Product Communities

Marketoアカウントに紐づくメールアドレスを変更したい

Hello!  I managed to create a report to count the number of R1-R7 parent tasks in a report. However, when I look at it more closely, the parent tasks are repeating! I created a filter where parent tasks contain R1 OR R2 OR R3, etc., and I also grouped them by the parent task name.  Is there a way to remove the repeats, because when I check the projects, they only appear once!Grouping: group.0.linkedname=parentgroup.0.namekey=view.relatedcolumngroup.0.namekeyargkey.0=parentgroup.0.namekeyargkey.1=namegroup.0.orientation=Hgroup.0.valueexpression=IF(CONTAINS("R1",{parent}.{name}),"R1",IF(Contains("R2",{parent}.{name}),"R2",IF(CONTAINS("R3",{parent}.{name}),"R3",IF(CONTAINS("R4",{parent}.{name}),"R4",IF(CONTAINS("R5",{parent}.{name}),"R5",IF(CONTAINS("R6",{parent}.{name}),"R6",IF(CONTAINS("R7",{parent}.{name}),"R7")))))))group.0.valuefield=parent:namegroup.0.valueformat=stringtextmode=true What am I doing wrong? Is there a way to fix this?

As shared in prior communications, Adobe Marketo Engage is rolling out an updated version of the Salesforce CRM integration through a phased rollout. To ensure a seamless upgrade, customers must meet Salesforce’s latest connected app OAuth 2.0 requirements in their Salesforce instance. OAuth 2.0 is a new Salesforce platform/security standard, and customers are responsible for updating their Salesforce Connected App configuration to remain compliant. This update is required to support the latest version of the Marketo Engage Salesforce CRM integration. Who this impactsAny customer with an active Marketo Engage Salesforce Native CRM integration in both Sandbox and Production.What you should do nowProactively flag this dependency and engage with your Salesforce Admin / IT team to review OAuth settings. Validate both Sandbox and Production environments so you are ready when your Marketo instance is included in the phased rollout of the new Salesforce CRM integration.Salesforce has publishe

In the new approvals, I get emailed about everything - every approved/changes/needs work, when it is final decision, etc.  I can see all that in my notifications in WF and it is burying important emails.I can’t seem to find a place to turn it off - any one happen to know?

🍀 [VIRTUAL] March 10 @ 6:30pm AEDT: "AEM vs EDS: Three Months On" with AEM - Australia New Zealand Chapter🍀 [VIRTUAL] March 17 @ 3pm CET: "High-Performance AEMaaCS: What Still Makes The Difference?" with AEM - Champion Office Hours🍀 [VIRTUAL] March 18 @ 4pm CEST: "AEMUG Benelux Kickoff – Let’s Shape This Together" with the AEM - Benelux region Chapter🍀 [HYBRID] March 19 @ 4:30pm ET: "All About AI & the Adobe Stack: Insights, Implications & What's Next" with the AEM - Southeast Chapter (📍Atlanta, GA or virtual)🍀 [IN-PERSON] March 20 @ 2pm IST: "The AI Revolution in AEM Development" with the AEM - India Chapter (📍Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India)🍀 [VIRTUAL] March 25 @ 1pm ET: "Accelerate Content Creation with Adobe Experience Manager, Firefly, and OpenAI" with the AEM - Women In Tech ChapterRegister here: https://aem-augs.adobe.com/

Lets assume I have 3 sites with different content structure each: SiteAServername sitea.example.com/content/sitea/Has statfileslevel 4 SiteBServername siteb.example.com/content/siteb/Has statfileslevel 3 SiteCServername sitec.example.com/content/sitec/Has statfileslevel 2 Lets also assume that all sites share some DAM assets and share design/layout assets (in /etc.clientlibs/*) so I want to use a common shared dispatcher cache folder for all sites. Now I have one *.vhost file per site, with the respective Servername. Reason being that I need different RewriteRules to map incoming requests to full content paths (that are externalized in markup based on /etc/hosts config, which differs due to different content structure).Now I have one additional flush.vhost file, which hasServerName "localhost"ServerAlias "\*.local" "127.0.0.1" "*.adobeaemcloud.net" "*.adobeaemcloud.com" "flush"this gets all the dispatcher flush requests as well as internal Adobe requests etc - it has no site-specific r

