Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
The following are the REST API Enhancements we as a user are expecting to see it in near future. - Asset creator details to be included in the API (Email, Files, Campaigns etc.,)- Flow ID is returned in campaign API, however there is no endpoint to utilize and get the flow details- SmartList Cloning option is there, however there is no SmartList Update option (PUT method for updating the rules/criteria/conditions) via API. Likewise for Files, images can be created via API but there isn't an API option to update (PUT method) it. How come your product team ended up with just providing endpoints for reading and updating the meta data? Why should a development team in a company should create lines of code just to update a file name. I completely don't understand. - Final member count in a smartlist is not able to be pulled via API, again I'm not sure why this not considered as a meta information.- Worst pagination technique followed for returning records. While trying to pull the
How can I pass an HTML tag as a variable in AJO?I want to declare a variable that contains a hyperlink. For example:{% let abc = "<p>hi this is my url <a href=\"https://www.google.com\">Google</a></p>" %}However, when I display this variable in my Handlebars template, I'm getting an unexpected output, such as:"Hi this is my url <p>hi this is my url <a href="https://www.google.com">Google</a></p>"Questions:How can I correctly handle HTML tags in a variable?How can I properly include quotes (") in the variable declaration?
I want to build a segment where a user has seen an event such as a page view (in this example "brand") more than 3 times but less than 10 times. What is the best way to create this in AEP segment builder when you build out the rule? Do you do it at the top where it shows include then between 3 and 10 or do it at the count level? But count only lets me do greater than or less than. Someone mentioned that you need to do it as an aggregator first to do the count. Anyways hope this makes sense.
Is it better to use some custom field with ECID as a primary identity or to used Identity Map?What is the advantage of Identity Map?
Has anybody track something like that? Is it even possible?
Hi,As part of optimizing authoring activity , business is looking to deactivate and delete 10k pages on prod author using groovy script.We think this might impact cache flush on dispatcher.As 10k cache flush request will be created.Is there any suggestion to better handle this part ?Thanks,
Hi All, I created a customer action for making an API call within my journey and then is trying to parse the custom action response as contextual attribute to create my email. This is how the response looks like from custom actionI can access most of the thing in this response like name,url,cta_label,description but is unable to access the _path which is present in the media object. I am wondering because its an array its not working. Did any one tried accessing a array object via contextual attribute in AJO? I tried using helper function for it , but didn't succeed. Thanks,Arpan
How to do that? Than extension is only client-side: https://developer.adobe.com/client-sdks/home/base/profile/Do we need to use Rules in Properties and send data to Streaming API?
I am doing project for a company which consists of 3 entities. Data Mart would ingest to CDP 4 datasets:- data for entity 1- data for entity 2- data for entity 3- combined customer view across all entities Would you make ona schema or 4 schemas? Is it some max number of fields which schema
hi, I've recently developed a custom destination conenctor for streaming audience that pushes audience membership to Eloqua. The connector is set for testing purpose with a maximum time of 10 minutes or 10 profiles. Its all working perfectly, except I find quite randomly that the same profile with the same audience qualified date/time is pushed around 2 hours later again to the endpoint. Would anyone have any idea why this would happen? I could expect that to happen if the profile qualified for the audience again 2 hours later, but it has the original qualified date and tme which makes no sense thanksMarc
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide the ability to add custom validation to the OOTB fields created via the CF model editor. Use-case: We have the following use case: two multifields. If one contains X items, then the other one needs to contain X items, or the validation should fail and show an error message to the editor. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, custom validation can only be added for custom fields. However, we do not want to add custom fields, we only want to add custom validation to the existing OOTB fields. Improved/Expected Behavior: Add an extension point for developers to define custom validation using an Adobe IO plugin. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS 2024.10.18311.20241017T104455Z Customer-name/Organization name: Assa Abloy Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): No example documentation found in: https://developer.adobe.com/uix/docs/services/aem-
