I'm not 100 percent certain on this but do you happen to have some custom statuses set up where some of your teams are using a status of Confirmed, and others are using a status of Approved? Workfront sometimes allows you to have different groups use the same status (for example, both equate to Appr...

can you give us any more information about the difference between the 6 and 9 user sets, and the difference in the records' role IDs (were all the role IDs the same or did the 184 and 125 have some different role IDs listed?)? Also helpful to know whether there are discrepancies in other months like...

You would need Fusion for this.

I'm not sure why you put the STRING command in there? Why would you not just use CONCAT("G24_" + TRIM(RIGHT("0000" + {referenceNumber}, 4)))   (also not sure why the 0000 and TRIM were necessary but I left that in since it didn't seem harmful)

You would not be able to refer to the two column's results, but I don't see any reason why you would not be able to just copy and paste the two valueexpressions into a third one. The syntax for division is  DIV(number1, number2, ...) so I would just picture some sort of monstrous valueexpression=DIV...

I agree with Victoria -- I find approvals on tasks to be limited -- because our users just ignore them and keep working through the rest of the project timeline. We have projects which get to the end of the project timeline and the approvals only get addressed when the Project Owner tries to close t...

  I think this already exists. See screenshot.

Just call me Captain Obvious. And yes, they do not retroactively track.

One of the struggles I've seen in other instances is the struggle of tracking the time it takes to move through a deliverables-based process. i.e. if I say that I want 2 of something, then it should take twice as long... or to generalize, if I select something on the custom form, I would like to hav...