Product Communities

It would be great to have a native integration with Microsoft Advertising as an installed service option in LaunchPoint.

Hi,We recently noticed that with each analytics request we view in the adobe experience platform debugger there is a frame parameter present. We never implemented this and the adobe service desk also couldn't help us with the following questions:What is tracked with the frame variable?the answer here was that adobe analytics doesn't use the frame variable.How do these values of this variable land in adobe analytics?Can we control the values of this variable? We would like to make sure some query-parameters in the url of the page don't get into analytics, when certain query-parameters are present we would like to strip them before entering analytics.We would like to be able to control this value or be aware of what it does/where it comes from.

Hi everyone,Beginning of 2020(1st & 2nd Jan), we observed no data collection for all report suites & Adobe engineering team identified the issue pertaining to -getTimeParting plug-in. To notify all the users in our organization, we use 'Calendar events' in Reports & Analytics, but it would be great to have the same feature in Analysis Workspace.

Please consider configuring announcements to accept and send screenshots. In most cases i include a screen shot of a new view, report, dashboard, or other areas and cannot do this in announcements. So I have to switch back to email for this type of communication- where it should be contained in an announcement. Thanks.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Struggling to upload a directory full of assets into AEMaaCS from my Mac OSX laptop. Assets were pulled directly from a dispatcher cache, so they are all valid AEM filenames. AEM Desktop App 2.1.2. Issue: Any time a failure occurs, the upload operation can't be resumed, it just spins forever. The only way to move past this is to fully exit the app and restart it. There should be a way to recover from this scenario - the app should not appear to still be doing work when it's already aborted the operation.   Use-case: Content migration from AEM On-Prem to AEMaaCS. Content Transfer Tool did not work, so Desktop App and Package Manager were the only remaining options. Current/Experienced Behavior: App appears to still be doing work even though all app activity has ceased due to the error Improved/Expected Behavior: App should properly reflect the status of the current operation. It should also should warn that an e

Create an option in settings or queue settings to populate a project sponsor with the primary contact of the converted issue. At the moment, we have to check the primary contact on the issue before converting and then enter the sponsor manually.

It's currently impossible to create a true "read-only user". I can accomplish some Marketing Activity restrictions, but I'd like to be able to give access to view people in the database, and view smart list criteria without being able to modify the smart list criteria. Would be great if this functionality existed.    Today on my "read-only" user, I have "Access database" checked off, and everything below it unchecked and it is giving full edit access to the database versus just view access and it's not desireable. Any solution or potential work-around would be much appreciated! 

Inherited permissions are critical to giving people appropriate access. However, if someone removes inherited permissions or if a user strips permissions when moving a task these inherited permissions can be pretty quickly removed and it becomes very difficult for project owners to realize this.I propose adding a simple "Inherited Permissions T/F" flag on Issues, Tasks, Projects, Programs, and Portfolios. This needs to be accessible in reporting and it should pretty quickly indicate when there are no inherited permissions attached to an object. This would allow for some very easy audit reports that allow these problems to be addressed proactively.Examples of things that break without inherited permissions: reporting on actual hours, resource management practices when trying to determine availability, scheduling with predecessors when you can't find you task, etc.If a True/False flag isn't possible on these objects, what are other suggestions that Workfront can make t

Users are requesting overtime to be calculated automatically.i.e. standard working week = 40 hours (5 x 8 hours)Total time entered = 48 hoursAutomatic calculation of Overtime = (48 - 40) = 8 hours

Our clients are requesting schedules on their projects and we would like to do so by exporting the current project schedule as a Gannt chart in excel for their viewing (as our clients do not have access to our system). Also, we need to be able to translate schedules for dozens of projects into a single Excel Gannt chart, which is currently extremely time consuming by hand.Can you improve the Gannt feature within WF to be exportable so that we can manipulate the information for our client's needs/viewing.Please consider this request to be able to highlight how multiple projects for a single campaign work together by using an exported Gannt chart.

It's pretty disappointing that there is not an audit trail for adjustments made to communication limits for things like smart campaigns. 

Description - Allow to restore deleted activitiesWhy is this feature important to you - To avoid accidental loss of invested work and gained results. In large teams, users may accidentally delete activities.How would you like the feature to work - Deleting an activity moves it into a recycle bin. From there it can be restored within a grace period of 90 days.Current Behaviour - Activity can be deleted, which is irrecoverable, losing the experiences and reports. The user just needs to confirm the message “Are you sure you want to delete the activity ...? Deleted activities cannot be recovered.” 

