Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
I would like to take a folder with an asset in frame.io and copy it over to a project in workfront. I have established a connection in frame.io and have a project, folder, and asset all ready to go. How would i go about doing this?
While being able to list out individual Program cost line items is a useful feature, it's limited by a few things: namely, the ability to only parse certain types of budget information based on information in the note. I would like to build a more robust approach for budget measurement and compliance in Marketo by providing a standardized set of custom fields that could provide more detail in budget analysis. While I would expect to have some of these as fully custom, I think others are widely applicable and may make sense to be in the core product. Some examples of these would include: - Spend Type: Categorizes the primary expense of the campaign (e.g., 'Media Spend', 'Agency Fees', 'Content Creation', 'Sponsorship'). This allows for a more granular analysis of where the budget is going and the ROI on different types of spend.- Budget Source / Team: Tracks which team's budget is funding the campaign (e.g., 'Corporate Marketing', 'Product Marketing', 'Fiel
Hi there,Its the first time I used the Email Program for A/B Testing.I used Subject A/B Testing and all worked fine so far but I’m a bit confused why the dashboard only displays the results of the A/B Test and not the results from the final sent Mailing (opened/klicked ...etc.).Yes, I can create an email performance report but I want the results on the Dashboard like it was displayed on this site: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/marketo/using/product-docs/email-marketing/email-programs/email-program-data/use-the-email-program-dashboardCan someone help?Thanks in advanceFalk
Hi, I am onboarding a team on to Workfront proof. They have not used it previously so I ‘m wondering if anyone can recommend the best training materials or successes of onboarding user groups by roles. I’m anticipating creating training guides but any input would be greatly appreciated
Hi everyone So I am new to this organization and when I started executing some campaigns I was asked to update the scores in the flow steps of individual programs while we were having an agency update our lead scoring. So for example, when we had list imports come in from content syndication, I was asked to give them 40 points. Well, I assumed that I would be adding this to behavior score since they filled out a form to get into the system, but I was later told they only use person score right now. Is there a way for me to remedy this and add it to the person score without having to go into individual campaigns? If I do have to do it individually, I assume I would make a campaign that takes the 40 points off behavior and then execute another to add to person? Is there a better way to do this?
With companies becoming more security-aware and device manufacturers blocking requests to certain domains, people are looking for opportunities to bring their marketing tools in a first-party context. With Launch, we can either host the library on Adobe's domain or our own webserver, but not behind a transparent reverse-proxy. After some experimentation, I have found that the individual extensions and files are still loaded from Adobe's domain, even if the initial Launch library is hidden behind a proxy. Conceptually it should be an easy addition to allow users to hide the adobedtm Domain behind their company's proxy. From a feature perspective, I would like to specify both a domain and a path from where Launch should attempt to load files instead of the standard Adobe domain and path. The files should still be pushed to Akamai and be available there, but should not reference files from the Adobe domain. This would make it significantly easier for companies like my own to bring La
Hi Team, Please assist with this, is there a way to do A/B test (subject line) of email when there is no fixed audience. We have a nurture campaign with different product suite streams; people qualify in the suite stream based to certain criteria and receive email. So would like to know if we can do A/B test for emails since we don't have fixed audience. Thanks,Deepthi.
Is there a way for test push in Campaigns? or using Simulate Content?
In Universal Editor, when trying to align text in Rich Text field by using default alignment option (left, center, right), it only adds inline style. Upon saving changes and exiting out of RTE, all inline styles are removed.I want to have per-paragraph alignment option within a rich text field so didn’t do this through custom model field. Any fix for this? Like adding a class instead of inline styling so this can actually work?
