Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
I'll take a step back to approach the question. We are moving to WebSDK from at.js. While testing I see that the QA link returns the experience. But if I switch the QA link to audience mode, then nothing gets returned - the audience has a condition that checks certain profile attribute value, and the correct value is being passed from the client through events[0].data.__adobe.target object. It would help me to see what response tokens are returned for this user, but I’ve never seen them in the responses for some reason ... so then there's one more option - switch Target to debug mode and generate debugging token in Target UI. But the token generated in the Adobe Target interface no longer works because alloy.js doesn't accept mboxTrace parameter. I know about an alternative way to view logs - to authorize in the extension, go to Logs > Edge, and create a debugging session, but I wasn’t able to find anything useful in those logs similar to what mboxTrace was retu
I'm building a block using EDS with XWalk, and I'm fetching content fragments via GraphQL in AEM as a Cloud Service. The image field in the response returns a DAM path like:"image": { "_path": "/content/dam/shared/en/contributor/ian_provo.jpg" }In my JavaScript, I'm using a helper (createOptimizedPicture) to render the image in a <picture> tag, which generates URLs like:<img src="/content/dam/shared/en/contributor/ian_provo.jpg?width=750&format=jpg&optimize=medium">The problem is: The base path /content/dam/... works fine, but adding query parameters like ?width=750&format=jpg causes a 404 error.What I’ve Verified:The image is published and accessible in DAM.The GraphQL response includes the correct _path.There don’t appear to be any permission issues. Looking for Guidance On:What’s the correct way to reference and optimize DAM images returned from a GraphQL query?Why do image URLs with query parameters like ?width=750&format=jpg result in 404 errors?Is
Hi, we've got Brand portal running and all is good with access controls, contribution folders etc.It includes several business created user groups (called Product profiles in Admin Console/BP) However, I'd like to restrict access to some folders for some of these Product profiles. I can't do that in Brand Portal directly - so would need to do it in Assets then publish those folder changes to BP. But these BP user groups are not available in Assets when I try to set the Permissions in a folders properties. I can see the top level BP Editor/Admin roles to add eg But not the BP user groups I've created. Anyway know if this is possible ? In all the material it implies it's possible. Eg 'Brand Portal Editor' role states:-A user with this role can login to Brand Portal and access permitted folders Does this mean just the folders published to BP, or is there a specific way of controlling folder access to specific user gr
Hi All,How could we possibly achieve the following email flow using Marketo Nurture stream?Here's how the email flow works:Week 1:Email 1 is sent with content about "Content 1"If the recipient opens Email 1, they progress to Email 2 in Week 3If they don't open Email 1, a resend of Email 1 is triggered after 1 weekWeek 3:Email 2 focuses on "Content 2"If the recipient opens Email 2, they move on to Email 3 in Week 5If they don't open Email 2, a resend of Email 2 is triggered after 1 weekWeek 5:Email 3 contains "Content 3" contentIf the recipient opens Email 3, they would presumably move to Email 4 (not shown)If they don't open Email 3, a resend of Email 3 is triggered after 1 week
Is there any real advanced formatting capability for designing content card? Something similar to what is available for the in-app message content. We really need the ability to apply our branding to the content instead of the default Adobe styles. Thanks.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to disable the Publish functionality on Assets View Use-case: When using AEM Assets with Dynamic Media with OpenAPIs, the 'Publish' functionality is not relevant anymore as assets are published by 'approving' the asset. Current/Experienced Behavior: In an architecture based on Assets View and Dynamic Media with OpenAPIs, users see a Publish option, which is not supposed to be used. The Publish prompts occurs upon asset upload, which is confusing for the users. Improved/Expected Behavior: Ideally, there should be a configuration option to enable or disable the Publish feature depending on the the architecture needs. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service - Assets View interface. Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
I've got a scenario which is supposed to run every 5 minutes (Watch Events), but I see in the history that it runs at almost random times, sometimes 5 minutes, sometimes 10 or 20, or it can be hours between runs. What could be causing this?
