Product Communities

Before unified approvals became a thing, we used to be able run reports showing assigned approvals that any user could run for themselves using the $$USER.ID wild card. Now, the only place that assigned approvals are listed is the home page and I haven't been able to figure out how to create a report similar to the one we used to use. I would be willing to switch to using the home page but, as someone managing a team with assigned tasks, I can't filter tasks by working group on the home page. I'm left with having to use a custom dashboard / report to manage tasks and issues, and the home screen to manage approvals. Is there a way to create a report that could be added to my custom dashboard and list all of my assigned approvals?

Hi, I know you can create a parameter report to list all reports a field is being used on.  1. Does this mean the field is in the filter or the view (or column)? 2. Has anyone been able to create a report to list filters a field is being used on? I have tried combinations between an API call or even the Data Lake to see if I can pull data.  Curious if anyone got close to this?

Introduction When it comes to integrating your existing Adobe Analytics Classifications to Customer Journey Analytics (CJA), you have two options to consider. The first option is to use the Adobe Analytics Classifications Data source connection to automate the migration of your classifications to CJA. By utilizing the source connector, you can connect your existing classifications from Adobe Analytics and import them automatically into Adobe Experience Platform (AEP), and ultimately into CJA. This option can save you time and effort, particularly if you have a significant number of classifications to migrate. Please note that you need to be an Adobe Analytics Product Admin to administer the Analytics Source Connector in AEP. The second option is to recreate the Adobe Analytics classifications in CJA. This involves going through each classification and recreating them within the CJA platform as a new dedicated lookup dataset. While this option may require more time and effort, it all

Is anyone experiencing any issues with your users logging their time off?  Here is what our users are experiencing: User goes to put time in October 13-17, and then they go put time in December for 8-12. When they do that, the time the put in for October disappears?  

Hey Community. It is a bit complicated.I have issues/requests with documents attached.Approval processes are also added to the issues/requests.There are teams assigned to the approval processes. Besides other filters I want to show documents where the user is part of the approver team. But I don't get to the data via EXISTS statement. This is what I currently have:currentVersion:proofID_Mod=notblank EXISTS:A:$$OBJCODE=OPTASK EXISTS:A:ID=FIELD:opTaskID EXISTS:A:teamAssignment:teamID=$$USER.teamIDs EXISTS:A:teamAssignment:teamID_Mod=in opTask:status=CLS RLV opTask:status_Mod=notin OR:1:currentVersion:proofID_Mod=notblank OR:1:opTask:status=CLS RLV OR:1:opTask:status_Mod=notin OR:1:owner:homeTeamID=$$USER.teamIDs OR:1:owner:homeTeamID_Mod=inThe last OR filter for approver teams is missing because i don't know how.Last try was:OR:1:EXISTS:B:$$OBJCODE=OPTASK OR:1:EXISTS:B:ID=FIELD:opTaskID OR:1:EXISTS:B:approvalProcess:accessorIDs=$$USER.ID OR:1:EXISTS:B:approvalProcess:accessorID

Hi, Has anyone been able to use text mode to group by project name (or ID) on a baseline task report? I tried the below as a starting point, but it is zero value group.0.linkedname=task group.0.namekey=view.relatedcolumn group.0.namekeyargkey.0=task group.0.namekeyargkey.1=Project ID group.0.valuefield=task:Project ID group.0.valueformat=customDataLabelsAsString

If you are in a large company where different departments separately purchased products that each group manages separately, and you all enable SSO for your products, how has your Workfront migration gone or how is it going? Our migration to SSO has been fraught - to put it mildly -  as the architecture of the Admin console places some serious limitations on our ability to manage our sensitive Workfront information independently --- far from the prying eyes of unrelated departments with whom we're suddenly forced to share the console.  I've already created a related submission under the Ideas forum, so I won't re-hash everything, but if you are experiencing similar pains at your company, I ask that you cast a "Like" for my idea in order for it to gain traction and help others who still have to complete their migration. And to summarize, here are our pain points with the ongoing Adobe Admin Console migration:We've learned the following from the Adobe reps who have been wor