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide the ability to define which RTE plugins to show to editors Use-case: In different CF models using richtext, we do not want editors to have all RTE options available, and we want to limit them to only a few, like: bold, itand alic, bulleted list. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, all default RTE plugins are shown to editors, and we have an option to add custom plugins. Improved/Expected Behavior: Have an option to define which RTE plugins to show, define a subset. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS 2024.10.18311.20241017T104455Z Customer-name/Organization name: Assa Abloy Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): No example documentation found in: https://developer.adobe.com/uix/docs/services/aem-cf-editor/api/
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add the ability to select/pick a folder in the new CF editor Asset picker Use-case: In some CF models, our editors must pick a folder, not an asset. We have a logic in our web component to display all assets within that folder. Those assets may change over time, and we always display all of them; we do not want editors to pick assets 1 by 1. Current/Experienced Behavior: Editors can only pick assets, not folders. Improved/Expected Behavior: Editors should be able to pick both assets and folders. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS 2024.10.18311.20241017T104455Z Customer-name/Organization name: Assa Abloy Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add mimetype of svg files to DAMUtil.java as it is read only file. Use-case: Since it is an image mimetype, replace should happen between svg/png/jpeg etc. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently we are unable to replace a jpeg/png with svg as it is not treating it as image mimetype in Dynamic Media Improved/Expected Behavior: We should be able to replace. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): DEV/STAGE/PROD Customer-name/Organization name: Signify Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When bulk editing assets after selecting multiple assets and opening the details, the interface should allow for editing meta data individually as well as in bulk. Use-case: When uploading multiple files it is often necessary to create individual as well as group metaproperties. With the suggested feature, one can do this is one single step instead of opening and editing all files individually. Current/Experienced Behavior: 1) Selecting multiple assets 2) opening details 3) editing common meta data, e.g. attaching a meta property, tag, description etc to ALL files at once 4) when saving ONLY the common attributes applied to all assets are saved Improved/Expected Behavior: 1) Selecting multiple assets 2) opening details 3) editing common meta data, e.g. attaching a meta property, tag, description etc to ALL files at once while all are selected 4) selecting only certain desired assets individually (in the
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Scheduled content sets for content sync Use-case: We have more than 60 sites on our AEM instance (and growing). There are days where we use to create content packages to sync all these sites content from Prod to lower enviroments.We were very happy to see the feature "Content sets", which made sync easy. Now we have to manually run sets for the sync process every two weeks. Current/Experienced Behavior: Executing the Content sets manually Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to schedule the executing of content sets Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Re-label the home icon with "Experience Hub" as this is exactly to which the editor is routed once he clicks on the icon. He is actually already in the Experience Manager itself - in this case the start page! Use-case: The newly introduced icon confuses our editors. For them the AEM start page is their entry point to maintain websites and they are in the Experience Manager - if they click on the icon they will routed to Experience Hub and not like the label tells them to Experience Manager. Current/Experienced Behavior: Label is totally misleading and conflicts with the indicator in the upper left corner which actually tells you that you are in Adobe Experience Manager already. If editor click on the icon they will end up on Experience Hub. Improved/Expected Behavior: The home icon should be correctly labeled with "Experience Hub" to make it clear to where the editor is routed, once he clicks on it! Environment Details (AEM vers
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Adobe Assets currently provides limited reporting capabilities for shared links. Admins lack visibility into which assets within specific folders were shared, how often, and whether those links were engaged with, clicks or downloads. This feature request proposes an enhanced Share Link Report that allows folder level targeting and includes detailed engagement metrics. Use-case: As an admin, I want to: Identify which assets in a specific folder were selected and shared via link. See who created the share link. Track whether the link was clicked. Determine if the asset was downloaded via the share link. This visibility is crucial for understanding asset engagement, optimizing content strategy, and ensuring proper usage and compliance. Current/Experienced Behavior: The existing Share Link Report under Assets > Reports provides a basic overview of shared assets. It includes the asset name,