Hi, I need to find a way to show active projects per month (or ideally, every two weeks) for 2025 and start comparing it to this year. IE, how many projects were active in January 2025 vs January 2026. Not how many projects started or closed, but how many were still active. This seems like it should be an easy report to pull, but I have not been successful. This information is now required by our leadership, so the report is essential. Thanks in advance for any help and advice!

So, I have a scenario, We’ve more than 5000+ pdf and XDP to convert.we’re running on AEM on prem LTS.  Has anyone here done something similar? As this is going to be a lot of configurations, implementations and then migration. I need some guidance on how to achieve it. I am closely following documentation and seems like it should be easier process after the right configuration. Configure the Automated Forms Conversion service (AFCS) | Adobe Experience Manager I appreciate the help or any more documentation, if we have it. I have search on AEM forums but, didn’t find anything yet. 

On our site we have the following :each evar below expires on visitcategory Level 1 page → evar1 is set on that pagecategory Level 2 page → evar1 and evar 2 are set on that pagecategory Level 3 page → evar1, evar2 and evar3 are set on that pagecategory Level 4 page→ evar 1, evar2, evar3 and evar4 are set on that pagecategory Level 5, up to 6 follow the same structure as aboveI want to see page views for category Level 3 pages only as well conversion rate for visits who have seen category Level 3 but not any of the other pages. i have tried building a hit segment with a container (hit) that includes evar3 exists and is set and within that same hit container, I added an exclude hit container(excludes evar 4, 5 and 6) but the data returned shows that my segment does not work. While I would expect to see only Level 3 pageNames in that segment , I am seeing all kinds of pages.What is the solution?  

Is it possible to create edge & streming audience definitions using segment API? Its not confirmed in the documentation ..

Has anyone used Segment and Adobe together? We’re bringing in Segment and want to know how other organizations use the two in tandem.  Thanks. peter.wolly@consumer.org

Sometime this week, Adobe CJA added text to my summary number visualizations, referencing the Dimension involved.  Sometimes, this reference.  Mostly it’s not - AND it shrinks the actual number displayed.  This can be fixed but I now have to do that fix to hundreds of dashboards.  I also can’t figure out how to turn it off/hide.  Anyone else notice this? 

I have setup alert and i get email around 12:40 but my data is not settled by that time so usually alert I get are not useful. How I can fix this

i have an exit intent pop up built in adobe target VEC custom code that loads Marketo form(single field - email) i need to capture country from adobe target and pass it into hidden marketo field (country) without showing it to the user. but the country sometimes empty. what is the recommended prod safe way to pass Target geo attributes into Marketo hidden field?

Hi Team,We currently have a process where an email is marked ineligible from Marketo after 5 soft bounces or a Category 2 hard bounce. However, we’re planning to use ZeroBounce to re-validate those email addresses after a defined period (for example, after several months of being ineligible).ZeroBounce provides results such as valid, invalid, and catch-all. Our intention is to carefully reintroduce only the valid email addresses through a separate warm-up campaign, rather than adding them directly back into regular marketing sends. The idea is to first monitor engagement and mailbox health before including them in standard campaigns. For example, emails that previously soft bounced due to mailbox full may become deliverable again over time.We would like guidance on the following: What are the best practices for safely re-engaging previously bounced emails without negatively impacting our IP and domain reputation? Since we use the same sending domain for a specific brand so bringing bac

 Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide configuration in AEM as a Cloud Service to control or disable the default video preview rendition (cq5dam.preview.mp4) generated by the standard Asset Compute processing pipeline. Today, cq5dam.preview.mp4 is created automatically for all supported video assets as part of the default Asset Compute processing profile and cannot be turned off by customers. We need a supported way to: Disable this preview rendition entirely (per program/folder), or Constrain it by file size/duration/resolution, or Mark individual assets/folders as “do not generate preview MP4”. The main driver is to reduce time-to-publish for large live content where downstream workflows depend on the original master, not on an internal preview proxy. Use-case: Customers ingest very large, high‑resolution video masters (e.g. 1 to 15 GB 4K MOV files) into AEMaaCS Assets in near real time during live events (e.g. sports, automotive races, conc

Hi There, We have a requirement where several custom dropdown fields have been added to the metadata schema of our assets (DITA files). During the translation process, AEM currently picks up the dropdown key value (the stored value) instead of the display label. This key is then sent for translation and applied to the translated language copy. As a result, the translated copy fails to load the corresponding dropdown option correctly in its properties. Additionally, all dropdown labels and options remain in English after translation. We would like to explore whether there is an OOTB approach in AEM to automatically localize or translate these dropdown labels across language copies. Thanks,Ravi Joshi

Hello Team,When I am ingesting the data via HTTP API Source the data is getting ingested in dataset but not in profile store, however it was working fine earlier. Current Observations:When I check dataflow runs it show completed  But in the dataset I see two entries getting created for same record one with failed and other with success. The success records do not get ingested in Profile Store  Troubleshooting: I did following troubleshoot however no luck:Created a new HTTP API data flow as the earlier one was not working, the new worked well for the first time and next day it has stopped working I made sure that the dataset is profile enabled I validated the success dataset batch records via query services and they are appearing fine in the dataset however not reflecting in profile store I made sure the payload has all the mandatory fields such as primary and secondary keysCould anyone confirm how to fix this, this would be a help.Thanks in advance! Regards,Mustufa  

I have got such an error while building Dev4 library. Does this mean that every resource which is already upstream has to be changed in order to build dev library? Its not possible to only update only one resource in Dev library?  

Default checked state is not appearing for coral checkboxes"granite/ui/components/coral/foundation/form/checkbox"but it's working fine for granite foundation one. i.e. granite/ui/components/foundation/form/checkbox. I've tried many ways (e.g. checked (string) property setting as true, defaultChecked / uncheckedValue etc.) but nothing is working. One thing noticed that, "checked" property has type  ' booleanel ' while in JCR, only boolean is available;not the expression lang type. So,is it causing any issue?  Any pointers on this will be really helpful.

Once Unified Experience is in place in our instance, are there any admin controls to change the icon menu view that users see? I see that Workfront Profile is now accessible from the account avatar. But the other menu icons and account links are very confusing and I would like to limit the user view to a lot of these. Is that possible? We tested with a non-admin user view in Unified Experience and the user sees a lot of information that isn't helpful to a non admin user.Thanks  

I would like to create a Fusion scenario where, when a proof that is still pending a decision goes past the due date a notification can be automatically sent to the approver following up on a decision.  We have a standard decision due date of 2 days. I've searched for quite a while with no success, maybe i overlooked something. Any assistance is appreciated. 

Hello,We have an AEM integration in place with Adobe Target. We're encountering a replication error when publishing pages that contain activities. Saving the activities works fine—there are no errors, and the activities are successfully synced to the Target workspace. However, when we attempt to publish the page, we receive an error related to Goal Metrics.Please note that we don't require any tracking.Has anyone experienced this issue before? If so, what was the resolution? Any insights or guidance would be greatly appreciated.  Error.log:2025-09-08 20:08:36 - ERROR - test_and_target : Error replicating /content/campaigns/project/experience/test-experience - com.day.cq.analytics.testandtarget.TestandtargetException : com.adobe.tsdk.common.TSDKException: Unable to parse goalsandsettings from json.metricsJson:{"goals":{"metrics":[{"title":"MY PRIMARY GOAL","postGoalSuccessAction":"","type":"engagement","worth":"","engagementType":"pageViews","metricLocalId":10}]}} @davidj