Product Communities

Description - Block access at the proof level and only allow those listed to proofWhy is this feature important to you - we've had some requesters find their way from the Document section and interject before the asset is ready to share out.How would you like the feature to work - Allow access from the Workflow level for the versionCurrent Behaviour - Anyone with project/task access can navigate to a proof from the document section and start commenting.  Once they are in a version (accidentally) they are added to the the Workflow in a new stage.  We can set the Requester access level and restrict it for all but it would be nice to do it from a proof/version level especially during internal proofing before the asset is shared back to the Requester/stakeholder..

We currently have teams that create a strategy document that includes information for many teams. The Creative Team is requesting the teams make requests in WF with only Creative needs and not the whole strategy doc attached. The requestors provide screen snips of images and text describing their needs in the document. Not all information is relevant in the document for the Creative Team so we moved to custom fields in the Custom Issue/Request form.  There is not a custom form field format to capture this information in the request. I opened WF support case #00390925 "Ability to copy/paste images and add to a custom form field" and was told the functionality doesn't exist and to enter an Idea. See attached examples that were also included in the WF case. The requestors would also like to add information in the custom form fields in a table format that is much easier to read, interpret and digest vs. adding fields for each row of a table. See attached doc with an example.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Publish all content fragment live copies in one go Use-case: Currently we are able to rollout a fragment 300+ Live copies but to publish the same fragment we have to go to all 300+ live copies and manually publish which makes impossible to do.  Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently we are able to rollout a fragment 300+ Live copies but to publish the same fragment we have to go to all 300+ live copies and manually publish which makes impossible to do.  Improved/Expected Behavior: An option to publish content fragment similar to rollout. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMasCSAdobe Experience Manager 2024.9.17689.20240905T073330Z-240900 Customer-name/Organization name: Bread financial Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA

Description - Why is this feature important to you -Business wants to understand the profile count for reporting in advance without actually triggering communications (Email/DM/SMS) but custom action can work as intended. This is mostly because of condition checks added in the journey and, to gauge the journey's behavior given the high volume.  How would you like the feature to work -1. Do not want this journey step events data going into the steps events schema as this is just a dry run. OR even if it writes it, expire the data after couple of hours. Given the high volume it is not ideal to write it (so toggle option to write or not would be good).2. Mock the Email/DM/SMS activity - Real communications must not be triggered except for test profiles.3. Produce a report to share with the business. Current Behavior -1. There is no dry run capability.2. Test Profiles option does not help much.

Description - A "week of year" dimension, that functions similarly to the "month of year" dimension item. "Month of year" allows for year-over-year comparisons at a monthly level and can produce a view where the user can see the raw numbers for current year and previous year along with the percent change between the two time frames.Why is this feature important to you - I would like to be able to do year-over-year comparisons at the week level where I can also see the percent change. How would you like the feature to work - In the same manner as the "month of year" dimension. The values could be 1-52 (sometimes 53) or even better, the month of year and week of the month, for example, "April week 1".Current Behaviour -In current state, I can only add a time period column, which allows me to see the raw metrics for each time frame but does not allow me to see the percent change.

Description - need a "Ready to Start" filter on the Teams Requests widgetWhy is this feature important to you - uses on Teams are starting tasks before they are ready and causing chaos! How would you like the feature to work - just like the filter on My Work widget Current Behavior - there is no filter on Teams Requests widget so users cannot exclude tasks that aren't ready

We would like to see the option to filter Team Requests by 'Ready to Start'. On the old Home, there was a link that took you to the team page where the 'Ready to Start' filter is available. However, there is no longer a direct link to this page and most users don't know how to access it otherwise. This feature is important because some users work off of the Team Requests list, and they can't work as efficiently if they are not able to quickly see which items are ready to start.

Description -Why is this feature important to you - Whenever we try to search any object we are getting the information about Project/Template/Documents associated with the object in the basic search area but the names of the object are getting cut off and not even readable. Even the hover text is also not available for those object.How would you like the feature to work - Whenever it is showing the object data, though the names are getting cut off we should atleast have the hover text option with the object name.  Current Behaviour - Now the text is getting cut off and there is no option to expand the right side column

Description - Unable to associate lookup dataset with multiple datasets within the same connection. Why is this feature important to you - It's such an important piece that is missing; if this is not given, I cannot make meaningful reports or spend more time creating my mapping in CJA.  How would you like the feature to work - Give the flexibility to associate lookup with multiple datasets.  Current Behaviour - While setting up connections, I am ingesting multiple event datasets, a profile dataset, and a lookup dataset in CJA. However, I can associate lookup with only one dataset. 

