Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Description - Until very recently the Auto-Align button was on the main screen. Now it is hidden under the More (...) button.Why is this feature important to you - When I'm building I use this button dozens of times per day...possibly even hundreds of times. Now with it hidden underneath the More (...) button it is doubling my mouse-clicks....very frustrating.How would you like the feature to work - Please put it back on the main screen.
UI Description:The current Fusion UI does not prompt for confirmation before deleting a scenario. Additionally, there is no visual indication of which scenario is selected for deletion, and deleted scenarios cannot be restored via the UI.Why this feature is important:Accidental deletion of scenarios can result in lost work and require significant time to rebuild. Without a confirmation prompt or a visual highlight, it’s easy to misclick and remove the wrong scenario. Since the UI offers no recovery option, this can lead to irreversible loss.How this feature would work:When a user clicks the delete icon for a scenario, a confirmation modal should appear asking, "Are you sure you want to delete this scenario?" The scenario line item should be highlighted when hovered over or selected for deletion, so the user clearly sees which scenario is being targeted. Optionally, an "Undo" notification or a soft-delete feature (trash bin or restore option) would add an extra layer of protection.Curre
The Fusion tab and filter for Active/Inactive scenarios was recently removed for Workfront Ultimate users. This filter is a key indicator for companies on whether or not their complete Fusion environment is functional. Regardless of if an org has an unlimited license, they should still be able to filter between their active/inactive Fusion scenarios and know at a glance the state of their environments.
Description - Enable a module that can call another scenario directlyWhy is this feature important to you - This would enable a more modular design of our workflow by having common functionality in one scenario that can be called by other scenarios without having to duplicate the functionality across all of the scenarios.How would you like the feature to work - A simple module that provides the input of the scenario name to call and the inputs to pass.Current Behaviour - Have to code custom webhooks to call scenarios
Description - While using the HTTP Fusion module with the Basic Auth feature, the system creates a key (in the Keys section) for the credentials added. There is no option to update an existing key which was created in a case where the credentials were changed. We use many such connections to our internal services where the credentials are rotated periodically and to update them in Fusion, someone needs to find the usage of the credentials in the whole list of scenarios and update them manually after creating a new key.Why is this feature important to you - It takes a lot of manual effort to find and update every scenario, even with the use of the connection switch tool within the Fusion dev tools where a person needs to look through all the scenarios and update the HTTP modules.How would you like the feature to work - It would be nice to have an option to update an existing key from the Keys section where the users cannot see the existing credentials but are able to provide and save ne
There is no easy way to know if someone has deleted a scenario and who deleted the scenario ...or a way to restore it back. There is also no easy way to run a report or even copy/paste the scenario names into a spreadsheet to try and compare against. This is an urgent need, because someone could really mess things up the way the product works currently.
Hello, I am Have kept collect user agent and client headers settings in datastream. Assuming this will collect device type information correctly forexample desktop vs mobile or tablet. However I do not see that. I have more no-values and I believe the desktop is falling into this, not sure why or what additional settings needs to be done in either datastream or data view
Grok and I have been trying to crack this nut for an hour now. (I asked the AI Assistant and….let’s just say there were many 👎🏻s) Figured I’d ask the hive mind and--if I figure it out before anyone else does--I’ll post it here for everyone else.The ask: I want to be able to determine the ID of an approval attached to an issue. The only pieces of data I have are the approvalProcessID (which I know because I have Fusion apply an approval process to these issues) and currentApprovalStepID. No matter what I do with that currentApprovalStepID, I just cannot get to the approval. If I try to use that to search for the APPROVAL object, I get a 400. If I try searching via the ARVSTP object, I get scolded that it’s “...not a top level object and can't be requested directly in internal”There has to be something that both Grok and I are missing here. Any thoughts?
Here record count for bottom x axis is default name or we can change this ( no of projects) by any method.
