Product Communities

Description - Add the new Priorities feature as a Home widget optionWhy is this feature important to you - It would alleviate the need to click back and forth from Home to Priorities. It could also be used in place of the My Work widget for some users. The Priorities view is more compact and uses less white space and that would be useful on the Home page. It would also alleviate the need for the left navigation bar.How would you like the feature to work - Add Priorities option to Home widget customization listCurrent Behavior - Not available

2000 characters is not enough to solve the issue of needing to block many email domains/spam from filling forms - especially when commas in between the email domains count as characters.   It would be great to increase this, or allow us to upload a CSV file with domains.  

Hi there! We would love the new Priorities view to include hyperlinks to both the task or issue and the project so you are not just stuck within that task/issue. Ideally there would either be breadcrumbs at the top, or the project/task names would be clickable URLs within both the list, summary, and in the overview/details when clicking into the object itself.  This is important for us because the majority of the work being done around that task requires understanding something about the project. Many updates are at project level. Our documents are stored at project level in particular folders. Yet logging time, accepting/closing the work, etc. are still done at task level. Having hyperlinks to get around to the associated objects alleviates all of this.  Thank you so much! 🙂 Brittany

In the new home experience, when using the My Work widget to display projects in various different formats there is no option to 'collapse all' on the project name/heading. Projects are displayed based on name/date/status. Clicking on the project name/date/status will collapse all tasks and requests within the project and 'minimise' it. This is not an issue if the user is working on a small number of projects (around 5-10) but if the user has a large number of projects (30 or more) it can be cumbersome and tedious to collapse each project one at a time to get to the one you are interested in. Users would benefit from this as it would save them time by eliminating the need to collapse each project until they find the one they are interested in.

Description - Either give proper control back to Sys Admins to suppress this feature via groups/layout templates OR at least don't make the feature visible at all to users who are assigned a Reviewer, External User or Requestor license type Why is this feature important to you -  Roughly half my instance are assigned one of those license types, and cannot be assigned tasks or issues, making the Priorities feature irrelevant UI clutterThey're also very curious people that like pushing buttons, so I'm fielding tickets about whether I can enable it for them, and explaining over and over that they can't use it anywayHow would you like the feature to work - At minimum, the feature should only be accessible by a license type that could have the ability to use it, much the same way that users who don't have security for Boards don't see the Boards widget Current Behavior - Priorities is globally visible/accessible by every user in the instance regardles

Would like to be able to see when Target users last logged-in to be able to properly manage accounts. Currently unable to determine if users are using their accounts, apart from the change logs, which do not apply to all users. This is also an IT security control requirement for auditing capabilities. Ideally, the Last Login date would appear along side user info in the Admin console.

This time of year I find myself creating a lot(!) of recurring tasks as reminders for weekly, monthly, quarterly events for next year. I suspect more users would take advantage of recurring tasks if they were a bit easier to execute. And I've finally documented a host of enhancements that are needed for recurring tasks as they currently function. During set-up of the taks, I'd like to assign the child tasks to a user without assigning the parent task, there is no reason to assign the parent task to someone when all the child tasks are assigned to them. And that parent task just becomes clutter in their work listAllow choice of child task suffix. Currently the suffix auto-populates as a sequential number. I wind up manually editing every task and changing that number to the planned completion date. I can see others potentially wanting to use something else as the suffix, planned start day perhapsAllow entry of both planned hours and duration while setting up the task (we use t

Description - Currently when editing code in the Recommendations section (specifically when updating Designs) there are no line numbers on the code entry.Why is this feature important to you - Makes it difficult to find and amend when working on a number of similar DesignsHow would you like the feature to work - As with other code editors within Adobe Target, display the line numbers to the left of the field 

Description - The My approvals widget currently shows PROOF approvals which appears to be great for my org, however does this not tie in with the rest of Workfront, for example the delegate button (see attached) appears to give you that functionality but we know that proof approvals cannot be delegated, only document approvals, SO a separate Proof approvals widget might be an idea.Why is this feature important to you - It takes away the misleading delegate nature of the interface, I have confused usersHow would you like the feature to work - just to separate proofs and document approvalsCurrent Behaviour - as above it's misleading to contain them both in the same widget.

