Something I've done in the past. I had a group that required 2 day notice and so wanted to report on requests that gave less than that. I created a "Compliance Date" which is a calculated field (set to date and time) that has the formula like ADDWEEKDAYS(Entry Date,1) - since you said you want less...

Hi - yes. However, you can lock the proof so they cannot add anymore additional comments or replies or change their decision. Hope that helps

OH! Gotcha. Hmmm... WELL.... you might be able to get away with it by cheating. LOL!! If you do an issue report, you can easily pull in fields for the Resolve Project. This means you can have things like REsolve Project Name, Resolve Project Owner, Resolve Project Planned Completion Date, and Resol...

Hi - so since you are seeing N/A, I"m assuming you did the Calculated field on a custom form right? Just out of curiosity, are you looking at a new request or one already there? If it is one already there, did you remember to recalculate expression? It is in the three dots menu by the name of the r...

Hi Everyone - with the great left nav menu in NWE, it does seem weird now that you can't customize the left nav for the Documents Details area. (i.e. move custom form to the top for approvers, or move Proofing Workflow to the top for traffic people) Found this idea someone submitted and would love ...

Hi - I haven't seen any issues on my end. I would recommend going to WF Support, but you will need to send them a screenshot as well of the Helmet 21 workflow and the deadline that was given to Andrew in his stage (or if you use basic approval, not advance, the proof setting that shows deadline). T...

To add... I recommend adding https://one.workfront.com/s/document-item?bundleId=the-new-workfront-experience&topicId=Content%2FReports_and_Dashboards%2FReports%2FReporting_Elements%2Funderstand-wildcard-filter-variables.html&_LANG=en to your favorites/bookmarks. Especially for things like other team...

The valueexpression for aggregator is still looking at one field on one line item. It is just saying, instead of looking at one valuefield, look at this calculation instead. The true "aggregation" is done with the aggregator.function line. In this case you said SUM so it is adding all the items in t...

Curious if someone can figure this out. The part I'm getting stuck at is that you want the square root of the sum of the variances. So you need both a SUM and SQRT to happen in the same aggregation.

Well, the problem is... since it is now a note report, if you don't use it as a filter, you will get the same issues appearing multiple times. I can't think of a filter that would reduce the number of returns for non-"escalated" issues so you only see them once. :( (Maybe someone smarter has an i...