Product Communities

When ingestion data via HTTP API to profile, FIFO is not guaranteed, resulting in potentially incorrect data being stored on the Profile. The enhancement request is to make this an optinal feature when creating a source connector or dataflow. It could be a toggle. The trade-off would be increased processing time, but I would rather have correct profile data a bit slower, than fast updates that taht eventually prove incorrect

Live stream show details:Marketing and customer experience teams are under immense pressure to deliver faster, smarter, and with greater context. Enter Agentic AI, the breakthrough approach enabling teams to meet these demands.This exclusive session features an insightful Q&A session with Anjul Bhambhri, Senior Vice President of Adobe Experience Cloud. Discover Adobe’s journey and bold vision to provide innovative Agentic AI capabilities that empower marketing and creative practitioners to automate complex steps, accelerate decision-making, and expand their teams’ capacity without compromising control or oversight. Be inspired by early customer adoption success stories and learn how Adobe supports your onboarding and adoption process, giving you the confidence to embark on your own Agentic AI journey. Date: March 3rd, 2026Time: 9:00 am PTCan’t make it? Sign up anyway and we will send you the recording afterward. We hope to see you there!REGISTER NOW!

Live stream show details:Marketing and customer experience teams are under immense pressure to deliver faster, smarter, and with greater context. Enter Agentic AI, the breakthrough approach enabling teams to meet these demands.This exclusive session features an insightful Q&A session with Anjul Bhambhri, Senior Vice President of Adobe Experience Cloud. Discover Adobe’s journey and bold vision to provide innovative Agentic AI capabilities that empower marketing and creative practitioners to automate complex steps, accelerate decision-making, and expand their teams’ capacity without compromising control or oversight. Be inspired by early customer adoption success stories and learn how Adobe supports your onboarding and adoption process, giving you the confidence to embark on your own Agentic AI journey. Date: March 3rd, 2026Time: 9:00 am PTCan’t make it? Sign up anyway and we will send you the recording afterward. We hope to see you there!REGISTER NOW!

Hello EveryoneI have a Workfront Search module that returns multiple attachments. The challenge is that I want to send all these attachments in an HTTP form-data request in one module (e.g., to one API endpoint that expects multiple files)  How can I achieve this ?  

Hello,I have listed for my understanding from the “Mark as done” behavior. Please advice, it’s correct?“Work on It” and “Mark as Done” options are visible only to users with a Standard access-level license. These options cannot be configured at the access-level or individual user level; they can be configured only at the team level. Example:Arunachalam has a Standard access license, so she can see both options. However, when he clicks “Work on It” or “Mark as Done,” the task status does not change because the option values are not set or configurable at the individual user level.When the same user is added to a team where these options are configured, and that team is assigned to a task, the options will be visible and clicking them will update the task status based on the team-level configuration.

I'm using the Workfront Search API to retrieve documents for a project. When I delete a folder (keeping its contents), the documents correctly appear in the root folder in Workfront's UI. However, my API document search queries aren't returning these documents.What I tried:- folders:ID_Mod: "isblank" - Only returns documents that were never in a folder, but misses documents fromdeleted folders that currently live in the root.- Various search modifiers with "isblank", "isnull", filtering by folderID, nameTo me it seems there is some remnant of these documents having been under a folder previously, and that's causing an issue here? Or I could just be missing something. Has anyone found a server-side filter combination that works for this use case, or is client-side filteringthe standard approach?

Hello,  Trying to update fusion certificate secret ID.  Can someone share how to this in Fusion? Luis

Query:In AEM, when using the Dimensional Viewer for 3D assets in DAM, we navigate to the asset's detail page, select Viewers → Dimensional Viewer, and see two buttons — URL and Embed. Clicking the URL button provides a link like https://s7.scene7.com.Where can I find the actual code or configuration responsible for generating these URL and Embed buttons, so I can modify the output URL to use https://abc.com instead of https://s7.scene7.com Regards,Srinivas

In Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), performing a rollout from a blueprint currently requires the initiating user to have at least read access to all live copies associated with that blueprint. If the user lacks access to even one unrelated or newly created live copy, the rollout operation fails—even when the user has full permissions on the blueprint and the intended target live copy.This behavior creates significant operational challenges in large, multi-site or multi-tenant environments where: Editors are intentionally restricted from accessing unrelated live copies New sites are frequently added under the same blueprint Permission models are designed to enforce strict content isolation As a result, editors are blocked from performing legitimate rollouts, while administrators can perform the same action successfully. This forces teams to either over-provision permissions, rely on admin intervention, or introduce service-account-based workarounds, all of which increase operational

