Product Communities

This is a Feature Enhancement request to add a collapsible Hamburger menu or similar for the various options for Asset Details in Assets UI. Currently a user has to hover over the button to figure out what the icon means. The same is applicable in order to view a datapoint quickly for example, Dynamic Media URL, for an approved asset.

Currently if a user is deactivated on workfront environment, user will still show as having access in admin console This is causing issues from a consistency point of view so data is accurate in both ends If you report on WF you will see less users active than if you report in admin console This requires us to do some manual batch updates on a regular basis to keep both systems consistentThe ask is that admin console and workfront instances are fully in sync so: Deactivating a user in Workfront removes or deactivates them in Admin Console Removing a user in Admin Console deactivates them in Workfront

The Problem:Right now, settings for New Issue Fields (like Planned Completion Date or Priority) can only be set at the Project level. This means every issue/request in that project shows the exact same fields.If I want to show the "Planned Completion Date" for one type of request (Queue Topic) but hide it for another to keep the form clean, I can't. It’s "all or nothing," which creates unnecessary clutter for users. Proposed Solution:Allow admins to customize field visibility at the Queue Topic level.Individual Control: Let us choose which native fields appear for each specific Queue Topic.Cleaner Forms: Requesters only see fields relevant to their specific request.Flexibility: Keep the Project-level settings as a default, but allow a "Topic-level override" for better customization.  

In B2B marketing, brand consistency isn't a design preference, it's a growth lever. Every email, nurture stream, and interaction shapes how your organization shows up in market. But as content velocity increases, maintaining control over tone, terminology, and visual standards becomes exponentially harder. That's true whether your team is writing copy manually or leaning on AI to accelerate production. That's why we're excited to announce that Brands is now generally available in both Marketo Engage and Journey Optimizer B2B Edition to users with Admin level access. The Brand Challenge B2B marketers are expected to remember and apply every brand rule (naming conventions, tone of voice, required disclaimers, regional nuances - to name a few) across every email, every time. Add AI into the mix, and without structured guardrails, content can quietly drift: outdated product names slip through, tone shifts, terminology becomes inconsistent. The result? Manual review cycles, brand team bottl

Export options are available for Issue Details screens, but nothing like this is available for the Updates section of an Issue.  For auditing we show documented actions like system activity or comments made and the only option I have today is utilizing the print function which doesn’t allow viewing the entire page.

When we create projects, we would like it to be easily identifiable by a docket number, something sequential eg 17-xxxx and should increment only by the specific object type eg Project. Unfortunately, the only available autonumbering available on Workfront is through all objects, meaning if I have 2 projects created, this could be 17-ABX1 and 17-1257 because of all objects created in between. We need this number to be sequential to the object only.

Marketo filters bot clicks based on IAB lists (known registry of non-human traffic sources/bots) or by identifying proximity patterns (multiple clicks within a short timeframe). However, bot activity has evolved leading to several bot engagements slipping through the cracks and firing off triggered smart campaigns that track link clicks. We recently identified two bot click behaviors we would like the development team at Marketo to investigate and patch: Logged clicks on links before “Email is Delivered” logging Click proximity outside the configurable 0-3 second window but within 30 seconds of email deliveryI am sure multiple Marketo Admins have dealt with false positive click engagements and have had to answer to their teams. This submitted idea within the Idea Portal is to alert the Adobe Marketo Engage development team of the need to tighten up criteria relating to bot click activity.

Managing campaign tracking in Adobe Analytics (AA) is often more complex than in Google Analytics. While GA relies on standard UTM parameters, Adobe Analytics utilizes the CID (Campaign ID)—typically captured via the v0 or s.campaign variable—to track the effectiveness of marketing efforts.Here is a guide on how to transition from manual tracking chaos to a streamlined workflow using UTMMind.Part 1: The Dilemma of Adobe Analytics CID ManagementFor many enterprise teams, managing CIDs is a significant operational hurdle. Without a dedicated system, organizations often face the following "Tracking Debt": Inconsistent Naming Conventions: One team might use fb for Facebook, while another uses facebook_ads or FB-Paid. This inconsistency shatters your reports, making it impossible to see a unified view of channel performance. The "Mapping Table" Nightmare: Since CIDs are often cryptic strings (e.g., em_promo_20240501), teams rely on massive Excel or Google Sheets to "map" these IDs to huma

