Product Communities

Hi Adobe Team,Please find my feature suggestion below: Description -Add a "Comment" prompt every time a Target Activity is saved to help be able to document changes in a Target ActivityWhy is this feature important to you - This feature would be extremely helpful for documentation purposes; Yes many users utilize secondary ticketing systems or spreadsheets to help manage information, but I find that Adobe Target (being the source of truth) should be able to document changes in the activity from a different angle. There are description fields in the Goals & Settings, but those aren't viewable unless you actually open the ticket, and often are forgotten to be updated.How would you like the feature to work -Every time you save an Activity, before being able to save a user would be prompted with a Comment text field to add a small comment about what was done, which would then be displayed on the Change Log panel in Adobe Target (see example screenshot I created below):This fi

Objective 1: Create a folder structure to organize web personalization campaigns   Use Case Scenario: If you have multiple campaigns you can group them together using folders (by type, audiece, location, initiative, etc.). This will make things look cleaner in the campaigns interface, providing overall better organization, and an easier way to locate existing campaigns.   Current Issue: Since we are unable to organize our web personalization campaigns using a folder structure the web campaign page looks chaotic. It's a long running list of campaigns with no organization other than being able to filter by some things that don't really help for the type of organization we are looking for. It takes a lot of time to locate the particular campaigns we are looking for. We don't have any easy way to establish which campaigns are running for a particualar audice or initiative.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Content Transfer Tool currently supports only on-premise to AEM as Cloud movement.  Use-case: Content Transfer Tool currently supports only on-premise to AEM as Cloud movement. However, there are use-cases wherein content needs to be synced between AEM as Cloud instances for which package manager process can be cumbersome. Especially when dealing with GBs/TBs of data now that disk usage dashboard is also not available in AEM as Cloud. Current/Experienced Behavior: Package Manager has to be used to transfer content and there is no easy way to split packages based on size apart from using include/exclude rules. Improved/Expected Behavior: Extend Content transfer tool to allow content sync between AEM as Cloud instances. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if ap

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Quick redirect to the homepage of the AEM dashboard. So that we can navigate to other tools pages Use-case: During presentations or quick analysis, the ability to navigate between tools seamlessly without manually updating the URL in the address bar proves to be beneficial. Current/Experienced Behavior: When using a tool and clicking on the AEM logo, it redirects to the homepage while displaying the URL of the current tool's page. However, if you navigate to another tool and then click on the homepage, it redirects back to the previous tool's page instead of the current tool's homepage. Improved/Expected Behavior: Clicking on the AEM logo should not only redirect to the homepage of the AEM dashboard but also update the URL to http://localhost:4502/aem/start.html Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5, AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Bounteous Screenshot (if applica

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Upload Link for external contributers to AEM Assets.   External agencies / contracted photographers are contracted one-time. Agencies / Photographers need to upload assets to Enterprise Asset Management application - AEM Assets. Onboarding effort to AEM is too high for  photographer / agency.  Current/Experienced Behavior: Agencies / Photographers upload to assets to Dropbox or WeTransfer.  Internal users need to download all assets each time and upload back into AEM Assets for Enterprise Usage. This results in delays in workflows and delivery of content.  High manual effort & time / costs due to download & re-upload to AEM Assets. Improved/Expected Behavior: Editors / Internals create an 'Upload Link' in AEM Assets and share with externals. There could be an authentication (user-defined password) in place.  Photographer enters the upload link --> enters password --> can create fold

Enable SSO for Marketo Event App so we do not have to disable SSO to use it.

Would like to see scrolling columns in the dashboard to show full list instead of having to scroll since we are in a desktop view and have room to not have to scrollWhy is this feature important to you - UI happinessHow would you like the feature to work - would like the list to open up fully to not have to scroll in order to make a selection Current Behavior - scrolls 3 times to view 18 items in a list to choose from  It can be coded but is not currently. 

Hi,   One feature Marketo is missing is the ability to easily pull up a list of all the batch campaigns (repeating and single send) that are scheduled for a specific date or timeframe.  You may want this to troubleshoot issues or sync errors, clean up campaigns, or even deal with Marketo maintenance requests.        My recent use case was I recently received a maintenance email from Marketo with these instructions To avoid additional impact, we recommend not scheduling smart campaigns during this timeframe.   Campaign inspector helps a bit here, but my org has 142 repeating schedule batch campaigns and 103 scheduled for their first run.  For bigger customers, this becomes a really big pain.  I need a way to easily slim down this list so I can update the ones that may get impacted!         

