Product Communities

Hello, I'm having trouble about how the week view in the calendar calculates and displays the duration for multi-day tasks, use custom dates as start date and finish date.I've set up two test schedules with different end times, and they are displayed in a way I did not expect.我很难理解日历中的周视图如何计算和显示多日项目的持续时间。我设置了两个不同结束时间的测试时间表，它们的显示方式出乎我的意料。Test Case 1: Schedule 'Testline2'测试用例1：计划“Testline2”Set Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 9:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 5:00 PM (within the configured working hours).设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日上午9:00至2026年1月22日下午5:00（在配置的工作时间内）。设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日上午9:00至2026年1月22日下午5:00（在配置的工作时间内）。  Expected Display: Should span four days: 19th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd.预计展期：19日、20日、21日、22日四天。Actual Display: In the week view, its bar visually extends to cover Jan 23rd as well, spanning an extra day. Test Case 2: Schedule 'Testlink3' (for comparison) Same date but different end timeSet Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 12:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 11:00 PM.Expected Display: Should also span the same four days.

Hi, I’m having some difficulties determining the best way forward, as the Enhanced Connector appears to have a significant downside: assets must be uploaded to AEM manually. The main challenge is that, in order to upload an asset, users need to navigate through the full folder structure, which is unfamiliar to most Workfront users. On top of that, the volume of assets being created is simply too high to handle through manual uploads, making this approach impractical. Ideally, we’d like to automate this process so that once an asset is approved, it is automatically mapped to a consistent folder (e.g., content/dam/workfront) without requiring manual navigation. We’ve also explored the option of using linked folders, but this approach doesn’t align well with our project structure or data governance model. Our current project has two layers for both product and asset data, structured as follows:Product Code → Product data on taskAsset Created → Asset data on taskAsset Create

Hello, 你好,I'm having trouble understanding how the week view in the calendar calculates and displays the duration for multi-day items. I've set up two test schedules with different end times, and they are displayed in a way I did not expect.我很难理解日历中的周视图如何计算和显示多日项目的持续时间。我设置了两个不同结束时间的测试时间表，它们的显示方式出乎我的意料。Test Case 1: Schedule 'Testline2'测试用例1：计划“Testline2” Set Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 9:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 5:00 PM (within the configured working hours).设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日上午9:00至2026年1月22日下午5:00（在配置的工作时间内）。 Expected Display: Should span four days: 19th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd.预计展期：19日、20日、21日、22日四天。 Actual Display: In the week view, its bar visually extends to cover Jan 23rd as well, spanning an extra day.实际显示：在周视图中，它的栏在视觉上也延伸到1月23日，跨越了额外的一天。 Test Case 2: Schedule 'Testlink3' (for comparison)测试用例2：计划“Testlink3”（用于比较） Set Start/End: Jan 19, 2026, 12:00 AM to Jan 22, 2026, 11:00 PM.设置开始/结束：2026年1月19日，上午12:00至2026年1月22日，晚上11:00。 Expected Display: Should also span the same four days.预期显示

Hello, I have an integration with Azure DevOps that creates Product Backlog Items when a WF Project goes Current.  Context:In the WF Project, there is a parent task named 'MarTech Development,' and varying subtasks underneath it that are all summed up. I can retrieve this information in a GET API Call; part of my QS is:Key: fieldsValue: ID, name, workRequired, plannedStartDateKey: nameMarTech DevelopmentRight after this API Call module, I have a Set Variable module that I reference as 'Planned Hours', with a value that effectively gives me the hours:round(body:data[1]:workRequired/60) I Create a Record (ADO module), set my Dev Hour Estimate='Planned Hours' and voila, my MarTech Task total planned hours is now the same as my PBI Dev Hour Estimate in ADOWhat I want to accomplish:I want a bi-directional communication of Dev Hour Estimates back to my MarTech Task. Assume that I have a link to the PBI and the PBI ID stored in the respective Workfront Project. What I

If you've tried to report on these Billing Record fields and can't, please upvote this idea Billable Hours Billable Expenses Billable Revenues All native fields should be reportable

Is it possible to merge multiple videos into one proof review?

I'm creating an AEM Adaptive Core Components Form and want to trigger Adobe Analytics when user clicks on the submit button and the form gets submitted successfully. Currently, I'm trying to listen to events such as "submitSuccess", "afSubmitSuccess" "afFormSubmitSuccess". But these are not working. Can someone help me out here? I'm on AEMaaCS.

I am trying to migrate existing unstructured FrameMaker documents (.fm and .book) to DITA following the official documentation here: Migrate unstructured FrameMaker documentsHowever, I am unable to proceed because the Map to DITA (or Convert to DITA) button is missing from the Assets toolbar when I select my .fm file. When I open the file, I only see options to generate PDF, HTML5, and EPUB (as shown in the attached screenshot), but no option for DITA migration.Steps to Reproduce: Upload an unstructured FrameMaker file (.fm) to an AEM Assets folder. Select the file. Look at the top toolbar and the Output Presets panel. Actual Result: The Map to DITA button is not visible. Only standard Asset options and Generate (PDF/HTML5/EPUB) are visible. Expected Result: The Map to DITA button should appear to initiate the migration workflow using the .sts file. Environment: Adobe Experience Manager (2025.11.23385.20251113T172403Z) aem-guides (2025.10.0.278)  

Hello Team,I am trying to integrate AccelQ automation UI tests into my project and execute them as part of the Adobe CI/CD pipeline.I would appreciate guidance on the following: How to properly add or structure the ui.tests folder in the project for AccelQ test execution. Recommended project structure for integrating AccelQ with existing UI tests. Steps to configure AccelQ tests to run through the Adobe CI/CD pipeline. Any required build configurations, scripts, or plugins that need to be added to the pipeline. Sample configuration or documentation references, if available. My goal is to ensure that AccelQ automated UI tests are triggered automatically during the CI/CD process and results are reported as part of the pipeline execution.Thank you in advance for your support.