Hello, Any idea what could be causing this problem? I think it may be related to the version the user uses, but I would like to know where to keep reading about this error (And what may be causing it). I haven't find much information online Any idea? Thank you in advance!
I am trying to figure out how to get more advanced with random samples in Marketo. Here's an example: Sending an event invite to the state of New York. There are 100,000+ plus people in the database in New York across ~150 zip codes. For the soft launch, I want to select 10 people from each zip code in the state. I can't figure out how to do this, random sample seems to only allow me select a specific % across the entire state, but gives me no flexibility on how I'd like to distribute that sample. Is there a way to accomplish this? I'm trying to apply that same logic to a product launch soft launch. I want to limit how many peopleper account get the first email but the random sample doesn't seem to allow me to distribute how I want the sample to be applied.
A community user wondered if they could show an email’s Subject line in View As Web Page mode. It makes sense that Subject and other SMTP headers aren’t part of the VAWP display, as it’s designed to show the HTML content. (And the Subject is typically reflected in the content anyway, albeit with different phrasing.) But you can set any element to only show in View As Web Page – including a copy of the Subject line! Just hide the content by default in all clients, as you would with an email preheader: <table id="emailSubjectMirror" style="mso-hide:all;mso-line-height-rule:exactly;visibility:hidden;opacity:0;color:transparent;line-height:0;font-size:0px;display:none;"> <tbody> <tr> <td>They’re tariffin’ pariffin, but our tactical candles are made here in the US of Flamin’ A</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Then include this CSS, which will unhide the content in VAWP mode: body:has(#forwardtoFriendDropDown) #emailSu
Hi , I am trying to use Adobe IMS for SSO for our author instance and Admin console ,as we are migrating we already have Directory and domains in AMS , as per adobe we raised the request for domains and got it approved .In Admin console I can see directories I need the SSO to be applied for the domains under directory I have gone through the adobe docs and i have arrived till this step , please suggest me the next steps to be followed so i can successfully integrate SSO for Author and Admin console , and how to validate them
Hi everyone,I'm trying to set up the Apache Dispatcher locally for an AEM AMS (Adobe Managed Services) environment but want to leverage the AEM as a Cloud Service SDK to make local development and testing easier.However, I’m running into issues - I suspect the Cloud SDK may not be fully compatible with the AMS dispatcher setup, and manually configuring the dispatcher for AMS (eg. Apache configs, SSL, farms, etc.) is proving to be a tedious and time-consuming process.Is there any streamlined or recommended way to set up Dispatcher locally for AMS projects more efficiently?Any tools, scripts, or starter templates that can help speed this up would be appreciated!Thanks in advance.
Description: Enable sharing of request drafts, which is currently not possible in Workfront.Importance: Requestors save drafts to gather missing information or discuss with managers. Sharing drafts allows for manager input before submission.Benefits:• Manager review and feedback.• Team collaboration.• Departments add missing details.• Comprehensive review by all parties.• Stakeholder feedback. Desired Functionality: Add a "Share draft" icon to share drafts with internal team members.Current Behavior: Workfront allows sharing request queue links for direct submissions, but drafts remain private until submitted.
Can Marketo sync and update then one record type with Salesforce?
DescriptionAlerts are a popular way to notify users that an anomaly or data issue has occurred. The alerts manager page allows users (and admins) to view which alerts have been created, including the expiration date and date modified, but does not show when the alert was last triggered or how many times it was triggered over the last 30 days. Why is this feature important to youKnowing how often an alert was triggered can let users (and admins) know if alerts are still useful, whether alerts may need definition changes, or whether an alert is happening so often that an underlying issue should be prioritized. How would you like the feature to workAdd a column for "Last Triggered" that will show the date-time for the last run (e.g. May 14, 2025 3:17 PM). Also, add a column showing the number of times the alert was triggered within the last 30 days. These columns could be toggled on/off. Current BehaviorNo information about when an alert was last triggered or how often it w
I have created an email and used a subject line as well. Is there any way that subject line will be visible in the browser also?
HI All - I'm trying to use validation logic to prevent a task from being completed, UNLESS the user has completed the task's custom form drop downs. Id simply like the system to notify the task-assignee that the form fields need to be filled out in order to complete the task. Any suggestions?
