Product Communities

Description - Use an LLM and finetune it with WF(and the other products) documentation and the content stored in the Community forums. Then put it either in the search or in the side bar as an assistant.Why is this feature important to you - It would be a great way to make finding answers more efficient.How would you like the feature to work - Expained above in Description.Current Behavior - THere is currently no AI so searching is the only choice.

Can you believe both AEM Sites or AEM Assets do not have Trashcan feature where you can easily undelete/restore deleted files?As a robust product like AEM, this is absolutely inexcusable to not have such feature built in.. Even Wordpress has "Trash" feature..Please, I beg you, product team, consider adding this feature.Philip

Customer Journey Analytics recently got a new visualization called "Journey Canvas", which lets us define user journey through dragging and dropping elements onto a canvas. It nicely fits between the exploratory Flow viz and the more rigid Fallout viz and is great to visualize, well, journeys: However, if we right-click any node and choose the "Create Segment Filter from node" option, we see that there is no magic smoke inside of this new visualization. This impressive viz falls in the category which I like to call "Segment Builders", as all that it's doing is creating complex sequential Segments Filters on the fly, then display the result in a nice way. It's practically just a couple Freeform tables in a trench coat: This doesn't make the Journey Canvas viz any less impressive but clearly highlights one important detail: There is no technical reason why this shouldn't be in Adobe Analytics. We have built Segments like the one on the screenshot above for years in AA, especially with

Description - When copying an activity to a different workspace, list workspaces alphabetically Why is this feature important to you - we often copy activities to other workspaces and it's frustrating having to hunt through an unordered list of 20+ workspaces to find the correct one How would you like the feature to work - When copying an activity to a different workspace, list workspaces alphabetically Current Behaviour - When copying an activity to a different workspace, the workspaces listed are unordered, or not ordered in any logical way

Description - For users on organic search (i.e. Google) and land on a result such as 'Morgan Stanley PDF' this link takes them directly to the PDF instead of going to the Morgan Stanley website first. This means we are losing millions of visitor analytics data.Why is this feature important to you - The current workaround of embed API is a timely workaround we are exploring. It is important to have this feature as a toggle option within Adobe Data Collection similar to 'download links'. It is important because we have many users going through this flow for many PDFs and it's over 1 million hits we are missing attribution. Given they are both Adobe products, we expected a seamless integration with analytics.How would you like the feature to work - By default Adobe Analytics captures analytics from users that click on MS PDF that links directly to PDF from google search. This can be toggled on in similar way to  'download links' check box in Adobe Launch.Current Behaviour - Currently

Every event, condition and exception wich is saved in a rule is saved with a name. It would be a time saver, if it is possible to reuse saved events, conditions and exceptions in other new/existing rules.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM as Cloud service CDN (BYOCDN) logs should also include X-Forwarded-Host header value.  Use-case: AEM as Cloud service CDN (BYOCDN) logs should also include X-Forwarded-Host header value. This header is crucial in determining the request host in a multi-tenant environment. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM as Cloud service CDN (BYOCDN) logs do not include X-Forwarded-Host header value. Improved/Expected Behavior: AEM as Cloud service CDN (BYOCDN) logs should include X-Forwarded-Host header value. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Sample logs (Current):  {"timestamp":"<timestamp>","ttfb":85,"cli_ip":"<cli_ip>","cli_country":"<cli_country>","rid":"<rid>","req_ua":"<req_ua>","aem_program_id":"<programID>","aem_env_id":"<environmentID>","aem_tier":"<aem_tier>","aem_env_type":"<aem_env_type>","hos

Hi Team,as requested by customers, it would be great if there is a way to export all rules and elements for the purpose of maintaining the data dictionary and documentation.

As a developer who builds tight integrations with Marketo, I am interested in being able to send users back to Marketo where appropriate reviews can be done for things like Lead records, Smart Lists, various Assets, etc.For example, if I am showing records to a Marketo customer that may need to be reviewed (such as having a bad email address), I'd like to provide the exact record in Marketo's UI for cross-referencing. However, to create a URL around a Lead record's details, the structure needs to be like the following: app-aba.marketo.com/leadDatabase/loadLeadDetail?leadId=123 Without an Idea like Provide API method to determine instance datacenter , there is no way to provide a correct URL to end users. There is no valid way to create a redirect that would allow a developer to send people back to Marketo without knowing the exact datacenter and pod. Today, Salesforce works around this potential issue by using login.salesforce.com as a valid wildcard

