Product Communities

When the instance has OAuth enabled for the SFDC sync (which is all new instances by default), the Salesforce admin page still shows a "login with Salesforce" button after the sync user is logged in and while the sync is still active. This may be confusing to an admin user who may believe that the sync user is no longer logged in, or there is otherwise an issue with the sync.   It appears that the Disable Sync and Edit Sync Options in the gray bar at the top may indicate that the sync is set up. However, it could be helpful/clearer to include a message such as "Currently logged in as [user sync name]" and/or changing the button to "log in with different SFDC user" or otherwise showing a different experience in the admin page between when the sync is not yet set up and when the sync is active.

in WF classic I could command+F search a long report to look up specific information... or any long page. Now, in the New Experience, command+F will only search what is visible within my browser. There could be 100+ entries in my search query but if its not visible where I am in the page, 0/0 results. Why did we lose this functionality? Can this be turned back on?random example of why i'd use this: I have a task report that list out ALL tasks assigned out to users that are due in the next 10 days. If i see a few projects are running behind, i'll [command+F - {search employee name} and tap enter a few times - this helps me see if they are just running behind on one project or behind on everything.... In the new experience, am I supposed to create a custom prompt report where i type in each user, or whatever other specific information I'm looking for? Other example: I may need to create a new user, i'll go to my list of all users, command+F a similar user, then copy their

Description - Campaign data not surfacing data available Why is this feature important to you -Our users are asking for the Campaign Analytics to include the Sent date event just the Sent for the first sent for a Campaign. Our users need this date to analyze engagement from days when the Campaign was sent.  How would you like the feature to work -Sent date data would be available for inclusion in Adobe Campaign analyics. Current Behaviour -This data point is not available. 

Description - When I search in Launch, I'd like to be able to know what rule a rule component belongs to.Why is this feature important to you - Right now, if I need to find the rule where prop17 is set to "resources", or I need to make a change to every rule that references the Criteo marketing pixel, I have to resort to digging through code, because the current search functionality is so limited. It's not exaggerating to say even some slight improvements to Launch's search would give me back many hours of my life.How would you like the feature to work - When I enter a search term, like "prop17", and get results int he search drop down, each rule component would have the rule name either along side the component name, under it, on the same line as it, or available as a tooltip sort of thing when I hover over it. Better yet, if I could click "...more" to get to a search results page that has a complete list of matches (and information about the rule it is in). Current Beh

Customer has project managers and resource managers that are required to have manage access to projects in order to do their job, but this access allows them to potentially approve the business case for these projects. The customer wants to know if there is a way to limit access to the business case.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Move the manage tags button to be on the top menu bar on the More details screen, so users can quickly manage tags when viewing an asset from a workflow.  Note:  When you click on Payload from a workflow, you are landed on the More Details screen. Use-case: Move the manage tags button to be on the top menu bar on the More details screen, so users can quickly manage tags when viewing an asset from a workflow.  Note:  When you click on Payload from a workflow, you are landed on the More Details screen. Current/Experienced Behavior: No Manage Tags Option Present Improved/Expected Behavior: Add Manage Tags Option Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.9+ Customer-name/Organization name: Humana Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: As a user, I’d like to see a red notification pop up that lets me know I’m missing values in the *Rights Managed Asset field so that it will display the same way as other required data fields.  Use-case: adding metadata to an asset Current/Experienced Behavior: Rights Managed Asset field and other required fields using a dropdown picker do not show up in red when asset is first opened and only displays a red outline but no triangle after an attempt is made to save the asset.  Improved/Expected Behavior: Those dropdown fields will look like free text required metadata fields and display a red outline and triangle when asset is first opened.  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   AEM as a cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Mark Edelstein/Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):  

Need the ability to add images to Dashboards that is intuitive and easy. There is no need for an image to have a title like it does now if you add an image via the Add External Page. Images should be able to be added and then the image should size accordingly based on screen and resolution size. I have 1000 of users that use this system and there is a 100% turnover rate (retail)I need ways to include instructions within the system so that new users coming on can quickly and at a glance know what reports mean and simple navigation. The ability to add images cleanly would allow for easy imagery and text available on dashboards to help the users utilize the system thus prompting higher adoption rate.

There is no way in WF right now to find objects that were shared with a team/group/company. For example: A previous admin set up something that somehow shared ALL our requests in all our queues with the entire Company (3k people). So anyone, regardless of user access, can go to Requests > Submitted and see all requests ever submitted. This is obviously a security risk.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: An Author should be able to set some preferences in the Action bar, such as sort alphabetically, always display in column view, alwas open the references sidebar... Use-case: When an Author opens a section, AEM will load them base on creation date and in Card view. An Author can click on the action bar to sort them alphabetically or to display them in column view; or any other configuration which help the author find the necessary resources. But when an author then navigates to another section or returns later during his day, the author always has to repeat the same task of clicking sort alphabetically, display in column view... If an an author could set his preferred sort of view, then he would not have to repeat these tasks every time. Current/Experienced Behavior: Repeated manual task of setting the view configuration in the action bar Improved/Expected Behavior: A saved preference so the author does not have to repeatedly set

Description - App on phone that mutes any music played during a phone call (mute of music playing while on hold)Why is this feature important to you - I won't have to only speak with customer support through text and chat messagingHow would you like the feature to work - As describedCurrent Behaviour - There isn't an app which performs this.

