Product Communities

Hello all, Workfront has confirmed that they currently only support 100% zooming, and will soon support up to 200% zoom (WCAG 2.1 compliant). What this means is that at times if you are/over 100% zoom on your browser your screen may get wonky. Below are two examples that I run into this issue and it is pretty annoying. I almost never keep my browser over 90% zoomed. Pretty simple fix, but super annoying, and I am just surprised it is not supported.When trying to send a report: If you go to utilize the send report option, and select a recurring send (which I do for TONS of reports), and you are not at 100%, the screen goes white when you try to add a resource to send the report to. You cannot proceed until you get zoom to 100% and refresh. SEE SNIP BELOW: If you are looking to book someone's time off, or really anytime you see the mini-calendars on the screen (schedules, etc), and you are not 100% zoom, the calendars give you the wrong dates! For example, my colleague thought Workfront

Keeping the browser zoomed always to 100% is not feasible. When projecting Workfront to a large room of people, no one can read what is in Workfront in the back.

Just like you can view who uploaded a document and when in update feeds, we'd like to have the ability to see who downloaded a document and when. We need to see who downloaded documents sometimes for confidentiality reasons.

A lot of companies are using Google for their email and calendars in 2021 and it is critical that "Add to Calendar" functionality is added as an out of the box functionality for webinars.   If a "Add to Calendar" token can be created for Google that will include the {member.webinarURL} token it would be a huge step forward as I find it hard to believe that this doesn't exist today.

While it's great we can combine multiple STATIC files into one proof, we REALLY need the ability to combine multiple MOV files.My creative team works on A LOT of videos and many of them have multiple versions. It is not an efficient workflow having to constantly go back and forth through multiple files when proofing. They should be able to all be combined into one.

When trying to generate a proof from a file in Google suite, we need to use the interactive setting. This prompts the user to download Workfront Proof tool., and then log in to Google suite every time they want to review the proof which leads to a poor user experience. We would like to see the google suite being a supported file format of proofing which should hopefully remove the problem of seeing a 'login screen' when using a static page or downloading the software to use an interactive screen.

Description - In case if you need to disabled the extension for some reason, there is option to disable and once you clicked on that action there is no choice to revert back.  Why is this feature important to you Because if we have multiple extensions installed in your property and by mistake you disable the wrong extension then there is no way to cancel.  How would you like the feature to work -Have a Cancel button next to OK button so that user can cancel the action and return back to Installed extension screen. Current Behaviour -   

The documented default for Proof is to send a daily summary of comments. For users managing dozens of proofs at a time, this is bogging down their email. I think there are a variety of ways to customize this experience: allow the user to set defaults for when comments come in, decisions are made, or they're mentioned. Related: It would help if the admin could set or even lock defaults for the above options based on access level.

ProofHQ currently can not view content in PDF "Sticky Notes" comments. Our clients often send us PDFs riddled with them, from multiple reviewers. It would be great to be able to see them by default, much like how you can see comments and changes in Track Changes view in MS Word.

Description - Currently CDF logs gives us the legacy segment IDs and to check for any segment, it involves login into AAM UI and then back the trace each of the segment to know whether it was realized or not. This take a lot of effort to do back tracing a legacy ID from multiple segments.Why is this feature important to you - Having segment IDs in the CDF which ease the job for end users who are utilizing these logs for data tracing. With segmentID in the file, one can directly check whether a segment was came in fine or not.How would you like the feature to work - Just replace legacy ID with segment ID.Current Behaviour - Currently legacy ID being exported in CDF logs.

I would like a way to edit planned hours at the assignment level:task > multiple assignees > different hours per assigneePM = 1hrDev = .5hrNow the scope changes and we need to double the timePM = 2hrDev = 1hrIf I just double the planned hours at the task, Workfront simply divides the planned hours evenly across assignees.For a PM who runs several projects, on a client that causes such shifts at least once a week , doing this currently in WF is super time consuming - in list view everything' would be right there and editable. The workaround easily doubles if not triples time spent on this I am looking for an efficient way to edit allocation on a task, something like this:

Hey Team-There is a pain-point that has been particularly excruciating for me. There have been several times, for one reason or another, the work I have done on a WS project has not been saved and is now gone forever. Surely, I am not the only one who has experienced this.Could your team provide a SAVE-ty net? Auto-save is a feature that I would appreciate immensely.Thank you in advance!Ron

