Product Communities

<b>There is no Velocity in Language dropdown. Just because of that HTML/XML language was chosen here</b> <br><br> <b>Following links will work correct from Velocity:</b> <br><br> <a href="https://www.veeam.com" target="_blank">Example of static link to veeam.com</a> <br><br> #set ( $myLink01 = "www.veeam.com/how-to-videos.html" ) <a href="https://${myLink01}" target="_blank">Example of static link from variable to veeam.com/how-to-videos.html</a> <br> <br><br> ## --- Links with problem -- inside of the Array - s ## <b>Example of the problem: </b> <br> <br> if we generate links inside of the array -- when we are sending ecard to Test we will have the same links to Page with Title for <b>Veeam Basics (Americas)</b>: <br> But links should be different ones<br> It means that in test for All links we have link for the last item in array: &

One unfortunate discovery after transitioning our setup to take advantage of Subgroups, is that a Subgroup cannot have its own custom statuses. In the same way that Groups inherit the System-wide statuses and can have additional custom statuses; Sub-groups should inherit their parent Group's statuses, and have the ability for their own additional statuses. When we have a small team that is part of a large group that needs custom statuses, we have to choose to either make them a separate group (which introduces other challenges), or make their collection of custom statuses available to the larger group, which gets very messy and introduces confusion.

When @-tagging only first/last name appears. Suggest adding another distinguisher (email address or roll-over profile info.?) so that it is easier to distinguish the correct "John Smith" from all the "John Smiths". This may be especially helpful to groups like ours using SSO because we cannot provide distinguishing names in the user profile that will survive the next login when SSO is re-authenticated.

Please add URL in the Condition Types of the Core Extension. Scenario: fire a rule on https://my.website.com/pageThe current version requires to build a list of conditions:for protocolfor subdomainfor pathIf there was a URL condition available, it would would require only a single condition. The creation will be faster and easier. This is how the current version looks: Obviously, there is a workaround with using a custom code, but let's make the tag manager more convenient for the Launch developers. Thumbs up 👍 if you agree.  Best wishes,Andrey Osadchuk | Inspect Launch Implementation, Automate Classifications & Data Sources, Essential Bookmarks

As part of depreciation of legacy resourcing tool, 'Project: budgeted hours' field no longer displays data for budgeted hours. Pulling this field into a project view displays '0', even if budgeted hours are set up in the new resourcing planner. This means project managers cannot see their allocated 'bucket of hours' against their planned and actual hours within their Workfront plans, forcing them to look at three different places at once (WF plan + resourcing planner + utilization tool) and therefore adding in unnecessary additional clicks and time. This also prevents us adding a calculated custom field to each project plan which gives an at-a-glance running total of budgeted hours remaining as planned hours are added.As we begin moving all our resourcing efforts into the platform, this would be an essential element to enable project managers to understand their allocation and plan their hours accordingly.

We often use the "star" feature to sort out projects that are most urgent so that these schedules are at PM's finger tips. Would it be possible to set up a status report that shows these starred projects at a glance?

My business area uses Projects that need unique names, as each Project is tied to a specific product. For us, when the same Product project is imported via Kickstart into our workflow it doesn't break anything - if we catch it we remove the extra and only one will go through the workflow. However, at the end of the season we then have a lot of open product projects that we need to circle back and see if they are duplicates or are truly missed. Right now, I just run reports of the projects and group by project name and investigate any of the groupings with more than (1). Having a "is/is not Unique" option when searching by project name (a text field) would be incredible as then I can search for just the offenders, similar to is/is not Blank.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add the same functionality to AEM Designer for adding a Tool Tip, Custom Text, etc. as there is for editing a default value in a fillable field. Use-case: When creating 508 compliant documents/forms where the Tool Tip or Custom Text needs to be entered. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM Designer provides a very small window for entering and editing text. Some tool tips have extensive text or have more text than the current box shows Improved/Expected Behavior: Create the same feature in AEM Designer that is available for a default value in a fillable object (i.e. Text Field). At least the window would be big enough or bigger to allow for easier tool tip or custom text creation and editing. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Designer 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Rick Kuhlmann/DT Professional Services Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable)

One of the most irritating issues in Workfront over the years that I have used it is the default display rows are set to 100. Very often you start analyzing data in either a project task list or a report and much later realizes that you are not looking at ALL the data. Could the default displayed rows become a feature where each customer can decided how to set the amount or can you at least make the default displayed rows more than 100? If the latter, I would at least suggest 1000 rows.

When I use the portfolio/program or project filter on the Workload balancer without a user specific filter, all the users in the system are shown, not just the users that are associated with that portfolio/program/projects in that portfolio. This not intuitive and not what a user is expecting when they use this filter.

Currently, when viewing a webhook you cannot see what headers you have set in the "Details" panel.   It would be good to show which headers you have applied in the details panel.      

Description - Provide option for creating segments/calculated metrics at project-level when creating them inside a project Why is this feature important to you - Having a lot of segments/calculated metrics at a user-level can make it difficult to manage them. Worse, when the user leaves the organisation, the user who gets these components transferred to will have even more segments/calculated metrics to deal with. How would you like the feature to work - In the segment/calculated metric builder, include a checkbox to allow the created component to be at the project-level. Current Behaviour - When creating a segment or calculated metric, the default behaviour is to create it at the user's level.