Could we add a button that will allow us to share a preview of emails to the wider company. You can do a sample send with the view in browser option enabled, however once disabled the link breaks and you cannot view. This would be helpful to hold in a shared space for sales and customer services to view

Out of the box (OOTB) Filtering options provided by Adobe on the page is not relevant or useful to the end users When the users click on Filter, this shows the data sources, we do not use so many datasourcesUnable to search/custom sort on the fields providedCustomizable options provided are limited 

DescriptionAfter migrating to the Admin Console environment, the WalkMe integration used by IPG has lost connectivity to Workfront. WalkMe previously worked in their original environment before the URL was migrated to experience.adobe.com. The issue seems to stem from the current Content Security Policy (CSP) for adobe.com and adobe.net, which is blocking the WalkMe scripts and resources necessary for the tool to function.The WalkMe team has confirmed that specific URLs need to be added to the CSP for the integration to work again.  Why is this feature important to youWalkMe is a crucial tool used by our customers for guiding users through Workfront, providing real-time help and onboarding assistance. Without it, teams are unable to effectively train new users or assist current ones in navigating Workfront, resulting in a negative impact on productivity and user adoption. Restoring this functionality is critical to maintaining seamless operations for large enterprise clients

DescriptionThe Sign module in Fusion currently only supports RS1 and RS256 as signing algorithms.  Many applications are deprecating these in favor of PS256 (RSA PSS variant) or EC (elliptic curve). Why is this feature important to youNetSuite recently announced that RSA PSS is now the minimum required and RS256 is no longer allowed.  https://community.oracle.com/netsuite/english/discussion/4490520/end-of-support-for-rsa-pkcsv1-5-scheme-for-oauth-2-0.  As such, our Fusion-to-NetSuite integrations using OAuth 2.0 is now deprecated. How would you like the feature to workAdd the additional signing option(s) to the Encryptor modules.  PS256 would be minimum, but PS256 and ES256 and EdDSA would be ideal for future proofing since RSA as a whole is generally less preferred than EC. Current BehaviourOnly RS1 and RS256 are given as options.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Implement a mechanism to ensure that user accounts are created simultaneously on all pods. This will eliminate delays in availability and ensure consistent user data across the system. Use-case:   Current/Experienced Behavior: Its take up to 200 to 500 ms in syncing pod Improved/Expected Behavior: User get created in all pods simultaneously Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Munich Re Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

We are a Marketo partner who often assist our mutual customers in cleaning up their Marketo data by identifying specific Lead IDs who need to be deleted or modified. This is the best way for us to identify the records because the ID is unique. Unfortunately, ID is not a filter that can be used in a Smart List. I have heard of the workaround to find the lead by using the URL, but this is not a realistic option if we provide them with a list of 10,000 records to delete. Will the ID ever be available as a filter?

Description - let System Administrators remove the "Priorities" button from the top-right waffle/Main Menu within Layout Templates.Why is this feature important to you - 1) if we've disabled Priorities at the system level, we clearly do not want the icon appearing to our users, 2) we have the ability to add/drop all other icons, and 3) the alt text for the icon tells users to ask their administrator to enable this feature, making the choices we've made (to not enable Priorities) seem unimportant, as if Adobe knows our users better than we do. This also adds confusion to our users when we've specifically coached them to ignore the new left-hand side bar on the Home page.How would you like the feature to work - add "Priorities" as an Active Item/Available Item icon option in the Main Menu settings within Layout Templates.Current Behaviour - "Priorities" does not appear as an Active Item/Available Item icon option in the Main Menu settings within Layout Templates, and instead appears for

Description -There is currently a robust set of user permissions that can be set up for A/B testing, however this does not extend to recommendations. There is no way to stop any user who has access to Target from editing a Live Recommendations design/critera/collection.Why is this feature important to you -To ensure accountability and site stabilityHow would you like the feature to work -In exactly the same way the roles and permissions work for A/B testing:Observer - ability to see, but not edit any design/criteria/collectionEditor - ability to edit, but not publishPublished - ability to publish, but not editApprover - ability to edit and publish

