Product Communities

Hello everyone, Good Morning. I have worked on Adobe reporting API previously and currently exploring the CJA API to extract data from Adobe workspaces I have created a project in console and adding CJA API to it and was able to establish a connection and can see data views via the /data/dataviews end point. However the subsequent calls via /data/dataviews/{dataview_id}/dimensions end point are failing with API error 403027 . The solution mentioned is to add AEP API into the project. Can some one explain me the dependency of AEP API for the same. Thanks in advance

Hi Team,I have an AEM page that includes one or more Experience Fragments, also known as XFs. The page is already published and is accessed through a domain on the AEM Publish environment.I need to display a “Last Modified” date on the main page. This date should be calculated based on the latest published modification date across the main page and all related or referenced content.The requirements are as follows:If the main page is modified and published, the displayed Last Modified date should be the main page’s latest published modification date. If one or more Experience Fragments used on the page are modified and published, while the main page itself is not modified, the displayed date should be the latest published modification date of the Experience Fragment. If both the main page and one or more Experience Fragments are modified and published, the displayed date should be the most recent published modification date among them. If an Experience Fragment used on the page contains

When navigating to Tools > Integrations in the AEM author console (https://author-p552-e2209.adobeaemcloud.com), I consistently get:An error has occurred.You do not have access to this resource.Sorry for the inconvenience.The "Local token" section below the error still renders fine (Get local token / Create new technical account buttons are visible and clickable), but the main Technical Accounts panel above it fails to load with this error.What I've already verified/tried:Confirmed in Adobe Admin Console that i has Developer Access assigned specifically to the correct product: "Adobe Experience Manager as a Cloud Service - " — not just the generic org-level AEMaaCS product. Assigned the "AEM Administrators - author - Program 212 - Environment 209" product profile to this user (previously only had Integrations/Developer profiles on the generic org-level product). Saved the change in Admin Console, confirmed it shows up under the user's assigned products. Fully signed out and back in,

While trying to do regression test experiences created in Production we are not able to test on Adobe Target

I’m trying to set up a user on the publish instance to use as the author replication/transport user.  It looks like jcr:read, rep:write, jcr:versionManagement on say /content generally work well for replication.  However, if the page has Closed User Groups configured, I am running into the following error on the publish instance during replication:11.08.2026 18:21:57.678 *ERROR* [127.0.0.1 [1786486917674] POST /bin/receive HTTP/1.1] com.day.cq.replication.impl.servlets.ReplicationServlet Error during replication: The tree for /content/wknd/us/en/adventures/riverside-camping-australia/jcr:content does not existjava.lang.IllegalStateException: The tree for /content/wknd/us/en/adventures/riverside-camping-australia/jcr:content does not exist    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.MutableTree.beforeWrite(MutableTree.java:354) [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-core:1.88.0]    at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.core.MutableTree.setProperty(MutableTree.java:237) [org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-core:1.88.0]    at

We are scheduled for the AWS data center migration in mid August. Can anyone that has already been through the migration give their feedback on how that went, issues they faced, gotchas to have in mind prior to the outage? We’ve gone through Marketo’s documentation but some of it is a little vague. In addition if anyone can answer any of the questions below that will be helpful:Does anyone have any screenshots of what the pages / forms (embedded or otherwise) look like during the outage?Did you get a notification when the migration was completed? They offer to cache embedded forms - what is the benefit of this? Would this allow the forms to stay visible and receive submissions to be processed later or does it just mean they would stay visible. Did the migration get completed within the window they gave or was it longer / shorter?  Other than updating IP Addresses were there any changes that might impact webhooks, endpoints etc that we might be missing?We are also recaching out to Marke

🗣 Looking to continue the conversation after Experience Makers The Skill Exchange? The conversation isn't over.At Skill Exchange on August 12, AEM experts ​@ghowell15 and ​@pstolmar will take the stage — Gary with Scaling Content Creation with Product Launch Accelerator and Generative AI and Peter with Scalable Content Workflows for Authoring and Asset Governance. Afterwards, they'll host an open office hour built for one purpose: to keep that dialogue going with you.This is your chance to bring the questions you don't get to ask live, the use case you're still working through, or the challenge you hit the moment you tried applying what you learned. Come with your real-world scenarios — Gary and Peter will be here to work through them live.What you'll walk away withDirect answers from two AEM experts on scaling content creation with generative AI and building governed, scalable authoring workflows — grounded in what they're seeing in real implementations, not just theory Practical nex

The Workfront Skill Exchange sessions are now available to watch on demand. As you work through the recordings, you might find you've got questions for our speakers, and we'd love for you to ask them. We've created discussion posts for each of the sessions and encourage you to leave your questions in the appropriate thread to chat with our presenters directly. Don't be shy! These folks have been in your shoes and are here to share their experience, so you don't have to learn things the hard way! Here's a handy list of all the sessions and speakers:  Workfront Product Keynote: Angela Zhang, Adobe  LEARN TRACK  Build for the Bot: Designing Workfront for Automation & AI — Kaylee Richard ​(@KayleeRichard), Accenture  Streamlining Planning with Workfront AI: From Spreadsheets to Smart Workspaces — Autumn Earle (​@AutumnE ), Perficient  Reporting Hidden Gems: 10 Tips That Will Save Time and Impress Leadership — ​Daniel Clarke (@Daniel_Clarke), EMMsphere Mastering Workfront Admin Basic

🗣 Looking to continue the conversation after Experience Makers The Skill Exchange? The conversation isn't over.At The Skill Exchange on August 12, AEM Champions ​@BrettBirschbach and ​@venkatkrishnat will take the stage — Brett with Leveraging AI in AEM Cloud Service Development and Venkat with Content Authoring Evolution and Best Practices. Afterwards, they'll host an open office hour built for one purpose: to keep that dialogue going with you.This isn't a repeat of their sessions. It's your chance to bring the questions you don't get to ask live, the use case you're still working through, or the challenge you hit the moment you tried applying what you learned. Come with your real-world scenarios — Brett and Venkat will be here to work through them live.What you'll walk away withDirect answers from two AEM Champions on applying AI to AEM Cloud Service development and modernizing content authoring — grounded in what they're seeing in real implementations, not just theory Practical nex

If you have a follow-up question from the Skill Exchange session Driving End User Adoption: Change Management Best Practices for Real Impact with Danielle Johnston (@danielle_john) from Adobe and Kellie Gardner (@kelliegardner) from EMMsphere that originally aired on August 5, 2026, you're in the right place! Leave your comment below and our speakers will do their best to reply. And if you see a question below that you know the answer to, don't be shy! We'd love for you to answer from your own experience and perspective. Have questions about another Skill Exchange session? You can see the full list of discussion threads here. On-Demand Viewing - This session is now available on-demand, you can find the recording here. 

Hello,  We are using AEM 6.5.22 (on premise version). which uses Apache Tika-core and Tika-parsers bundles with versions 1.28.5.Our Infosec team has reported a vulnerability on these versions and suggested to use the versions 3.2.2 and above. As I checked the maven repository : https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tika/tika-core all the versions below 3.2.2 have vulnerability. We cannot directly updated the versions on our side as this is OOTB.Also, when checked with the latest service pack (6.5.25) also doesn’t have latest tika-core. Any thoughts/suggestions would be much appreciated. Regards,Rohit

We have a classification on the tracking code that rolls up to different campaigns. This is not the marketing channel or last touch channel, etc.Suppose I use the campaign rollup at look at a campaign, email, for example, and I look at entries, orders participation and revenue participation over the past 7 full days.Then for the same timeframe, I create a segment where the campaign rollup = email and it’s a visit level segment. I also look at entries, orders participation, and revenue participation.Why would the orders and revenue be different? Both are using participation metrics over the same timeframe. If a visit had an email entry and ordered, it should show in both cases.We have two reports supplying two different values each week and I’m trying to a) explain where the difference comes from and b) determine which report is showing what we are asking of it.My theory is the ‘visit’ level segment is pulling in orders where the visitor had an email entry within 30 days and it’s being

Hi Team, I'm working on a usecase where I need to create a Interactive Proof for a Web URL and need some ideas and suggestion on how to achieve this. I have a field attached to an object(TASK) where we will enter the URL of the webpage that needs to be proofed and I need to develop the fusion scenario that will automate Interactive Proof for that URL entered. Any suggestions and ideas are appreciated. Thanks for your time!!!

We’re excited to partner with the Adobe Workfront Product team for a 3-part event series to help you prepare and feel empowered for the changes coming to reviews and approvals in Workfront. Each session will offer live demonstrations, best practices, and more to help you with the transition to Unified Review and Approvals. Sessions include: August 11 – Everything You Need to Get Started with ​@Elise_Lawley  September 15 – Making the Switch: Preparing for Your Move with ​@Travis_Jordan  October 28 – Making the Switch: Completing Your Move with ​@MikeEngel  This post will serve as a central location for: Registration links for upcoming sessions  Event recordings after they happen  Related resources and documentation It’s not required, but if you’re interested, we did a session in March – Understanding Unified Approvals: Direction, Reporting, and What’s Next. You can catch the recording and resources here. Don’t forget to click the star at the bottom of this post to subscribe, so you’ll a

On Friday the proofing app had an outage for around 12 hours. I am wondering if those users who have migrated to Unified Review and Approvals using Frame.io experienced any issues too. Trying to find out if the Frame.io process is more stable as we have been experiencing a lot of issues with proof lately.

