Adobe Experience Manager

Hi Experts, In my form on the last page (so in my example 3 pages) it will never print the form title and order number.  The following script is in place to determine of there are more pages:  Form.frmHiddenGlobalFields.txtFormTitle::ready:layout - (FormCalc, client)// Set the form title as the combination of title and document ID, separated by colon //First Page (always available)if (HasValue(txtChangedDocument.rawValue) == 0)then  xfa.resolveNode(Concat("#pageSet[0].mst1.FirstPage.frmHeader.txtTitle")) = Form.frmHiddenStaticTexts.lblSalesOrder.rawValue//  xfa.resolveNode("#pageSet[0].mst1.FirstPage.frmHeader.txtTitle") = Concat(Form.frmHiddenStaticTexts.lblSalesOrder.rawValue, ": ", Form.frmHiddenGlobalFields.txtDocumentID.rawValue)else  xfa.resolveNode(Concat("#pageSet[0].mst1.FirstPage.frmHeader.txtTitle")) = Concat(Form.frmHiddenStaticTexts.lblChangeToSalesOrder.rawValue, "\u000d", Form.frmHiddenStaticTexts.lblSalesOrder.rawValue)//  xfa.resolveNode("#pageSet[0].mst1.FirstPage.frm

Hi community,  We want to share details about a significant regression in AEM 6.5 LTS SP2 (Oak 1.88.x) where online garbage collection (GC) causes the segment store to grow instead of reclaiming disk space, along with an available workaround.  --- What is happening  Customers on AEM 6.5 LTS SP2 observed that after running online GC, disk usage was increasing rather than decreasing. Compaction was taking far longer than expected and writing significantly more data than on AEM 6.5 LTS SP1 (Oak 1.78.x) for the same repository.

Hi all,we are registering API client ID’s in an api.yaml (see https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/open-api-based-apis) and deploy them with a config pipeline.The documentation describes that for secrets can be used placeholders (see https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/operations/config-pipeline) Something like shown here seems not to work: kind: "API"version: "1"data: allowedClientIDs: author: - "${{MY_AUTHOR_CLIENT_ID}}"We added the values as secrets with “Service Applied: All” in cloud manager configuration but it only works with specific values directly in the api.yaml.Do you know if this not supported kind: API?Best,Mark

Hi Community,I’m looking for suggestions and best practices around importing Salsify product data into AEM, specifically for creating or updating Content Fragments.Current ArchitectureSalsify product data is exported and stored in AEM DAM as .txt files. AEM Workflow is triggered on these DAM assets The workflow: Reads the Salsify JSON Creates Product Pages Sets product properties on the pages based on the JSON This approach is currently page‑centric, driven by workflow logicNew / Evolving RequirementWe are exploring a shift to:Content Fragments as the primary product data source Importing product data via: CSV files where one or more columns contain Salsify JSON, or Directly from JSON assets Mapping Salsify attributes to Content Fragment Models Supporting re‑imports / updates (idempotent behavior)What I’m Looking ForI’d appreciate guidance on:Recommended patterns for CSV/JSON → Content Fragment creation Whether workflows are still the preferred approach, or if: Custom servlets Sc

Dear Team,We are using AEMaaCS, created adaptive form using Core Components, added rules and created theme, which is working fine as standalone form. While embedding the adaptive form to the AEM Page the rules and styles are not loading. Please help / guide in fixing this issue. Thanks

I have a use case where I have two PDFs. 1- Static PDF  2- Dynamic PDF, generated using AEM Form Communication API (https://developer.adobe.com/experience-manager-forms-cloud-service-developer-reference/api/output-sync/).   Ask - I would like to insert static PDF pages after page 2 of Dynamic PDF(generated using communication API) using Document manipulation APIs (https://developer.adobe.com/experience-manager-forms-cloud-service-developer-reference/api/assembler-sync/#section/Introduction).   Any sample code or DDX file, if this can be done?

Hi All,AEM: 6.5.12I’m encountering this issue for the first time. I’m currently using the AEM OOTB Sitemap generator for testing purposes. However, when I try to use the scheduler approach, the job gets stuck and doesn't trigger. please refer below screenshot.  The logs don’t provide much information. I’ve attempted to create the scheduler through /system/console/ConfigMgr and even added a run mode, but it still doesn’t work. However, the "On Demand" approach works perfectly fine. I checked from status-slingsitemap and it appears as scheduled.I've done the the following actions:- re-index from oak:index -> slingSitemap- Adding  the config to be placed "/apps/system/conf/ (didn't work)- Adding runmode config (didn't work).- flushing classloader (didn't work).Is there a way to know if the scheduler got stuck somehow?. if so, do you know the path where I can check it?. Previosly, it was working fine but not sure what changed. 