Description - Many of my users work their tasks off of custom lists/reports/dashboards and not the Worklist. Currently delegated tasks do not pull into any sort of task/assignment reports, so I fear that if tasks are delegated to a user working off such a list, the tasks may fall off their radar as they don't pull in where their other assigned tasks do.    Why is this feature important to you - Need this to fully utilize the task delegation feature.   How would you like the feature to work - Fields would exist on task reports where you could pull in "tasks delegated to..." and it would reference user ID object. This would allow you to chose if you want delegated tasks to appear in a list or not. Even if they were a separate object report that would be ok! Just need some way to pull a them into a list.   PS this is also an issue with personal tasks, reoccurring tasks, along with these delegated tasks. Though these are called "tasks" they don't pull into reports or s

  @tushargu@adobe.com @karmakar@adobe.com @carltonr@adobe.com Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Publish assets to the preview server Use-case: The requirement is to build an EDAM where all the assets reside. A key requirement for image management is the ability to expose an image for internal preview by other users/systems, without exposing the image publicly. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, there is no way to publish assets to the preview server for Assets customer. Improved/Expected Behavior: We would expect there to be an OOTB way to directly publish assets to the preview server. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Starbucks Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Can Adobe implement the Google Feeback Loop system for Gmail:https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6254652?sjid=10186142268067450677-EU This is now out of Beta and is impacting all Marketo customers come Q1 2024 with the change in the Gmail spam rule changes:https://blog.google/products/gmail/gmail-security-authentication-spam-protection/ 

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM Core components should have common and generic features, including accessibility. It appears that ARIA Attributes are not implemented in AEM Core ComponentsTeaser ComponentLooking at AEM's teaser component documentation, which showcases screenshots from author, the only accessibility field Adobe have is for the "alt" property.• Teaser Component (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-core-components/using/wcm-components/teaser)When I look at Adobe example output (the Markup tabs under each section) and look at the sections with anchor links, I do not see any ARIA attributes either.• AEM Core Components - Example Output - Teaser Component (https://aemcomponents.dev/content/core-components-examples/library/core-content/teaser.html)Button ComponentOn the other hand, looking at AEM's button component documentation, Adobe DO provide an aria-label field for authoring.• Button Component (https://experienceleague.adob

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable log collection from Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) in Dynatrace as part of the monitoring integration Use-case: We have successfully integrated Dynatrace with Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) for performance and application monitoring. However, the current integration does not support log collection from AEM servers. Having the ability to collect and analyze logs directly within Dynatrace would significantly enhance our monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities. Current/Experienced Behavior: Dynatrace is integrated with AEM for monitoring, but logs from AEM servers are not being collected, as this feature is not supported. We previously created a support ticket about this, and we were advised that currently, there is no solution for log collection through Dynatrace in AEM Improved/Expected Behavior: We expect Dynatrace to support log collection from AEM servers, in addition to the existing monitoring features. This would al

When building campaigns and journeys, teams often need on-brand visuals at the speed of iteration—without exporting work to disconnected design tools for every small change. Journey Optimizer’s AI Assistant for images, combined with Generative models under Brands, lets you choose how images are generated (default Adobe, partner, or custom Firefly models) and use prompts and settings directly in the content editor.This guide explains what generative models are in AJO, when to use them, where to configure them vs where authors use them, and pitfalls to avoid—so your team can roll this out safely and consistently.Official references: Create and manage generative models, Generate images with AI Assistant.  When to use this patternUse Generative models + AI image generation when:You need new or refreshed imagery for email, web, landing pages, or push inside Journey Optimizer’s content editor, not only static uploads.You want brand-aware generation: authors pick a Brand, tune the prompt, and

The Text Field with Formatting is a great new display type that we'd love to convert a lot of our existing fields to. This display type can only be selected when creating a new field, so existing fields can't enjoy the benefits of text formatting.

DescriptionWe are using AJO to automate email, with email HTML being sourced dynamically via AJO Integrations(Beta) and Custom Actions from an external email creation platform (e.g. Stensul, Wordpress). Current workflow:An external team builds emails in Stensul. AJO then calls the Stensul API via AJO Integration (Beta) to retrieve fully rendered HTML, which is injected into an AJO email template and then sent in a Journey. We have also tried this process pulling content from Wordpress and have had success.This workflow functions correctly from a delivery perspective; however, we have identified a limitation related to link tracking and analytics. Observed LimitationChannel Configuration URL parameters and click tracking are correctly appended to links when emails are authored natively within AJO. However, links contained within externally sourced HTML (via Integrations) or URLs returned from Custom Actions are not rewritten by AJO at send time. As a result, these links do not receive t

Hi Team,Is it possible to add "Executable Campaign" as a category in Campaign Inspector for better visibility? 