Currently the Work List only shows tasks that are within 2 weeks of the start date. I would like to see all upcoming work, regardless of the start date.Current state: Ready to Start: Only tasks and issues that are ready to start are displayed. These tasks and issues have no predecessors or task constraints preventing them from being worked on, and the Start Date is in the past or up to two weeks in the future.Desired State: Ready to Start: Only tasks and issues that are ready to start are displayed. These tasks and issues have no predecessors or task constraints preventing them from being worked on.

We have users working in different countries within Europe and some countries have specific rules/laws that mean that certain employees may have to work specific hours per day for a period of time e.g. in the summer and no more. As we cover all resourcing requests on Workfront, we would like to be able to limit the hours that a user can work per day. We can create a specific schedule for a particular user but if work assigned to them exceeds their schedule, the resourcing tool shows they are over allocated but there is nothing to restrict the user from being assigned so it would be good if Workfront had that functionality.

Description -Add a possibility to Undo changes in Launch UIWhy is this feature important to you -When you change the rule with many events/ conditions/ rules and then accidentally delete one of them, you have to either add it from scratch again or close the component without saving and then update it again.How would you like the feature to work -Cmd+Z (Ctrl+Z) to undo the last change.  Best wishes,Andrey Osadchuk | Inspect Launch Implementation, Automate Classifications & Data Sources, Essential Bookmarks

As a System Administrator I would like to have access to customize any/all of the email notifications that are enabled. For example, if I activate the 'Issue Add to Issue Primary Contact' event notification I would like to be able to edit the text in the email that is sent to the Primary Contact. This will make all email/event notifications more use and provide the content the receiver requires.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:   Use-case: Allow images for field description e.g. https://aemlab.blogspot.com/2021/05/aem-touch-ui-component-dialog-fielddescription-image.html Current/Experienced Behavior: Rich Text gets encoded and does not render HTML Improved/Expected Behavior: Rich Text should be supported for dialog field description property Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 and AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: N/A Screenshot (if applicable): More details at https://aemlab.blogspot.com/2021/05/aem-touch-ui-component-dialog-fielddescription-image.html Code package (if applicable):  

On the the main difficulties with styling forms is that it is quite difficult to distinguish form elements apply various styling to them.@Sanford Whiteman​ has provided some very powerful solution using tags but the limit of it is that your CSS needs to know in advance the fields that are used in the form and their layout.The whole form styling would be much easier if, on any field in the form designer, we could add class to the input field itself, to it' label, to the form column and the form row :These class would automatically be injected into the form html.This is a functionality that many CMS offer, and I simply got inspired by these -Greg

Description - While sharing segments/calculated metrics with a user who have same first & last name i.e multiple users with the same name in an organization. Email ID can be appended for such users in the sharing list, as it is not clear which user to choose from the list, I have noticed Email ID does show up for the users with the same name while sharing workspace project. If this feature can be added to segment & calculated metrics sharing it would be really helpful. Why is this feature important to you - It will be easy to share the component with the user in one go, instead of test and trial which is time consuming. How would you like the feature to work - Append Email ID in the sharing list for the users with exactly the same name.Current Behaviour - it appears as duplicate user account and does not provide clarity which one to choose.

We have a need to be able to post the same update on certain tasks in multiple projects at the same time...task name is the same on every project. This would make our Marketing team VERY happy!

capability to re-baseline projects in a portfolio as a bulk action in Workfront.

In the new WF experience, the notifications in the upper right hand corner display the task name and the person making a note. But it doesn't show a project name or program name as well. For our users, since we utilize project templates 100% of the time, the task names are repetitive so it's hard to distinguish based on the quick notification which project the task may relate to. Is there an option to display the project name in the notification?

Description -Activity Duration currently displays as: "Duration: Mon, 21 Jun 21 12:01 AM until deactivated."Why is this feature important to you -Avoid possible confusion.How would you like the feature to work -Two minor enhancements would clarify the date and time: 1) Display the full, four-digit year; 2) provide the time zone.This would be clearer: "Duration: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:01 AM ET until deactivated."Current Behaviour - "Duration: Mon, 21 Jun 21 12:01 AM until deactivated."

We want to be able to distinguish a true Document approval version count between a business lead and creative review.Possibly counting how many times a Document approval has been Rejected and by which role.Example: A Document Approval can have 10 versions, but how many were Creative vs. the lead?

Currently if you copy the URL from your web browser while viewing a proof and share it with someone else, it "logs" them in as you and uses your name when making comments. I know that you are supposed to utilize the "share proof" link, however, this is a very common action we have found our users trying to do - and is a huge red flag knowing that they can share this proof with anyone regardless if they have access to the proof workflow.