!--startfragment>I want to use the AEM List Folder module in Workfront Fusion to fetch subfolder data. However, while creating the connection I keep getting a 400 error.To troubleshoot, I went to the Adobe Developer Console, created a project, and added the AEM Assets Author API. But when I try to configure authentication, there is no option available for Server-to-Server OAuth.Because of this limitation, I am unable to connect the module.Could you please advise how to solve this problem, or if there is any alternative solution to connect Fusion with AEM Assets for listing folders?!--endfragment>

Hi everyone- I am looking for some resources, thinking, conversation, training etc for what to do now that timesheets/time tracking is enabled for my team. How can I make the most of this data via reports or dashboards? Ideally I’d love to understand how often we’re going over or under hours, which task types are often the most culprits?  What are people spending time on? I am a WF admin team of one, and the timesheets was requested to be enabled by my BU. That was all fine to figure out, but now that we are collecting this data, I feel a little lost how to get the most value of it. Thanks in advance!

It is cumbersome when scrolling through a long list of options (such as from Search Criteria Fields, Select Forms to Map, Outputs, etc.) to see which are checked.  It is especially so when you have long custom forms hundred of fields long.I suggest incorporating an action where if boxes in Fusion Scenario Modules are checked that they could be automatically pinned to the top for easy reference.

Hey Workfront admins!We’re planning August Skill Exchange sessions and want to make sure we’re building content that actually hits what you need most.👉 What’s the number one topic you’d love to see covered?It could be anything, for example:Reporting & dashboards Instance cleanup or inheriting an existing setup Governance and COE best practices AI in Workfront End-user adoption strategies Cross-solution workflows (e.g., Workfront + other Adobe apps)Drop your top pick (and a sentence on why it matters to you) in the comments. Your input will directly influence what we put on the agenda for August.Looking forward to hearing what’s most important to you right now. Let’s design these sessions together!

Marketo’s onValidate and friends stack like DOM event listeners: they run in the order they were added. But there are still major differences:In Marketo, the listener stack isn’t deduped. If you add the same listener function 3 times, it’ll run 3 times. In contrast, DOM addEventListener(event,callback) checks if the callback was already added and if so, doesn’t add it again. In Marketo, all listeners always run. There’s no short-circuit method like stopImmediatePropagation(). In Marketo, to stop submission you call submittable(). There’s no event-level preventDefault(). (Note onValidate — but only onValidate — respects the callback’s return value, kind of like DOM inline event handlers.)Adding (1) is an easy tweak that makes it a lot easier to manage advanced form behaviors with lots of coordinated components. Adding (2) is quite tricky[1] and I’ll cover that another day. Might even throw in (3).😏 We’re adding idempotence to the Forms JS APIIdempotence is a show-offy CS term for an ac

We started using Dynamic Chat and are finding some gaps in the reporting that we would love to have. Currently, the default just shows everyone that reached any goal within a dialogue. The issue is that 1 dialogue may have multiple different goals and not all are as  important as others (i.e. we have an MQL goal vs someone who is subscribing to receive content). We want to be able to see in the reports the conversations by goal to show over time how many people hit each different goal.What I’m also noticing is that the global reports are pretty good, but you cannot segment them at all by dialogue on that screen and it’s causing me to go into each dialogue to see it’s performance. I’d love a filter at the top for the different dialogues so you have it in 1 place and can view all the reports. I’d also like to have the ability to compare across different dialogues easier. For instance, we have so many people that engaged across all of our dialogues over time, but I’d like to see that 10 w

adaptTo() turns 15 in 2026. From 28–30 September 2026, we’ll meet in Berlin for three days of developer talks and discussions focused on AEM and the underlying open-source stack.Details, tickets, and Call for Papers:https://adapt.toTickets are now available. Loyalty Tickets are available for returning attendees, and Early Bird pricing runs until April 12, 2026.The Call for Papers is open until 5 April 2026 — submit your talk!Please note: This year we’ve adjusted the schedule to allow arrival on Monday morning without missing content.Registration starts Monday at 11:00.Conference begins Monday at 12:00.– adaptTo() Conference Team

 I'm excited to recognize ​@Tad_Reeves as our AEM Champion of the Month for February! 🤩 👏Over the past two years, Tad has made a meaningful impact within the AEM Champion Program—and even further across the broader AEM ecosystem. From sharing expertise on the mainstage to showing up consistently for the community, his contributions speak for themselves (many of them powered by countless miles on two wheels 🚴🏼‍♂️).Please join me in congratulating Tad on this impressive achievement.

Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2026Time: 10am ET | 4pm CESTLink to register: https://aem-augs.adobe.com/aem-assets-dam-global-user-group/ Interested in learning how to double-down on your AEM Assets + Marketo integration? Check out our upcoming AEM User Group meeting, hosted by 4 Adobe Champions - ​@mbartlett, ​@Avinash_Gupta_, ​@coreybay, and ​@mariacruz !In this panel discussion, Adobe Experience Manager and Marketo Champions will share real-world guidance on integrating AEM Assets with Marketo to drive efficiency, consistency, and better campaign outcomes.The conversation will explore topics such as: Best practices for syncing and activating assets across AEM Assets and Marketo Governance, permissions, and approval workflows for marketing teams Common integration challenges and anti-patterns—and how to avoid them Tips for maintaining brand consistency while enabling speed and flexibility Real-world use cases and lessons learned from production environments Attendees will leav

Description:When managing XDM schemas across multiple sandboxes, there is currently no way to determine which assets reference a specific field before making changes. If a field was created with the wrong data type (e.g., number in one sandbox, string in another), there's no built-in way to assess the blast radius of fixing it.The Problem:Today, if I need to deprecate or replace a schema field, I have to manually query multiple APIs to find references:Export all segment definitions and parse PQL expressions for the field path Query the Catalog API to find datasets tied to the schema Export computed attribute definitions and search those too Check dataflows via the Flow Service APIThere is no unified view, no reverse-index on field paths, and no UI support for this workflow. For organizations with hundreds of segments and dozens of schemas, this is a significant operational gap — especially when a schema inconsistency needs to be corrected urgently.Proposed Solution:Add a Field Usage An

Wondering if anyone has found a way / best practices to tie in the data from the Planning Record types to the Cards on Kanban boards.Would be great to configure Boards by Workspace, ability to see the name of the Campaign Or Initiative the task is related for starters. 

Thanks to everyone who joined today’s workshop, Your Workfront Success Toolkit: Resources to Accelerate Adoption, to learn about the people, platforms, and tools available to support you in your journey with Workfront! We realize this may have been a firehose of information, but hopefully you were enabled with at least one new resource you can take advantage of today!  Highlights of the workshop included:Experience League for on-demand training, documentation, release notes, and community engagement through discussion groups, AMAs, and product idea submissions. Adobe teams are available to assist you from Customer Support and Account Teams to Customer Success, Adoption Marketing, and Professional Services.  Advocacy programs to share your expertise with others like Community Advisors, Workfront Champion Program, Experience Makers Awards, and Workfront User Groups.  The value of attending Adobe Workfront events, user groups, and Summit for networking and peer-to-peer collaboration.  Dow

Hi, We have a requirement to render PDF from Adaptive form on AEM 6.5.The rendered PDF should have the data from the Adaptive form as well. Currently I am using the below code window.guideBridge.getDataXML( { success: function(result) { var formData = new FormData(); formData.append("dataXml",result.data); var url = "servletpath?data=" + result.data + "&path="+path;to fetch the formdata from the adaptive form. This script is trigged on clicking a button in Adaptive form.A custom servlet is called from this script, which uses formservice.outputservice to render static PDFs along with data. The issue that we are facing is that the application is placed behind SI proxy and the request is then redirected from SI proxy server to AEM load balancer. In this case, the SI prxy server is appending url /abc/def/ to access all the pages on AEM.As a result, the AF are available on <SIProxydomain>:

One of our teams would like have their task start and end dates update based on the predecessor task completion. If the predecessor task is completed late, they’d like to see the start and end dates for their task update to reflect the completion date of the predecessor task so that they can prioritize their tasks accordingly. For example, if the predecessor task is due 2/9 but not completed until 2/11, they’d like the start date of their task to be 2/12 instead of 2/10 (when the task constraint is “As Soon as Possible”). This would not be a universal rule but only applied to specific template tasks and/or for specific teams based on the way that they work. They do have a report that sorts tasks by Handoff Date, but this does not fully meet their needs.

 Hello,We’re looking to add a part-time Fusion contractor to our team to support a few current and upcoming projects.If you’re interested in learning more, please reach out to Trevor at Trevor@syncpointdigital.com. 

ProblemAdobe Analytics Workspace currently allows link sharing for projects but not for Adobe or company templates. While projects themselves can be shared through links, templates can only be shared by manually saving a copy first or asking others to locate it within the template menu. This makes it hard to promote standardized reports or guide users toward the correct starting point.Templates are meant to make analysis easier, but without a simple method to point others to the right one, they often go unused. Proposed SolutionEnable templates to generate shareable, permission-aware URLs, similar to existing project links. Clicking the link should open the template directly or bring the user to it in the template gallery. BenefitsFaster Onboarding & TrainingTeams can send a direct link to the exact template a new user should start from.This reduces time spent navigating long template lists or hunting for the correct one.Improved Consistency & GovernanceOrganizations often rely