Want us to send you a calendar invitation so you don’t forget? Register now to receive a reminder!
Rob Hornick is the Senior Product Manager for Machine Learning and Personalization with Adobe Target, based in San Francisco. Rob is energized by both building tools to personalize digital experiences and putting advances in machine learning into marketers’ hands. Prior to joining Adobe, Rob was a Manager with Accenture Digital where he helped marketers optimize their processes and technology.
Curious about what an Adobe Target Community Q&A Coffee Break looks like? Check out the thread from our last break with Ram Parthasarathy, Principal Product Manager for Adobe...
Topics help categorize Community content and increase your ability to discover relevant content.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
@Rob_Hornick what are the odds of being able to expand the window of conversion to more than 30 minutes? Financial planning events have a much longer conversion time than e-commerce events.
@evidana wrote:@Rob_Hornick what are the odds of being able to expand the window of conversion to more than 30 minutes? Financial planning events have a much longer conversion time than e-commerce events.
Eric, thanks for your question! I can't comment on the likelihood of adding features that aren't on our publicly committed roadmap, but we don't have an immediate plan to add a longer window to Adobe Target-defined conversion metrics. You're welcome to submit this (and any other feature requests) in our Ideas forum: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-target-ideas/idb-p/adobe-target-ideas
In the meantime, you may be able to accomplish your goal using our Analytics for Target (A4T) integration along with a conversion metric defined in Adobe Analytics with a longer attribution lookback window. Adobe Analytics conversion metrics are supported for A/B and XT activities, and with our June release, we added A4T support for Auto-Allocate activities. Later this summer, we'll release A4T support for Auto-Target activities.
@Rob_Hornick Apologies for the first question, I was on the wrong account. Any chance that the Recommendations tool can get eligibility at the offer level. There are collections, but I have not seen anything more granular than that. The hypothetical use case will be that I do not want to advertise a lawnmower if you have one in your garage (not necessarily purchased from our store).
@Rob_Hornick do you have any advice on hooking up internal decisioning (algos) to Adobe Target as the last mile of determining eligibility for running experiments?
@Eric_Vidana wrote:@Rob_Hornick do you have any advice on hooking up internal decisioning (algos) to Adobe Target as the last mile of determining eligibility for running experiments?
Hi Eric, there are a few options you might consider here for bringing external decisioning data into Adobe Target.
This is an area of active investment for us. We're currently working on a feature, "Auto-Target with Custom Model", that will enable Target Premium users to bring their own model into Target's Auto-Target feature. If participating in a beta of this feature is of interest to you, please reach out through your Adobe CSM.
@Rob_Hornick I will do just about anything to get the 50 profile param limitation on AT 2.3 removed. Thoughts?
@Rob_Hornick why is AP and AT not an activity type of it's own i.e. and currently "inside" the A/B Test flow?
What is the difference between AP, AT and Recommended for you? Are all 3 using the same algorithm?
How would I be ablecable to use AT or AP together with a propensity score (hopefully from AA)? Any examples or tips how to achieve this?
Can you share some examples of websites that sucessfully use AP, AT or Recs.?
How do I use Recs. within a Single Page Application? Trigger Views?
Merci beacoup!
Nicolas
@Nicolas_Swisscom wrote:@Rob_Hornick why is AP and AT not an activity type of it's own i.e. and currently "inside" the A/B Test flow?
What is the difference between AP, AT and Recommended for you? Are all 3 using the same algorithm?
How would I be ablecable to use AT or AP together with a propensity score (hopefully from AA)? Any examples or tips how to achieve this?
Can you share some examples of websites that sucessfully use AP, AT or Recs.?
How do I use Recs. within a Single Page Application? Trigger Views?
Merci beacoup!
Nicolas
Nicolas! Great to connect with you and hope all is well in your neck of the globe! Automated Personalization (AP) is its own activity type, but Auto-Target (AT) is embedded within the testing activity workflow for ease of "one-click" personalization, evaluating each individual's profile for determining the next best experience to deliver. It makes it easier to consider utilizing personalization when considering traffic allocation to different experiences (when you are in the 2nd step of our 3-step testing activity workflow), and to consider leveraging our algorithms for dynamically decisioning for each individual (equivalent of taking action off of hundreds of tests in a single moment)
A good reference for the underlying algorithms is our Automation Infographic: https://wwwimages2.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/marketing-cloud/target/pdf/54658.en.target.infograp...
Here is more information on our Recommended For You algorithm and use cases, written by Rob: https://theblog.adobe.com/delivering-dynamic-personalized-experiences-with-adobe-targets-new-user-ba...
AT.js, our javascript library, is built for integrations within Single Page Applications. This enables leveraging triggerviews for delivering experiences discretely within an SPA experience.
@drewb6915421 wrote:
@Nicolas_Swisscom wrote:@Rob_Hornick why is AP and AT not an activity type of it's own i.e. and currently "inside" the A/B Test flow?
What is the difference between AP, AT and Recommended for you? Are all 3 using the same algorithm?
How would I be ablecable to use AT or AP together with a propensity score (hopefully from AA)? Any examples or tips how to achieve this?
Can you share some examples of websites that sucessfully use AP, AT or Recs.?