For some reason, I cannot seem to reset the smart campaign limit for an individual batch campaign back to the Default (admin) value once I have set it to a custom value at the smart campaign level. With needs for recurring smart campaigns changing over time as an instance develops, it would be great to be able to revert to Default.

The "Open Summary" capability is a valuable time-saver when working on tasks within a task list within a project. We recommend adding that capability to dashboards with "Task" reports so that tasks can be worked on right from a dashboard instead of clicking on the dashboard task and then working from within the project.

It would be extremely useful to see the impact of editing an issue, task or project approval process before we make the edits. For example, when editing an issue approval process, I would like to see if that process is associated with any queue topics in the system. Similarly, if I am editing a task approval process, I would like to see if this process is currently attached to any template tasks.This would help us update approval processes more quickly and maintain a clean list of approval processes in the system.

Description: Adding the owner of a workspace to the PDF or CSV export.Why it is important: It is important to verify a workspace. There are a lot of workspaces that are created and owned by admins. If someone copies the workspace and changes its content but not the title/headline and sends the report to a third person, the third person does not know if this workspace is verified by admins or not.How shall it work: The owner/creator of the workspace should be written down in the exported PDF, like the title or the date of creation for example.Current behavior: At the moment, there is no creator name displayed in the exported workspaces and if a verified and a changed version of the verified have the same title still, a third person does not know if the displayed reports are kind of verified or not.

We would like to see the total revenue for the budgeted resource, or the labor cost, or both in the Business Case.This opens the platform to companies that charge for time budgeted on projects; not just the bottom line.

We would like the field "Primary Contact" to be added to the New Work Request notification. In the example, it is already part of the Issue Added notification. This is used for our helpesk ticketing system and has been requested by the IT Manager.

It would be great to be able to send data via the API (1.4) to only update a specific metric associated with a particular dimension value. We use data sources to push data into Analytics; for a particular dimension we have multiple values, each containing multiple metrics.We've run into issues with one specific metric for multiple dimension values and we don't have a method to update that specific metric without sending the entire data set unless we set up a new data source.

I've searched endlessly but don't think this topic is out there yet. I would like a person with Manage permission on an object to remove just ONE inherited permission on the object. For example: A document that you wish to limit access to. You may not want to remove ALL inherited permissions because some people with inherited permissions do require access. This is just one idea of many with the theme "We need more customization and privacy setting options at every level."

In Workfront New Experience, when one clicks on the Campaign tab does not have the default views of "Projects I Own/Projects I'm On/All Projects/Templates".Whilst it is possible to create Reports/Dashboards to replicate these views and add custom sections that contain these dashboards, the interface that allows users to create new campaigns is only available in the original and default 'Projects' view.Users need access to the various views and the ability to easily access the 'New Project' feature, without having to click around the screen to access different views. Users also want a consistent represemntation of filters across the various views.

Hello fellow Adobe-pros,With the new Workspace landing page beta, it is quite apparent that Reports & Analytics will become more and more obsolete. And I'm a big fan of that! But still, there are some things that I would love to have in Workspace to make life a lot easier for our business users.One of those features is the Page Summary report in R&A: For business users who just want a quick overview over a certain page (or other pathing-enabled prop) this feature is super helpful! We have something similar in Activity Map, which is also quite cool:Luckily, from my point of view, it should be a relatively simple task to bring this to Workspace. As a basic replacement, we would just need a Line Chart, a Flow visualization, and some metrics in a dedicated panel. I'm thinking of something similar to the Quick Insights panel, which is super user-friendly:We could reuse a lot here. The Metrics selector wouldn't even be necessary! What we would need:A dimension item selector that

•Scenario: The system only captures the name of the associate on proof decisions but does not capture their role at the time of decision. If the user changes roles there is no way to see what they historically approved as another role. This is very inefficient for our audits and regulatory requirements •Solution: capture role changes of associates throughout their use of the WF Tool. This information would be captured on their profile.

While teaching boot camps we've noticed frustration of labeling and designating in the Team area when creating a new team. If you navigate to the team area and click on the team dropdown there is the option of "Create Team" which is how someone that's not an admin but has those permissions would create a new team. The issue with the display here is that there isn't anything designating this as an action and it just looks like any other team called the Create Team or something like that.I suggest adding one or more of the following changes:Add a plus symbol "+" prior to "Create Team" so it reads "+ Create Team"Add a line dividing it from the teams in the dropdown so it's clearly separateRename it so it appears something like "+ Create a New Team"Attaching image for reference:Note: Create Team is highlighted because I was hovering over it while taking the screen shot.

Subscriptions are helpful, but currently only capture a portion of what is going on with the task or issue. Status and condition changes represent a core part of the item's progress and it would be very helpful keep folks apprised of what is going on by having subscriptions push out a notification if the item's status or condition changes. In our organization we often have people interested when and issue closes or just generally where an issue is in the a workflow. Having subscriptions keep them updated would be great.Thanks.