One of our teams would like have their task start and end dates update based on the predecessor task completion. If the predecessor task is completed late, they’d like to see the start and end dates for their task update to reflect the completion date of the predecessor task so that they can prioritize their tasks accordingly. For example, if the predecessor task is due 2/9 but not completed until 2/11, they’d like the start date of their task to be 2/12 instead of 2/10 (when the task constraint is “As Soon as Possible”). This would not be a universal rule but only applied to specific template tasks and/or for specific teams based on the way that they work. They do have a report that sorts tasks by Handoff Date, but this does not fully meet their needs.
Verifying On-Time Delivery logic in Workfront: same-day date comparisonsWe are implementing an On-Time Delivery KPI where work is considered on time if the Actual Completion Date is the same day or earlier than the Planned Completion Date.However, even when both dates appear as the same day in the UI (with different times), comparisons using <=, DATE(), DATEDIFF(), and DATENOTIME() sometimes return late.Is this expected due to Workfront storing DateTime values in UTC?What is the officially recommended approach for calendar-day-based SLAs in Workfront?What is the way to compare only date without time ?
I need to see a report of Tasks and Requests that do not have hours logged by every assignee on each task/request so that we can see what Tasks/Requests are missing hours for which assignees.There’s a thread here that identifies a way for an individual user to see their own Tasks that have not been assigned hours, but I can’t seem to find anything that shows how to see multiple users who do not have assigned hours. Any advice is appreciated.
Does anyone have any links to what the various graphs in the Fusion performance dashboard actually mean? I can interpololate some of them, and others are obvious, but it would be nice if there was some explanation, I’m hesitant to use them to do any evaluating of anything without it.Executions waiting to be processed: Feels obvious, scenarios with data that are waiting to startPool Utilization: No ideaExecutions per scenario: Feels obvious, tracks the number of times a scenario was ranDuration of executions: Feels obvious, length of time that scenarios were running
Does anyone have any experience using the Dry Run mode in AJO with either events as a condition within a journey or as an entry point? I’ve been using it recently and whilst it works fine for batch qualified audiences, I’ve not seen any results when using events?Thanks,Paul
I’m trying to permanently Stop a journey that is currently in a Paused state, as we have no intention of resuming it. However, the 'Stop' button is disabled/greyed out in the UI.Is this a permissions issue (e.g., lacking some permission as I have publishing rights), or does the system require a journey to be Live before it can be stopped? Additionally, is it possible to force a termination via the AJO API?
we have requirement to design website header.requirements dynamic tabs/menu (header).when we over on any tab/menu it should display sub header/ sub menu and this submenu items are dynamic.when we over on subheader/sub menu it should show its nested menu (nested menu is also dynamic).i dont want to use multifield design for nested menu’s.is there any ways we can design this configuration in dialog?
Hello,We’re looking to add a part-time Fusion contractor to our team to support a few current and upcoming projects.If you’re interested in learning more, please reach out to Trevor at Trevor@syncpointdigital.com.
Hi Everyone, I am working on a use case where I need to capture ‘Open’ Reaction and send a Re-send email to people who have not opened first email. I used the reaction event but despite the audience profile capturing opens, the reaction event is unable to identify/capture the opens. As a result the entire audience base ends up receiving the re-send email even the ones who have opened. Please help me understand this and any workaround if anyone has any awareness on this. Thanks in Advance!
