Thank you @Anuhya-Y for all the answers. Appreciate it!

Thanks both for your responses. So @Anuhya-Y - are you saying that even though the offer shows up in the Decision Scope, it will actually not be considered during evaluation and not be displayed to the user?  Second question - will I have to deliberately reduce the number of Offers in the Placement ...

To add, to exclude the archived or draft offers from the decision scope, I had to manually remove the Collection Qualifier. I feel like the Decision Scope should not take into consideration Archived or Draft offers, even if they have the appropriate Collection Qualifiers. Thoughts?

#AJO#Offer Decisioning When an offer is archived or 'unapproved' (moved to Draft state), why does it continue to show under the Offer Collection in the Decision Scope? Shouldn't the Offer Collection within Decision Scope only show the offers that are Approved? Is this a bug? @SatheeskannaK 

Great way to network and talk to folks with similar business challenges! 

We have Email Opens and Clicks defined as XDM Experience Events. Using this, how to build a segment where Open exists but Click does not exist?

We have verified all the above items. We are pursuing the issue with Adobe Support. 

There seems to be a latency of about 10-15 minutes for a offer to display - in my use case, I have capping set to 1. Once the offer with the highest priority is displayed, it is being capped at 1 as expected, but it takes about 10-15 minutes for the offer with the next priority to be displayed. Anyo...

Hi @Anilr1717 I like your solution better. However, I wanted to know if the process of creating the columns can be dynamic? Lets say 1 record has 2 months so only 2 enrichment tables (only display 2 columns) but other record has 4 months, so display 4 columns?

Thanks. And then how do I view the results? Right now, in the journal it says:Activity 'js': Transition 'done': The target activity is not specified