Hi everyone, We are asking for help, as we struggling with ACS editor.On ACS STG, we are working on a new footer in "HTML TYPE = TEMPLATE."After building the footer with content and style (specifically, we added visibility conditions for mobile-only and desktop-only at the structure level, as well as the "Do Not Stack" function for a four-column structure), we encountered an issue.When we save the FOOTER TEMPLATE as a FOOTER FRAGMENT, we lose the visibility conditions and the "Do Not Stack" function.Could you please help us resolve this issue?CC enclosed exemplesThank you in advance for your support.Best regards,
Description - There used to be functionality in an older version of Home to revert a task back to not working on it in what is now the My Work widget. Why is this feature important to you - Occasionally we need to backtrack the timeline to a previous task for an edit before creative can be reviewed again. However, if the reviewer hit working on it, the task still shows up in their work list since we currently have all users with working on and ready to start filters turned on.How would you like the feature to work - Have a "not working on it" button for the task to get it out of the work list when not ready for them to review. Current Behaviour - If a user hits work on it, the task remains in their work list even if the task is no longer ready for them due to the prior task being backtracked.
I want to know how to map a user who uses multiple browsers in a single device. The person has never logged in. what to do in such a case. do i need Customer journey analytics to map users (who are not logged in) but browse website using multiple browsers in the same device or without Customer journey analytics, I can map these users. The problem statement is: how to identify and figure out the journey of a user who has visited my website using meta's in-app browser, then later on visited my website using google chrome. In this case, 2 ECIDs are generated. In both cases, user did not log-in. So how do i track this person's behavior. In both cases, the device used was same.
Hi All,the Q2 2025 release notes mention the new event subscriptions version. This article describes the differences between the legacy and new version.And the list of the Workfront Fusion modules describes (not vey detailed) how you can switch between the versions:This suggests that you can change/set/manage the subscription version for each of your scenarios separately.I did some testing today and my findings don't confirm this.I found that:The module "Update Events Payload Version" needs to be run only once, to set the desired version. (As opposed to being included in the scenario each time when it's running.)More importantly, when the module runs, it sets the desired version for ALL your scenarios, not just for 1 specific scenario. (I confirmed this by checking my subsriptions' data using a custom HTTP call to the subscriptions endpoint.)So it seems irrelevant which of your scenarios includes the module. You could create a new scenario just to hold the "Update Events Payload Versio
Is it possible to use an online version of a deployed email in a different email CTA?Will this work in every email client and with that CTA tracking?
I am trying to get an alert for when a particular form is submitted a certain number of times. Ex: after 10 form submissions I know to take the form down as we would have reached max capacity for an event initiative.Essentially, I'm trying to think through if there is a new custom field that could be created that would incrementally update when a new form submission comes in, then when it reaches the max total, a flow is triggered.
Hi,We are experiencing a persistent double-slash (//) issue in our website URLs, which are also getting indexed by Google. An example of the problematic URL is -: https://mywebsite.com//content/site/en/learn/about-us/company-overview.html We have applied the following Rewrite Rules in our dispatcherRewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^(.*)//(.*)$RewriteRule ^ %1/%2 [R=301,L]RewriteRule ^/$ /content/site/en.html [R=301]RewriteRule ^/en(.*)$ /content/site/en$1 [R=301]RewriteRule ^/content/site/en$ /content/site/en.html [R=301,L] Additionally, we also tried the following alternative rules:-RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^//+RewriteRule ^(//+)(.*)$ /$2 [R=301,L] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^//content/site/en(.*)$RewriteRule . /content/site/en$1 [R=301,L] Despite these rules, we still see URLs with double slashes getting generated and indexed. These are also appearing in the Google Search Console under the list of crawled URLs. Are there any potential issues with the a
In the WF instance I manage, users are allowed to log time directly on projects. However there is one project where we only want time logged to tasks. Any ideas for limiting the objects users can log time to (in this case: tasks on a specified project), when the instance is configured to allow time logged directly to projects?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.