Description - Within the comment section, have a dropdown of premade comments (Ie: Done reviewing, Done w/ comments, Done w/o comments, etc) that users can click on instead of having to type out certain messages.Why is this feature important to you - For a handful of our user base, they leave the same type of comments when they're reviewing work. This would help reduce the amount of clicks by having some type of dropdown list of comments to choose from instead of having to type it all out.How would you like the feature to work - Be added as an additional field type where a sys. admin can type in the comments and it will show as a drop down option to the user. Current Behaviour - Not available/ users have to fully type out their comments

I've found the Workfront Cookbooks to be extremely helpful in optimizing our Workfront experience. Something that I've continued to struggle with as a small implementation team is best practices for training. Could you develop a Workfront Training/Implementation Cookbook for new users? 

Description - When creating a new webhook, it's very difficult to search for a custom field within a filter. We have a lot of custom fields and having a simple dropdown which is lengthy is not ideal in 2025. A searchable dropdown as for example this one (https://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_js_filter_dropdown.asp) would be extremely helpful. This would primarily be for a webhook, but the same approach would be for other Workfront modules where currently CMD+F "does the trick".Why is this feature important to you - I spend ages in trying to find a custom field in a webhook dropdown.How would you like the feature to work - Just add a searchable dropdown instead of a regular HTML dropdown.

Would like the ability to build into a template a specific task notification. So if task 42 is marked complete it would send a notification to either a certain user or group or ideally an outside email address (executive notification). We have people who only want to know when one specific task is complete.

Description - During a CSV import, there should be an option to either append the data to the existing dataset or overwrite it.Why is this feature important to you - This option is important because it prevents data loss and ensures proper data management. Without a clear choice between appending and overwriting, users might accidentally overwrite valuable existing data or create duplicate entries.How would you like the feature to work - When manually uploading a file with data for an audience, one of the steps should include an option to choose whether to append or overwrite the data.Current Behaviour - Currently, when manually uploading data, it's unclear whether the data is being appended or overwritten.

If you go the Filters or Calculated metrics managerhttps://experience.adobe.com/#/@intelcorp/platform/analytics/#/components/filters/managerhttps://experience.adobe.com/#/@intelcorp/platform/analytics/#/components/calculatedMetrics/managerThe "used in" function was release in 2024 but is only available for Adminshttps://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics-platform/using/releases/2024#sep24  It works great and I used it to clean up my unused assets but I can't do that for users. Please  make this function available to all users.

Description - We need to determine where a micro-audience is being used, such as whether it is part of a larger audience or journey.Why is this feature important to you - Audience cleanups will be easier since we’ll know which micro-audience belongs to which audience, preventing accidental deletions.How would you like the feature to work - In the selected audience window, in the Summary display whether it is part of other audiences.Current Behaviour - Currently, there is no straightforward way to determine if an audience is part of another one.

Description - Making A4T compatible with the Cross Device Report Suite (not currently using CJA)Why is this feature important to you? Understanding how cross-device behavior influences the results of our digital experiments.  We have a very integrated customer journey across Mobile Apps, Desktop Web, and Mobile Web.  It would be beneficial to understand conversions across devices to tie back to whichever Recipe of the test they are allocated to.How would you like the feature to work - Simlar to the way Analysis Workspace + A4T works todayCurrent Behaviour - Known limitation -- "CDA is not currently compatible with A4T"https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics/components/cda/overview 

Description - While having permissions per object is great for granular security, it is not so great for providing access. It requires manually sharing multiple objects to give the same set of people permission. This is especially true for dashboards, where users must have permission to the dashboard itself, the reports on the dashboard, and the projects and tasks on the reports. Having a Team or Group to organize the users is not the issue. It's making sure all of the elements on the dashboard is shared with the same Team/Group. It would be very helpful to add an option in sharing of dashboards and reports to cascade the sharing at the higher level down to the lower levels, assuming the sharer has that permission on the lower objects. Obviously it should not be too easy to accidentally expand the sharing, but it shouldn't be too hard either. Why is this feature important to you - For ease of use of dashboards and reports, having a way to provide dependent access removes the

It's often very important when undertaking analysis to be able to understand when a value is set rather than propagated forward.With eVars this is possible using the corresponding "instance" metric for the eVar.With List Vars I cannot see any way of differentiating between values carried forward and those values actually set within the hit.Please can you consider introducing a way to differentiate between List Var values that have been 'set' rather than just carried forward?[note: I think this is similar to the issue often faced with products variable where segmenting a specific product at a the hit level returns all products captured in the hit  i.e. it is currently impossible to isolate something at a 'sub-hit' level]

Description - I would like to add an option, like a checkbox, to updates so that the update will not be sent to the primary contact. Why is this feature important to you - I am a system admin for our Workfront instance and use Workfront to collect support requests from our users.  We use the requests and the updates section to keep notes on what is happening with the request; what we've worked on, communications we've received, technical notes, etc.  Unfortunately this filles up the inbox of the user who submitted the request (primary contact). How would you like the feature to work - Add a checkbox or similar, to the updates view (could be titled something like 'private' or 'no notifications') that could be selected.  When selected, no notifications would be sent to the primary contact.  Any user's that were specifically tagged in the update would still get a notification. Current Behaviour - There is an option to keep updates internal to a company,

Description - I would like requestor to have the option to always receive an email notification when the status of their request is changed when converting their request into a project.Why is this feature important to you - In quick turn-around projects, some of our clients like to see the progression of their requests being converted.How would you like the feature to work - During the process of converting an issue to a project, we set the status of the project to in-progress on creation of the project. When submitted, this currently changes the status of the issue to in-progress, but does not send the email notification to the requestor. In the user profile, we have turned on the email notification "The status changes on my request" and set to instant. (screenshot added)Current Behaviour - The requestor will only receive a status change email notification when the status of the project is manually changed, which updates the resolved issue.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enterprise level applications with the option to be able to upload binaries require anti-malware protection. Also, most enterprise policies require "Anti-malware" to be implemented to be compliant. AEM does not provide any means of Anti-Virus OOTB, but there are solutions which can be used in "on-premise" and AMS (managed Service) scenarios.However, in AEMaaCS (Cloud Service) there is no option, and no way to create a "customization" to be able to implement anti-virus/malware-protection.   In the AdaptTo()-2020 several ways to implement "Anti-Malware in AEM" were proposed [0][2].   The solution by Oliver Lietz (Sling Contributor) has the charm, that the malware scanning would be implemented on SLING level using SlingJobs (which would work across the Author Cluster in AEMaaCS), with a "CloudService" which is used to scan the binaries outside of the AEM instances - which seems to be compatible with AEMaaCS and it's Cloud-Servic

Why is this feature important to you? Currently, understanding Adobe documentation in Experience League requires reading through lengthy content, which can be time-consuming. A summarization feature would make it easier to grasp key concepts quickly, save time, and enhance learning efficiency.How would you like the feature to work?A “Summarize” button on each documentation page should generate a concise summary of the content, highlighting key points, definitions, and steps. This summary should be clear, structured, and easy to read, helping users quickly absorb the essential information without going through the entire document. Current Behavior:Users need to manually read and navigate through long and detailed Adobe documentation in Experience League to understand concepts. There is no built-in summarization feature, making it difficult to extract key information quickly.

Description - currently, you can only update proofing summaries manually at the contact level in Proofing HQWhy is this feature important to you - Every reviewer in the Workflow needs to be manually adjusted and can easily be missed.  Defaulting to a daily summary can be problematic when the user has set their daily summary for 7am, we offer up a proof at 8am on a Friday and the Reviewer or Approver in the proof doesn't see the Daily summary until 7am on Monday.How would you like the feature to work -  Ability to default to Hourly or the ability to mass update the setting in Proofing HQCurrent Behaviour - manually adjust the Workflow drop down to Hourly or manually adjust a Contact's default in Proofing HQ.

Description: I would love to have a dashboard where you can both select the date range (as it is currently) and have a second date range picker for a "compare date range". this way, user can easely compare any date ranges they want just by select one of the date ranges.   Why is this feature important to you: almost in every dashboard the people would love to have more than just 1 date comparison, sometimes there are 4-6 different comparisons. currently we need to pre-build every different comparison in advance, wich is both a lot of work and makes the dashboard more complex   How would you like the feature to work: I would love to have an additional date range picker at the top of the panel. the second date range picker would be for the "compare date range". each "date range" can be relative either to the main date range (default) or to the "compare date range" (as a flag). or there are completely new date ranges just for comparison. however, the workspace would lo