Product Communities

I’m trying to create a freeform table that shows GA Medium broken down by GA Campaign. When I apply the GA Campaign dimension as a breakdown to GA Medium, only the first GA Medium row displays campaign results. If I remove the breakdown from the first row, then the next GA Medium row shows campaigns — but still only that one row, not all rows in the table. What I need is for all GA Medium rows in the table to be broken out by GA Campaign at the same time. How can I achieve this?

We want to analyze users who have the latest version of our app and the ones who haven't installed it but because of the range of time, it is possible for the user to be in more than one version of the app because if the user installed the latest version on sunday but we have the data from monday to sunday, this user will be on both scenarios. Is there a way we can filter this dimension only to show us users who upgraded and exclude them from past versions? 

Does anyone have insight into this error?  It appears to be specific to one Adobe Analytics account.  Do they need to re-OAuth or is this an account issue? Error: Adobe Analytics (FCSA:10334162): Client error: `POST https://ims-na1.adobelogin.com/ims/token/v3` resulted in a `400 Bad Request` response: {"error":"ride_AdobeID_acct_actreq","jump":"https://ims-na1.adobelogin.com/ims/jump/eyJraWQiOiJpbXNfbmExLWtleS1hdC0xIiwi (truncated...)

Does Workfront allow sharing your team with others so that can at least view it when they go into waffle menu > teams and then click on the dropdown list of teams they are part of.  Basically I want a user to be part of my Agile team in WF but he does not want to receive any notifications from this team particularly.

Displaying Workfront Data In the previous post, I described a super rudimentary way to use Fusion to generate a dummy page, and how to use that scenario's webhook URL to put that "app" into a dashboard as external page.  Let's now use real Workfront data using that use case of displaying project documents under a program. The use case is that on any given project, the user wants to check if a certain document was already attached to the program or any project in it. If it exists, no need to recreate it. Routing But before we start the surgery, let's look at the current flow: So we're going to expand the "set content" part, and because I dislike the mile-long scenario types, might as well think about routing at this point already, although not really needed yet. When I think of this I'd like to separate the "doing work" from the "send the response" part. Part of sending the response is the HTML wrapper, any Javascript etc. We make 2 branches: Regardless of what the upper branch d

Hi - I'm trying to add some exceptions to my team's default schedule, but when I go to add the days it's only adding that exception for me. I've never had this issue before. Was there an update I perhaps missed? I am a sys admin so I should have full access.  Appreciate any guidance! 

Welcome Back to the Adobe Workfront Customer Newsletter!  In this Issue:  What’s new in Workfront Q3 2025 release — Unified Approvals, Home enhancements, and proofing updates  Sneak peek at Q4 2025 features, including AI Reviewer and external lookup custom fields  Submissions now open for the 2026 Adobe Experience Maker Awards  Announcing the inaugural Adobe Workfront Champions Class of 2025–2026  Save the date: Workfront Q4 2025 Release Webinar on October 9  Fresh training resources — text mode, filters, dashboards, calendar reports, and more  Upcoming events in September: Admin Chats, Fusion webinars, and Workfront Collective  How you can lend your expertise by answering unresolved Community questions  Spotlight on Blueprints: project templates, dashboards, and org structures ready-to-use  Community Spotlight: Top Contributors     What’s new in Adobe Workfront?  Q3 2025 Release (July): Unified Approvals r

1. Introduction Overview of the challenges in coordinating marketing activities across disparate teams Organizations are increasingly challenged with making sense of disparate marketing activities across their own teams. Marketing activities that are specific to a certain team are often siloed until launch, which makes it difficult for teams to understand dependencies or anticipate downstream impacts. In today’s landscape of revolutionary technology stacks, the key challenge organizations face is not a lack of data or robust tools. Rather, organizations struggle with generating real business value due to fragmented data and systems, which prevents them from achieving a seamless integration and providing actionable insights.1 The importance of structured planning and visibility While organizations have tools that can cover some parts of the process, many do not have strong connections to each phase of work where they can consistently provide results. That’s where Workfront Planning come

