Build better products with our product team
We would like to be able to use the AI Assistant to extract information from custom fields on custom forms on a project, etc. Currently it is not able to intelligently answer questions related to custom field selections and entries.
Add the ability to store Internal Link Click information on main domain level.AppMeasurement Activity map uses a cookie(s_sq) set on main domain level to store information about the click from previous page, page name, link, region. The corresponding feature with WebSDK, Internal Link Click, only offers to set this information in either local storage or session storage, both stores data on subdomain level. Result is that Internal Link Click tracking doesn't work across subdomains. If your site holds e.g. www.website.com and secure.website.com Internal Link Click tracking won't work across.Would be ideal to be able to use a cookie for Internal Link Click tracking with WebSDK too. Sending Internal Link Clicks immeadiately and not use a grouping would duplicate the server calls and not an option.
Include thh Adobe consulting plugin Get previous value as part of the default Adobe product and also make it work across subdomains as this now only works isolated per subdomain. Get previous value is setting information in a cookie e.g. Previous Page Name, but does so on a subdomain level which makes the previous page name to not work properly across subdomains e.g. www.website.com and secure.website.com
Description - Update the dimension operator in Annotations from AND to OR. Why is this feature important to you - Currently, if an annotation includes multiple dimensions, it only appears on a Workspace dashboard when all of those dimensions are present. If the dashboard contains only one of the specified dimensions, the annotation won’t be visible.For example, if I create an annotation using both eVar1 and eVar25, I must include both in the dashboard for the annotation to appear. To work around this, I have to create separate annotations for each dimension. How would you like the feature to work - Change the annotation logic so that it uses the OR operator. This way, the annotation will appear if any of the specified dimensions are present in the dashboard. Current Behaviour - Annotations use the AND operator, requiring all listed dimensions to be present for the annotation to display.
Workfront Administrators should be granted system permissions that allow them to configure, control, and govern notification behavior across the Workfront domain for their system users. This would help to ensure consistent system communication, reduce notification fatigue, and support enterprise standards for how and when users are informed of Workfront activity.
SUMMARY FOR WORKFRONT FUSION detailed Observability requirements.We are working on offloading the Workfront Fusion logs to Splunk and have explored the recently shared Workfront fusion activity log api . Below are the enhancements we are looking to get from Workfront Fusion platform._______________________________________________________________________1.Fetching Notification Logs (Execution State/Errors/history)• Currently Fusion maintains execution logs for each scenario, and you can view these logs in the Fusion UI under the scenario’s execution history.• Enhancement: Is there a way to fetch notification logs or see where they are stored (e.g., scenario stopped, execution errors)?________________________________________2. Enhanced Message Field for Module Actions (Create/Delete/Modify/etc.)• Currently, Fusion logs actions such as module creation, deletion, and modification, but the log messages are not highly descriptive about the specific changes made.• Enhancement: Is it possible to enhance the message field for all actions on scenario modules? More detailed logging (e.g., which field or configuration was changed) for audit and troubleshooting purposes.________________________________________3.Enhanced Message Field for Scenario Scheduling ChangesCurrent Behavior:When you activate, deactivate, or update a scenario schedule (such as changing the frequency), the audit log or message field records a generic message like <user> updated <scenario>.• Currently, the message field does not provide granular details about what specific attribute (like frequency) was changed.• Enhancement: Can the message field capture more details (e.g., “changed the frequency to 30 mins”)?________________________________________4.Retrieving “Folder” Details Alongside Other Properties• Currently, Fusion scenarios and modules do not natively expose a “folder” property in the API responses.• Enhancement: Is there a way to get “folder” details with properties like teamId, entity, etc.?
The Workload Balancer is one of the most useful tools within Workfront but could be made even better with some quality of life updates.Ability to extend the length of time you’re viewing. Right now there are limitations on the number of weeks or months you’re allowed to view (only up to 12 weeks/3 months). Extending the ability to view as long as 6months to even a full year would be helpful. We see a variety of use with entering and managing allocations. Some teams enter allocations for the year on a handful of tasks and redistribute allocations as needed on a monthly basis when changes occur. Others focus on the more granular allocation to short-duration tasks that they need to see totals by day but over a period of several months. Clear allocation to capacity comparison on the screen. A toggle to turn this on/off and display on screen rather than only having the pop up that shows you this information. Correcting the Workload Balancer so that when hours get contoured in the WLB and then dates later change the updates respect the project schedule and do no put planned hours on weekends. This is a known and ongoing issue that needs to be corrected. If durations change and you don’t have the same number of days to put hours on, just revert to spreadhing the hours evenly with a warning message to the user they have to accept. Ability to show/hide weekends for companies that do not schedule work on weekends. (Obviously need to fix the issue with Contouring before this can be an option.) This would be another setting that can be toggled on/off.
Description -The quality of the proof downloaded, viewing comments is severely compromised and the proof is incredibly blurry, so much so that it can be very difficult to make out the text within a PDF/document. It's also very time consuming because we need to download the marked up proof and it is delivered as an email. This can take several minutes to arrive. The solution of downloading a high-res proof is compromised because it takes even longer to download and takes up memory. We want to download a marked up PDF, which opens in Adobe Acrobat. Why is this feature important to you -We want this because we have users who don't sit on the system so we need the ability to share these marked up proofs offline. How would you like the feature to work -We want to be able to allow users the proofing tool but when you download it, it downloads as a PDF with marked up comments. Leverage Adobe Acrobat to be able to view and work on higher quality proofs.