So that is the crucial attibute which has to match in both in order for recommendations to work?Web SDK: Feeds:  

Hello! I’m trying to use logic on custom form but can’t get it to work correctly. I have two fields, both multi select. What I’m trying to do is if an option on the first field is selected, then the second field automatically selects an option. Is that possible?

Greetings,We have a strange issue with our etc mapping structure, our project has a lot of domains and all of them are under etc/map, the recommendation for a better structure was to follow this guide/etc/map/         https/                 www.example.com.443/                           rulenodes But this approach makes it so the domain disappearsleaving https: //matchedPathWe do not know how to format the sling:internalRedirect and sling:match properties in order for the rules to work like they do under just etcAny help would be appreciatedBest Regards,Daniel

Hello - I just started this below course and the video quality was too poor and in the settings also I don’t see an option to switch to higher pixel so, can you pls check.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/courses/ajo-design-and-deliver-messages/module-1/step-2Thank you!

Hi Folks,Following the recent migration of the Experience League Community portal to the new platform, I am unable to locate one of the questions I posted a few weeks prior to the migration.The post was quite detailed and focused on a conceptual discussion. It also received valuable responses from community experts. Unfortunately, the question no longer appears on the platform.I was able to find the original link to the post in my email inbox; however, it now redirects to the Experience League home page.Here is the link for reference: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/concept-review-strengthening-user-tracking-with-server-side-fpid/m-p/789244 Could you please guide me on whom to contact or how I can retrieve this question and its associated community responses?I require the post and comments for internal communication purposes.Thank you for your assistance. Regards,Nitesh

What is the difference? Should I set up Core and ECID in Tags in Identity Map? Should I put ECID into Identity Map if it should be retrieved through Data Collection?https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/collection/use-cases/identity/id-overview#retrieve-ecid

Hi, I am planning to leverage Adobe scene7 video player for our application and want to analyze the downsides ahead of implementation.Parameters to analyze:1. Accessibility of the player (When we performed proof of concept 1.5 yrs. back, player was not fully accessible)2. Ease of customization with backward compatibility. 3. Performance on low bandwidth networks. Thanks,Vishal

We currently have users uploading their assets to the linked AEM folder in Workfront, which then syncs to AEM/Content Hub. If an error is identified on an asset, it must be manually deleted in AEM and then again in Workfront.Is there a report available that can identify whether users have deleted an asset from the linked AEM folder? Additionally, do teams typically have a governance process in place for when this occurs?

How do I rebrand and configure the default WKND search page?

For our dynamic xfa pdf forms that are created in AEM (LiveCycle), we have some fields where users need to be able to add formatting like bold, bullets, indenting, etc. Do you have any suggestions for doing this?

Dear AEP Community,Happy New Year 2026!Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with Adobe Experience Platform.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for January 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for AEP. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any AEP-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – creating highly personalized digital experiences with AEP.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top KCS Artic

Dear Adobe Campaign Community,Happy New Year 2026!Your time is precious, and we understand the importance of efficiency when it comes to troubleshooting issues with Adobe Campaign.That's why we're excited to again bring you our carefully curated collection of Top KCS (Knowledge-Base) Articles for January 2026, designed to help you resolve common challenges swiftly and effectively.Our Top KCS Articles are your shortcut to:Quickly identifying and resolving recurring issues. Accessing expert insights and best practices for Adobe Campaign. Streamlining your troubleshooting process for maximum productivity. Empowering yourself with the knowledge to tackle any campaign-related problem head-on.Why spend hours searching for solutions, when our Top KCS Articles have already done the heavy lifting for you?Let us help you save time so you can focus on what truly matters – creating exceptional campaigns with Adobe Campaign.Start supercharging your problem-solving skills today by exploring our Top

 Stop Guessing: Visualize AEMaaCS Editor Activity with Splunk by @daniel-strmecki IntroductionWhen we talk about performance optimization in AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS), we usually focus on Dispatcher caching, CDN configuration, frontend performance, query indexing or backend refactoring. What often gets overlooked is the actual editor activity on the Author environment. Knowing how, when, and how intensely editors use AEM Author is critical operational information. Heavy editorial activity can significantly impact Author performance without proper optimizations in place, especially during peak hours. Conversely, periods of low editor activity present ideal windows for running content cleanup jobs, bulk imports, reindexing, or maintenance tasks that would otherwise degrade the editor experience.In this post, we’ll walk through how to build a Splunk dashboard to gain clear visibility into editor behavior on AEMaaCS Author. The goal of the dashboard is simple: to understand editor u

tl;dr: You gotta use the API to use the API. When browsing Marketing Activities, you’ll see the URL change to reflect Program IDs, Static List IDs, and Smart Campaign IDs:.../marketo-engage/classic/PG3350A1.../marketo-engage/classic/ST6331A1LA1.../marketo-engage/classic/SC9850A1ZN19In these cases, the first sequence of contiguous digits in the last path segment is the asset ID and can be used in the API. Above, you see Program ID 3350, Static List ID 6331, and Smart Campaign 9850. The structure works for Smart Lists as well. Other asset types like Forms and Emails also have their IDs in the URL. Not Campaign Folders, though!Selecting a Campaign Folder shows a tempting URL structure —.../marketo-engage/classic/MF2421A1— leading you to think the Folder ID is 2421. Nope, in this case 2421 is the “tree node” ID, which is a UI thing only. It’s not the same as the REST API Folder ID, which reflects the persistent structure in the database. Worse, the actual Folder ID 2421 can be located some