Product Communities

We are getting daily notifications with "Marketo is unable to update the following records in Microsoft Dynamics." These are records that have recently been merged and are no longer active (deleted) in Marketo and Dynamics due to that reason.   We receive this notification because updates must be in process. You can ignore these notifications as they do not cause sync issues. We would prefer that these notifications do not come in at all since the records no longer exist in both systems. Hence, no actions are needed in Marketo or CRM.

We want to give users permission to be able to import leads but we ONLY want these users to be able to import leads using “Skip new people and updates” List Import Mode ONLY.   i.e. we don't want to give them permission to import leads using “Default” List Import Mode as we don't want them to be able to import new leads.   Would be awesome if user Role permissions could be configured to do this

I'd like to have the ability to display a field based on what role, team, group a user is in.

We're managing a large implementation across several countries where we have limited contact with the users. We're not sure what our users are finding helpful (and equally importantly, what they're not using at all). It would be good if administrators could see which reports are being viewed. Not just total figures but the ability to see which users are accessing which reports would be useful as well, as we would contact the users of deprecated reports or such.

There are teams that are interested in seeing if there could be functionality to see when an approver has downloaded a document. This is important as it will allow document owners to see if the approvers/team members are taking action on the document.

Hi,In order to manage properly all risks in a project, it would be great to have custom forms/fields to have more information in risks menu.The vision is to combine the default fields with new one's, in a custom form, as occurs in issues and tasks. Is this possible?Also would be great to have the possibility to convert risks into other objects(tasks or issues)

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: "Build Form" should "stick" on the metadata schema editor page Use-case: To be able to create metadata schemas easier Current/Experienced Behavior: When we are creating metadata schemas that have a lot of fields, it is cumbersome to drag the field from the top of the page (since the "Build Form" scrolls with the page) and drag it again to the bottom of the page Improved/Expected Behavior: The "Build Form" should stick to the page and not scroll with the page so that it is within easy reach. The "Build Form" interface then should have a separate "scroll" from the page, to scroll through the field types. We also think it would be better to have it in the left side of the screen and collapsible so that it does not intrude as much in building the metadata schema.  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable): &nb

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Default option values when creating dropdown options in the metadata schema editor Use-case: To be able to create metadata schemas faster especially when creating dropdowns with a lot of options Current/Experienced Behavior: When creating dropdown options, we need to enter manually both "Option text" and "Option value"  Improved/Expected Behavior: When creating dropdown options, as a default for the "Option value", it should have the same value as the value inputted in "Option text"  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to copy fields in the metadata schema editor Use-case: When creating a metadata schema that involves similar fields, it will be a lot easier if there was a copy function for the fields Current/Experienced Behavior: No copy function for metadata fields. We need to define similar rule settings over and over again for several metadata fields Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to copy fields so that rule settings, field type, and field options (if applicable) will be copied as well.  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to re-arrange options in the dropdown fields in the metadata schema editor Use-case: Easier to maintain dropdowns in metadata schemas Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, the metadata schema editor does not allow the re-arrangement of the dropdown options. For us to change the order of the options, we need to delete and create the options again according to our preferred dropdown option arrangement. Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to drag and drop the dropdown options according to our wanted display from first to the last dropdown option  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description When using Analysis Workspace, one key workflow of my users is the creation of Segments from filtered Freeform tables. While we can use the super efficient workflow of right-clicking a selection of items from a table, we can't do the same with the summary row of a table:However, being able to create Segments from those rows would be highly useful. Filters and breakdowns defined for those rows could automatically be used for the segment definition. In the screenshot above, right-clicking the Page row would produce a Segment like HIT(Page exists) as there is no filter used on that row. On the Entry Page row, which is a breakdown and has an advanced filter for contains "category" and "2", the Segment could be HIT(Page equals "articles" AND (Entry Page contains "category" AND Entry Page contains "2")).This simple workflow would make it much quicker to build segments like this and free users from the tedious validation required after Segments have been built.Why is this fea

Moving a task from one project to another is more cumbersome and time consuming in the new interface. In 'Classic' a user can search for the destination project using part of the project name and case sensitivity doesn't matter. In the new interface you must start at the first letter of the destination project name and correctly enter the full name (including upper/lower case) until you winnow down your results enough to see the destination project. This is one area of the new UI where the update is inferior to what it replaced.Please reconsider the Destination Project Search. Having it operate like it did in the Classic interface is much more user-friendly.

In Workspace, is there a way to turn off background and percentages at an account level?  Every project I create I have to go into each column in every table and turn off these features.  Would be great if I could do that once at a project level or even at an account level.  Thanks.-Peter  

The new Landing page layout is nice... but there's one thing I would add!   In our Marketo instance, we have several workspaces and domain aliases setup. I never use the default domain for the work I do in my workspaces and need to change the domain every time I open a landing page. It would be nice to be able to pick the domain alias when previewing the landing page. It would be nice to have an option in the admin area to set the default LP domain alias for each workspace.   At the moment, I'm using a javascript injected snippet to achieve a similar objective. A "Change Domain" drop-down allows me to pick the domain I want to use in one of the 4 workspaces I'm currently active in. Using the drop down, I can pick the domain alias to use and it updates the link so I can click to open it or so I can copy it to the clipboard.   The drop down could contain a list of all alias domains or a sub-set configurable in the admin section for each workspace.