Hello everyone,We have the following issue at the company: we receive external lists from various data sources as ad-hoc communications. These lists contain fields that we need to use either to segment a journey or to personalize email content, for example. It's important to note that these are cases where we don't have structured data in Adobe XDM, and they are sporadic occurrences.Given this scenario, we opened a ticket with Adobe, E-001621243, inquiring about the use of data from custom audience sources for these purposes. We were informed that it was not possible.However, upon analyzing the settings under Configurations > Data Sources, we saw that it's possible to create a field group and select custom audiences and their derived fields within it. Again, these are sporadic cases and will always be handled this way.Our questions are:Is this considered a good practice by Adobe?Could we encounter future problems using this custom data in a journey?If this is not a viable option, do

I am brand new to Fusion and am needing to develop a scenario that will find all the Programs that have an empty field.  I am currently using "Search", but I get this error each time I run it, "The operation failed with an error. [422] APIModel V20_0 does not support field null (Project)".  Any suggestions or tips are greaty appreciated!  Thank you!

I have a task report built that is correctly showing me two date columns. I want to compare these 2 dates using WEEKDAYDIFF. These are standard fields and values but the valuefield has been customized with text mode.Column 1 - Default baseline planned start date for the projectdisplayname=Project Baseline Planned Start Date querysort=project:plannedStartDate valuefield=project:defaultBaseline:plannedStartDate valueformat=atDateColumn 2 - Baseline completion date for the go-live task displayname=Baseline Target Go-Live linkedname=defaultBaselineTask namekey=view.relatedcolumn namekeyargkey.0=defaultBaselineTask namekeyargkey.1=plannedCompletionDate querysort=defaultBaselineTask:plannedCompletionDate valuefield=defaultBaselineTask:plannedCompletionDate valueformat=atDate Trying to calculate the difference between these two dates on a Task report using these column details in a "Week Day Difference" column.displayname=Week Day Difference valueexpression=WEEKDAYDI

Hi Community,I have a simple service with an OSGi config. After deploying, the service always uses defaults what I have in code - not picking from the environment valiables.Here is my codepackage com.acme.core.schedulers;import org.apache.sling.commons.scheduler.Scheduler;import org.osgi.service.component.annotations.*;import org.osgi.service.metatype.annotations.*;@8220494(service = Runnable.class, immediate = true)@Designate(ocd = ACLCleanpSchedulerConfig.class) // not a factorypublic class ACLCleanpScheduler implements Runnable {@ObjectClassDefinition(name = "Acme - ACL Cleanp Scheduler")public @interface ACLCleanpSchedulerConfig {@AttributeDefinition(name="Enabled")boolean enabled() default false;@AttributeDefinition(name="Cron")String cron() default "0/10 * * * * ?";@AttributeDefinition(name="Base Path")String base_path() default "/content/dam";}@3214626 private Scheduler scheduler;private volatile ACLCleanpSchedulerConfig cfg;@580286 @9182423protected void activate(ACLCleanpSched

Hey Team, One quick question on Dynamic contentIf a Marketo Email Program is scheduled with Recipient Time Zone (RTZ), the email is processed approximately 24 hours before the scheduled send. Once processed and the Send Activity is stamped, no changes to the content are possible.My question is: in the case of an email containing a dynamic content module mapped to a segmentation, will the recipient see the segment value at the time the email was processed, or the updated segment value at the time of delivery?For example, I have a dynamic module that shows the number of items in a cart. At processing time, the recipient had 3 items in the cart, so the segment maps to “3.” By the next day (delivery time), the number has changed to 5 and the segment reflects “5.” Will the recipient see 3 (the value at processing) or 5 (the updated value at delivery)?

Trying to create a link for a gif via scene7 to have users post to LinkedIn.  We created a vanity for the scene7 link, but when posting it to LinkedIn it generates a preview called Web Link.  Is there a way to customize this via scene7 or have it not default to Web Link?  Or is this something that has to be done each time on LinkedIn?