How do I use Recs. within a Single Page Application? Trigger Views?
Merci beacoup!
Nicolas
Nicolas! Great to connect with you and hope all is well in your neck of the globe! Automated Personalization (AP) is its own activity type, but Auto-Target (AT) is embedded within the testing activity workflow for ease of "one-click" personalization, evaluating each individual's profile for determining the next best experience to deliver. It makes it easier to consider utilizing personalization when considering traffic allocation to different experiences (when you are in the 2nd step of our 3-step testing activity workflow), and to consider leveraging our algorithms for dynamically decisioning for each individual (equivalent of taking action off of hundreds of tests in a single moment)
A good reference for the underlying algorithms is our Automation Infographic: https://wwwimages2.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/marketing-cloud/target/pdf/54658.en.target.infograp...
Here is more information on our Recommended For You algorithm and use cases, written by Rob: https://theblog.adobe.com/delivering-dynamic-personalized-experiences-with-adobe-targets-new-user-ba...
AT.js, our javascript library, is built for integrations within Single Page Applications. This enables leveraging triggerviews for delivering experiences discretely within an SPA experience.
Here is a nice article illustrating the difference between AP and AT for your reference: https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/target/using/activities/auto-target-to-optimize.html#section_...
@Nicolas_Swisscom wrote:@Rob_Hornick why is AP and AT not an activity type of it's own i.e. and currently "inside" the A/B Test flow?
What is the difference between AP, AT and Recommended for you? Are all 3 using the same algorithm?
How would I be ablecable to use AT or AP together with a propensity score (hopefully from AA)? Any examples or tips how to achieve this?
Can you share some examples of websites that sucessfully use AP, AT or Recs.?
How do I use Recs. within a Single Page Application? Trigger Views?
Merci beacoup!
Nicolas
Hi Nicolas! Adding to what Drew mentioned:
Hello - how can I get into the Conversation? first timer here - already registered, not seeing the link. thanks.
Ha. I have a similar question. I think you are in it. AMA. Forum style.
@ActiveMitchell wrote:Hello - how can I get into the Conversation? first timer here - already registered, not seeing the link. thanks.
You are in the conversation/discussion thread - post your question and we'll respond as quickly as we can!
@drewb6915421 wrote:
@ActiveMitchell wrote:Hello - how can I get into the Conversation? first timer here - already registered, not seeing the link. thanks.
You are in the conversation/discussion thread - post your question and we'll respond as quickly as we can!
Welcome @ActiveMitchell !
HI @ActiveMitchell ! Welcome
Hi all! Looking forward to answering your questions today.
Hi @Rob_Hornick, this question was posted in the community by @anils5920589:
Had a question on how Target derives reward probabilities for the MAB algorithms implemented for Auto Allocate, Auto Target and Automated Personalization activities.
Was going through your docs and found out that there are three ways of feeding data into Target:
Since MAB algorithms need reward probabilities of each experience/variant as an input which change over time as more visitors participate in an activity, does Target derive the reward probability from the data supplied using the above methods ?
@surebee wrote:Hi @Rob_Hornick, this question was posted in the community by @anils5920589:
Had a question on how Target derives reward probabilities for the MAB algorithms implemented for Auto Allocate, Auto Target and Automated Personalization activities.
Was going through your docs and found out that there are three ways of feeding data into Target:
- mbox parameters
- Profile parameters/attributes
- Server side APIs for profile updates.
Since MAB algorithms need reward probabilities of each experience/variant as an input which change over time as more visitors participate in an activity, does Target derive the reward probability from the data supplied using the above methods ?
Hi @anils5920589!
The Auto-Allocate multi-armed bandit feature is a non-contextual bandit so does not leverage the aforementioned attributes to derive a reward probability; instead it solely examines prior behavior at the aggregate level.
The Auto-Target and Automated Personalization feature act as contextual bandits and, as you've correctly inferred, leverage the provided profile and contextual (mbox) parameters to derive an estimated probability of conversion (per experience for Auto-Target and per offer for Automated Personalization). To learn more, see: https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/target/using/activities/automated-personalization/ap-data.htm... and https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/target/using/activities/automated-personalization/uploading-d...l .
Hi @Rob_Hornick this question was previously posted in the Community by @ambikaTewari_ATCI:
Hi Experts,
As per help doc, Entity attribute values expire after 61 days. This means that you should ensure that the latest value of each entity attribute is passed to Target Recommendations at least once per month for each item in your catalog.
does this mean if the same value for an entity attribute is updated then attribute will not expire. ? or should it have new value for entity attribute not to expire?
@Amelia_Waliany wrote:Hi @Rob_Hornick this question was previously posted in the Community by @ambikaTewari_ATCI:
Hi Experts,
As per help doc, Entity attribute values expire after 61 days. This means that you should ensure that the latest value of each entity attribute is passed to Target Recommendations at least once per month for each item in your catalog.
does this mean if the same value for an entity attribute is updated then attribute will not expire. ? or should it have new value for entity attribute not to expire?
@ambikaTewari_ATCI (love the user name!), you do not need to change the value. Sending the same value will still let us know that the product data should not expire.
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies