Product Communities

When a risk materializes, it becomes an issue. It would be nice to not have to re-create the risk as an issue, but convert it once it materializes.

Description - Ability to generate proof to all PDFs uploaded at the same time instead of manually one by one generating proof.Why is this feature important to you - Manually generating proof one by one for PDFs uploaded. There is a select all but actions applicable are limited to move to other folder and delete.How would you like the feature to work - Insert radio button for select all and create proofCurrent Behaviour - we have to create proofs one by one manually that takes time in order for us to add a comment with our revisions. this is time consuming when the project we are working consists of 50 or more pdfs.

At the moment it is not possible to share a folder with other users in Workfront. The content is shared, but not the folder.because we are working together with different users, it would be useful if I share a folder completly so that this folder also appears for the other users in the structure (menu item Documents) and they have also full access to the content and above all the folder. At the moment, only the content can be shared, but not the folder itself It would make work much easier to share important documents quickly and easily as folders

I would like the ability to either outright delete interesting moments or to be able to modify them when necessary.  We have been taking a look at the interesting moments lately and quite frankly some historical things just aren't relevant and/or they were things we wouldn't consider interesting moment worthy today and I would like to clean that up.  Also we have tried implementing new interesting moments and they have not all worked out like we would have liked them too and we would like to back those out of the system.  That list can get really cluttered and we would like to have the ability to tailor it as we grow as an organization to what things we think are most important.

We would like to see a granular path to where a document is if it was located within a Document folder. We can have numerous documents in the Documents section that are placed in Document folders and sub-folders.Example:When a user receives a proof email, it will link them directly to the document, but doesn't give a path to which folder it is located if the user needs to provide a new version.It does identify the path to the Project/ Program/ Portfolio, but would like to see the folder path as well.

Description - We would like to see the ability to view users from the previous version of a proof on the latest version which seems like a new addition recently. This feature should also display the status of these users (e.g., pending or accepted) from the previous version of the proof when they are added to the new version of the proof. Why is this feature important to you - This feature would improve our workflow efficiency by eliminating the need to manually track users across proof versions. Having the ability to easily see previous users and their statuses ensures seamless proof management and review continuity, especially in multi-phase approval processes. How would you like the feature to work - When a new version of a proof is created, the system should automatically display all users from the previous version, including their approval status (pending, accepted, or declined). Users should be able to see the status at a glance when managing the latest p

Description - We have integrated Workfront with Microsoft teams through the Workfront App. However, when there is a notification for the approver of proofs, our stakeholders will like to see a proper preview of the proof within the Workfront App in Teams, so that they can possibly approve it from there. Why is this feature important to you - It would enhance the user experience and allow our stakeholders to work efficiently by easily identifying what proof needs approval. How would you like the feature to work - The thumbnail is shown should be expandable for a clearer sight, the same way a file can be opened when shared directly in Teams. Also, the same way the app allows the approval of tasks and issues within Workfront, with the potential ability to preview the proof, it will be nice to be able to approve the proof within Teams. Current Behaviour - Depending on the file type of the proof, it either renders a thumbnail which isn't visible, or it renders nothing at all

Description - When creating custom fields - you have the option of creating a Field Label (what you anticipate the user to see) and a Field Name - used heavily for Fusion. The goal is to provide a consistent user experience where they are only ever seeing the label when searching for that data.Why is this feature important to you - Consistency in the UI for users as well as Fusion connectivityHow would you like the feature to work - Regardless of where the Field Label exists as a User I only want to see the Label. From Views, to Forms to Reports to DashboardsCurrent Behaviour - When creating custom views - each field has to be renamed due to the fact that add column shows the Name - there is a current instance where it CANNOT be renamed and that is on Dashboard Reports.

Description - When reports are exported, any text in a Workfront field that is in a rich text format, including bullets, bold, italics, etc., all that rich text formatting is not included in the exported report.  Why is this feature important to you - Without rich text formatting, recipients of exported reports may not understand what the author of the report was trying to communicate, causing confusion, lack of trust, and continued perceived lack of understanding from Adobe Workfront for customers requiring professional looking reports out of Workfront.  This seems so basic, and Adobe's name and reputation will continuously be tarnished if this isn't addressed (or even accepted and acknowledged?!).  How would you like the feature to work - include rich text in exported reports.  Current Behaviour - Lack of rich text in exported reports.  

Description - Ability to persist splits of an audience Why is this feature important to you - Usage of experimentation within audiences (test/control/holdout) are important to measuring KPI's of an auidence.How would you like the feature to work - When a split of an audience is performed, have the ability to select the persistence of the audience based upon a system and or use defined time based value.Current Behaviour - Audience splits are available in Adobe RTCDP audience compositions, but the split of audiences are not retained after the split is performed.  

Description - The abililty to translate the labels associated with custom fields so that when the user is displaying Workfront interface in a browser set to, for example, Chinese-Traditional, we can show them labels that they can read. Currently it appears they can only be displayed in a single language.Why is this feature important to you - We have Workfront deployed globally and manage all of our services centrally. It is important that our clients can view Custom Forms and Fields in the languages that they natively speak, read and write, to ensure that we get high quality intake.How would you like the feature to work - In the "Edit Custom Field" popup, add a new button that enables another popup to appear where translations can be managed by language. They will then surface in the front end depending on browser language, like the main Workfront UI does.Current Behaviour - Labels can only be displayed in a single language and for complex labels like Checkboxes, there is not enough sp