I would like to EXPORT OLD Programs to CLEAN / DELETE them out of our Marketo instance (to keep things 'tight & right') It is way too time consuming to UNHOOK everything and delete each asset / program manually. I have 4+ years of programs to delete -- across 10+ business units. And we have only three resources to run campaigns and manage the instance. Another thought is -- after 2 years of archiving -- Marketo automatically deletes assets/programs.

When using Analytics to evaluate experiments, it is very common to have multiple tables and visualizations with two(+) distinct segments (audiences).As teams build out their analysis program its very efficient to create a templated approach, since the dimensions and visualizations evaluated can be fairly consistent among experiments.Currently a user needs to manually replace each segment reference within a templated project, for each new experiment.This is incredibly tedious and can involve upwards of 40 drag and drops.  This request is to introduce functionality to enable users to right click on a component and replace all references within the project.This functionality is available in other analysis/viz platforms; below is how it appears within Tableau workbooks.

Description - The threshold in the alert system is a statistical calculation on the average. Current alert system uses anomaly detection based on the selected granularity:Monthly granularity: 15 months + same range last yearWeekly granularity: 15 weeks + same range last yearDaily granularity: 35 days + same range last yearHourly granularity: 336 hoursWhy is this feature important to you - For business purpose, we need to detect an anomaly based on previous day data, or previous week data. Looking at "35 days + same range last year" or "15 weeks + same range last year" when your web app/pages have been recently updated doesn't make sense.How would you like the feature to work - There is a wide range of possibilities offered with dates when you create a report, but not with the alert system, very limiting. I would like to receive an alert when today's data are xx% above (or below) previous full day data, only. Example: Today, event A fired 200 times, but it fired 100 times yesterday. I w

WF has a significant gap in Document functionality. There is no way to assign a type when a document is being uploaded. You can create a field on a custom form and hope the user navigates to Custom forms, selects the correct form and then updates the correct field, but that is massively clumsy. WF competitors allow a type to be selected from a dropdown list as part of the document upload process. The list of available types should be managed by the system admins. This will support reporting and risk checking of mandatory documents being loaded to a task or project. In a single client project, there are these separate doc types that we need to assign: campaign brief, data brief, business brief, media plan, print brief, laser brief, comms checklist etc etc, and they all need to be identified and reported separately. Right now, WF doesn't offer this but it would be a massive win if we can have it and it would also bring WF up to the level of its competitors in this area. Please

We are looking to update a data value depending on a link that is clicked in a specific email, we need to have the option to select the specific link instead of just clicked link in email where it would pull in all links.    If we could have a constraint of link we can then update different values instead of creating multiple smart campaigns

Hi,   Was just wondering if there is an easy way to export only the fields that have been blocked in the admin section along with the block updates from value so it is easier to the admin to go through the list and make changes based on their business need.   Thanks, vineela.

Tint every alt row with in a task list for easy reading. With large list this feature would be nice to be able to turn on and off.

Description - Site freezes when enabling data layer monitoringWhy is this feature important to you - want to be able to monitor changes in our data layerHow would you like the feature to work - as stated in the documentationCurrent Behaviour - after I specify a data layer name the site I am trying to debug will not fully load.  When I remove the data layer name it starts working again.Anyone else experience this issue?This is on Chrome and the app I am trying to debug is Gaia/Java.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: There is no exclusion or blocked keywords list that can be configured for Smart tags Use-case: Currently, there is no way to prevent Sensei from adding some keywords via smart tags. This is important since in our organization, we cannot simply tag assets with race, gender and ethnicity tags without approval or consent Current/Experienced Behavior: There's no exclusion list Improved/Expected Behavior: Have a keyword exclusion list Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): ACS Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description - There is currently no way to remove a base connection for data ingestion, not even with the existing API.Why is this feature important to you - This would add two benefits. First, it keeps the UI clean of unused or unwanted connections. Second, it would allow for better automation of AEP architecture. Any scripting to generate base connections would need to correctly create a connection of a desired name on the first try since editing isn't possible and reusing the name of a connection isn't possible.How would you like the feature to work - Both an API that allows permenant deletion of base connections, where a name can be reused, and, when a base connection is clicked in the UI, it would have a deletion button above the details pane.Current Behaviour - There is no way to delete a base connection permenantly through the UI or API, but using the API you can at least delete the connection even if the name cannot be reused.

Description: I have a field to identify a group of records.I have four profiles with this group ID in a custom field in the Profile feature.My goal is to identify these profiles using enrichment features in the respective event configuration.My problem is. Why despite having four profiles identified with this group ID, why can I only receive email for one profile. Each profile has its own email address. Why: Real Time Communication Submission for multiple emails.How: I would like the transactionmessage enrichment to accept the association of 1 to N. with this limitation, I will have to use the workflow.Currently: If I want to continue using TransactionMe, the energetment association has to be 1 to 1. and not 1 to N.Problem: Let's have a rework and think about adapting and / or rebuilding integration into one of the formats below:If Acs really can not do that. I think of two other ways to make that sending mail:* First, use the calling workflow by external signa