Product Communities

Scenario:    We have a request form has several display logic fields such as if {Field 1} has a value of “A” selected then display {Field 2 } and have the user populate {Field 2}.  The display logic is much larger and more complex but the general idea where there is multiple fields impacted.Our issue is that if someone copies a previous request or changes the response on field 1 in this use case, then field 2 still holds data.    This is an issue as we use calculated fields to help advanced logic and scoring based on field entries and these unexpected hidden values are causing issues with the output of the calculated field.  Is there a way in a calculated field to have some display/visibility logic like ….&& {DE:field 1}.visible=true… or something like that?  Additionally, is there a way to simply have fields that are hidden cleared out upon submission? 

I’m trying to build a PROJECT report that includes the request form details in Project Details AND request form details from the sub request section within each project. Is this possible?

The Workfront Skill Exchange sessions are now available to watch on demand. As you work through the recordings, you might find you've got questions for our speakers, and we'd love for you to ask them. We've created discussion posts for each of the sessions and encourage you to leave your questions in the appropriate thread to chat with our presenters directly. Don't be shy! These folks have been in your shoes and are here to share their experience, so you don't have to learn things the hard way! Here's a handy list of all the sessions and speakers:  Workfront Product Keynote: Angela Zhang, Adobe  LEARN TRACK  Build for the Bot: Designing Workfront for Automation & AI — Kaylee Richard ​(@KayleeRichard), Accenture  Streamlining Planning with Workfront AI: From Spreadsheets to Smart Workspaces — Autumn Earle (​@AutumnE ), Perficient  Reporting Hidden Gems: 10 Tips That Will Save Time and Impress Leadership — ​Daniel Clarke (@Daniel_Clarke), EMMsphere Mastering Workfront Admin Basic

Hello! We have been advised that due to updates to tracking laws in two EU countries, we would like to exclude email open tracking for those two particular countries. We have an incredibly high volume of email sends, and would like to find some way to do this without having to create two versions of the same asset. Basically, there’s a box in the email designer that you can check to disable open tracking, but we just want it to be disabled for France and Italy. We don’t want to have to create specific emails for those two countries if we’re also sending EU or global emails.  Is there a possible way to do this through tokenizing? How can we tell an email asset to check the box sometimes, but not others?  Thanks. :)

Hello, We have 119 groups that need a report shared with them. I wanted to know if there is a work around to get this report share with all the groups but the limit is 100 users/groups.

We have a project within WorkFront where all the subtasks under one of our task buckets are complete but the main task is stuck at 90% - which means we cannot “complete” the project.  See attached image. Anyone know why this would occur or what the fix would be?  

Enable a client into a journey. A journey in this case could be serious of steps a client has to taken to complete an action. Taking an action is supported in multiple channels like web, mobile in app, email and push notifications. How would one should think of creating an omni channel journey that helps us visualize end to end client move through the journey? Question: How can Adobe Journey Optimizer support an omnichannel client journey today and in the future?I’m looking for guidance on how to model and orchestrate an end-to-end, omnichannel client journey using Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO).In this context, a journey represents a series of steps or actions that a client needs to take to accomplish a specific goal. These interactions may happen across multiple channels, such as:Web Mobile/in-app Email Push notificationsFor example, a client may start an action on the web, receive an email as the next step, continue the process in the mobile app, and then receive a push notification

I’m looking for a way to be able to export multiple PDFs in one go if possible. For example, I’ve got 20 briefs submitted into a queue and I would like to be able to export the issue details into 20 PDF documents but without having to go into each request manually. Anyone have any ideas on a way to do this?Thanks!

Hi there!I’m looking for a hands-on Senior Marketing Automation Specialist to own the day-to-day operations of our Marketo Engage instance, supporting two of The Freeman Company’s brands.This role will be the execution engine behind our owned-channel campaign activity, partnering closely with campaign marketing teams to build, launch, and report on Marketo programs across email, digital, and events.The position is eligible for a hybrid schedule, generally requiring work in-office and/or on-site at events 2–3 days per week. The ideal candidate will be located in Philadelphia, PA or Dallas, TX.If you’re interested, or know someone who may be a great fit, please feel free to reach out or applyhere. 