I believe it would be extremely helpful to have the blueprint size of a scenario displayed on the UI. In an area that is easy for any user to find. Right now, as far as I am aware, you have to download the blueprint and check the file. I think this will be extremely helpful for users to keep an eye on the blueprint size and be able to keep it to the size that is recommended in the guardrails.   

As the subject says, it would be really useful to have the ability to query against the Company endpoint, by UpdatedAt. This would reduce the number of calls required to validate changes, and extract the data for reporting needs.

Description - A better summary for each certification, with every part needed to study explained Why is this feature important to you - I want to get certifications and t's difficult to beginHow would you like the feature to work - GoodCurrent Behaviour - There is not really a good for study certification system @alnavarg @heku_ @_manoj_kumar_  @yansu  @3176980 

Description - Feature that will allow you to see all products with more than x number of categories.Why is this feature important to you - It would simplify the catalog management process we currently use.How would you like the feature to work - There should be an option in the UI to configure a collection based on the number of values in the categoryId so I can ask Target the following: "Show me all products with 5 or more categories"Current Behaviour - Nothing like this currently exists. Mihnea Docea  "Committed to Excellence" |  Technical Support Engineer  |  Adobe  |  1 (800) 685-2950 #3 #2 #3 |  docea@adobe.com

Recently we migrated assets from one instance to another. Although we could redirect landing pages, we could not redirect all of the PDFs that were hosted in one instance. I feel that it would be a great tool to redirect assets like the LP redirection page.

hi, We have accidently connected a Salesforce sandbox instance to Marketo and it is now NOT possible to rollback.   If there is any rollback steps or help to disconnect Salesforce from Marketo it will be very helpful. Talked to Marketo support and they are saying we need to get a new instance, but that comes with a caveat of lot of issues.   Any Suggestions/product features that can help us to resolve this unwanted Salesforce integration? Help appreciated.   thanks -Sree   Getting a new instance will cause these problems which is not desirable at all. 1. Lead Database records, field-level data, and activity history are not copied2. CRM configuration is reset.3. Users are not copied.4. CRM Field Mappings are removed except for standard mappings and must be set during the Field Mapping Stage of CRM sync initialization.5. RCA (Advanced Report Builder), SEO, ABM (Target Account Manager), and Web Personalization information is not copied. These settings would need to be

Description Ability to Combine Audience Library audiences with activity-only audiences and attributes   Why is this feature important to you We have default audiences that we use to help gate campaigns to their proper areas. Because these are part of the audience library, we have an explosion of 1 off audiences   How would you like the feature to work When Combining Audiences for an activity, it would we great to be able to select from the audience library, activity-only library or create a new container with custom attribute and combine them all together.   Current Behaviour You can combine audiences from the library OR create an activity-only audience customized by Target attributes

I often have figures with complex labels, often with long-winded names based on variables I have no control over.For example, in this chart (screenshot below), the main metric is Revenue, but there are filters for marketing tactic and a note on the non-standard attribution model (it can get worse than this!). The figure labels in the legend are concatenated from all elements. But the chart is already titled with what it's showing, so I edit all the legend labels to remove the redundant factors for simplicity and clarity. E.g.,  Revenue [Marketing Tag Tactic: SEM] (U Shaped | 90 Days) --> SEM Changing the metric, model, or filters causes the labels to reset to the full names, so you have to edit them all again - it's very tedious, especially when the UI response is slow, like it is today.Can we have a master legend configurator in the chart settings that allows you to choose which component elements to include or omit in the figure labels? E.g. [ ] Metric[ ] Attri

Description -It would be beneficial when converting an issue/request from a request queue to be able to adjust the start date right away along with the duration. Why is this feature important to you - Our maintenance queue takes in 200-300 requests per month and one project manager (me) is assigned to make sure that work moves along in a timely manner.  The resource pool contains 10-15 people to draw from so we can't assign the request out.    The start date is tied to the start date of the project which will always need to be manually edited unless it happens to come in on the first day of the project. How would you like the feature to work - When converting the request queue item to a task, bringing up the date range boxes as fillable would be beneficial.  At the end of our project period, the potential to make an error assigning to the wrong month is higher because the date defaults to the start of the active project.  The only way I've figured out

