Product Communities

HiI would like to propose one improvement to the use of comments in Adobe Document Cloud.Paste active links (url to sites or other documents uploaded to document cloud) on comments of pdf files shared on Document Cloud.This functionality would be very useful.

When you enter text into the email body/message field when setting up delivery on a report, this message is attached as a .htm attachment instead of showing in the email body itself. This is not a good user experience and the message could very easily be missed. It would make more sense and be far more effective if the message appears in the body of the email.

As system admins, we see everyone's templates within the instance. Can we unshare any only see our groups?

I would like to request for an ability to add comments when responding to a Project Approval request.

The mbox cookie uses a pipe delimiter as follows:mbox=PC#e03088f9e8cb4e07a5ad1103f49a0b58.17_0#1646387508|session#aef29d047d614042a63ffbdb82b87c06#1583144568; Some customers have firewalls that block the pipe character in the mbox cookie and requires that the character is encoded.  

The Resources we use are in 3 different locations/ time zones, and all have a slightly different Schedule from one another.The system requires that we set to a Default Schedule, which isn't always accurate when reviewing the Resource Management schedule.Can the DEFAULT be removed and base it on just the Schedule the user has been assigned to?

A real pain point is having ALL prior projects, etc. be impacted by a change in a used Custom Form. In the event that a custom form is updated (due to changing business needs), then we're required to add in a NEW custom form (i.e. version 2). In a practical example, if I need to add ONE piece of information to a form, then in order for me to 1) not lost historical data; 2) have a satisfactory form on project moving forward, I must add them both the project template--thereby impacting all "net new" projects. I would expect that simply making the edit on a custom form would "time stamp" the edit so ONLY those projects moving forward would be impacted with the new information.

I think it would be great if we could export meta-description from Target activity Goals & Settings section. We currently export a list of live activities to use it in our dashboard showing test live but it would be great if we could export also meta-description showing what the test is about.

It would be ideal to have the ability to create roles in Target similar to Analytics.  We have a number of specific needs with regard to custom roles, right down to specifying the ability to make changes on the individual Experiences, Targeting, Goals & Settings.  For instance, we need these roles:Approver Only - Cannot create or edit an activity, only observe and approve (e.g. start, stop)Analyst - Can observe and only edit the Goals & Settings Plus we'd need to specify these abilities by subdomain and url (regx style).  So some roles would only apply to parts of the site.  I know about Properties, but dev time is rare enough.  Adding more code to the page is and expense, cumbersome, and we don't have Premium. Being able to create these roles and others would help Target fit better with many teams.

As a worker I want the actual start date of a task with the constraint of finish-start to bump to current time when I complete a predecessor task ahead of the planned schedule. Given I finish my consultation call ahead of schedule, I want my next design task to fall within my standard SLA window of 10 days instead of sticking to the plan and still due 15 days from now despite the fact that I finished my consultation early. This should be an option to turn on/off at the system level, knowing that not all schedules work this way. But this would reduce the PM time to manually move the start date of the next task to today to match the duration I originally intended despite the fact that I finished ahead of schedule. Related to:https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000XhugAAC/detail

Some of our Account Teams need the ability to export the gantt view to Excel in order to make some modifications.

By default, proof will NOT display slides marked as "Hidden" in PowerPoint. There are times however when we still want to view and comment on those slides. Having a toggle to opt to view them or hide them would be ideal.

It would be great to be able to add a template task to multiple parent tasks at once, instead of only being able to add to one parent task at a time. That way if there is one task series that I want to go within each month in my project, I can easily add it to every month's parent task at once instead of having to keep re-entering the template and individually adding those tasks in.

While being able to empty the proof trash is good so as to save space in our environment, it's rather scary because we all know that the day you empty all the trash is the one day you will need to restore one. It would be ideal if you were able to select specific proofs to empty from the trash. And, be able to sort by date added. We would use it be sorting by date, the selecting all, but then unselect the ones from the past week or so. Even better, if you could select by date range and empty ones that were older than say 7, 14 or 30 days.

It would be beneficial to have the "All Tasks" selection option at the top of templates/projects so users do not have to scroll all the way to the bottom to select that option.

I'd like to be able to correct any project data after Completion.Sometimes my Planners need to correct some things that were made by mistake. Now if we want to do so that will impact the Project Actual Completion date which is very far from being ideal for sometimes a really stupid but annoying mistake and impacts our figures very seriously.If I (as an admin) could do that without impacting the completion date, would be great. An alternative solution could be if I (again as an Admin) could override the Actual Completion Date after the project closure manually.

We have a custom form field called "suppliers" and it contains hundreds of choices. Certain suppliers have special requirements that the people working on these projects need to know about. It would be so nice if we had the ability to flag certain suppliers within the custom form so that, when selected, that field stands out as different from other selections - such as turning red, having a flag, etc. to alert the workers to view another document.

Some users need the "changes required" decision type to be available when creating a proof and some of our users need that decision type to NOT be an option.We want a way to limit what decision types are available, whether it's an automated workflow setting, group setting, or personal setting.

When contouring resource allocation day to day in the Resource Scheduler, we should not only be able to see how many hours have been allocated per role (this is also addressed in another Idea post), but also, when removing hours from a day, the tool should automatically distribute the remaining hours across the duration of the task. This would speed up the process and not require us to perform unnecessary math.

If there are 2+ users assigned to a single task, and the task is set to simple with a different allocation of hours between the resources (example below), there is no way to see how many hours are allocated to one person vs. the other if I am the resource working on the task. I suggest adding a feature so that each resource can clearly see their allocated time. Example: Resource 1: Assigned 1 planned hour Resource 2: Assigned 2 planned hours How do these two resources know the amount of time allocated to each person? Along the same lines, when using the contouring feature of the scheduling tool, how is the resource able to see the # of hours allocated on day 1 vs day #, etc.? I don't see a way a resource is able to see this either.

When converting an issue/request to a task or object we can currently keep the issue open and resolvable by the object or delete the issue. The following additional options would be useful.Do not make the issue resolvable to the object AND keep the issue open (so multiple objects can be converted from one issue) OR Allow multiple resolvable objects so the issue is only resolved when all resolvable objects are completeDo not make the issue resolvable to the object AND close the issue (but do not delete for reporting purposes)

Dashboard Print MUST BE IMPROVED. Not possible to print the complete details.Else, we miss data & info EVERYTIME.

Hello Team, Currently we're seeing the republished state notification in different property where the republished library not exist. So its better to show the notification where it belongs to.  For example. Look at the below screenshot.   The republished library AppD belongs to different property but I can able to see the republished notification in above property where AppD Fixes library not exist at all.  Looks like its a Launch UI bug - but if it's not considered while implementation so sharing the post as an IDEA. 

It would be really useful to be able to report the Planned, Budgeted, And Actual hours booked per project by Job Role/Resource by Month (allocation date) . Currently i have to run a resource estimate report and/or a Finance report and compare. This is difficult because a) these reports do not have the same reporting attributes and b) it makes it difficult to track to plan.

What is the benefit for limiting "severity" classifications to Issues? If the field exists at the issue level, what is the harm in exposing it at the task or project level? I'd like to see this available or the severity field does nothing since we work mostly in tasks & projects.