How do you identify reports impacted by a field change?As I work to modernize our decade-old Workfront instance in preparation for Planning, Fusion, and future AI capabilities, I'm finding it increasingly difficult to identify which reports are impacted when a custom field is updated, consolidated, or retired.We currently have more than 700 reports, and I haven't found an efficient way to identify which reports reference a specific field.For example, we recently consolidated several legacy Yes/No fields into a single multi-select field. The new design is cleaner and easier to maintain, but now I need to identify all reports that: Filter on any of the retired Yes/No fields Display those fields as columns Group by those fields Use those fields in chart configurations Include them in prompts or other reporting logic Today, the only approach I know of is manually reviewing reports, which is not realistic at this scale. Questions for the community: Is there a way to report on report

Hi ,I am working on a requirement where a custom sling model needs to exclude pages that are unpublished/hidden from navigation, while recursively walking a page tree vis listchildren(). The issue driving this: page that are hidden in nav, unpublished and have a redirect configured still showing up in the list. so we need to explicitly hide unpublished pages, not just hidden ones. To fix this, I check cq:lastReplicationAction/cq:lastReplicationAction_Publish  on each pages’s ValueMap to filter unpublished ones. Resource contentResource = childPage.getContentResource();            if (contentResource != null) {                ValueMap properties = contentResource.getValueMap();                isHidden = properties.get("hideInNav", false);                isPublished = properties.get("cq:lastReplicationAction", String.class);                 isPublishedDispatcher = properties.get("cq:lastReplicationAction_Publish", String.class);            }            if (isHidden ||                 (St

If you have a follow-up question from the Skill Exchange session Reporting Hidden Gems: 10 Tips That Will Save Time and Impress Leadership with Daniel Clarke (@daniel_clarke) from EMMsphere that originally aired on August 5, 2026, you're in the right place! Leave your comment below and our speakers will do their best to reply. And if you see a question below that you know the answer to, don't be shy! We'd love for you to answer from your own experience and perspective. Have questions about another Skill Exchange session? You can see the full list of discussion threads here. On-Demand Viewing - This session is now available on-demand, you can find the recording here. 

Hi All,I’m trying to add custom styles to the table plugin in an RTE. Below is the structure I’ve used: <table jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" features="*"> <tableStyles jcr:primaryType="cq:WidgetCollection"> <style-one jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" cssName="table-bordered" text="Bordered Table"/> <style-two jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" cssName="table-striped" text="Striped Table"/> </tableStyles></table>But I don’t see the style options in the table edit options. Has anyone implemented similar functionality and can guide here?

We're building a hybrid implementation where a handful of pages (e.g., Home, Contact Us) are served via Edge Delivery Services (EDS), while the remainder of the site continues to run on AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS). Looking for guidance/best practices from the community on the following:1. Splitting traffic between EDS and AEMaaCS via FastlySince AEMaaCS ships with a managed Fastly CDN in front of it, for a hybrid site where only select pages are served from EDS and the rest from AEMaaCS:Should the path-based routing rules (to send specific URLs to EDS vs AEMaaCS origin) be configured in the AEMaaCS Cloud Manager / Fastly  on the AEM side, or should they live in the EDS project's ? Since AEMaaCS Fastly config is managed through Cloud Manager pipelines, is there a supported way to add custom routing rules there ? Any guidance on keeping this maintainable as more pages incrementally migrate to EDS over time?2. Sharing a common header/navigation (XF) between AEMaaCS and EDS pagesOur g

We have a classification on the tracking code that rolls up to different campaigns. This is not the marketing channel or last touch channel, etc.Suppose I use the campaign rollup at look at a campaign, email, for example, and I look at entries, orders participation and revenue participation over the past 7 full days.Then for the same timeframe, I create a segment where the campaign rollup = email and it’s a visit level segment. I also look at entries, orders participation, and revenue participation.Why would the orders and revenue be different? Both are using participation metrics over the same timeframe. If a visit had an email entry and ordered, it should show in both cases.We have two reports supplying two different values each week and I’m trying to a) explain where the difference comes from and b) determine which report is showing what we are asking of it.My theory is the ‘visit’ level segment is pulling in orders where the visitor had an email entry within 30 days and it’s being

I’m integrating Coveo with AEM 6.5.23, and I want to make sure that my AEM page metadata and cq:tags are properly indexed in Coveo.I can crawl the content using the Coveo web connector, but I’m not sure how to:Expose custom metadata fields (like cq:tags) from AEM to Coveo.Map those fields in the Coveo index.Has anyone set up field mapping for AEM metadata in Coveo? A sample configuration or mapping JSON would be really helpful. Regards,Karishma.

Hi,We are using AEM 6.5 on prem. I would like to know if there is a way to find out the number clicks over a period of time on published assets in the DAM?Thanks.

Are there known issues with proofs not generating today in Workfront? I have not seen any communication yet, and we have multiple people with the same problem. It just spins but never generates.