I have lost hours of work over time using workspaces due to not remembering to press save, after having my attention pulled onto something else. Sometimes workspace tries to accommodate this with its unsaved changes prompt, sort of a 'pick up where you left off' feature, but it doesn't save everything. Just yesterday I lost about 2 hours of work.An autosave feature saving every few minutes, or after every action, would save significant time. I'm thinking along the lines of cloud services such as Google and Microsoft documents, which cloud save constantly.I imagine there are resource and usability implications to this, though I would happily accept a second or two of sluggishness now and again to prevent loss of work.Where a workspace is saved with a name, the autosave would save against the named project.Where a draft is being worked on, it could be autosaved into a drafts category.And to throw in some idea creep, perhaps we could get version history added along with this.

Group Admins can currently build custom Layout Templates.We would like an option to disable this functionality.This allows us to control Layout Templates at a central level.

Can additional restrictions be added to the access level for "financial data"? If you give someone edit access it let's them recalculate finance, which you rarely want to do on an ongoing project. There are cases where it is acceptable, but an admin should do that. Unfortunately, if you don't have edit access to "financial data" you can't update expense records or see billing records. Our Project Managers are responsible for some of the financial data, but should never be able to recalculate it.

Certain entries can be searched for in the Logs tab of the Experience Platform Debugger. The search not only uses the message visible in the register, but the entire message text, although this is not visible in the debugger and cannot be viewed. Since there is no point in using text for the search that cannot be made visible, the search should only use the visible message.Alternatively, it should be possible to configure whether hidden message text should also be searched.

The new Workfront experience only shows the first 5 Favorites. You have to click "Show More" to see the rest. Meanwhile, most of the screen is left blank. Please return to showing all Favorites by default with a scroll bar.

When I assign a task or post an update, I tag the relevant team members. When I start typing their name, it shows all my users in alphabetical order. The project team members are already assigned to the project in Workfront. We're most likely to tag people assigned to the project so project team members should be at the top of the list.

would love to see an actual time stamp under proofing for proofs as well as updates "tuesday at 2:22 pm" instead of "14 hours ago" thanks!

Would love to see the ability to keep report conditional formatting when a report is included in a dashboard, as well as the ability to apply conditional formatting to collections using text mode. Overall, expanded use of formatting within reports would be nice. We often send dashboards and reports to our executive team who like to see things presented nicely.

Description -Why is this feature important to you -How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour -Hello,The the Event description should always be in English? For example we get some times Japanese characters:'プロジェクトが更新されました : 名前=bim-cim_wp プロジェクト ID=613038bc06f4225dcb202cdb 所有者=XXX'instead of'Project updated: Name = bim-cim_wp Project ID = 613038bc06f4225dcb202cdb Owner = XXX'Thanks

Add a new visualization that combines Summary Number, Summary Change and Line.Summary numberTrend line that can be optionally displayed for the reporting period set in the panel or for a fixed period like last 30 daysMost frequently used comparisons like WoW, MoM, QoQ, YoYCustom comparison — a user adds a date range that will be compared with the previous one (e.g. if custom date range equals Last 10 days, the comparison will be run with 10 days prior)Reporting period (works like Custom comparison; if the reporting period is last 30 days, the comparison will be run with 30 days prior)This will significantly simplify dashboards as instead of 3-5 visualizations mapped to one or few tables, there will be a single vizualization mapped to a table to pull only the summary number from (the other values will be pulled automatically based on the settings rather than mapping to freeform tables). Here is how it may look: 

We would like to see a Baseline Custom Form added as a new custom form type in Workfront. When we create new Baselines, we would like to be able to attach a custom form directly to the Baseline object, and record our reasons for capturing the Baseline in a standardized way. This will help us review triggers for our Baselines in aggregate, and identify trends/bottlenecks across all of our projects. Note that this is a different idea from this one, which asks for project/task custom field data to be captured automatically when a new baseline is taken. We are asking for a new custom form type that will be attached directly to the baseline object.

When looking at a Team that has been set to view as a Kanban board and you try to filter members of the team, it current only sorts by team members who have the most number of assigned tasks. Can the ability to toggle between "alphabetical by name" and "number of assigned" be added?

Would like the page search ability like we have in other sections / other landing pages. Typically left of Filter option or elsewhere near the list/result area,