that the profile should have a test profile flag to true then it enters a journey.But what if we have just an experience event schema and profiles are created pseudonymous on the fly. This way the profile doesn't have any related individual profile schema to have a test profile attribute.In this case when we are testing the test profile, we trigger the event with a payload that contains{"_tenant": {"Key": "HT","testProfile": true}}with test profile attribute that is not from Out of the system fields group. This way when we are trying to trigger the event, will it trigger the journey in test mode?AI answer - NOTests - NOThanks

Is is possible to access the Title and Body of a push in a Custom Action? I can't find a kind of metadata of the push to use in CA  Thanks.

When we use one click unsubscribe as channel, i see the below value is modified."idSpecific": { "Email": { "abce@hotmail.com": { "marketing": { "email": { "val": "n", "time": "2025-08-21T03:35:23.983335Z" } How do we modify this value to n to y. So that user can optin again. I tried landing page identity based email optout. but it is not updating the above value instead it created using identity value like the below. "CompKey": { "1234": { "marketing": { "email": { "val": "y", "time": "2025-08-28T02:41:55.421381Z" Please suggest

might be best explained with an example:Putting everything inside the component annotation works. When I tried using SlingServletFilter as suggested by Apache in their Sling Filter page (https://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-engine/filters.html), the filter stop working. Any ideas? Thanks(service = Filter.class, property = { "sling.filter.scope=REQUEST", "sling.filter.pattern=^/content/myapp/sg/en/login.*", "service.ranking:Integer=101" }) /*@Component @SlingServletFilter( scope = {SlingServletFilterScope.REQUEST}, pattern = "^/content/myapp/sg/en/login.*" ) @ServiceRanking(101)*/ 

I have a XF field in my component with resource type as : cq/experience-fragments/editor/components/xffieldand i have given one property rootPath as /content/experience-fragments.Now when i type anything in this field it throws an error as failed to load next page If i give rootPath as /content/experience-fragments/myproject then this error doesnt show up. But i want to have rootPath as /content/experience-fragments only. Any solution to this?

I have custom index file created and added index rule for text property. if my search key match in href tag value present under the text value the result not display. i have tried to add href index rule also with value href.. But same issue matching result not display.my search key value:national my sample text value:<p><a id="back-to-forms-link" style="display: none;" href="/content/national.html" target="_self">Back to forms</a></p></ul></ul></p> my index rule: <textjcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"name="text"nodeScopeIndex="{Boolean}true"propertyIndex="{Boolean}true"type="String"useInSpellcheck="{Boolean}true"useInSuggest="{Boolean}false"/> <hrefjcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"name="href"nodeScopeIndex="{Boolean}true"propertyIndex="{Boolean}true"type="String"useInSpellcheck="{Boolean}true"useInSuggest="{Boolean}false"/>

I have a use case where the Video component is allowed both directly on a page and as a slide inside the Core Components Carousel (v1) using editable templates.When I add the Video component directly to a page, I can assign a policy that enables embeddable options (e.g., YouTube, Marketo) via the template editor. When I add the Video component inside the Carousel (as a slide/panel), I do not see the option to assign or inherit the same policy for embeddable options. The Video dialog inside the Carousel does not show the "Embeddable" dropdown, even though the Video component is allowed as a child.Questions:1.How can I ensure that the Video component inside the Carousel inherits or references the same policy as the standalone Video component, so that embeddable options appear in the dialog?2. Is there a way to configure or map the Video policy for the Carousel’s panelcontainer in the template editor, or does this require manual changes in CRX/DE?3. If manual CRX/DE configuration is

Hi,  is it possible to create a custom action (a POST request to trigger a service that sends email via SMTP) that can then use a email template created in Adobe Journey Optimizer?  For example, sending in the body of the request the email template itself? It sounds complex actually. Thanks

Hi,I created an Hours Report to collect hours from different projects and users. However, the report is not capturing all hours from the parent tasks. I need it to include hours registered in both child tasks and parent tasks, since many users log their time directly to parent tasks. Could you help me identify what might be missing in this report? Looking for your expertise and suggestion. Regards 

We are considering using business rules and would love to talk with anyone who has had success in implementing them.  What kind of business rules have you implemented?  What level of effort is needed to implement and maintain?   Any draw backs or lessons learned?