We have Workfront proofing custom form with fields, as per requirement we have to hide the few field values. We have submitted the Adobe Support request (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/support?support-tab=my-cases&case-id=E-002089146&org-id=A1B8BC4D584032500A495DE5%40AdobeOrg#home) & team suggested to submit a feature request to enhance the feature. Example: Field Name: Vehicle (Project Type) Field Values to hide: Digital Paid Media and Third Party E‑CommerceFind the attached screenshot for more details;
In the new builder, it would be great to able to select text-transform styles (uppercase, lowercase, etc) within a created theme under My Themes instead of having to write in the custom CSS in each template. Having it carry over to every template we make with our theme would be much more efficient. Thank you 😊
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add Sorting filter in Card View for collections Use-case: Users created multiple collections but navigating into them using the card view, they are not able to easily sort the assets using name, title or other information like already happens for list view. Users require to have sortable functionality in the card view because they should have the possibility to see quickly preview of the asset to select from an ordered list. Same behaviour from list view is expected. Current/Experienced Behavior: Collections are sortable only in the list view. Improved/Expected Behavior: Each collection should be sortable by title, name, date, etc also in the card view. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2024.10.18175.20241010T124406Z-240900 Customer-name/Organization name: Jet2 Screenshot (if applicable): List view Card view Code package (if applicable):
Description - ability to create custom fields/forms that we could attach to hour types in WF.Why is this feature important to you - would allow for improved grouping and reporting for charts and graphs.How would you like the feature to work - TBDCurrent Behaviour - Not able to lump hour types together in current setup.
We have an integration with out timekeeping system. We need go be able to track custom fields based on hour entries. This will allow us to manage multiple budgets within the one project.
This might sound unusual, but I request custom form for HOUR object. On hour records, such as on January 1, we would like the option to enter more information along with the comments.There is where the custom form should be available:
The flow test option in Dynamic Chat is a great tool and our team loves it for testing that the answers go the way we want it to. The only downfall is that if you have the 1st node (possibly others) as a conditional set, for example we have it set to identify customers vs everyone else, you can only ever test the first path. There isn’t currently a way to use the testing option to go down one of the other paths to see how the conversation will work. I’m not sure the best way to implement this, but perhaps in the test flow, the 1st option can be select your branching option? Or something similar?
Currently it is not possible to identify whether a Dashboard is still being used. We need a default View which shows this, same as is available for Reports.
Current state there are Object specific icons, we would like the ability to upload an image to an Object type to customize it based on User Preference or at a system-wide setting. We love to promote Workfront as a customizable platform that works to help you work. Customizing the Object Icons (Such as a Project, Task, Issue/Request, and especially Teams and Groups) would help acheive this.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Use-case: In AEM, a proper preview can be generated, but this functionality is missing in Content Hub. Current/Experienced Behavior: Many assets are stored in ZIP file formats, but Content Hub currently displays them as blank folders or icons. Improved/Expected Behavior: need for a feature to generate previews for ZIP files automatically to avoid manual effort Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
In the new email builder, I think it would be great to have Adobe Fonts as an option in My Theme — in addition to Standard and Google Fonts. Also being able to define fall-back fonts within My Theme would be great as well. Thank you!
There’s a function that I really like in the Developer Console: In order to delete a project, you need to enter the name of the project in order to delete it.It would be nice to set some Workfront objects with that setting (request queues, certain projects, etc.). Perhaps a toggle switch on the object’s settings.When you’re an admin and you’re stressed and you have 20 tabs open, the possibility of deleting something you shouldn’t becomes greater than 0%. If the admins have the power to delete anything in-system (and we do), we should have a check on things to ensure that we’re deleting the right things.
Currently with Dynamic Chat, if one of our BDRs misses the chat, the only option is to display a message and possibly display their calendar link. What we would like to have is if the agent misses the chat, after it displays the fallback message, we want to reroute it back into the bot workflow to ask additional questions so we can send it to someone to do a follow up. It’s a better experience as well for someone engaging with the bot because it isn’t just a they’re not available and that’s it.
In the Classic Workfront experience, there was a way to attach a custom form to a task without having to fill in the required field information. My agency has project managers add these forms to the appropriate tasks as new requests come up and then another team member fills the form in. Now we're switching people onto the new experience and realizing that all the required fields have to be filled in whenever a form is attached because there isn't a way to add a form without also hitting that requirement.In our scenario, our project managers do not have the information that goes in those forms, they're just the person getting the form in place because they have the proper licenses. Another user with a work license generally has responsibility of filling in the form information and typically at a later date then when the task & form are added to the project.Losing the functionality from the classic experience really hurts the process we had in place. And if the project managers just go in and add a bunch of dummy data to these required fields it means they're going to be triggering any reporting where users relay on these required fields HAVING information to pull into a report so they can count it as having been filled in for processing.
https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/campaign/campaign-v8/privacy/privacy#namespacesPer Adobe documentation linked above, as of the time of this post:“Adobe Campaign does not support importing namespaces from the Experience Platform Identity Namespace service.”The request here is to enhance Campaign such that it importing namespaces from the Experience Platform Identity Namespace service is possible.Business Impact: The inability to process privacy deletions in ACC can block critical implementation work, impacting compliance and data privacy operations. When implementing custom namespaces with Campaign, this process often involves roping in Field Services or Technical Consulting.
From what I can tell (and correct me if I’m wrong), there’s no way to edit a theme I’ve created in the new builder without creating a new template. The only way I can see to do it is to create a new template, select Create or edit themes, select the My Themes tab, select the theme, and then click Edit. It would be great if there were a way to access My Themes without having to create a new template every time 😊
It would be grate if I could better decide what people can do on proofs they are shared with (decide if they can add comment, share, download original file, make decision, edit stage/proof/custom fields, send notifications, print summary, use @mention). Also some of roles available right now should not be used and it would be good to decide what roles are available when sharing proofs.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
