Product Communities

Description - add a 'filter' ability to the tickets table on the my cases' screen in the Customer Care portal , for easier searches when looking through ticketsWhy is this feature important to you - would make it easier and faster to search through the long list of tickets in Customer Care portal, My Cases screen.How would you like the feature to work - add a 'filter' ability to the tickets table on the my cases' screen in the Customer Care portal , for easier searches when looking through ticketsCurrent Behaviour - can only 'sort' the columns in the tickets table currently, which, if you have 10 pages of tickets, isn't easy to find the specific ticket you're looking for, (like how you can filter in excel)

Would like to see improved proofing functionality that allows more than just basic markup and commenting on proofs. The vision here is that it becomes truly collaborative where multiple users can documents or spreadsheets together to more quickly get to a final approved product. The edits would have an audit trail as well as email notifications when changes are made. Also consider including shadow/backup copy functionality.

In Classic Workfront, if you navigated to an object (task, issue, project, program etc) that had multiple custom forms on it, you had the ability/option to edit just one of those multiple forms. However, in the New Workfront experience, if you begin editing one of the custom forms and there are multiple, the system actually has you editing all of the custom forms; whether there are 2 or 20. This causes problems if you have a custom form that has a required field that you don’t have the information for yet and where anticipating/planning on adding that information at a later date. I am really not sure what the purpose of this change is since it only serves to remove flexibility.

We have recently moved to New Workfront Experience and one of the big features we miss from Workfront Classic is being able to see the Document's custom form data from the Summary side bar on the right. In New Workfront Experience, there is a link to see the custom form data but there are often times when we want to do a quick comparison of custom form data across multiple documents on a project. It was very easy in Workfront Classic to be able to move back and forth between the custom form on multiple documents and now we have to have several tabs open at once to do that comparison.

It would be nice to be able to display a field in a custom form based on a previous date field. Use case example: There's a date field called Requested Due Date. Display a secondary field called Priority Justification that is displayed only if the requested due date is 5 or less days after today's (request entered) date.

When using weekly charts the business should see the dates in the charts as they are used to .... and since our calendar starts with "Monday", I would expect that the charts also show the dates of all mondays in given time period. Here is an example of a weekly line chart to show the current issue:as you can see, the data points perfectly match the calendar setting (showing a dot on each monday). but the dates on the x-axis are showing "Sundays", as well as the vertical lines above the x-axis-dates. so there is a "gap" between the data points and the chart description which makes it hard to read (and I think it just looks aweful ...) IDEA: Align chart description (dates on x-axis) to match the data points While this "works as designed" I hope this can be changed very soon - I know Adobe can do charts better than thisThanks!

Description - To save up time, allow segments to be applied to multiple panels of a project at once.Why is this feature important to you - It saves time, a lot.How would you like the feature to work - I'd drag the segment on an aread at the top of the project, and it will be applied to all panels below.Current Behaviour - this is not possible.

It would be great to have these feature available: 1. See if a token is in used in any assets or campaigns 2. When changing a token name, token names are dynamically changed in assets/campaigns.    Pain point: If I'm to refresh token naming conventions, there's no way to know where the token is used. And since token name doesn't change dynamically in existing assets/campaigns (as opposed to the process of email name change), it's very likely that I'd miss some assets/campaigns, causing the old token to stop working.

To be honest, most users don't even notice commit date until it starts messing with their projections. In the innovation lab there have been numerous requests to change commit date behaviour, that either haven't been implemented, or have been marked implemented when the solution doesn't actually resolve the issues users are experiencing.The historical requests to fix commit date include:1. Give system admins an option to remove "Commit Dates" from the system – 2100 points https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSAKAA4/detail2. New Home: Admin ability to customize left side Work List – 970 points https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSgfAAG/detail3. Viewing Planned Completion vs. Commit Dates – 510 points https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSB0AAO/detail4. Commit Dates Approvals follow the same flow as all approvals – 180 points https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSaMAAW/detail5. Ability to reject a pro

Color coordinate Parent tasks so it is easier to track deliverables in a large project. There can sometimes be different tasks that have different times to be reviewed/proofed so color coordinating them would help us to find the "grouped" parent tasks in a project that has 300+ deliverables.

