This is not how validation logic works, so I've split this out into a separate question. If you have the right contract with Adobe, there is a feature called Business Rules which might be more in line with this. The link for this is: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/adminis...

One possibility is the project sharing or access setting. I'll show it in the sharing dropdown (screenshot) but you can also find this in the access section when you edit the project.   In this screenshot I show how I have shared a project with a team using "contribute" access, and then clicked on t...

I'm not clear on where you are stashing this "travel time" task, but as long as it is not in the same project, you might want to look into filtering hour types and see if it would work for you. See this link: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/manage-work/projects/manage-proj...

did you do this step I mentioned in a more recent post? https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-questions/reporting-on-task-completion/td-p/753566

You can do this by creating a User report. Go to filters, and select the license = ___ for your filter. Select each option one at a time (Standard, light, contributor), and then convert to text mode after each, to see what letter represents each.

Is it possible (or beneficial) to work around this somehow by using the configuration filters (advanced filters in the following link: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/agile/agile-planning-boards/add-intake-column-to-board ) or do the users have a need to see the parent tas...

this worked for me, but I'm not clear in what you mean when you say "I'm having issues". What behavior are you seeing? Since it worked for me, I wonder if it's just the case of you having forgotten to toggle one of the checkboxes on the calculated field (the one about "apply to existing calculations...

it should be link.url (all lower case)

I just tested both in my instance and both work. I even added a question mark to the field name (which normally I do not do), and that also failed to trip it up.   IF({DE:SYS User Type?}="Test User","not ok","") IF({DE:SYS User Type?}="Test User","not ok")   I'd have to ask what you mean by "it d...

I'm not clear on why you need to do this, and whether or not your CS agents are also in Workfront, but yes, in theory although it's not good practice to add a user under a generic name it's something that can be done. Additionally your CS agents should at least have "contribute" access to the projec...