Description - There should be settings or options to NOT create Email only profile/account in Workfront and in the Proofing tool.Why is this feature important to you - As detailed in Current Behaviour, this feature should fix all these issues or provide easy solution or workarounds.How would you like the feature to work - Current Behaviour - In Proofing, If the email address does not belong to an existing Workfront user, Workfront will attempt to create an “External User” or “Guest” profile for them. This is creating duplicate accounts for the user which is causing :1. Users not able to access Proofs on which old account is there2. New proofs getting new account added3. We have to raise a Adobe support ticket to merge both accounts proofs and delete duplicate accounts. There is no way System Admins can fix this.4. No consistency of new account is Guest or old account becomes Guest, email ids crisscrossing5. Please refer Adobe Support Case Number 00438353 from Dell c

Description - Approval flows are key functions that often support compliance standards or even legal requirements. Retention of the approval information is essential. Lack of retention has consequences that can devasting to a business if they are audited and found out of compliance.Why is this feature important to you - What is the point of an Approval flow function if there is no record of it? To reliably capture approvals, I now have to build a workaround, probably with a custom form.How would you like the feature to work - Retain the decision of an Approval flow indefinitely. Either retain the Approval flow, log the decision in Updates, or both. Bonus points if you give sys admins the ability to lock down the ability to remove Approvals from objects.Current Behaviour - If you associate an Approval with a request, then convert that request to a project, the Approval is removed from the request. There is no place where the outcome of that Approval flow is documented—not the Appro

Description - It would be nice when you copy a template it would also carry over the users that the template is shared with Why is this feature important to you - It's redundant work to add the users again when you're copying from a template How would you like the feature to work - Carry over the users the template is shared with Current Behavior - It does NOT carry over the users when you copy a proof workflow template 

We have around 20 groups. The statuses in these groups seems to have sorted themselves randomly. I set order on the main "system statuses" page, then I have to do the same thing 20 times. It would be very nice if the order could be pushed to the sub groups either on a one time basis or automatically.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enhance AEM Desktop to detect new files from local cache and bulk upload new files within a downloaded folder Use-case: When creative users work on product creation. It is usually at a folder level, where they have multiple files within a folder. This complete folder would be treated as a single entity.The users work on multiple files within the folder, also creating new files. Users generally use save as feature on their creative Apps (  Applications for creating assets) to save/export to a particular format. The desktop app currently tracks only the existing files which are synced from AEM cloud to desktop. The newly added files even though are available on same hierarchy on their local cache is not displayed within the desktop App and the users have to manually drag and drop from local cache space to desktop app for uploading. The new file in the local cache is not even shown within the desktop app.A feature which can show som

Description - Enable proofing in the Workfront Sandbox Instances.  Why is this feature important to you - All other "add on features" that are integrated with Workfront like Scenario Planner, Resource Management Tools, Goals all are available in a sandbox so users can test out different scenarios without creating test data in production. Now that proof is integrated, it should follow the same path. Also, when trying to implement proof for the first time, the users will need longer than 1 week to do configuration and testing, making preview only useful for shorter testing  functionality. If we are forced to use preview that creates A LOT of extra work on implementation.  

Description - Add modules to Fusion that allow reading / updating content in Excel files stored in Workfront, without downloading the the files, similarly to the modules in the existing "Microsoft Excel 365" module family.Why is this feature important to you - We rely on importing data from XLSX files into WF via Fusion and currently this can be done only by saving the files to OneDrive. This is a workaround that raises data security issues: Any member of the Fusion team holding our scenario can access all files stored in the OneDrive. (Plus the scenario needs to be updated when the owner of the OneDrive leaves the company.)How would you like the feature to work - New Module family (group) including a set of modules analogue to the existing "Microsoft Excel 365" group, except maybe the "Watch event" modules. Retrieve type modules allow accessing data stored in XLSX files stored in WF. Update / Delete type modules update the file stored in WF, resulting in a new version of the file

Description - The "my task" widget on the New Home area defaults to showing ALL tasks that a user is assigned to. We have the option to set default filters at the layout template, but it becomes "sticky" when an admin does this. The default filter for my tasks should prioritize work that can/should be happening. The my work widget isn't optimal to use since it's not as streamlined as the My Task widget. Why is this feature important to you - Users need a list of actionable to do items that's clean and easy to manage. By showing them things not ready for them it's confusing and not a great user experience. How would you like the feature to work - Default to the filters to show only current work or allow admins to change it without it impacting other areas of the tool. Current Behaviour - User has to pick the filter or the admin can set it but then it becomes sticky across all pages.