I would love to connect user names and the custom forms. That way when submitting a project, the requester can choose the users within a custom form and those users would be alerted that the request is submitted or project created.

Ability to assign every member of a team to a task without having to enter each of the members names manually - The use-case here is tasks that represent meetings. In these cases, we need to assign every member of a team and have the hours allocate across all of them. We want to assign the team and have everyone on the team assigned, not just the first to pick up the request/task.

Imagine a scenario where lead IDs 4 and 5 are merged together in a Marketo instance. 5 is the "winning" ID, so querying the lead via the REST API returns data. However, if you query for data on lead ID 4, a successful API query is returned with no data in it. This means reconciling that 4 was merged into 5 difficult, and leaves a stray ID. Would it be possible to update results on merged records so that they pass something like "mergedInto" : 4 when this occurs?   Bonus points if the winning record also got a note like "mergedWith": 3,4,7 -- something that concatenates all records which have been merged into this winning record; this would be nice to help verify on both ends that a merge was successful.

We wanted to make sure that everyone on our "team" was getting instant notifications, not just daily updates onmost of the sub-categories under notifications. I asked and there was no way to set this for the entire team vs. each one having to check their settings...so I did this manually for my entire team. Thank you for considering this idea to update this process.

Display traffic volume in Occurrences rather than in Page Views on the Traffic Management Overview page to help administrators to estimate the server calls volume.

For every project, there should be a checkbox setting that allows for ignoring a user's schedule in the timeline.For example, if a project has a 5-day schedule and one user on the project has a 7-day schedule, there should be a setting on the project to only use the project schedule and ignore the user schedule.

The Team view is great, but the color coding throws everyone off. Or lack of, since it's random and different for every user. If the system could cycle through colors, even if limited, it would help identify the different tasks for the same project (one color for one project) across the teams or groups workload. The visualization/formatting is a must for all areas in WF since the workers are primarily creative-minded.

We would like to add emoji to proof comments

Hi,We would like to request the following enhancement:-Current situation: In order to change the status of a Project to "Complete", you need to mark as completed each one of the individual tasks. -Enhancement: Allow to change the status of a Project to "Complete" (even if the individual tasks are not completed) and automatically mark the status of the tasks as "Complete". Thanks,Ana Aristizabal

The workload balancer allows a user to group tasks by project which is great. But it needs to go a step further to group those projects by program/campaign.

In Classic, we can add additional custom forms needed in Requests and Projects without being forced to fill them out. I noticed Experience is forcing me to complete them when I add on forms (must fill out required fields to add it). We'd love to see this function like Classic as the person adding them isn't necessarily the person that will complete them.

When converting an issue to a project, it would be helpful to retain the priority level of the issue after conversion rather than having to manually set it each time

Allow users to choose which time zone they want to see on task due dates when they're viewing tasks in Workfront via web browser.I have a team split between Eastern Standard Time and India Standard Time. The folks in India Standard Time want to be able to view EST time stamps. Because the browser is using the time stamp of the machine, there isn't anything that I can change in Workfront to help them see EST time stamps.

Is there a way to update the notifications so that we don't get 2 emails every time someone comments to someone on a proof? We are getting a lot of complaints that 2 emails go out (one from Workfront and one from Workfront Proof) every time someone is tagged in a comment.

Description - Cross-Device Analytics allows analysts to understand user behaviour across devices, by stitching device data together.I would like to see this extended to become more of a general "Cross-User-Agent Analytics", where (field-based) stitching works across devices and browsers (and even standalone browsers and in-app browsers in mobile devices).I would also like to see this extended to all AA SKUs, not just AA Ultimate.Why is this feature important to you - Given modern browsers' tracking restrictions, it might be more feasible and accurate for clients to provide their own "user ID" that analytics systems can consume. Also, with the proliferation of apps and browsers (standalone and in-app), there are many areas where a common user ID is beneficial to identify actual unique visitors, or "people".How would you like the feature to work - The client provides its own "user ID" (with Adobe providing a fallback user ID, e.g. with the current Experience Cloud ID Service). AA co