Hi All, Do we have an article on “Cyberark integration with AEM 6.5.x on premise to retrieve secrets”?I searched in commmunity/googled, but not find any. Thanks,Raju
ProblemAdobe Analytics Workspace currently allows link sharing for projects but not for Adobe or company templates. While projects themselves can be shared through links, templates can only be shared by manually saving a copy first or asking others to locate it within the template menu. This makes it hard to promote standardized reports or guide users toward the correct starting point.Templates are meant to make analysis easier, but without a simple method to point others to the right one, they often go unused. Proposed SolutionEnable templates to generate shareable, permission-aware URLs, similar to existing project links. Clicking the link should open the template directly or bring the user to it in the template gallery. BenefitsFaster Onboarding & TrainingTeams can send a direct link to the exact template a new user should start from.This reduces time spent navigating long template lists or hunting for the correct one.Improved Consistency & GovernanceOrganizations often rely
Within projects, functionality exists to make tasks and subtasks dependent on completion of other tasks. This allows projects to move forward in the optimal order and timeframe. What about allowing the same type of dependencies to exist for Programs?As a project manager, I often work on multiple projects within an overarching Program (which itself exists within a Portfolio.) There may be multiple projects within a portfolio which depend on one another in order to move forward. Currently, there is no logical connector between the health or completion of a project and starting another project. Example Program: Spring Campaign. Below are examples of projects which might exist within the Program. These are not in order, but there IS an order to them. Project: Campaign StrategyProject: Content StrategyProject: Approved Marketing CopyProject: PhotoshootProject: Video ShootProject: Social AdsProject: Web BannersProject: Campaign Web PagesProject: Pitch DeckProject: Sales Enablement Materi
Hi Team,When I tried to generate xdp letter from my local AEM cloud, getting the below error in error logs. Can anyone suggest on this?Java version - 17SDK - aem-sdk-2025.8.21994.20250818T175115Z-250700Forms addon - aem-forms-addon-2025.08.31.00-250900.far *ERROR* [[0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1] [1770809309168] POST /bin/fc/fmcc-ssd-daas/v2/generate-document HTTP/1.1 585c44b2-bf28-4fda-a01f-c0ec56500bd5] com.adobe.forms.xfanative.sdk.impl.XFANativeServiceImpl Error resolving templatejava.lang.IllegalStateException: Error getting shared temp directory, check whether the SDK started successfully. at com.adobe.forms.xfanative.sdk.impl.XFANativeServiceImpl.resolveTemplate(XFANativeServiceImpl.java:389) [adobe-lc-forms-xfanative-sdk:10.0.378] at com.adobe.forms.xtg.impl.XMLFormServiceImpl.$anonfun$resolveTemplateCacheGen$2(XMLFormServiceImpl.scala:211) [com.adobe.aemfd.adobe-lc-forms-core-common:2.0.144] at com.adobe.forms.logging.PerfLogger.measure(PerfLogger.scala:61) [com.adobe.aemfd.adobe-l
After upgrading to the latest LTS version of AEM, we have encountered an issue with the Rich Text field using the resource type cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/richtext. When saving any sentence containing two consecutive curly braces {{, the data is not being stored correctly in CRX. Specifically, the double curly braces are being replaced with {<!-- -->{, which causes problems when the final HTML is generated.Steps to Reproduce:Open a dialog with a Rich Text field (cq/gui/components/authoring/dialog/richtext).Enter the following content:<p>{{someData['someData']}}</p>Save the dialog.Check the value stored in CRX.Expected Result: The data should be saved as entered:<p>{{ContentBlock['chaseContactUsFooter']}}</p>Actual Result: The data is saved as:<p>{<!-- -->{someData['someData&#39;]}}</p>This unexpected replacement of {{ with {<!-- -->{ is causing issues in the rendered HTML and breaking our templating logic.This issue occu
Hi,I have created a calculated column in an Adobe Workfront report using text mode, and the column displays correct numeric values (0/1) in the report grid. However, this column does not appear in the “Values” dropdown when configuring a chart for the same report.What I have done Report Type: Project / Task Report Created a calculated column using text mode: The column correctly shows: 1 for on-time 0 for late Attempted to use this column in: Pie / Column / Gauge charts Different “Summarized by” options (Average, Sum, Count) Issue The calculated column does not appear in the Chart → Values dropdown. Native numeric fields and custom number fields do appear correctly. Questions Are calculated columns (text-mode columns) supported as chart values in Workfront? Is there a known limitation that prevents calculated columns from being used in charts? Is creating a custom calculated field on the object the only supported way to chart this data?
Synchrony is seeking an AVP, Marketing Platform Enablement Manager with strong expertise in Adobe Fusion and the application of Artificial Intelligence to modern marketing enablement. The ideal candidate has significant experience enabling enterprise marketing platforms, partnering with marketing, technology, and data teams to operationalize Adobe Fusion capabilities and drive scalable adoption across the organization.Learn more and apply here: https://synchronyfinancial.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/careers/details/AVP--Marketing-Platform-Enablement-Manager_2600256-1
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
