Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
We’ve seen a sharp spike in unsubscribe rates in recent months. Unsubscribe logs show users being marked as unsubscribed across multiple emails (see image), with entries spaced just 5 minutes apart—this does not reflect actual user behavior. This issue began in June 2025, coinciding with the rollout of one-click unsubscribe by major email providers. It now inflates unsubscribe metrics, distorts performance data, and raises serious concerns about potential domain reputation impact. Other Marketo customers are reporting the same problem. This is more than noise in analytics—it’s a systemic issue that demands urgent investigation and resolution.
We have a use case to schedule a dataflow with ~10M records to a profile enabled dataset for 2-3 times a week. Since its a huge dataset what would be the impact of ingesting this on our sandbox? Just to clarify, we’re not introducing new profile attributes each time—this is simply an increase in the frequency of dataset refreshes. Would this change in frequency affect our storage capacity, export processes, etc
Hi Community, I’m facing an issue with Experience Fragments in Cloud.We are trying to use the same XF across multiple sites. The fragment references are resolving fine on Author, but after publishing, some of the pages show broken references (the XF doesn’t render at all).The XF is published and available in Publish, The content path looks correct, Replication logs don’t show errors.Interestingly, if I republish the XF again, it sometimes works — but not consistently.Has anyone run into this problem where Experience Fragments intermittently fail to render on Publish? Any tips on what could be causing this or what I should check (replication agents, permissions, etc.)? Thanks for your help!
Description - Datastreams are required to set access type to Mixed Authentication to allow unauthenticated requests from AEP web or mobile SDK https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/datastreams/configure. My understanding is edge network validates ECID, environment id, org id and other non-cryptographic-secrets to ensure request is not bogus, but does not care where the request is coming from. Can we have the option for authenticated access type to protect our datastream from spoofing attacks? Why is this feature important to you -Our organization has security requirement for this. Data passed from mobile SDK to datastream contains sensitive customer data, that if unprotected can expose notifications intended for our customers to unauthorized third parties, and possibly fraud activities. In my country, there are federal cybersecurity guidelines and laws that govern how we handle customer data. How would you like the feature to work -Hav
Did You Know? Basic Text Mode Filters for Beginners At Workfront, we are passionate about creating real solutions that provide you with a better, more productive work experience. The next several blogs will focus on a topic you asked for — basic text mode for beginners. Why Text Mode: Text mode unleashes the full power of Workfront reporting capabilities; unlocking your data in ways that make more business sense to your organization - for example, by combining columns, or accessing a wider variety of fields, including your custom fields. This week we’re sharing some introductory notes, along with a few examples of text mode for filters. Text mode is the programming language used to create reports in Workfront. Although you may not realize it, each time you add a filter to a report, text mode is applied in the background. The clean user-friendly interface of the Report Builder was designed for people like you and I, who don’t have programming e
Description -Why is this feature important to you - When working with multiple user groups that have different roles, this feature will allow admins to restrict the custom form visibility based on sections that are relevant to a specific user group and not everyone. This will also help in restricting visibility of confidential information instead of creating new custom form for different user groups. How would you like the feature to work - The feature should have the ability to adjust the visibility of a custom form section to only a specific group and not be visible to other users who have access to the custom form. For eg. A custom form has two sections, section A and section B and the custom for is shared with group A and B. With this feature, section A should not be visible for group B and section B should no be visible for group A. Current Behaviour - There is no option to share a section and adjust the visibility for users on the custom form.
I'm trying to create a property field ("text") inside my block. However, the field did not render as expected. Is there something missing from my json file?{ "definitions": [ { "title": "Credit Cards", "id": "credit-cards", "plugins": { "xwalk": { "page": { "resourceType": "core/franklin/components/block/v1/block", "template": { "name": "Credit Cards", "filter": "credit-cards" } } } } }, { "title": "Credit Card", "id": "credit-card", "plugins": { "xwalk": { "page": { "resourceType": "core/franklin/components/block/v1/block/item", "template": { "name": "Credit Card", "model": "credit-card" } } } } } ], "models": [ { "id": "credit-cards", "fields": [ { "component": "text", "name"
Hello Community,We have encountered an issue with the AEM Target integration, specifically related to saving and syncing activities in Target. We are receiving an error that does not seem valid in our case, as we have already referenced the audience with the offers/experience. Additionally, the same API integration works in other environments.We have also verified the permissions for the target group/service account for the relevant paths. Even after restarting the Test and Target bundle, the issue persists. Can someone advise what might be causing this issue and what fix is required to address it? Our AEM version is 6.5 SP22. We are using the out-of-the-box experience fragment component. We also tried using other components, but still had no luck. Verified the following areas:API integration has approver and editor privileges.Cloud service connectivity is in place.Cloud service configuration is updated in the root page.Able to pull audiences from Target.Test and Target replicatio
We need to support a new language - Montenegrin with the code as - cnr-ME.Can AEM even support it? By checking some of the existing language codes, what I see that aem can support 2 letters like "fr" or 5 letters like "fr-FR" but not 6 letters. I tried adding the language code under - /apps/wcm/core/resources/languages/.content.xml but it is still not getting resolved and we get the null value.Any insight will be helpful.Locale locale = LanguageUtil.getLocale("cnr-ME");System.out.println(locale); // prints null instead of cnr_ME<cnr jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" country="*" defaultCountry="cnr_me" language="Montenegro"/><cnr_me jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" country="Montenegro" language="Montenegrin"/>
I created a new A/B test and added modification code (Mbox code) under Experience A using the Custom Code option. The changes saved successfully in the VEC editor.However, during validation:Experience A delivers nothing (and appears empty in the VEC editor).Experience B, where I did not add any code, is unexpectedly delivering the Mbox code. The Mbox code is appended on Experience B, and when I open the VEC it shows up there.Has anyone faced this issue before? How can I resolve it so that the custom code applies only to Experience A?