Hi Folks,   Today, Adobe Workfront shared this announcement upon login:     We first learned of the upcoming change a couple of weeks ago (then, cited less precisely as "Sept 2025"), so have been working furiously to upgrade all of our solutions, and were delighted to make a similar announcement today in response:     As Workront's oldest partner, we had vestigial references going back to API v2.0 all the way up to current (v20.0), and as we tackled this upgrade, had to decide whether to:   use the "Latest" API by NOT specifying a version and instead "roll with it" whenever the official Latest version changes (so less maintenance, but more risk), or use the specific "v20.0" latest version to "lock in" that functionality, recognizing that someday the code will need to then be upgraded (deferred maintenance) We decided to go with the latter, and have teed up our tech stack to make future such transitions less onerous, but I am curious what others ar

I have a content fragment with a text box that has the “unique” option enabled. When the fragment loads, it triggers the unique field validation call (/mnt/overlay/dam/cfm/admin/components/authoring/validations/uniquefield.json), but it doesn’t return any response.In the Query Performance tool, I can see the following error:“The query read or traversed more than 100000 nodes. To avoid affecting other tasks, processing was stopped.”To fix this issue, I configured Lucene indexing for this query:/jcr:root/content/dam//element(*, dam:cfVariationNode)[(@location = 'market')] option (index tag fragments)I used the Oak Index Generator (https://thomasmueller.github.io/oakTools/indexDefGenerator.html to create the index definition. However, it didn’t work. After adding the configuration, the Content Fragment didn’t use the index. I tried restarting and reindexing, but there was no luck.\What could be the issue? { "/oak:index/damcfVariationNodeLucene-12-custom-1": { "async": [ "async",

Hi All, I am facing a weird issue where any clicks on Exit outbound link (different domain / social media) renders the rest of the setup not working.I have used Adobe Data collection to setup the tags and within it I am using extensions like Adobe Client Datalayer to trigger Rules based on datalayer pushes. However, in testing when I click on any social media outbound link or any other outbound click, after that any basic CTA or link tracking events on the man site are not being triggered.

Is there anyway to show the email address in a typeahead custom field instead of the user name?Even though when typing in a user, the email adress is visible, I need the populated field to show the email address, not the name in the submitted request form.Or, can this be done using calculated fields? 

Hi! Our department is looking to create a customizable project plan with Workfront. We cannot afford Workfront Planning. Has anyone successfully done this and if so, please share any tips and tricks you may have! Thank you!

Hi I am facing some issue with the Marketo Destination testing for LENS - 1.I have ingested data to AEP and it qualified for a segment and that segment we are trying to send to Marketo. - Which is success.  2. For the same record which reached at marketo end, when I am trying to send with Updated value for a Delta field (EBR) in my case, I am seeing a strange behaviour for the field 'sourceType' being 'Marketo' which ideally should be LENS since it is handled at mapping end.  Due to the above behaviour the updated profile is not getting qualified for 'segment' and not able to sent to Marketo through the destination.

Hi everyone, We are currently implementing an Adobe Commerce on Edge Delivery Services (EDS) storefront connected to AEM Sites as a Cloud Service. In our current setup, the file https://example.com/configs.json is publicly accessible from the browser. This file contains environment-related configurations and API endpoints required for the Drop-ins initialization. While this approach works functionally, it raises a security concern for production environments since the file is exposed and potentially reveals sensitive configuration details. I would like to know what Adobe recommends as the best practice for handling environment configs and secrets in EDS storefronts. Specifically: Should these values be managed through a secure service, such as Adobe App Builder runtime variables? Is there a supported mechanism to inject configuration dynamically without exposing it client-side? Would Adobe recommend using a CDN layer (Fastly/Cloudflare) or a

I have an OSGi service that uses the WorkflowService API to programmatically trigger the "Update Asset" workflow that's forever been found at:/var/workflow/models/dam/update_assetIt's missing in AEM Assets as a Cloud Service and I can't find clear documentation on triggering its equivalent. Does anyone here have advice on what needs to be done to trigger this or its equivalent from inside an OSGi service in Assets as a Cloud Service? Note: The workflow model still exists in the Quickstart Jar from Software Distribution, so everything works fine for me locally. For context: The reason why we're triggering the workflow is because we have custom OSGi code that pulls proprietary data from other systems and creates and updates both image Assets and Content Fragments. Updated images will create new Revisions of Assets through the AssetsManager API. The Update Asset workflow doesn't seem to fire the way it would if you manually made these same changes, so we're triggering the Update