I would like to be able to retrieve the custom form values (parameterValues), given a custom form section (categoryParameter) name or ID.  Currently, the API allows for Custom Form Names to be retrieved from a given Custom Form using the following api call:/proj/[projectID]/search?fields=objectCategories:category:categoryParameters:parameterGroup There is also an, unsupported, api call that allows for a "data dump" of all values in a given custom form, using the following api call:/proj/[projectID]/search?fields=*,parameterValues I would think that the "parameterValues" object would need to be added to the "parameterGroup" object.{ "data": { "ID": "", "name": "", "objCode": "PROJ", "objectCategories": [ { "ID": "", "objCode": "OBJCAT", "category": { "ID": "", "name": "", "objCode": "CTGY", "ca

Description - When you are in reporting it gives you the option to display currency or number fields with a $1,234.00, but when you actually run your reports or views, it will show CAD1,234.00. There should be an option, even in the Project Preferences, to set a symbol that can be used so it can match what options are available. Why is this feature important to you - It is cleaner looking and more efficient.

As an integration developer, I would like to include Marketo data in various large-scale big data projects. However, there is no reliable way to pull a list of all lead records in Marketo. Marketo's own response to the question historically has been to determine the oldest part of an instance and run rolling 30-day exports of records. This is resource-intensive from both Marketo and the end-user side.   The more reliable option in such cases is to make a Smart LIst that contains all records, then reference that Smart List ID in the bulk export. That requires that marketers set up a Smart List ahead of time—but it makes little sense when there is already a Smart List that does this (consistently ID 1014 across instances).  However, the system-generated Smart Lists cannot be referenced with this export.   Would it be possible to update behavior so either System Smart Lists are compatible with Bulk Lead Extracts or supplemental additions solve the problem of pulli

Description-Multiple request would be linked to one project.  This way all requests that have been worked can be tracked but multiple projects do not have to be opened for similar requests that may come from different departments or different timeframes.   Why is this feature important to you - Shows accurate representation of requests received and work completed through reports.How would you like the feature to work - Current request and project linkage would allow for multiple requests to be tied to a project.Current Behaviour - Only 1 request can be tied to one project.  If an additional request for similar work within the scope of the project is received that request has to be made a separate project or closed.

Description - It would be beneficial to have a Text-mode option when adding custom fields to a card on a Kanban board.Why is this feature important to you - There are many project-level fields which would be beneficial to include on a card, which are not available in the existing list of Task fields (when adding fields to a card). For example, I would like to include the Project Owner Name, however only Project Owner ID is available in the list. Similarly, I would like to include the Portfolio Name, however only Portfolio ID is available in the list.How would you like the feature to work - Include a Text-mode button within the Cards section of the Configure menu. This button would open a Text-mode window where the user could edit the fields being included on the card. In my above examples, I would be able to reference project:owner:name and project:portfolio:name. This could function similarly to the Board Intake filters which already have this functionality (a Text-Mode option when cr

When setting up a custom object, you can only link it to a field that is visible to users or to the Marketo Id of either the person or the company. As for integrations it adds a level of complexity to maintain a repository of the unique Marketo Ids as mapped to the externalCompanyId it is a bit strange that this other unique field for the Company Object cannot be selected as a link field. Using a field that is visible to users as a link field introduced the possibility of user error in tasks like list uploads to mess up the data and lose the connection between your CO records and their Company record. For use via the API it would be a great help to be able to use the externalCompanyId as link field.

Description - The new filter experience does not close once a selection is made, like the legacy filters, views, and grouping do.  Why is this feature important to you - It's impractical for this box to stay open and to have to manually close it, when we are used to the better functionality that exists in the legacy experience.  How would you like the feature to work -  Close after selection is made and for this to be fixed prior to Views and Grouping being rolled out.  

Description - Many modern project management tools have real-time editing to allow for synchronous collaboration. The asynchronous nature of Workfront makes it more clunky to use compared to other tools on the market. Real-time editing would all for more streamlined and efficient project and workflow management.Why is this feature important to you -  Real-time editing would all for more streamlined and efficient project and workflow management.How would you like the feature to work - real-time editing to allow for synchronous collaboration.Current Behaviour - No such real-time editing in Project and workflow management.