Tried to include custom rewrite file in a wknd project dispatcher in two ways including a call to custom rules file in rewrite.rules file and another way is including it using vhost.Both ways gave error in validation step in local.Please advice Thankyou
Hello,I 'm sending the adobe page name , one on page load and another on a success api call, in the same page.But in the adobe tracking tool i only see a single page name under Report Suite(s) column, [xyz-TAG-1].but under the network section i see 2 columns where i see the 2nd TAG in Page Name coumn -[xyz-TAG-2].but under the Adobe analytics i do not see the [xyz-TAG-2].is this. a known issue or is this the expected behaviour , also are both the page names are received in the tracker?
Hi All, I am trying to use CSV Assets Importer for our UAT environment, and I am getting an error message, and my assets are not being imported.I am using a NAS server that is connected to our UAT environment, where people go inside the folder create their own folders and drop their files inside. I have to get those files and then export them into AEM.
I want to select only 'Queue Properties & Issue Setup' when attaching the project template using Fusion.What should I enter in the 'Options' field in the Fusion module?
Hi all, I created an Adaptive form and one of the requirements was to mask the PII information (SSN) on the form as the user types and exits the field. For this I have created a JS function that takes the value and replaces first five characters with * (asterisk) and sets the value back on the text field. This is working fine. Now as the user clicks back into the field, i wanted to show the original value. For this, i created a hidden field and before calling the mask JS function on the field exit, i also set the value of this hidden field with original value of the SSN. But i am unable to find an event that matches the ENTER event or Click event to trigger this script. I have built this form using Foundation components. Any ideas to implement would be helpful. Thanks,Abhishek
Hi! I am trying to add Adobe AEMDS Core Document Manager Support (adobe-aemds-core-manager), but I don't know where to find it out. How can I download it to classpath in order to ensure that bundle is present in AEM and it will resolve DocumentSourceHandler class? Thanks. Also, do I need to get special authorization from Adobe to install it?
I have a form that is in Landscape orientation in the designer view, it prints as landscape when printing in PDF form from the file storage area. However, when linked through a server to print automatically it prints in portrait mode with all the landscapes settings, so everything looks small in the top half of the page with some information cut off. Same server, same printer, same settings I have on another form, and that ones does print properly in landscape mode. This other one existed first.I already tried saving the one that works with another name and editing there and it still does not print properly. Any ideas?
Hello, I'm doing investigation regarding the state of the bundles. When we performed rolling restart in publishers. We noticed 1 bundle were not proceeded to starting state. But this only happen in rare cases as we are doing a rolling restart multiple times and that bundle was properly start automatically by the AEM with no problem. Checking the Bundle Event written in error.log. I noticed the pattern that all bundle after stopped it will go to resolved state and start again. This is the expected case.Example 1:Example 2: However, one bundle was not activated. Specifically, cq-dam-cfm-graphql was stopped and tagged with [FelixStartLevel]. After that, it transitioned to the Resolved state, but this time the tag changed to [OsgiInstallerImpl] instead of [FelixStartLevel]. Please disregard the last two lines in the log, as I manually triggered the bundle to start. Here are the questions that got me stuck for a while:1. Is there any known issue or limi
Hi Everyone Hope all are staying safe and healthy!Has anyone taken the AD0-E117 Architect certification recently. Please let me know. Thanks
I love to see the back and forth, full story of review rounds so we can identify bottlenecks directly through tasks, but it is more admin / tasks to work through. How do you prefer to structure you review rounds? Similar detail, more agile open ended Create Design // Receive Approval tasks? My preference: Create Design and Send Proof Receive Changes Create Design V2 and Send Proof Receive Changes Create Design V3 and Send Proof Receive Final Approval
Fellow AEM folks, The pressure to go "Headless" or "Hybrid" is real. Every client and every project seems to be asking for it. But is it always the right answer? The Good: For those who have made the leap, what was the biggest actual benefit you achieved? (e.g., developer freedom, faster site speed) The Bad: What was the most unexpected downside or complexity you faced? (e.g., content preview, author experience, cost) The Verdict: Is Headless AEM a must-have for future-proofing, or is it an overkill solution for most common use cases? When should a traditional AEM setup still be the preferred choice? Let's get past the jargon and talk about what really works (and what doesn't).
Is it something like that possible to sent to email address which is not marked as identity?
Hi All,I've got a Workfront webhook as the first module of a Fusion scenario. The scenario is meant to run when the Home Team of an active Workfront user is updated - but it's not working.Here's how it's configured:Record type: User State: New state Filters: HomeTeamID Changed AND IsActive EQUAL true AND connection updates included Record Origin: Updated Record OnlyWhen I update an active user's Home Team, the webhook is not called so the scenario does not run.I did some testing and figured that the issue is caused by the filter IsActive EQUAL true.If I create a webhook withouth that filter, it just works fine. (Obviously it is also called when an inactive user's Home Team is updated - which is not what I want.)Record type: User State: New state Filters: HomeTeamID Changed AND connection updates included Record Origin: Updated Record Only Can someone please tell me what is wrong with this filter?Thank you,Tibor
If the user logs out then I should use that method in order to clear Identities?https://developer.adobe.com/client-sdks/home/base/mobile-core/identity/api-reference/#resetidentities
If a user completes their part of a multi-person assigned task, that user's full planned hours still shows in Workload Balancer, even when the settings for show completed work is turned off. I guess this is since the task isn't fully complete that time is still showing. Is there any way to prevent time from showing in workload balancer for the user who has completed their portion of a task, when the task is still open due to other's outstanding work? Thanks
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.