2 questionsHow I check if the redirect happens in my unit test?I cannot get a proper mock of an OSGI service that provides me access to an OSGI config. When I try to debug my unit test and the execution enters the filter, provider is null. How can I code it so it's not null?some code (unit test + filter class + service)my unit test@ExtendWith(AemContextExtension.class) class MaintenancePagePrincipalsFilterTest { private static final String MAINTENANCE_MODE_FLAG_TRUE = "true"; private static final String MAINTENANCE_PATH_PATH = "/content/myapp/sg/en/maintenance.html"; @Mock private HttpServletRequest request; @Mock private HttpServletResponse response; @Mock private FilterChain chain; private MaintenanceModeConfigurationProvider provider; private final AemContext context = new AemContext(); private MaintenancePageFilter filter; @BeforeEach void setUp() { MockitoAnnotations.openMocks(this); provider = mock(Maintenanc

Is there a way to prevent the duration of a recurring task from auto adjusting? We struggle with our resources not changing task status in a timely manner.  If a resource has a weekly recurring task, they work great if on Monday it is moved from New to In Progress and then on Friday from In Progress to Complete.  If a resource moves it from New to Complete on Friday, the duration starts to recalculate and adjust the rest of the recurring tasks.We use the recurring tasks to block off time on things NOT able to be done in Workfront, not meeting or admin times, but work NOT done in Workfront (yes, I know, multiple project management systems....not ideal, but it's real).Example:  Resource has 0 .8 FTE hours of capacity (32 hours, set in the resources WF User profile to account for meetings and unplanned discussion, get water, standing meeting, etc).Resource is assigned to work on 2 projects being managed by a vendor outside of Workfront.  Project ABC will run for t

I noticed a strange feature update/bug in Adobe Analytics Workspace today. When trying to drill down 2 row items of any dimension within a freeform table (using another dimension), the drilldown doesn’t apply to both at the same time. It only works for one row item, and only after crossing/removing that one does the drilldown appear for the other.Could you please confirm if this is a known bug, a recent update in Workspace behavior?

We’re trying to use Workfront to manage incoming project requests from various business-line teams, based on a set limit of design hours available per month.Is it possible to set a cap on how many hours a specific business-line team can use in a given month? Everyone won't be granted equal number of hours. But, for example:If a team has a monthly cap of 40 design hours and they try to submit a new request that would push them over that limit, can Workfront automatically flag that request or put it on hold?The goal is for the design team to only take on work from a business line up to their approved monthly hour limit — any additional requests should either be deferred or reviewed manually.In this setup, the team submitting the work isn't the designer — they’re the requesters. The cap would apply to how many hours that business-line team is allowed to request, not the availability of individual designers.Can Workfront be configured to support this kind of hour-based intake control per t

 Hi, I am trying to create a monthly performance dashboard to compare last month’s performance with the month before. To analyze metrics like visits month over month, I am using the "compare time period" feature. However, I’ve noticed that the comparison of visits and the percent change do not update automatically each month, which leads to incorrect data comparisons. Is there a fix for this issue, or is this feature functioning as expected?   

Good morning, I hope everyone had a great Adobe Summit both in person and virtually.  If you were in my session in person, I wanted to provide some follow up items that came up during the Q/A portion.  1. There was a question around managers and what they receive for reports.  I referred back to the Creative Resource Management dashboard use case and that we do have separate dashboards for our creative managers. I mentioned taking a look at the Expert Insights post where I talk about this use case and show a few other graphs that were not in the Summit presentation. Check out the link below. If there are still Q/A's about the capacity charts, send me a DM if you would like to chat more. Expert Insights On Demand Post & Video  2. There was a question around Fusion and some things that we are doing with it today. I described a use case that we just implemented not too long ago to automate manual email sends to our department and business partners as every min

Hi,I've been having this issue, since 8 hours ago, and everyone in my team has the same issue.When we use "Target Activity > Experience" and overlay segments inside of A and B, the segments only show under 1 of the variations. When deleting in one of the variations, all of a sudden they appear in the other one, as if they were there but not displayed. Tried:- Logging out- Clearing browsing data / cache- Restarting computer- Trying with new reports- Trying with old test reports SO this bug is also happening in old reports, that already had the segments overlaid fine. Does someone know the solution or experienced something similar?For now we can just keep them as separate tables but it slows down the work a lot and makes harder to compare the data.

I have 3 years of experience working with AEM 6.5, and 1 year ago, I achieved the Sites Developer Professional certificate. Now, I'm confused about how to advance my career further. Should I explore other Adobe products, such as Target, Web SDK, and AEP, or should I focus more on AEM and aim for the AEM Sites Developer Expert Certification? What should I do? Should I deepen my knowledge of AEM Sites or explore other products?How to advance further in my professional journey?