Product Communities

Would like to see a table field added as an option to a a custom form. See the attached example. This would provide an excel like table.

Description -Why is this feature important to you - this helps in debugging in case of any failures.How would you like the feature to work - File name should be made available in list of fields available so that it can be mapped to a field in schema.Current Behaviour - No such information is available so that we can link a batch to a file name and use that for debugging.

In the current set-up, data files can be sent to the Adobe Data Landing Zone, which in AEP is considered as an external cloud storage.The file there can be sent encrypted and decrypted by AEP.Huge data files (over 1gb) can be zipped. Issue now is that unzipping and decrypting the data files are 2 distinct steps, where ideally both can be handled immediately together.Enhancement request: unzip & decrypting files via 1 command/step

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: OOTB Option to search using tag in AEM Assets view for convenient filtering of assets within the AEM authoring interface. Use-case: OOTB Option to search using tag in AEM Assets view for convenient filtering of assets within the AEM authoring interface. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, tags can be added to any asset but searching for assets with a specific tag is difficult from the native UI. One has to generate a query and use custom reports to get this information. Improved/Expected Behavior: There should be an option in AEM Filters to search assets using a tag picker. This feature exists for auto generated tags like Orientation and Style but not for custom tags. PFA. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud service Latest release Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description - I didn't see any keyboard shortcut to rotate a proof and the default one from Acrobat doesn't work (Ctrl, Shift, - or +). Our line of work constantly has elements that are horizontal or upside down on envelopes and other flat proofs.  I wish WF Proof used the same keyboard shortcut to zoom in and out with the mouse wheel (Ctrl + Mouse wheel) as it is in Acrobat so I don't have to constantly think about which shortcut to use since Proof uses Shift and the mouse wheel. Why is this feature important to you - To easily navigate a proof using the keyboard for those of us who prefer shortcuts over the mouse to do everything. I am much more efficient in Acrobat than Proof.  How would you like the feature to work:Ctrl, Shift, - or +  keyboard shortcut to rotate a proofCtrl + Mouse wheel keyboard shortcut to Zoom in and out Current Behaviour - No shortcut to rotate. Different shortcut to zoom in and out than Acrobat (poss

Description - Harness the power of data analytics using Workfront Reporting or Fusion to systematically extract and categorize proof comments within a specified timeframe or based on other filters like file name or version. This endeavor aims to pinpoint areas ripe for improvement, refine training modules, and optimize processes by analyzing comment interactions and resolutions at critical stages. Moreover, this will allow us to collect a robust data reservoir to fuel AI-driven insights in the future. Adobe confirmed this isn't possible within Workfront reporting or Fusion's API capabilities.  Why is this feature important to you - Collecting data to improve efficiency moving forward How would you like the feature to work - Run a report on all comments using various filters and have native columns available that show comment text, the proof version number and file name associated with the comment (NOT the latest version of the proof like we can see now with custom report

I know my company loves the metric gauge visualizations available in Omniture dashboards in order to understand how their website is performing relative to benchmarks. It would be great to have this visualization made available in AW, or something similar that serves the same purpose.

When utilising API developers note: the following endpoints: Get Email by Id, Get Email by Name, Get Emails are only able to retrieve the subject line of emails that have been created as a template but does not have the ability to pull the subject lines of campaigns that have been created for A/B testing or a Champion/Challenger test. As per the developer notes below there is currently no way to pull the test subject lines and all these fields are returned as a blank. This is a mission critical reporting metric for any EMS (Email Marketing System) and should be something that comes out the box. The functionality must be available because this function is possible through RCS, however is not possible through the API currently. Developers noteIf an email is part of a program that is using Email Testing (A/B Test, or Champion/Challenger Test), then that email is not available for query using the following endpoints: Get Email by Id, Get Email by Name, Get Emails. The call will indicate su

Zusammenfassung der Funktionsverbesserungsanfrage (RFE): Currently the system only delivers ootb the option to download - Renditions (which include every rendition, even the unnecessary system renditions like for example the thumbnails) - Smart Crops (which include ALL the smartcrops)- Dynamics (were Presets can only get downloaded one at a time)  Anwendungsfall: A User wants to download 100 pictures, but only a specific rendition or smartcrop. Lets say the16:9 Smartcrop for all of them.  Aktuelles/erlebtes Verhalten: The Download option does not tell the user what this all contains.He will get every available rendtion (even those that are only useful for the system) and every smartcrop that is available for his selection. He does not see which options his download will contain. He can not opt out of the unnecessary options. Verbessertes/erwartetes Verhalten: The download dialoge needs to have sub-options that make it possible for the user to only download wh

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add a "Lock" button to the top rail in order to lock an experience more easily Use-case: Our content authors didn't even know they could lock experience fragments due to the button not existing in the standard location. Current/Experienced Behavior: There is a way to Lock experience fragments via the dropdown when in the editor for the page itself but you cannot lock it via the top rail lock button like you can for pages in Sites as well as with "Checkout" inside Assets. Improved/Expected Behavior: Lock button in top rail just like other content in AEM has. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.8 Customer-name/Organization name: Securian Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: 1) Being able to assign permissions to groups for Administrator-Roles and "AdobeIO Developers" 2) to enhance permission handing in AdobeIO-DeveloperConsole Use-case: Imagine: 20 program, 20 different partner-companies. Every partner has 10 developers and devops whom might need to raise tickets for their environment (1 out of 20). The role to be able to Create or See support tickets is "Support Administrator". Generally one would think to create 20 groups and add 10 people to each of these groups. These groups allow : AEM Administrator access (on DEVs and STAGE) Support Administrator permissions But this is NOT possible! You need to create these 20 groups and assign 10 people each.But then you have to add "Support Administrator" to 200 individuals separately.That makes NO SENSE!   In AIO-developer-console it is similar - as all these DEVS cannot be given "Full admin in the ORG".Now you need 3 devs for each project to b