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Content picker in the New CF Editor allows only browsing assets, not sites/pages. Use-case: Our CF models contain CTAs linking to pages. Current/Experienced Behavior: Editor needs to manually find and copy and paste the correct link to a page. Improved/Expected Behavior: Editors should be able to use Sites Content Picker pupup to select a page Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS 2025.8.22171.20250828T220440Z Customer-name/Organization name: Assa Abloy Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Implement PSAs so that they can appear in all of the AEM UIs Use-case: The content operations team is looking to create a PSA or Alert bar/popup that would appear for all/some users on the platform when they log in. Current/Experienced Behavior: Adobe proposed this solution: https://adobe-consulting-services.github.io/acs-aem-commons/features/system-notifications/index.html Results research: I have researched and tried out the ACS Commons System Notifications in the past already. Those only work in the "old" AEM UI, not in the "new" CF Admin/Editor or Universal Editor. So any author directly going into those UIs would never see the notifications. And even authors accessing the old UI might be confused since it disappears on the new UIs. They might think only the old UI is affected by whatever the notification says. Improved/Expected Behavior: 1- it would stay up as long as we need it (if we posted a message about an o
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEMaaCS - CloudManager - Track disk usage Use-case: Ensure that AEMaaCS clients are aware of their disk usage. Especially in times of performance issues, a transparently available monitoring of disk usage would help AEMaaCS projects to improve their setup. Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no disk usage monitoring available in AEMaaCS (in the CloudManager or elsewhere). Without Adobe Support input, a customer doesn't know this parameter. Alternatives via ACS AEM Commons reports are too time-consuming (XLSX work afterwards) or limited in scope (Asset reports only, no other content or full OS). VW's Adobe Ultimate Support recommended I open a ticket here when they couldn't find a suitable functionality in AEMaaCS (E-001835519) Improved/Expected Behavior: In AEM 6.x Cloud Manager, such a feature already exists: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-manager/content/using/monitori
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Introduce a visual indicator and count display for hidden components within containers, sections, and background elements in AEM’s page editor interface. Use-case: Content managers need to easily identify and manage hidden components on a page during editing. This visibility is crucial for maintaining content accuracy, avoiding duplication, and ensuring that hidden elements are not unintentionally overlooked. Current/Experienced Behavior: Hidden components are not clearly distinguishable in the AEM page editor. There is no count or visual cue indicating how many components are hidden within a container or section. Additionally, the content tree does not reflect hidden components, making it difficult to locate and manage them across different device views (desktop, tablet, mobile). Improved/Expected Behavior: Display the number of hidden components within each container, section, or background element directly in the edit mode. S
機能改善要求（RFE）概要： Show each item's path in the CF console list ユースケース： We live-copy the master CF to multiple paths. We need a way to find live-copy items other than the master item and to edit or unpublish items only in selected paths. 現在／体験した動作： Even after filtering, numerous items with the same title and identical folder names are shown, making it impossible to identify the item's path. We spend a lot of time each day managing CF. 改善／期待される動作： Show an item's path in the search results, or reveal the path when you hover over the item. 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM as a Cloud Services 顧客名／組織名 - スクリーンショット（ある場合） コードパッケージ（ある場合）
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Implement consistent error state styling and behavior for "aem-content" fields in Universal Editor, following the example of "text" fields Use-case: Required "aem-content" field validation in Universal Editor Current/Experienced Behavior: "aem-content" fields lack a red outline, a "red triangle with exclamation mark" icon on the right side of the input box and an aria-invalid="true" attribute. Improved/Expected Behavior: "aem-content" fields have a red outline, a "red triangle with exclamation mark" icon on the right side of the input box and an aria-invalid="true" attribute. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS v2025.8.21994.20250818T175115Z-250700 Universal Editor Service v20250828133131 Customer-name/Organization name: AVIS BUDGET CAR RENTAL LLC Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Display complete configuration values in Cloud Manager. There is no need to truncate the values with (...). Better to wrap at line endings (as is done on the keys). I want to be able to validate/share/document the configuration at one glance without having to open each individual variable. Use-case: Sharing / Documenting Environment configuration Current/Experienced Behavior: Values of environment variables are truncated after n characters Improved/Expected Behavior: Values are displayed in full and wrapped if table width exceeded Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Manager Sep. 22th 2025 Customer-name/Organization name: all Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): n/a
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