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Proposal to Establish Integration Between AEM DAM and AEC Assets Use-case: Establishing a seamless connection between Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Digital Asset Management (DAM) assets and Adobe Experience Cloud (AEC) assets to enhance user workflow and efficiency. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, there is no direct integration between AEM DAM assets and AEC assets, requiring users to manually transfer assets between the two platforms, leading to inefficiencies and potential errors in asset management. Improved/Expected Behavior: Proposing an integration solution that enables users to seamlessly sync and access assets between AEM DAM and AEC, facilitating unified asset management, enhanced collaboration, and improved content personalization capabilities. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Dam /cloud Aseet and AEC Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: TO THE NEW

Description - Users should be able to see when a task is due to start and end with timesWhy is this feature important to you - Our team operates on hourly tasks rather than daily ones. Without specifying start and end times for each task, this feature becomes unusable and ineffective for our users. We would need to revert to using reports to manage our team’s work, which defeats the purpose. This issue also affects the My Tasks widget grid view, causing significant frustration for our users as they struggle to determine task deadlines. It’s challenging to prioritize our work without this information.How would you like the feature to work - Please include the time a task should start and end. Current Behaviour - Not available in the priorities grid view or the task work list   Including the New Home idea here as well as these are related: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-ideas/new-home-my-tasks-display-time-when-task-is-due-to-star

Allow timesheet approvers to move time from one task to another task on a different person's timesheet. This means that timesheet approvers need the ability to add a project/task onto another person's timesheet in order to move the time.Example: Worker logged 2 hours to General Overhead, but timesheet approver/manager knows that 1 hour should have charged to a real project. Timesheet approver should be able to move that 1 hour instead of just entering a comment and rejecting the timesheet back to the worker.

Currently there is no notification that the user is notified that their hours have been pre-approved or pre-rejected.We want to make use of this feature but since there is no notification we have no way to control the hours that have already been pre-approved or rejected.

Description -When working on projects, there are times when work is required after hours.  For us, this is a lot times related to deployment tasks.  In the current setup, the system uses the User, Role, Team, or Project schedules to determine the duration and available dates to work on the tasks.  This rigid framework does not allow for allowing work to be performed outside of the normal operating schedule.  Proposing the to add the ability for two things:1. Project schedules to be built on the project itself.  This would not require an Admin to create new schedules.  This would  be similar to an MS Project record....schedules are built into each file.2. Ability to define whether the Task/Issues follows the Project schedule or the Role, Team, User schedule.Why is this feature important to you -The current setup does not allow us to assign tasks to users and have the correct after hours dates stick.  Having this new functionality would give the Pr

Description - For either New Home My Tasks or Priorities quick actions, users should be able to upload documents to a project object, not just a the task itself. Why is this feature important to you - Our team does not upload any documents to a task, so the quick action button is currently unusable and ineffective for users.Our creative team uploads their documents for proofing to project folders and not a task folder. My creatives want to be able to use this feature to save them time from clicking in the project to upload.  How would you like the feature to work - Provide an option to allow documents to be uploaded to the project object from the quick action panel. It could be a toggle button that can say either "add documents to task" or "add documents to project". Then depending on the toggle option, folder(s) that are tied to the chosen object would populate to be able to upload files to. Current Behaviour - Currently able to upload documents directly to a tasks

Description - We'd like to be able to create a journal entry report to track what/when changes are made to a custom field without overwriting any previous information (every time a change is made).  Why is this feature important to you - It's important we are able to accurately report every single time a user modifies a field in a report, so we are able to address each change when auditing. How would you like the feature to work - We'd like to be able to create a journal entry report based on a field in one of our project idea custom forms that will display each time that a user has updated the field along with the date/time the change was made without ever overwriting information that was there previously.Current Behavior - Currently, it appears we are only able to see the latest change/update made to the field. Whenever changes are made, the latest change overwrites all previous information. We'd like in the future for all updates to be reflected in the report without

Hi there,  In the new Priorities list/area, it would be great if the My Focus field could also be set by someone else aside from just the user viewing the table. For instance, if a Project Owner/Manager could mark a task or issue as "Urgent" and that choice would reflect on the work lists for the people assigned so they would know that is a high priority item. This would help with quicker and more accurate prioritization and work management.  Thank you! Brittany LangThermo Fisher Scientific