Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Description -Determine a way we can see how often a report is being used.Determine a way to get a list of all reports that have not been opened within the last 2 years.Determine users that have not accessed AA within 2 years.Why is this feature important to you - I want to find a way to get rid of old reports that are no longer being used in Adobe analytics. I want to get rid of Adobe analytics users that have not accessed Adobe analytics for a while or maybe 2 years and over. How would you like the feature to work - A filter on the table that contains all reports and adobe analytics users. Current Behaviour - I'm unable to find one.
Description - I see Audience Manager already allows Cross-bucket Auth. Our company would love to utilize this for Adobe Analytics. Why is this feature important to you - My company has restrictions that disallow sharing of persistent S3 User credentials. This would allow us to ingest our Analytics data into our own data pipelines for enrichment How would you like the feature to work - Exactly as described by Audience Managers specs works for us: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/audience-manager/user-guide/implementation-integration-guides/receiving-audience-data/batch-outbound-data-transfers/authorize-s3-cross-bucket.html?lang=enHowever, if it could be implemented into the UI in some way, that would be great. Maybe you could link to your account id similar to how you link to your rsa public key for SFTP. Current Behaviour - Currently we must either set up an SFTP server, which is additional unnecessary overhead, or create a persistent user, which our Security
Currently, the only option for viewing a Word doc is for Workfront to download the document. I would like to be able to open the document in a preview window, similar to how a PDF opens.
At present the removal process of the Marketo instance from the Marketo Measure take weeks of time. While the CRM integration removal takes up to 3 days, if not less depending on the number of touchpoints and other data synced to Marketo Measure from the CRM which is still reasonable and comparatively better than the weeks of time it takes for the process of Marketo integration removal. I agree that removing platform(s) especially MAP / CRM is not something that someone would do often, but it'd be great to be able to quickly remove the Marketo from Marketo Measure if need be.
Many of my users, especially new users, are confused about the difference between Proof Approvals and Document Approvals. People get these mixed up constantly. I want to be able to hide the "Approvals" tab in the left sidebar in the Document Details Landing page. This landing page is currently not covered by Layout Template controls.Thanks!
It would be helpful if we could paste screenshots directly into the Update section without having save it and then attach it.
Currently when an issue is in "awaiting feedback" status, the status automatically changes back to "in progress" as soon as the primary contact takes action. This is frustrating in situations where a user simply comments to confirm receipt and the status should not be changed back to in progress. Admin should be able to disable this feature, or even better, this should be a feature that is enabled at a project level. This often causes disruption for my teams who have to constantly change the status back to 'awaiting feedback' if they still need information from a primary contact.
hi. its 2022. im a person with an unconventional name (perhaps one that is in a cultural minority in the US (ie - not white) and includes punctuation). my name may be conventional in my country, but here it is not. and now i cannot edit my name to be my name. please allow special characters in name field for one.workfront and workfront live. this will also allow people to add their pronouns like this: FIrst: SydneyLast: (she / they) Gregory
Currently, there is no feature to automatically subscribe users to projects whether they are project owners or other users shared with the project.Issue requesters can receive notifications in the updates even if not tagged on them; however this does not apply to project updates.Looking for an automatic subscription or other means in which project owners can receive updates on their projects even if they might have not been tagged on
its 2022 and im queer. i look like a woman. i was born a woman. i identify outside of the current gender expressions that are available to me and as such use they / them pronouns. sometimes she is okay, sometimes he is okay. i need to be able to indicate this in one.workfront profile and to be able to configure my users pronouns, allow users to self-select pronouns, bulk upload pronouns, etc. i also need to be able to update my name without a ticket on both one.workfront and within our instance of workfront. this is because i may decide to transition my gender publicly in the future. seeing my old name (often referred to as a dead name) can be very traumatic - making changing my name as easy as possible will help me feel safe using this tool.please do this. it would mean so much to your gender fluid, LGBTQIA+, and well everyone!! some helpful information is listed below. (keep in mind, some people have MIXED PRONOUNS: she/ they)
I work with many groups of people an thus need a lot of different reports/dashboards.I would like the ability to "combine" multiple dashboards into a "main" dashboard. That way i could group the reports based on the team or work that is occuring. Example: I have pre-billing reports one 1 dashboard, and then billing reports on another. I would like to be able to add both of those dashboards together into a main BILLING dashboard but at the top there would be "tabs" similar to a browser, that would like me toggle between the two different dashboards. Allowing me to better organize my work and the reports needed.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Option to restrict the characters allowed in Create Tag Wizard using Regex Use-case: During SOLR/other third-party apps/service integration Current/Experienced Behavior: As '+' is not converted to '-', this is causing some issues in our project. Especially, when tag data flows from AEM to SOLR and vice-versa. Improved/Expected Behavior: Let the customer decides, what all character needs to be allowed in creating Tag/Namespace Wizard Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.9 Customer-name/Organization name: Agilent Technologies Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
It would be helpful if we could customize the email subject line to include the Queue Topic. We can currently include the Queue Topic ID, but not the name.This is what is sent for the email subject line: class com.attask.model.RKQueueTopic:61785a1501bf7f506688ac7723d2f95e - AlumniUpdate Spring 2022 Desired email subject line:Newsletter - Alumni Update Spring 2022 Thanks!