Demande de résumé des améliorations des fonctionnalités (RFE) : Having the ability to clone one environment to another one Cas d’utilisation : each 3 months we have to align the environment from PROD to STAGE or from PROD to DEV for all our digital world(from STAGE to DEV and for starting project DEV to STAGE, STAGE to PROD is also usefull)  Comportement actuel/expérimenté : today we use the feature of content copy - but it's taken around 4 days and the feature is not done for that. Comportement amélioré/attendu : have a feature of cloning, duration expected : less than one day Informations sur l’environnement (version d’AEM / service pack, et autres informations spécifiques si applicables) : AEM Cloud Nom du client/de l’organisation : Nathalie Riasse / Louis Vuitton Copie d’écran (si applicable) :   Package de code (si applicable) :  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add multifield support to content fragments Use-case: Sometimes, using nested content fragments just makes no sense to editors. Our case: making a cooking recipy. We'd like to break down the recipy into steps necessary to make a meal component (such as: mashed potatoes) including ingredients, and we have no need of reuse. If we'd split off the fragments into a seperate fragment, life for content editors becomes a lot more difficult - it's much easier for them to fill in everything inside of a single fragment view. Current/Experienced Behavior: No multifield is available in content fragments Improved/Expected Behavior: We have multifield available in content fragments, including the option to configure them in the model editor Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): All versions (but we're on 6.5 on-prem) Customer-name/Organization name: AmeXio (system integrator) Screenshot (if appl

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Dispatcher read only view similar to Repository Browser to view stat file and caching configuration Use-case: Option to view content tree on dispatcher under /var/www/html for better troubleshooting of cache flush issues and general configuration Current/Experienced Behavior: No access to dispatcher apart from Splunk logs Improved/Expected Behavior: Option to view content tree on dispatcher under /var/www/html for better troubleshooting of cache flush issues and general configuration Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service latest release Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

It would be helpful if annotations would appear if the user uses a segment or a quick segment to filter the data instead of just a dimension-level filter. I find that most in my organization filter at the panel level and not the dimension/metric level, so annotations that I have set up do not appear in those instances. They are still relevant regardless of where the filter is applied.  In my attached screenshot, you can see that if the filter is set for the country site for Japan (where this annotation applies) at the metric level, the annotation appears. If the user utilizes the quick segment for the country site Japan, there is no annotation, although it is exactly the same data. The annotation that I built really should also apply here, but support determined this is the expected behavior for this feature.

Description - Provide a way on Project Templates at the Project / Task and Issue levels to limit which users can be assigned. Could be done by setting a "Select Users from..." and allow the project owner / template owner to select groups, teams, users, or access levelsWhy is this feature important to you - Some teams are assigning work to people who do not actually do the workHow would you like the feature to work - Act in similar way to using the Typeahead FilterCurrent Behaviour - Anyone can actually be assigned

There isn't an efficient way for team members to log time so there is loss of adoption and increase of friction. How I would like the feature to work: Currently assignees are required to click multiple times and navigate away from the storyboard to log hours; timesheet is not flexible enough to include parent task visual, which would help Agile task owners who have repeatable tasks in multiple stories.  

My Tasks widget could be grouped by Project Name and Parent Task (helpful for Agile user stories that have tasks with the same name).  The user could log hours inline without having to open each individual task. This feature is important because currently there is no efficient way for assignees (especially on Agile teams) to log actual hours spent, reducing adoption and increasing friction.

Description - user generates a proof only to then notice the order of the pages is wrong. Would be nice if instead of deleting that version, the user could simply rearrange the page order within the proof. Why is this feature important to you - it would save time; would function like Acrobat How would you like the feature to work - drag & drop. open to other ideas tho. Current Behaviour - user needs to delete the version in question & upload a new, reordered version. 

Hello, I believe this was previously shared as an idea, but I do think it would be beneficial if we could have more than 5 fields on project headers. If not, then perhaps for options. One field that would really benefit my organization would be if "Project Sponsor" could be an option.

Upgrade the "Core - Enters Viewport" to match GTM behavior, precision and getting the "Click Element" variable into AA. Cf. support ticket linked attached.

https://one.workfront.com/s/managed-content-blogs/workfront-wednesday-did-you-know-basic-text-mode-groupings-for-beginners-MCEF5W6GIXBFBKHKA4LDIQWQWGJUThe page above shows how to rename a Grouping on the details tab of a report. It would be great if the text mode used would also change the Axis name on the chart tab of the same report.Due to having a shared instance with many teams, we've had to get creative with our field naming conventions. The naming convention works great for differentiating which team owns what fields but creates an undesirable result when it comes to displaying grouping/axis names in chart reports. The challenge is chart reports today only allows you to display the actual/physical name of the field.It would be great if we enabled he reporting engine to display chart axis names using a Grouping's text mode name or displayname.

Hello, We are in the process of implementing the timesheet functionality within Workfront. If users have to input actual work in the timesheet and then update percent complete on their tasks, it would make more sense to have the actual work on the task update the percent complete or percent work complete on that task. I know there isn't a field for calculating the amount of work complete but I think it would be beneficial to have that option and have it be auto populated by using the actual work against the planned work. We don't want to inconvenience our users by making them update both the percentage complete and the actual work on their tasks.

I would love to be able to add a column in the project view that allows to log time on task.

Ability for users to log time outside of using hours or timesheet. For example, Create a view with the the column for logged hours so the workers can go through and log time while in the project overview. Or have the ability to select multiple tasks and log the same amount of hours to each one (if they are assigned to many tasks, and they all take .25 to complete, they can log the time at once)