Hi,  Could you please confirm my logic is correct? I have a Trigger + 2 filters in the Smart list of a Trigger Campaign. However, I want the filters to be with OR logic between them. Since the logic ANY/ALL/Advanced applies only to filters, not to triggers, is it correct to set up ANY as logic?  I want either of those 2 conditions in the filters to be met when the trigger triggers, I don't want both filter requirements to be met at the same time. Thank you!

Hi All,a calculated custom field of mine is behaving like a bad boy. Can someone please help me with taming it? : )I have a form that is attached both to the Task and Issue objects.The form contains a calculated field (called ObjcodeDebugCombined) that is meant to flag up if certain settings on the Task/Issue record are not aligned to the expectations, i.e.:On a Task: the Task Constraint is not "Fixed Dates" OR the Duration Type is not "Simple"On an Issue: the Issue type is not "Request"Here's the calculation:IF(($$OBJCODE="TASK"&&({durationType}!="S"||{taskConstraint}!="FIXT"))||($$OBJCODE="OPTASK"&&{opTaskType}!="REQ"),"failed","") The problem is that this field is not recalculated when it should be. More precisely:When a Task/Issue record is created (with the custom form attached), the field is calculated correctly.When another custom field is updated on the Task/Issue record, it (ObjcodeDebugCombined) is recalculated properly.When a native field (e.g.

I have an existing lead field that contains the value for user Company Names, and with some company name ending in "Inc." we get an extra period at the end of the sentence where the token is placed.I want to set up a script token that can identify if the last character in the lead field string is a period and remove it. I've looked into substring a bit, but haven't found a working solution.  Does anyone have any suggestions?

We have two systems, Salesforce and Marketo, which are synced.In Marketo, records are synced to Salesforce based on the email address.In Salesforce, records created from Marketo are matched using the Salesforce ID.We do not have duplicate management enabled in Salesforce.We want Marketo to check the email address instead of the Salesforce ID when creating or updating leads.The process should start with a Marketo landing page or form submission.If the email does not exist in Salesforce, a new Lead should be created.If the email already exists, the existing Salesforce Lead should be updated.Additionally, when a lead comes from Salesforce to Marketo, Marketo matches it using the Salesforce ID instead of the email address.Is there any solution or configuration that allows Marketo to match leads based on the email address rather than the Salesforce ID when syncing from Salesforce?

Workfront proof now opens in a new tab versus having the close window button and returning the project. Is this always going to happen or will this be fixed so you can return to the previous window with the close button? 

November 2022     This is a roadmap.  It is not a promise.  It is a snapshot of what we think we can deliver based on our priorities at this current moment .  You should expect things to move around.  New items will be added.  Individual items will move closer and farther when development teams refine scope, update priorities, or otherwise learn that things did not take the exact amount of time that we estimated.  We reserve the right to be smarter tomorrow than we are today. Most recent update: 2022-11-15

Is it possible to create a segment that evaluates something in the segment over a period of time that is not dependent on the filter in your workspace view?  For example, If I want IP addresses excluded that had >1,000 visits over the last 12 months without an order in my workspace view that is filtered for today.  In other words, I'm excluding those IPs today (filtered in my workspace view) that met the above criteria.

I run into this a lot and curious to see how others handle it. Even when the numbers are accurate, stakeholders will often question funnel drop-offs or channel attribution. It feels less about the math and more about how much confidence people have in the way the data is configured and/or presented.How do you deal with that? Do you show the rules and assumptions up front, compare against other tools, or do something else that helps build trust?Would love to hear what’s worked (or not worked) for your teams.