In the Slack integration that enables posting an update to a project, issue or task - include details about the original post. This should include:original author namedate/time of post (in Slack)ideally a link to the original postCurrently this only shows info for the WF user who added it as an update - and makes it look like they wrote the update which is inaccurate.

Currently in Workload Balancer the only option is to see the task name or project name when reviewing work and assignments. We propose adding the functionality to support additional data elements to the view.This could be accomplished through:allowing configuration of additional columns (like most other views in WF)standard option to select data elements like: program, portfolio, and companyallowing display of a custom fieldenable the current field to be a calculated value (that could reference multiple layers of objects similar to what can be done in value expressions elsewhere - like grouping headers)In our organization it's not unusual to have multiple projects of similar (and even the same name) between customers. We leverage fields like program, company and custom fields to distinguish between them. In the Workload Balancer seeing that information is not possible. This requires jumping between screens to know what is being assigned and worked on.Furthermore, showing an add

Enable a configuration option at the system level to support setting how many weeks are in a month. Currently Workfront assumes this is always 4 weeks = 1 month.This behavior means that 12 months in Workfront = 11 calendar months. It also means that every quarter is a week short on views.We propose an instance level configuration option that would enable us to set workfront to use a 4.3 weeks = 1 month to mirror other non-Workfront reports and configurations.

I think the pinned menu concept is very nice, but the current interface allows for modifying/removing the pinned items too easy. A user can accidentally remove a pinned page or drag it to a different position because those options are always available.It would be better if the pinned items are in "read-only" mode after pinning (can't remove or drag). An "Edit" option would allow the pinned items to be dragged or removed. This way, the user has to explicitly go into edit mode to change the pinned menu items and thus avoid accidental manipulation.

Right now when we do a multi-file download from WF, the resulting .zip file, and unzipped folder name, has a very cryptic and completely useless (to the user) name like ATSK8657044837605293599.zip.It gets especially arduous when there are several of these zips and folders jamming up my Downloads folder. What would be waaay more useful is if the download zip file name were human-readable – something simple like WF-download-2022-01-28-0304pm.zip.We would love it if the project name could be at the front of download name

Please allow admins to configure which drawing & markup tools are available to their organization in ProofHQ. We have so many reviewers that misuse the tools and it causes confusion, extra time to complete revisions. I'd love the option to 'turn off' tools we don't want our reviewers using.

Add the ability to keep tasks collapsed when leaving the task view for a project. With large project plans, the need to collapse elements each time you enter the project is time consuming.

Today, when editing a custom form users have the ability under Additional Settings to limit view and edit capabilities to users who can/areView the issueContribute to the issueManage the issueAdmin onlyIt would be extremely useful to have an additional option to limit viewing or editing based on the user's team (or group).

We have finance partners across 35 markets and there is a regular annual demand to pull large volumes of time data from Workfront.The platform currently limits exports to 50,000 / 65,000 / 100,000 rows of data at a time, depending on the file format.We need the file limit to be unlimited; cutting the data is a pain point.We do extract time data via an API into a large data warehouse for almost real-time reporting, however, this will not offer the flexibility our finance partners require.

It would be great if the technology that the forms and landing pages use were updated for both desktop and mobile devices. We have to have a developer code everything new that we create because of this obstacle.

1- To change week to week (forward or back) you need to select 'back to Timesheets' then select the week and start again. it would be easier to have the ability to change weeks from the User Timesheet screen rather than going back & forth.2- Expand/ Collapse All button for Projects/ Tasks on the timesheets screen

Right now in the Updates feed on an object, user comments will show as posted "last Tuesday at 8:00am". We'd like this to be changed to a consistent timestamp (MM/DD/YY at 00:00 am/pm). The current "last Tuesday" setup, as we've come to call it, is confusing since it's really referring to the most recent Tuesday, not necessarily Tuesday of last week (as the name implies). For an example, let's say today is Friday January 10th. A comment posted on Monday January 6th will show as "last Monday". This implies the update was posted the previous week instead of just "01/06/2020". In situations where we have to take screenshots of Update feeds or copy/paste a thread into another system, we lose all relevant time data on affected updates.

Add a filter on the Home screen that allows users to sort by task or issue status. This was possible in Classic but not in the New Experience. Our design team relies heavily on this feature and having to create and use a separate report is clumsy and slow.

The team reviewing routing documents keeps checking them out and not checking them back in. Confusion ensues. Would like the ability to remove this option on certain interfaces to eliminate the problem.