Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
For auditing purposes and when exporting the Custom Form (via screenshot at the moment) to file the information in an Employee folder it would be great to have a Digital Signature to proof of the request by the Employee. Currently all the data for audit purpose is in orbit, which isn't ideal if you export the Custom Form to be stored else where outside of the system
Here is what I would like to see that a less expensive competitor offers: https://www.wrike.com/apps/file-storage/document-editing/
We have teams who tend to work specifically in one folder within a project, they like to host copies of documents in this folder for easy access, however, if the main document hosted in the main project folder is updated their document is out of date. We can obviously update teams to make them aware of any updates but it would be good if it were possible to instead create document shortcuts that can be hosted elsewhere for simple access but which are linked to the main host document.
When assigning tasks to users, if the user is assigned a schedule that has a holiday blocked off (ex. Chinese New Year) and the task falls on some of that blocked time, a warning should show to the project manager. Right now, the planned dates of the task change automatically without notifying the project manager.
Within DTM - all users of a property were notified when a change went live. This gave the ability to create a user whose email was a slack channel notification and inform the developers when a change was made in a form which they prefer.Now in Adobe Launch, a change is made and there are no more notification. For us, this is a security hazard that anyone could make a change and no one will know unless they go into each property and check when the last publish date was. I would like to reintroduce the ability to notify all users of a property when a published change took place.
It would be helpful if the deletion dialog window indicated the property name(s) so the user will make sure that only the expected property(ies) will be deleted upon confirmation. This is helpful for the accounts with high number of properties where accidentally more than one checkbox may be selected. Ideally, the deletion workflow should be improved to avoid situation when somebody deletes a property another team member did not want to lose. The deletion workflow may look as:1) the deletion marks the property Archived (like in AT). The archived properties may not be shown by default (like hidden report suites in AA).2) the next action may be the actual deletion from the account (the user has to again check the box and delete)
It would be great if in the context of mobile apps, Launch was able to replace Adobe Analytics processing rules. e.g. allow server side processing of the metrics calls, mapping context data variables to data elements and then mapping data elements to analytics variables using rules, ideally with the ability to execute server side JavaScript to maximise flexibility - all through the launch interface/workflow I was hoping the launch server side road map stuff would deliver this, but is seems to be more about 3rd party integrations/forwarding (or have I got that wrong? 🙂 )
When a user fills in the project schedule dialog and enters the email address that is not whitelisted in the Company Settings, no any notification appears. After clicking on the Schedule button, nothing happens either, no any notification about failure is displayed. Please display a notification when a list of recipients contains an email address the project can't be delivered to. This warning will help AA users to understand that the project will be schedule only if the email will be whitelisted or removed from the recipients list.
Issues are very much like Requests, at least the way we use them. And just like Requests, it would really help if we could Save as Draft for Issues, just as we have that ability with Requests.I see there is already an Idea posted for the same ability for Projects. This is a much-needed feature!
It would be useful to be able to save a draft of a project form the same you can now do with request forms
In a recent update, reports no longer open with default filters, saving users from having to filter each time. Would love to see this capability applied to dashboards as well. Thank you!
I've joined a new company that uses Marketo after previously using Iterable and sorely miss Handlebars functionality. Handlebars allows much more powerful control of what content is shown, so you can better personalize and don't have to create multiple versions of your email for different audiences. https://support.iterable.com/hc/en-us/articles/205480365-Personalizing-Templates-with-Handlebars-
Currently there is no way to bulk edit Kanban items once they are on the board (despite the fact that you can bulk edit items in the backlog and do the same for Scrum Iterations). It would be great to be able to see the Kanban board as a list to be able to: bulk move items from the board to the backlogbulk change the colors of each cardbulk edit custom formsbulk edit assignmentsetc. these feature upgrades would make the Kanban board so much more user friendly and i think would increase usage (at least in my company).
In our billing custom forms, within the Classic view, we are allowed four decimal places. However within the New Experience we are only allowed two decimal places. The different between the four decimal and two decimal can effect our exact billing price that is needed for our customers. Can the New Experience allow forms to have a four place decimal?
I think the ability to proof sketch design files would be a great addition to Workfront's Proofing tool.GitLab has recently made a lot of progress on their version control for sketch and ai files.I would like to see the ability to click on objects in a sketch file within a proof and pull up information such as CSS or location (from top, from left, etc)Some examples:https://gitlab-org.gitlab.io/gitlab-design/https://gitlab-org.gitlab.io/gitlab-design/hosted/chris/ee%236898__member-counts-billing-areas-spec-previews/#artboard1
For most of us, we'd like to lock a stage after a decision is made so that new comments are not entered as the proof moves through its stages. However, there are a lot of cases when someone replies to a comment with a question (or it is clear they didn't understand the comment) and someone in a locked stage needs to reply back. Would like a new stage setting of "No New Comments" which is like Locked but allows them to reply to comments.
I think it would be great if we had a baseline feature at a task level. Meaning, a task level field and a button that allows an individual to capture a baseline for ALL tasks. This will allow our teams to be able to see at a report level every time a project's "Due On" date changes and by how much. So, I would imagine this being a button that when hit the "baseline date" would be locked on what the current "Due On" date is. After someone clicks the button and the baseline date per task is locked, and then they can change the due date. Overall, this would be an easy way to monitor if our projects are slipping and by how much. Please inquiry for clarification.
Some fields that we have with selections longer than the available viewing space in the drop-down menus make it impossible to differentiate selections from one another. Also, File Uploader here won't let me load images (tried JPEG and PNG formats).
For each Launch library display the user name next to each key status like:Submitted by John Smith (27 Aug 2020, 19:23 UTC)Rejected by Veronika Angel (27 Aug 2020, 19:30 UTC)Submitted by John Smith (27 Aug 2020, 21:51 UTC)Approved by Veronika Angel (27 Aug 2020, 22:41 UTC)Published by Alex Green (29 Aug 2020, 11:06 UTC)
I am seeking to automatically receive notifications when documents are uploaded on completed/closed projects WITHOUT having the user tag another user when this occurs.
The option to sync the scheduler / team view to the synced calendar to show meetings and events. This will prove invaluable in managing a person's workload. Often a person may have a full day of work, but what the scheduler / team view does not show is that they also may have 2–3 hours of meetings that day. Showing these meetings will portray a person's day in much more detail and make resource management far more transparent as a result.
Currently documents saved in folder structures under specific tasks seem to be copied into the main project level folder, and are just dropped in loosely. This causes confusion and leaves a stream of loose documents at main project level when they are saved neatly and organised at the task level at which they were saved. If we don't need them at main project level, can we prevent them being automatically copied into this level?
We would like to increase the security of our processes by encrypting our Customer Attributes files before they go through SFTP to reach the Adobe servers.This would be a very useful way to ensure compliance at the customer end to prevent it being inspected or tampered with before it leaves our infrastructure.The key to be used to decrypt should be part of the config of the customer attributes profile.BTwiz
It's great that workload balancer allows you to increase the total number of hours on a task. However, this should trigger an alert or notification in the project view so others are aware of the change to total planned hours
Currently a reviewer cannot be included in multiple Proof Workflow stages. One of our biggest agency clients and multiple internal agency client services leads requests the following:Allow Proof reviewer(s) to be included in more than one Workflow stage.Example: The client Brand Manager may want to preview a proof before they send that proof to the rest of the team. This same person needs to moderate, clarify, apply actions to all comments, and make a final decision (at the last stage of the review).
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.