Hi Everyone, We have implemented the following business use case - 1. Send a request from AEM Publish to Runtime 2. Runtime action is able to generate the access token against the IMS to access the AEM Author instance 3A. Use cURL command to directly ping the author server with the payload -- Gives 200 OK works fine 3B Use the runtime action to generate the request to author instance -- gets blocked at CDN layer 4. The servlet at author takes the payload and does its own custom logic processing. So locally and via curl the servlet worked fine but when invoked from Adobe I/O runtime it failed with 403 not allowed. Conclusions - 1. Issue not in servlet, not in dispatcher rules as direct curl from local machine gives 200 OK The curl command when hit gives the below response - rohan_garg@work hello-runtime % curl -X POST \"https://author-p123456-e1234567.adobeaemcloud.com/services/abc/save" \-H "Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJSUz..." \-H
My entire company wasn’t receiving email notifications all day yesterday from Workfront. Just wondering how many other folks were having this issue? Seems to be resolved as of this morning but this isn’t the first time that I don’t receive a clear status on what is down within the system. Sometimes the system is running slow, sometimes proofs don’t want to work, and then we have days like yesterday when we don’t receive email notifications.
Two upcoming deprecations may impact your integration with Marketo Engage and may require action. Previously, both the SOAP API, and the REST API Access Token in Query Parameter were to be deprecated on 31 October 2025. They will now be deprecated on 31 January 2026. The Marketo Engage SOAP API will be fully deprecated on 31 January 2026. Please review if you are still using the SOAP API in one or more of your Marketo subscriptions. To avoid disruptions of service, you will need to retire or migrate any services using the SOAP API to the Marketo Engage REST API by 31 January 2026. Consult the Migration Guide for further information. Marketo Engage Support is only able to provide the IP address of requests made to the SOAP API. On 31 January 2026, the Marketo Engage REST API will no longer accept access tokens for authentication and authorization via the ‘access_token’ query param
We are working on an AEM project where the site structure is language-only, for example:/content/site/global/en/content/site/global/de/content/site/global/fr/content/site/global/esThere is no country structureFor translation management, we are using Phrase/Microsoft translation, and technically the translation flow is working as expected. However, over time we are facing serious content inconsistency issues across languages. Because there is no Master + Live Copy (MSM) setupPhrase only handles translation when content is explicitly sent, but:It does not enforce that all languages are updated It does not guarantee structural/content parity across languagesAfter some time, each language version of the same page looks different:Missing components/pages Different layouts Outdated text in some languagesWe are trying to find a scalable and maintainable approach to ensure:Content consistency across all languages A clear “source of truth” Less manual rollout effort Better control over what is
I’m working on an email nurture campaign that includes additional trigger emails based on engagement. Specifically, if a user clicks on two different emails, they receive a special trigger email. I’m trying to manage this within a single smart campaign, but I’m unsure if using the same email (e.g., Email 1) in both the “clicks link in email” and “clicked link in email” conditions would count as one click each. The nurture contains 13 emails, and the trigger email can be sent after any combination of two clicks across those 13 emails. In the following screenshots each email from the 13 in the ‘clicks link in email’ are also in the ‘clicked link in email’ filter. Is there a better way?
Description:The Scenario planner feels like a forgotten function of the tool. It’s very convenient for quickly getting projects added to Workfront as initiatives and moving them around, but it falls short in how it can be made more useful during project roadmap planning. The function would need to include:Project-to-project dependencies The ability to tie the start date of an initiative to the end date of another. This would be great for regular projects as well versus having to associate tasks within them.Custom form editingThe ability to associate custom form data at the initiative level that would carry over after publishing.Project summary view within the scenario plannerIf an initiative is tied to a project, you can more easily see the project details without leaving the page. More initiative dates optionsThe ability to sync resync my initiative dates with project dates.More specific dates - monthly increments can be too broad Reveal the Scena
Hi Adobe Community Team,Content Fragments Save and close at a time is not working in AEM 6.5.23Is this knwon issue with SP 23?
Hi,We have requirement to restrict the specific asset folder path while search in pathfield. Since there’s no ootb property to restrict the path. Is there any other way where we can do it? Also I need to disable the dates previous to currentdate. How to set that? How to dynamically set min date so that we can disable the previous dates.Thank you.
