Product Communities

Thank you to everyone who joined us for our MEGA-WUG panel discussion on building and advancing a career as a Workfront Admin! We had a fantastic conversation with experienced Workfront professionals who shared their career journeys, lessons learned, and practical advice for anyone looking to grow their skills and expand their opportunities in the Workfront ecosystem.  Let’s Keep the Conversation GoingHave a career question that wasn't answered during the session? Looking for advice on growing your Workfront skills, advancing your career, expanding your network, or incorporating AI into your role? Post your questions in the comments below! Our panelists will be monitoring this thread and jumping in to answer questions, and we encourage other members of the Workfront Community to share their experiences and perspectives as well. One of the greatest strengths of this community is the willingness of members to learn from and support one another.Whether you're just getting started as a Wor

The recording of today’s Experience League LIVE show is now available on Experience League:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/events/experience-league-live-recordings/episodes/exl-live-episode-06-24-26Target expert ​@drburnsTarget27 shared the latest ground-breaking innovations in Adobe Target as we embrace our new agentic era with a new Target MCP. We’ll share what it does, how to access it and show it in action. We’ll also showcase all of our new Adobe Target releases with demos showcasing expanded use cases and improvements in intelligence and execution!Jump in, ask your questions here, and connect with our experts.

Hi all,I'm building an integration where Marketo sends a webhook payload (via Mulesoft) every time a lapse-related email goes out, and the payload needs several fields from a Custom Object called lapseDetails.From this thread I know CO field tokens don't resolve in webhook payloads — only {{lead.X}} and the standard namespaces do. The two known workarounds are: (1) copy CO data to lead fields via Change Data Value, or (2) have the webhook receiver loop back via REST.Where I'm stuck:Option 1 has a race condition. Producers can have multiple lapseDetails CO records insert concurrently (one per policy lapsing). Each insert fires its own campaign run for the same lead, and the flow needs a 1-minute wait (for an OAuth token). Both concurrent runs write to the same lead fields, so by the time the webhook fires, only the last CO's values remain. Both webhooks ship the same payload — one CO gets archived twice, the other lost.Question:Is there a Marketo-side pattern for sending the specific tr

Lets assume I have labeled data with labels: X , Z , K , A , DUser has only assigned labels: X , ZDoes this this mean that user only sees X , Z attributes in personalization window?

Hi, I am currently limited to custom form validation to test this out. I am attempting to ensure that only specific values are selectable from a multi-drop down control based on the queue topic. After testing it out, I saw that it seems the custom form validation is not returning the value of the queue topic ID, even though it is a field I can use in the formula. Has anyone seen this or tried it?

Allow for creation of a Document Approval Template that does not include a specific approver. We have generic templates in Workfront Proof today that sets the Proof Creator as the default reviewer. The approver(s) is added when the proof is created.  We would use this template to pre-set multiple decisions/stages and due dates.

Hello. I am attempting to run a report on users in sub-groups. Is it possible to group a report by Sub-group, and within that group show each user’s last login date? Also, is it possible to group by users who have logged in the last month, while having another grouping showing everyone else?The end result should be a report that shows all users, grouped by sub-group with their last login date displayed. Has anyone accomplished something similar to this? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Hi, I am currently working AEM 6.5 on premise project. I would like to incorporate LLM visibility scans into our CI/CD pipeline.So far I have found LLM optimizer. Do you know if LLM optimizer provides some API that we can call during our automations tests?Alternatively there is AI Content Visibility Checker chrome plugin. Do you know how it calculate visibility metric? 

There is a streaming segment with condition - AttributesInclude First name equals latencyEvents(Include audience who have at least 1 Any event where (Event Type equals latency.ingested) ) and occurs in last 10 minute(s) Scenario 1 - event ingested first - no qualificationafter 2 min profile ingested - imediate qualified to the segment.--Scenario 2 - after 10 min from first event ingestion the Profile got exited from the same segment.qa) IS THIS EXPECTED? I have not ingested any event or profile attribute during this 10min.--Scenario 3 - after the profile got disqualified from the segmentEvent ingested again without altering profile attributes - re qualified qb) IS THIS EXPECTED? Just event is ingested and the profile attributes from previous ingestion stays as it is. Can some one give answers to qa and qb with supporting adobe documents.    

Hey all! To help you get oriented to Campaigns module in Coworker, here are a couple resources to check out: Blog: "From Prompt to Campaign" (Project Halo was the internal project name)  Get started guide: Coworker Product Docs Press release: Adobe Announces General Availability of CX Enterprise CoworkerMost importantly, try Coworker! Test different prompts and content generations. Try it in different languages. Leave feedback using the conversation icon in the top right nav. We’ll continue posting release news and resources here in the community as they’re available. Have additional questions? Put up a post or DM any of the Adobe team members posting in this community! 