There is currently no way to customize colors when a report is grouped by Task > Name. (We have multiple template tasks with the same name so we can't group by Template Task ID.) If there are more than 8 groupings on the report, the automatic color selections are re-used. This makes it difficult to tell different groupings apart visually. If you try to customize colors via the chart settings, it only allows you to select a color for a specific task (not a grouping of tasks). So this feature is unusable in this scenario.I'd like to see: 1. The number of unique colors automatically applied to groupings increased 2. The option to select custom colors based on the grouping rather than the individual objects in the grouping

Related Case Number: 00437896Summary:We request a feature enhancement that allows administrators to disable the "Log Time" button on tasks while still allowing users to log time via the timesheet.Current Limitation:Currently, adjusting the task access to "View Only" (as advised in case 00437896) removes the “Log Time” option from tasks — however, it also disables time logging from the timesheet for those users. This limits our ability to manage permissions flexibly while maintaining operational efficiency in time tracking.Business Need:For governance and process control, our team needs to restrict time entry directly on tasks to prevent incorrect logging, especially after a project is no longer active. However, we still need users to log their hours via the timesheet, which is our preferred method. The current limitation forces us to choose between two incomplete solutions.Proposed Solution:Introduce a configuration option (at the system or access level) that:Hides or disables the “Log

We have been running global campaigns from a single program. We'll have the global smart campaigns which provide the functionality. Then we'll create folders to localise emails & landing pages. Our process is to first create something in English, review it, once we're pleased we translate to Dutch, French & German. If there's a complex campaign with subfolders it gets to be quite a pain to create a new folder for the new language, then clone each asset individually into sub folders.Suggestion: When right clicking on a Folder within a Program, provide the ability to clone the folder & its children.  If one of the select fields on the clone popup screen could be Landing Page template it would make my campaign manager's heads explode with joy.

Allow “Mass Collapse” of all parent tasks that are 100% complete We have large projects that can be thousands of lines long. As a general rule, there is not a daily need to look at the fine details of completed work. I can spend many minutes collapsing all completed tasks to whittle down to a view that shows me the remaining work. Given that workfront does not save the state of my collapsed tasks, I have to do this over and over again throughout the project in order to make the project readable (and speed up the display). I don’t want to use a filter to remove completed tasks as it is beneficial to see tasks in the context of the whole project. It would be nice to have a ‚Äòmass collapse’ feature that allows me to one-click collapse all parent tasks at 100% complete.

Description:There are a few functions available in Workfront expressions that aren't available or easily accomplished in Fusion. For example: WEEKDAYDIFF which works similar to DATEDIFF but only counts weekdays. This is useful since durations are measured in working days, and we have automations that need to calculate durations based on various inputs. WEEKDAYDIFF isn't available in Fusion as a function and there isn't a clear or easy way to calculate it using the available logic.Fusion supports advanced expressions that would never be possible in Workfront. There should not be any situation where Workfront can support a simple expression using a single function, but that same logic is difficult or impossible to accomplish in a Fusion expression. Why is this feature important to you:It is sometimes difficult to mirror Workfront logic in Fusion because Fusion doesn't always have a similar function to mimic. Extra time spent by developers trying to devise workarounds reduces the value th

ダイナミックチャットとZoomを連携させてほしいです現在ではMeetのみ対応可能なので、今後は機能を拡充してほしいです

Description:We are requesting a reporting feature that provides visibility into the usage of widgets on users' homepage dashboards. This feature would help us better understand engagement with dashboard components and identify which widgets are actively being utilized. Why is this feature important to you?Understanding widget usage is essential for optimizing dashboard design and ensuring that users have access to the most relevant and effective tools. By identifying which widgets are frequently used or have been recently interacted with, we can make informed decisions about dashboard layout, training needs, and potential areas for improvement.How would you like the feature to work?The feature should generate a report that includes the following details for each user:Type of Widgets in Use: A list of the widget types currently active on the user's homepage dashboard.Date Last Touched or Frequency of Updates: Information indicating recent interaction or update frequency for each wi

Currently, you can only choose to color code the items in the Workload Balancer based on the project status, but it would be helpful to visualize the Tasks by their individual statuses.