Hi,I am using AEM as a cloud core component based adaptive form and want API to invoke form data model service from using custom javascript rule editor function.I am referring https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/forms/adaptive-forms-authoring/authoring-adaptive-forms-core-components/create-an-adaptive-form-on-forms-cs/rule-editor-core-components/invoke-service-enhancements-rule-editorBut I have not found any topics for API to invoke form data model service from using custom javascript rule editor function. there are some document form AEM6.5 like : https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-65/content/forms/adaptive-forms-advanced-authoring/invoke-form-data-model-services But want to do in AEM as a cloud core component based adaptive form not found any document for the same. Kindly share if there is any available API to invoke form data model service from using custom javascript rule editor function /** * CallApiOnButto
Busy MOps teams use a URL builder to manage tracking params (and sometimes for add-to-calendar URLs and other areas). They have a UI like this: And generate a copy-and-pasteable URL like this:https://www.example.com/landingpage?baseparam1=value1&utm_campaign=nosferatrix-or-treat-2025&utm_medium=email&utm_source=marketo&utm_content=logo&utm_term=defaultSometimes they’re built using Excel or a Google Sheet (ugh) instead of a separate web app, but the idea is the same.Problem: most such builders have at least one fatal bug. They do not properly support Marketo {{dotted.token}} syntax in query param values. This is bad, since tokens are a huge operational benefit on their own. Let’s say you want to use the built-in {{campaign.Name}} as the utm_campaign value: A naïve URL builder will mistakenly think {{campaign.Name}} is a literal value, as opposed to an interpolated variable, and will URL-encode it, breaking the URL in Marketo:https://www.example.com/landingpage?basepa
I am currently looking for ways to easily monitor our AJO journeys. As we create more and more, I was hoping there was a way to track our active journeys + what audience is tied to the journey. We used the adobe AI for a bit but are looking for a more scalable and repeatable way to do this. We also looked into using CJA, but it seems you aren’t able to get journey specific details.Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
Hi, I’m looking for guidance on reporting for journeys that have gone through multiple versions.Each time a journey is updated and republished, a new version is created with a new version ID, and reporting metrics appear to reset at the version level. This makes it difficult to analyze performance trends over time when a journey has evolved through several iterations.Is there a recommended way to view reporting that aggregates all versions of the same journey??Thanks in advance!
I’m facing the below error, while opening analysis workspace “The report suite is currently exceeding its reporting capacity. Please simplify the request or try again later.” This has been happening since the beginning of the year and occurring more often than before. What are the possible causes for this issue and how to load reports more efficiently. Is this related to adobe licensing renewal, may be a downgrade of existing license plan?
As I am trying to access the prep guide and book an exam slot, I only get option for "AD0-E555 - Adobe Marketo Engage Business Practitioner Professional - Japanese”. Could you please help me with the Adobe Marketo Engage Professionalcertification guide and exam form in English?
Description - I would like Frame.io to be a default/native option in the "Link from" popup that appears when a user is adding a document to a request. Why is this feature important to you - My customer has had to rework their current workflow using a custom form to allow end users to submit content . Expectations - The hope here would be to have Frame.IO included in the “link from” option for platform consistency, visibility and ease of use.
I noticed an issue on the Home Dashboard where users outside of the Design Team can only see projects with a Completed status in the Status column. Previously, they were able to view all projects they have managerial, view, or contributor access to if it was shared with them, regardless of status, so this seems to be a change from how it worked before. And I’ve checked each Access Level and this is even happening with certain people who have the Standard License. The dashboard indicates that a filter is enabled, but even after selecting Clear All several times, only the Completed status continues to display. There is no filter enabled even though it says there is.The Projects I’m On view should show visibility across all project statuses we’ve set up in the system, but it doesn’t appear to be functioning as it did in prior months.Could someone please take a look? I’ve attached a screenshot for reference. Thank you!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