Hi All, I am getting the below issue - For the same commit id in Adobe Git, I got the deployment failed the first time but succeed the second time. Build #1 - 22:27:04,861 [main] [INFO] Downloading from digital-mvn-build-dependencies: https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/cantire/_packaging/digital-mvn-build-dependencies/maven/v1/io/netty/netty-bom/4.2.15.Final/netty-bom-4.2.15.Final.pom22:27:05,126 [main] [ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:[ERROR] Non-resolvable import POM: The following artifacts could not be resolved: io.netty:netty-bom:pom:4.2.15.Final (absent): Could not transfer artifact io.netty:netty-bom:pom:4.2.15.Final from/to central (https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2): status code: 429, reason phrase: Too Many Requests (429) @ line 1169, column 25 @ 22:27:05,126 [main] [ERROR]   The project com.projA.aem:projAweb:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT (/build_root/build/projA-aemcs/pom.xml) has 1 error22:27:05,127 [main] [ERROR]     Non-resolvable import POM: The foll

Handling taxes can become easier when guidance is available from people who understand the lifestyle and responsibilities of military families. udChalo Finserv offers practical assistance designed to simplify tax-related tasks and reduce unnecessary stress. With Tax Services for Fauji Families, clients receive dependable support, clear communication, and solutions tailored to their financial needs throughout the year.

I took the AD0-E559 Adobe Marketo Engage Business Practitioner Expert exam last week and passed, but I’d like to review which areas I answered incorrectly. Does anyone know if there’s a way to access that information?

It would be extremely helpful if the Adobe Cloud Manager UI displayed clear information on which user initiated a pipeline execution as well as which user approved or rejected the pipeline in the approval step.Today, identifying who triggered or approved a pipeline often requires navigating through logs or API calls, which is not intuitive. Having this information surfaced directly in the Cloud Manager interface would provide:Better traceability – Quickly identify the person responsible for starting a deployment or making an approval decision. Improved auditability – Essential for teams that must comply with governance, security, or compliance standards. Faster troubleshooting – When a deployment causes issues, teams can easily see who initiated or approved the pipeline and follow up with the appropriate individual. Enhanced collaboration – Team members and stakeholders can more effectively coordinate by knowing who has taken action at each stage.Displaying the triggering user and the

Hi Experience League Community,   We are troubleshooting an issue with AEM Universal Editor in an Edge Delivery Services project.   The copy/paste functionality for components between pages was working before, but it recently stopped working. Authors can open and edit pages in Universal Editor, but when they try to copy a component from one page and paste it into another page, the paste action does not complete as  expected.   We have started reviewing Author logs and browser network traces, but we are not yet sure which area is most relevant to investigate.   We would appreciate guidance on what else to check, for example:   1. Universal Editor component definitions, models, or filters  2. Edge Delivery Services Configuration Service settings  3. Site/repository/branch configuration  4. Author permissions or access restrictions  5. Browser/network requests involved in copy/paste  6. Known limitations when copying components across pages or language/site branches  7. Any relevant Autho

Hi I have a project where the project-level schedule is set to A.At the user level, the assignee has a schedule set to B.The project is configured with "Consider user time off in task durations" enabled.My understanding is that for a task with this setup (one task, one assignee), the task start and end dates would take both schedule A and schedule B into account.In other words, if schedule A includes US holidays and schedule B includes UK holidays, the task would start on a day that is not a holiday in either country.However, in my testing this does not seem to be the case. Am I misunderstanding how this works?

Looking to see if there are any users in the Greenville, South Carolina area to create a local Workfront User Group.

Hello Workfront Community,    I can’t believe it’s already June! Time has flown by since our last review, but I wanted to update you all on our H1 2025 Community Ideas review. As you may recall, this effort is part of our bi-annual ideas review process, which involves our product team as they review and respond to the top 20 ideas from the past 2 years. Please note that this 2-year period includes ideas from our last review cycle in November 2024. Ideas from our last review cycle are listed in the second chart below, labelled ‘H2 2024 Carryover Ideas.’ Many of you may have already been notified of these idea updates if you’ve interacted with them previously, but I wanted to consolidate all product responses into a single page.    A couple things to keep in mind:    All reviewed ideas below were published in the past 2 years.   Ideas responded to in this cycle will be updated periodically by the PM Owner until they are moved to a 'final’ stage,

After a promo email went out, we got a huge spike from Microsoft-based IPs. I believe we got about 300K UV in 4 hours, so it’s likely from their email scanners. This seems like an old problem that is popping up again in 2026. Does anyone have a way to mitigate reporting this traffic as UVs? We’re using Cloudflare, but they even bypassed that.

Please add ‘Entered by’ to the list of fields available in a ‘Billing Record’ report.  Being able to audit who entered a ‘Billing Record’ is critical when you’re dealing with finance issues, we were surprised this wasn’t possible already. You can find a thread about this issue here: