Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hello community, We have limited the time frame for sending emails to between 21:00 and 8:00. To do this, in the deliveries section, under the scheduling option, in ‘Contact date calculation’, we have included the following formula that allows the sending to be postponed to the enabled hours Iif(Hour(GetDate())>=21,AddHours(ToDate(AddDays(GetDate(),1)),8),Iif(Hour(GetDate())<8,AddHours(ToDate(GetDate()),8),GetDate())) On the other hand, we use the waves feature to send emails in several batches, with the ‘send using multiple waves’ delivery option. The problem we have is that the time restriction is applied to the first wave but not to the following ones. How can we manage this so that all waves are sent within the enabled time range and if one of them falls within the range we do not want, that wave is postponed and the following ones are executed accordingly? Thanks
Hi,One of our team is constantly overloaded with work due to short turnaround times. They need a minimum of 6 weeks to turn around the job. The team has requested to prevent any requests coming to them if it has less than 6 weeks. Is this possible with Workfront?
Hi,I am working on creating a Dynamic Template using Conditional Rules. While adding a condition to my rule, I was able to add 5 values. However seeing below issue: For my use case, when I tried to add 200 values, it showed an error.Did not find any mention of this limitation or guardrail in the documentation.But it will be helpful if some one can help me with the details. Thank you in Advance!Referring below page:Create conditions | Adobe Journey Optimizer
In our project we have many report suites and we heavily use Processing rules.Currently we are using Adobe Analytics 1.4 api to extract Processing rules from multiple report suites and check mapping for each variable. This way its very easy to check mapping for each variable across report suites and its very fast as well.Adobe announces that Adobe 1.4 API will be deprecated by Aug 2026. And unfortunately Adobe 2.0 API does not support this feature. Does anyone know alternative to extract Processing rules without Adobe Analytics 1.4 API?
I have a webApp where it reads 3 data field values from an input form. On submit click it should compute a custom field value based on other inputs and save the record into a table. I'm able to read and capture the input using Page v5 compatibility node with html and js script. However I'm unable to save the captured record into table. I tried below function in the same Page v5 node and also tried in a script node after Page v5 node but no luck. If I hard code the values in script node then I'm able to see the record insertion otherwise I receive error : Error: SCR-160017 Function 'Write', argument 0: cannot convert argument to an XML document. Code used to save the record:function saveRecord(campaignLabel, deliveryLabel, mirrorPage){var currentDateTime = formatDate(getCurrentDate(), "%4Y-%2M-%2D %2H:%2N:%2S");var customSchema;if(campaignLabel.length > 0){customSchema =<customSchema xtkschema="xyz:customSchema" campaignLabel={campaignLabel} creationDate={currentDateTime
Hi, We are analysing on decommissioning the Production servers but also wanted to check here for any pointers/tips to consider if we want to reduce the number of AEM Publisher and dispatcher servers in Production if someone has already worked on this before?For ex: Out of 4 Publishers and 4 dispatchers, if we would want to reduce to 2 each as most of the sites are migrated to a different tool and we are just left with 8 out of 21 sites.Thank you
Hi all,I am trying to prefill an XFA form (XDP based) through data that is submitted through an Adaptive form.My Adaptive form is based off a JSON (Schema.json) attached. I bound each of the adaptive form field to this JSON. On the other side, I bound my XDP to a XSD file (attached).when i submit my Adaptive form, the form gives out the JSON (response.json), I am using a servlet to convert this to an XML (response.xml) and then use Render Service to stitch together a prefilled PDF form. But this is not working, i always get a blank form without any prefilled data.But when i use same XML and try previewing through AEM Forms designer, the PDF gets prefilled. Not sure what i am missing. I am attaching all the files that i used here. Would be really helpful if someone from the community can assist. response.json (data submitted as JSON from Adaptive form){"moneylink-trans-amount":1000,"financial-inst-name":"Sample Bank","acc_number":1.2312312E7,"checkbox-journal-amt":"1","total-journa
We have a Request Queue with a custom form attached that the user must complete certain fields. Of the fields there are 4 that are either a drop down selection or typeahead. The web version works with no issue. All fields function properly and the user can save his/her work as a draft or submit the request. If the user chooses to use the mobile app to complete the request and either save or submit, the drop down fields and typeahead fields do not save and in some instances will not let the user submit because if thinks one of the fields is not complete (because all four of these fields are required). The user (and I was able to duplicate) will complete the request on the mobile devise, but when looking at the Draft Requests on the web version, all of the data is complete except these four fields that are either drop down or typeahead. I went down the path that maybe these fields were not shared properly. I open
I need to customize the RTE options provided in the email delivery for Adobe Campaign classic. Is it possible to add more features to the RTE, other than what is default provided? How can we achieve that.
I wonder i sombody knows anyting about how the Mirror Page link is build, the structure of the link.I have faced a problem that in some cases I get a Mirror Page URL without the /ee in the final link in an email. And that link does not work. Sometimes I get a Mirror Page with the /ee included in the link, and then it works. I can manually change the link in my browser (set in the /ee in the right place, and then it works)https://data.nordea-test.cjmadobe.com/ee/v1/ ..................https://data.nordea-test.cjmadobe.com/v1/ ..................So the one million dollar question, what causes the /ee to be created in the final link, and what make this to be left out when rendering the link. Since it is the same mistake every time withe the same letters, this to letters must have some connection to something in the solution - putting them into the final URL.
I'm looking for Fusion best practices for setting up organizations where multiple groups will utilizing the system in tandem for their group processes. Examples on:How to set up TeamsWhat access levels to giveOnce teams and access levels are setup, how to control that users are only using the "service" accounts and not establishing personal connections to platforms.