We'd like to have the option to apply contouring (i.e. edit the distribution of the allocated hours per day/week/month) to tasks & issues in the "Unassigned Work" section of WLB. The UI would be the same as that in the Assigned Work section. A task's resource needs fluctuate during the span of the task and it is often known before a user is assigned but can't be captured via the Workload Balancer UI at the moment. This would make resource planning easier and more real-life. 

Currently only V8 is supported which don’t bring any advantage in compression/file-size compared to MP4/H.264Here are some requirements for Assets/Dynamic MediaDynamic Media accepts WebM/VP9 video files during the asset upload process  WebM/VP9 assets are automatically ingested into the Dynamic Media processing pipeline and appear in the DAM with correct metadata (resolution, frame rate, duration, codec). Video Profiles in Dynamic Media include WebM/VP9 as a transcoding output format with configurable bitrate, resolution, and quality settings. Dynamic Media delivers WebM/VP9 video via adaptive streaming to supported browsers, with automatic fallback to MP4/H.264 for non-compatible clients. Asset processing status (pending, processing, failed, ready) is correctly reflected in the AEM DAM interface for WebM/VP9 files. Published WebM/VP9 assets are delivered through the Dynamic Media CDN with proper cache headers and MIME type (video/webm).

Description:Currently, notifications for "replies to my comments" and "resolve comment" actions are grouped together in Adobe's notification system. This proposal suggests separating these two notification types to provide users with more granular control and clearer insight into the status of their commented items.Why is this feature important to you?Directly from a Designer on the team who gets a lot of these notifications: “Being able to turn off “comment resolved” notifications while still receiving immediate replies to proof comments would significantly improve my workflow and efficiency. I collaborate closely with my design team using proofs to provide edits, art direction, and feedback. As designers address those comments, they mark them resolved, which currently triggers notifications I don’t need. These updates clutter my inbox and make it harder to identify messages that actually require my attention. Resolving comments is an important part of the designers’ workflow for trac

As part of 23.2 release, the option to post a comment on each project during a batch update was removed. This is a feature that we used on a very regular basis for cleanups, etc. Please reinstate this feature!

There must be a way to edit MS Office documents without forcing users to Download, Open, Edit, Save, and re-upload as a new version in WF. So many other project management tools provide this functionality. It doesn't make sense to force a company to implement a cloud provider like Box or Onedrive in order to allow live document editing. It adds a tremendous amount of cost and overhead to manage a document structure in another document management tool vs using the centralize WF environment that we want our users to stay in.Tools like Wrike offer this functionality and cost less. It's a very large point of frustration for our users after migrating from a Sharepoint based Home Grown Project Mgmt tool. It's also a tremendous time sink, non value added and risk of losing data that people forget to re-upload.

For new and experienced users the entire platform would really benefit from having a more user-friendly interface and UX/UI design. Making it easier to preview dashboards or reports as well as the project templates and options given within a task.  Hopefully 2026 is the year for a better looking Workfront😁

Description -When you update a calculated field on a custom form, the change to the calculated field is not changed in other custom forms where the same field is used.  The calculated field needs to get updated in each custom form it is used in. Workfront Support Response > "After speaking with my team and running some tests, this is currently working as designed, and why we recommend copying the calculation into the instructions of the field settings so they can be copied and pasted into the calculation after it is added to the new form. Currently, if you update the calculation in one form it will not carry over to another form where that field lives."  REF: Case Number 00431554 Why is this feature important to you -Having to update a custom calculated field in multiple forms adds to the administrative burden and can lead to user error or inconsistencies in the calculated value across forms. How would you like the feature to work -Calculated fields sho

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Download Button for Sites page in AEMaaCS Use-case: This product enhancement request is to be able to download an image (pdf, gif, jpeg, etc.) from the preview page of a Sites page in AEMaaCS Sites. Current/Experienced Behavior: This is a requirement for larger multi-level organizations (in this case a large Adobe retail customer), which have Third Party & VPs/Executive leadership that do not normally access or do be granted access to go into AEMaaCS to view or approve a campaign. Thus, exporting the Site page from the preview page is a critical step in the approval process. Currently, there is no built-in functionality to download an image/PDG of a Sites page in AEMaaCS Sites. Improved/Expected Behavior: The scale of which the Adobe Retail customer plans to be creating emails and other marketing materials in AEMaaCS makes it unreasonable to go through a multi-step process in order download an image of a marketing component.