Adobe Journey Optimizer Community Lens Newsletter  Your quarterly roundup of insights, events, and member highlights Subscribe to the AJO Community Lens Newsletter   Hello AJO Community!  Welcome to your quarterly roundup – a curated snapshot of what’s happening across the AJO Community. From standout member contributions and the latest product releases (including features you requested and the product team delivered) to trending questions, ideas, and on-going learning opportunities, this is your go-to guide to stay connected and inspired.  This newsletter will be published every quarter, bringing you the latest highlights and insights in one place.  We’d love for you to explore the threads, celebrate your peers, and share your own solutions and ideas. Your voice shapes the future of AJO. So, jump in, comment below, and keep the conversations going!    Member Spotlight  Thank you, SatheeskannaK, for everything you do to make this Community

Hello,I'm encountering a persistent issue when attempting to create a Dataflow in Adobe Experience Platform (AEP) via the Flow Service API.### Problem Description1.  API Response: The API call to create the Dataflow consistently returns a `500 Internal Error` with the following details:   ```json   {     "type": "https://ns.adobe.com/aep/errors/FLOW-1102-500",     "title": "Internal Error",     "status": 500,     "report": {       "detailed-message": "An internal error has occurred. Please try again. If the problem persists, please contact customer support.",       "request-id": "jRYpviErjYYlp5lIszoHrfdtUb3pQZ3B"     },     "errorMessage": "An internal error has occurred. Please try again. If the problem persists, please contact customer support.",     "errorDetails": "An internal error has occurred. Please try again.

Hi All, Can anyone please suggest what is the difference between between profile attributes saved via FAC Save profile feature and standard AEP Profile by data ingestion ? What are the limitations of using FAC Save profile ? Is it possible to use save profile for profiles that does not exist in AEP? Thankyou !

I see two main methods:1. getPropositions() - This API retrieves the previously fetched propositions, for the provided decision scopes, from the in-memory extension propositions cache.As I understand its not new request but it takes what is already in Cache? Does it also include capping?2. updatePropositionsWithCompletionHandler() - this one gets propositions if there is nothing in Cache?

Hi all, I’m working on integrating an Adobe App Builder app with Workfront. I’ve created and deployed the app successfully, made sure the IDs are unique. However, when I go to Setup → Interface → Layout Templates, I don’t see the option to Add a Custom Application in the sidebar. Has anyone encountered this before? Are there additional steps or tenant settings required to make Custom Applications appear in Layout Templates? Thanks in advance for any guidance!

We’ve got another Top 3 video with your “On-Demand Workfront CSM”! This time we’re talking about a commonly overlooked (but helpful) object in Workfront – Companies!    Check out the video below.      Looking at adding Companies into your mix? Here are some tips!  First things first – documentation and tutorials!  Create and edit companies  Create companies – short tutorial video  Create and modify a group’s companies  Test in the Sandbox first! See what your vision can look like without impacting your live, production environment.  The Adobe Workfront Preview Sandbox Environment  Build a Report or a View that lists the impacted objects you want to move. If it’s Users, then a User View/Report. If it’s Projects, then a Project View/Report. If possible, use Groupings to make it easier to organize the work.  Create a basic view  Bulk edit or inline edit to assign your new companies.  Edit Projects in bu

Hi All,We are on a Cloud Service and enabled the sitemap generator per this article: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-learn/sites/seo/sitemaps. I can see the configuration in place, but I’m not sure where exactly the generated sitemap.xml file is located or how to access it.Anyone please help - this is something urgent. Thanks in advacne!

Hi,We have a requirement, where we upload a image on the publisher, and the same should reflect in author also.When raised a Adobe support ticket for the same, this is the reply we got."I would like to inform you that unfortunately reverse replication (from Publish to Author) is not supported out‑of‑the‑box in AEM as a Cloud Service. -This is a fundamental architectural change: unlike on‑premise and Managed Services deployments, AEM Cloud Service does not support the traditional reverse replication agents. The cloud model expects content to be authored at the Author instance and then pushed (forward replication) to the Publishers.Although Sling Content Distribution (SCD) is available for content transfer, the Sync Distribution configuration meant to mimic reverse replication is not feasible in AEM as a Cloud Service. -Because the traditional reverse replication mechanism is absent."Is there any workaround to achieve this functionality?