I have built out a scenario in Fusion and I can fetch and read the note/update and notify those not tagged. But, I would like to update the note/update to add tags. I’m able to create a new note/update that will add tags but I don’t want to create a new one I just want to update the original with tags.Is this possible?Thank you in advance for your insight.

If you have a follow-up question from the Skill Exchange session Your New AI Teammate: Mastering Workfront's Brand Reviewer with Ewan Hruska (@ewanh) from Adobe and Monique Evans (@moniqueevans) from IBM iX that originally aired on August 5, 2026, you're in the right place! Leave your comment below and our speakers will do their best to reply. And if you see a question below that you know the answer to, don't be shy! We'd love for you to answer from your own experience and perspective. Have questions about another Skill Exchange session? You can see the full list of discussion threads here. On-Demand Viewing - This session is now available on-demand, you can find the recording here. (Tip: Use the links in the left navigation to watch other Skill Exchange sessions!) 

If you have a follow-up question from the Skill Exchange session Building Strong Links for Your Content Supply Chain with Adobe Solutions with Natalie Shanks from OneAmerica Financial that originally aired on August 5, 2026, you're in the right place! Leave your comment below and our speakers will do their best to reply. And if you see a question below that you know the answer to, don't be shy! We'd love for you to answer from your own experience and perspective. Have questions about another Skill Exchange session? You can see the full list of discussion threads here. On-Demand Viewing - This session is now available on-demand, you can find the recording here.

SSO (SAML) breaks after an in-place upgrade to AEM 6.5.25 (CFP-25) Environment: on-premise AEM Author, upgraded from 6.5.10 to 6.5.25.Immediately after applying CFP-25, every SSO-related decrypt operation fails with:javax.crypto.BadPaddingException: pad block corruptedThis appears to break decryption of the SAML keystore/truststore passwords and replication transport passwords. As a result, SSO fails and the CMS becomes inaccessible, except by disabling SAML authentication and using the manual login route. The master key is stored in the JCR under /etc/key; it was never migrated to the filesystem bundle. The key value itself was not changed during the upgrade. I simply installed the CFP package, waited until it was complete and restarted the instance, as per the instructions.  The workaround that resolved the issue (currently on test environments) was to rewrite the stored /etc/key value from the older obfuscated format to the raw value, so the newer crypto bundle could read it correct

I am trying to subtract a system property call {estimate} and a custom field called Actual Points.  Both properties display correctly using these 2 text mode pieces of code:displayname=Actual Pointslinkedname=resolveProjectnamekey=view.relatedcolumnnamekeyargkey.0=resolveProjectnamekeyargkey.1=Actual Pointsquerysort=DE:resolveProject:Actual Pointsvaluefield=resolveProject:Actual Pointsvalueformat=customDataLabelsAsStringaggregator.displayformat=valaggregator.function=SUMaggregator.namekey=estimateaggregator.valuefield=estimateaggregator.valueformat=valdisplayname=Agile Assigned Pointslinkedname=directnamekey=estimatevaluefield=estimatevalueformat=doubleAsDoubleBut I can’t figure out why I get a blank column when I try to subtract them using this syntax:displayname=Difference +/-linkedname=resolveProjectnamekey=view.relatedcolumnnamekeyargkey.0=resolveProjectnamekeyargkey.1=Actual Pointsquerysort=DE:resolveProject:Actual Pointsvalueexpression=SUB({estimate},{DE:resolveProject:Actual Poi

Hi everyone,I’m currently working on setting up an Edge Delivery Services (EDS) site using an Adobe repository and would appreciate some guidance.My goal is to: Set up a new EDS project using the official Adobe repository Configure the required integrations to create and load the website using AEM Sites authoring Create pipelines, deploy the site, and preview content I’ve gone through the documentation, but most of the references are based on using a public GitHub repository. In my case, I’m working with a private repository (Adobe repo).At the moment, I’m facing an issue with site ownership verification. Even after adding the required verification file, the verification is not successful. Currently, my repository only contains this verification file and does not yet include files like fstab.yaml or other standard EDS configuration files.It would be really helpful to understand the correct approach for private repository setups, EDS site creation, especially around ownership verifi