Would like an option where we can enable Proof Reviews to also show on the Kanban (in addition to the tasks). In our case, the ideal scenario would be:Proofs created by the Kanban team would show in a custom status lane called something like "Proofs out for review" . And when the primary decision maker has made a decision, that Proof card would automatically move into a custom "Proofs requiring action" custom status lane.
Having a program/project wildcards will allow a custom section within a project or program to run a report without the user having to answer a prompt.
If I want to round numbers, I can currently use the calculated metric's function - "Round" This will output something like this: I would like to use the decimal places option to round up as well, where the following config gives the same result. This would help create the metrics faster and also put a use to the negative numbers that are can be selected in the UI, but currently not allowed to save.
Description - Add the ability to switch, what is green and red (good or bad) Why is this feature important to you - I have instances where a metric is increasing, but this is a bad thing, but in the mobile scorecard there is no ability to made this increase a RED color, so it shows Green, which makes the user believe this is good. Because of the lack of annotation capabilities, this makes the scorecard unusable without continuous explanation. How would you like the feature to work - Have a toggle button to switch from Red to Green or Green to Red Current Behavior - Currently it is automatically set based on some criteria, unknown to me, it shows wither Green or Red.
When a new request intake form is open, whenever you stop and hover your mouse the name of the custom form on the intake appears. This not only seems redundant/unnecessary, in some instances it interferes with the "?" pop up for providing further directions/information on a custom field. I suggest that it is removed or that system admins have the ability to turn that function off.
Workspace allows reports only to be sent das PDF or CSV but not as HTML, which is possible under Reports.Please add this feature.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: having the ability to open the blueprint control center (classic UI) in aem cloud service, Currently, any classic UI tool is disabled on cloud service, and the blueprint control center provides an interesting and useful option to manage MSM. I know about Live Copy Overview tool but blueprint control center has more options and its more helpful for business need Use-case: As a user, I need blueprint control center to manage MSM with options to check all the page status, rollout it out, restore any page deleted, restore any component canceled inheritance in one place Current/Experienced Behavior: I cannot access blueprint control center on cloud service Improved/Expected Behavior: to able to access blueprint control center on cloud service Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): Co
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Right now if business authors wants to move asset and rename in bulk they can first move assets in bulk from one folder to another, but they can't rename in bulk, at a time one asset we need to rename. Which is time consuming. Use-case: Ability to provide bulk move and rename functionality , so they can accomplish task in one go. Current/Experienced Behavior: You can't rename assets in bulk. Improved/Expected Behavior: Authors able to move and rename assets in bulk. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.7 + Customer-name/Organization name: Hershey's Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Currently, the system does not stop a user from adding approval workflows to tasks or issues within a project that is already in Completed status. Email notifications do not go out and approvers are unable to log their approval or rejection. It would be nice to have a hard stop with a descriptive error message:The project status cannot be changed to 'Complete' until open approvals are completed (and list the objects with links needing approvals)The approval process cannot be attached because the project status is in 'Complete'
Having submitted my fair share of support tickets in Marketo, I'd love to see some (hopefully) simple improvements that would make the experience a lot smoother: With the main ticket description at the top of the page, follow-up comments should be oldest first (this also makes more sense given that the comment box is at the bottom of the page) Add a window expander for the comment box (it's available here in the community!) - it takes a really long time to write out a detailed ticket or comment because you can only see 5 lines at a time, resulting in constant scrolling Allow links to be embedded in text - makes it easier to reference examples for troubleshooting without taking up a ton of space in the comment box Automatically have links open up in a new window - I've lost count of the times I've clicked on a reference link earlier in the ticket only to lose what I was writing at the time and have to start over Connect file attachments to the comments/ticketing section - I like
If a given amount of time is allotted in Workload Balancer is not used-up by the end of the week, it should be automatically re-allocated to the following week as a surplus.If for some reason, such as a user adding hours late, this "surplus" would diminish accordingly.We just feel like not having this means the automatic-ness of Workload Balancer's allocation abilities is a fascade because we still have to manually move those hours forward.
We are having to update each FTE role percentage of project work within the tool. We over 400 plus to do and currently there is no report or kickstart that will allow to to alter the percentages or even see them.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.