I am working on a formula field in Workfront Planning. I have a connected field for {Deliverable Type} that houses a list of deliverables in a separate record type in Planning. When a certain {Deliverable Type} is selected from the available list and a Qty is input in another column I want the formula field to tell me the resource hours needed to complete that amount of deliverables. The formula I'm using is:IF({Deliverable Type}="Video", CONCAT("Video Producer: ", {Qty} * 15, " hrs; Video Editor: ", {Qty} * 10, " hrs"), "") Workfront Planning is recognizing this as a valid formula but it's not returning anything after I click save. What does work is if I were to switch {Deliverable Type} to a free text field and type in Video. Any thoughts on how to solution for this? Does Workfront Planning even support this sort of formula?
I'm exporting projects from Smartsheet via Project XML, to import to Workfront. It worked fine for the first project, but keeps erroring out on the second one. "There was a problem.We're not sure why, but we weren't able to read the file you uploaded. Importing it again might do the trick."Re-importing has the same result - an empty project. Is there some particular format or column sets projects should have before export?
Is Workfront FEDramp or TXramp certified yet? The last time I looked into a few years ago it was not. If not, will it ever be?
How can I upload a document link from a software like sharepoint? Is this exact functionality possible within Fusion using the API?
some info:1. I need to check some stuff on the request before it can continue with normal processing.2. if the check fails, I need to redirect the user to the 404 page.3. I need to have access to Http session and HTTP request objects.4. I only need to filter on a specific path (example: /content/myapp/en/folder1 or /folder1) Any ideas on what sort of Java "tech" can do this?
Hello,We are currently facing an issue with recurring freezes in Campaign Workflows.During our investigation, we enabled the verbose mode and noticed that this setting seemed to significantly reduce the freeze occurrences.Has anyone else encountered this issue? If so, how was it resolved?
My New Request button is greyed out with this tool tip when I hover: The system administrator restricted your access to create requests.
Has anyone implemented https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/datastreams/data-enrichment/weatherI am planning to get the weather data into my dataset. Not sure if this licensing has a cost associated and whats the exact process?Thanks
Hi We have two Lists , and both of them have the Targeting dimensions as nms:address and a Red shift Schema. Note: The data in the Schema is different when compared to the Lists data. We need to exclude these Lists data from the Transactional Messages. Please let me know if any solution works for this.
Hello friends, I have a Brightcove third party that when I was using my old version of AEM on localhost I could build the project locally with no problems, but now that I upgraded my local AEM both the JDK and SDK I get the following error now[ERROR] The analyser found the following errors for author and publish :[ERROR] [configurations-basic] Configuration org.apache.sling.serviceusermapping.impl.ServiceUserMapperImpl.amended~brightcove_admin: Service.ranking is not of type Integer. Use 'service.ranking:Integer' as the key. (com.tfs:aem-tfs-project.all:0.0.1-SNAPSHOT|com.coresecure:brightcove.all:6.1.10|com.coresecure:brightcove.ui.config:6.1.10)The versions of the update are the next one:JDK: Oracle JDK 21.0.6SDK: AEM SDK v2025.1.19149.20250116T154450Z-250100I modified the file of the configuration:org.apache.sling.serviceusermapping.impl.ServiceUserMapperImpl.amended-brightcove_admin.cfg.jsonWith the next code:{ "service.ranking:Integer": "0", "user.mapping": [ &nb
I am facing some blockers with the following implementation :-> Once I start the Review Task and assign the topic to be reviewed by a designated reviewer, the reviewer should also have an option to reject the task (in that case an email will be triggered to the author who has initiated the workflow that the item has been rejected by the reviewer along with the comments that the reviewer has put in).Customizing the toolbar in the inbox section is not possible in AEMaaCS is what I have come across - so I am looking into some insights as to how we can modify the ReviewDITAMAP workflow to accordingly have our requirement fit in?OR another idea that came across my mind was to somehow capture the comments section when the reviewer hits complete. Maybe if a comment like Rejected is put in I want to capture that and accordingly send a notification/email to the initiator stating that the workflow has been completed and when he/she opens the notification the comments should show up with "Reje
Hi, I'm trying to create a report that shows a list of projects where both of these conditions are true (using fake ID numbers for the sake of this example):The status of template task ID AAAAA12345 is not Rejected.The status of template task ID 54321ZZZZZ is not Rejected.I know how to filter for each of these in a task report using the standard filter mode, but I only want to see the project name and not the tasks themselves. I suspect this requires using text mode for the filter within a project report, but I'm newer to text mode and I'm having a hard time figuring it out. How can I create this report?
We have an AEM page (product.html) that is quite heavy due to a large number of authored components. As a result, only part of the components load during authoring, which affects usability.To work around this, we increased the request size in the main Sling servlet from the default value of 1000 to 2000. This resolved the component loading issue during authoring but its not performance oriented . This page also takes significantly longer to load via the dispatcher URL. we to make it better .I’m looking for best practices or architectural approaches to make the authoring experience smoother and more user-friendly, while also ensuring optimal performance on the dispatcher. Any suggestions to address both concerns would be greatly appreciated.
I have 3 report suites that used the same classification. In the new classification sets, I consolidated these under one classification - the consolidation is complete.Now, when I look for the fields in the classification, with the exception of the key, all the results are 'unspecified' I've waited over 24 hours, thinking it might need to propagate through the data, but nothing. Naturally, this is data we use all the time. What do I have to do to fix this? Do I just need to recreate the classifications for each report suite? I've read through the docs multiple times. Thanks,Christy
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.