説明 - パッケージデザインの校正において、パッケージ展開図をProofで比較したときに、パッケージに記載の成分の1文字でも変更があることに自動で気が付かせてくれる機能が必要とされています。例えば「薄力粉」と「強力粉」のとても小さな1文字でも気が付けることを希望されています。変更の前後でコメントを手動で入力したりマークを付けることができないという前提での質問です。 There is a request to use Proof for checking product package designs.I am asking this question assuming that this is a request that will be updated in the functions of Proof or Frame.io.Is there any plan to update the function so that even a single character change in the product ingredients listed on the package can be noticed when comparing the overall image of the product package development diagram?1) There is a risk of missing something in the color of the automatic comparison function, as in Proof.2) This is a question based on the premise that it is not possible to manually enter comments before and after the change.3) This is a question based on the premise that it is possible to notice that there is a change without enlarging the image, etc. この機能が重要な理由 -校正システムは様々な業界で使われており、業界を問わずパッ

Currently, Workfront allows you to limit sharing on fields so that you can determine who is able to view, edit, or delete fields. This is very important, because you can designate globally available fields that cannot be edited by Group Admins. However, the experience for Group Admins are very poor. They can open and edit a view-only access field within a form and then save the form. At that point, an error pops up telling them they are unable to edit that parameter and doesn't save the form. IssuesThe error message doesn't tell them what parameter they cannot editThe field they edited doesn't revert back its previous state Ideal future stateIndividuals with access to custom forms that contain view-only access fields can view the fields on the formThere is a clear indicator in the form designer that the field is view onlyWhen they click the field they can view the field details but are unable to edit any field details (e.g., label, name, options, description, etc.)They c

Currently Alerts in Adobe Analytics are only sent by email or text message. However with more organisations using tools like Slack, it would be nice to have a feature to notify alerts that occur by webhook. These could then be integrated into multiple different organisational tools.

Description -Why is this feature important to you - to speed up tagging individuals in updatesHow would you like the feature to work - when posting an update, tag "@all or @16227148" to automatically tag everyone on the job, rather than have to type each individual name.Current Behaviour - You have to tag each individual on the job with "@name"

Description -Need a monitoring dashboard to monitor the API Mesh performance and health check status.Also need information on incoming requests (request/access logs)Why is this feature important to you -We are planning to use API mesh to consume data from our AEM Cloud Service and Adobe Commerce Instances in our Mobile Application. Once this functionality goes live in Production we would need a better monitoring setup for monitoring our API mesh.Other API gateways such as MuleSoft etc. offer very good monitoring and health check Dashboards.  

In reports, we can sort columns, why can we not sort groupings? For example, I have a report with 3 groupings. One of the groupings is our business units. We have reasons why we want to see these groupings in alpha order. WF confirms that we cannot sort our groupings. Odd that this isn't possible even in text mode (if I'm wrong on this, someone chime in). Please upvote!  

Enable the option to customize sort/filter & search on the Activation data page

I'm currently building out a series of custom objects for the explicit purpose of being used with Velocity to get certain custom elements into emails, but I may have to do a 1:N relationship rather than the 1:1 relationship I would have preferred. As such, I'd like a user-friendly (i.e., not having to go into the email script) way of setting a selector to choose which custom object to reference in the email. I'd like to have a variable set by the Marketo campaign name be the selector for the correct object to reference in the email.I'm not even sure if this is a reasonable ask with the current scripting setup but it'd make a huge difference.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The AEM RTE Table plugin currently generates tables without <thead> and <tfoot> tags, which can negatively impact accessibility and SEO. Use-case: We are enhancing our site's Accessibility and also need to integrate third-party libraries that support sorting and filtering but we found <thead> and <tfoot> tags in table (generated through rte plugin) are missing . Current/Experienced Behavior: Table generated through AEM RTE Plugin doesn't have options to add tags like <thead> and <tfoot> Improved/Expected Behavior: By incorporating <thead> and <tfoot>, the AEM RTE Table plugin can significantly improve its accessibility and SEO, providing a more inclusive and effective experience for users and search engines. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.21 Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable): NA

Hi all, I tried searching for an answer and have done extensive testing, but have not yet arrived at a solution. Is there a way in the Microsoft 365 calendar module to set the parameter so when an event is created, it creates an all day event in your home calendar? I have been exploring the configuration/parameters in the module but have not seen a way to do this.  This will be a great value add to our organization. Thank you for your help, Nick

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Extend the Cloud Manager events to include Audit related events Use-case: I want to be able to monitor changes to environment variables, domains, ip whitelisting etc... Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no audit trail of changes by users Improved/Expected Behavior: Events are to provide the user, change area, previous value, new value and time of change Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Manager Customer-name/Organization name: Spark New Zealand Screenshot (if applicable): Not applicable, not currently provided Code package (if applicable):  

Description - We would love the option to have the ability to start a timer in the system when a worker is working on a project. When they stop the timer it automatically adds their hours to the project timesheet. Why is this feature important to you - Right now, the addition of time is very manualHow would you like the feature to work - We would love the option to have the ability to start a timer in the system when a worker is working on a project. When they stop the timer it automatically adds their hours to the project timesheet. Many other smaller platforms have this option. Current Behaviour - You have to manually add in the time 

Description - Workfront should allow comments and actions within the proof to be reportable. Why is this feature important to you - Agencies and Marketing teams usually need to have visibility over the changes requested on a proof in order to trace the timeline of proofing. How would you like the feature to work - Ideally, it would be great to have a proof comments report that can possible include the parent proof's fields as well like proof status, proof decision, proof progress etc.Current Behaviour - There is no way to report on Comments made on a proof within workfront.

In the old Home, users could view information such as the Project Owner and Project Sponsor directly from the Home page without needing to open the task and the project. It would be helpful to add the missing data as column options to the My Tasks widget. It would also be helpful to allow users the option to color code rows like we can with reports, so that they can quickly see tasks that are overdue, etc.