Hi Team,We are observing a very high volume of requests hitting AEM internal Granite APIs:/libs/granite/csrf/token.json (~618K requests, ~19%) /libs/granite/security/currentuser.json (~300K requests, ~9.3%)Together, these endpoints account for nearly 29% of total traffic in our logs.We understand these endpoints are used for authentication/session handling, but this volume seems unusually high and is impacting overall traffic patterns.We would like guidance on:Is this level of traffic expected for these endpoints in Adobe Experience Manager (especially Cloud Service)? What are the recommended best practices to reduce or optimize calls to these APIs?      Dispatcher/CDN rules? Frontend implementation improvements? Could this indicate a misconfiguration (e.g., frequent polling, missing caching, or bot traffic)? Are there Adobe-recommended patterns to minimize repeated CSRF token and current user calls? Any insights or similar experiences would be really helpful. Thanks in advance!

I have created a custom component in my AEM as cloud which extends OTB Tab component and OTB Tab component extends the OTB Panel Container Component. And In this custom component i have added composite multifield field, now whenever i cancel the inheritance on live copy then ideally it should set cq:isCancelledForChildren as true , but it doesn’t,  resulting in overriding the manual changes done in this composite multifield on live copy. Do note this property gets set for normal components which are not extending OTB Tab or Accordian components. I believe this has something to do with cq:isContainer true property on panel container component. But i tried setting this as false and it doesnt work. Read few articles and found out that deepCancel on edit config helps to set this property but this also did not worked for me.Any solution to this?

Hello everyone, Hola, Welkom, Привет, Salut, Vítejte, Gruß, 환영합니다, Willkommen, Hoi, नमस्ते, Nazdar, Bienvenue, Witamy, ハワイ, Hej, Živjo, 拝啓, Velkommen, Cześć, Oi, 您好, Saudações, ようこそ, Salve, مرحبا, Benvenuto, Pozdrav, Hoşgeldiniz, Gegroet, Salutacions, Benvingut, הי, Saludos, Hei, Bemvindo, Hälsningar, Приветствую, Hi,  Välkommen, Saluto, अभिवादन, Dobrodošli, Tervetuloa, Pozdrowienia, Salutation, ברכות... We are happy to have you on the AEM Community and here, in our community, we believe it's important to create a space for you all to share a little more about who you are and all the cool things you are up to! So, let me first start by introducing myself - I, Kautuk, am working as a Community Manager for AEM and I have been with Adobe for almost 10 years now. I started my career at Adobe as a Software Engineer. Apart from being a Community Manager, I am also a sports enthusiast and love to play tennis. My other interests include cooking and

We’re excited to announce the early access launch of our all-new Dynamic Media Video Player – a faster, smarter, and more accessible upgrade to our existing player. Reimagined from the ground up, this next-gen player is built to deliver a premium viewing experience while giving your brand the performance edge it deserves.We’re inviting select customers to join our VIP Early Access Program! What’s New?Blazing Fast PerformanceOur new lightweight player drastically reduces load times, keeping your site snappy and responsive – no matter the connection speed. We have noticed almost 20% reduction in load time and 55-65% reduction in LCP.  .                             Savings of 70% bytes served for player images and 40% for player JS Adaptive Streaming for Seamless PlaybackComes with full adaptive bitrate streaming support through which the player dynamically adjusts video quality based on the viewer’s bandwidth and device capabilities. That means smoother playback, fewer interruptions, and

When we design adaptive forms with 3 or 4 columns, we noticed they tend to overlap when we switch to mobile renditions, i was under impression in the layout mode, i can arrange them, so they stack up one over the other but i noticed it stays the same after reverting to desktop rendition. Am i missing anything ? Eventually we will be delivering this form in headless but layout is something thats under AEM scope.

We are observing an issue in AEM Guides (Cloud Service) where the translation status does not revert after cancelling a translation job. As per Adobe documentation and earlier fixed issues, when a translation job is cancelled or deleted, the “In Progress” status should revert to the original state. However, in our environment, the status continues to remain “In Progress”. Observed Behavior: When sending a DITA topic/map for translation where the target language copy does not exist: A placeholder (empty) language copy is created. If the translation job is then cancelled: The placeholder file remains in the target language folder. The translation status of the asset still shows “In Progress”. The status does not revert even after some time or refresh. Expected Behavior: On cancellation of the translation job: Translation status should revert from “In Progress” to the original state. Placeholder language copies (if not translated) should ideally be cleaned up or

I’m trying to do a redirect based on the email domain that they submitted, basically want to redirect them to page A if their non-customer domains, page B if their customer domains. As i know currenly there is no native functionality to cross check the domain to marketo lists correct? Or is there an alternative for this

hi,I am trying to create an adaptive form using form template (xdp) (foundation components) on aem 6.5.The issue is after creating adaptive form using xdp, the data source is not populating  Even though an XDP is referenced in this form, it shows blank and the error.log as following errors:19.03.2026 13:56:52.576 *ERROR* [10.238.22.152 [1773924978316] GET /content/forms/af/FOFO/adaptive-forms/A123-abc/jcr:content/guideContainer.xfajson HTTP/1.1] com.adobe.aemds.guide.xfa.XFAJSONTransformer Error in transforming xfa json:nulljava.lang.NullPointerException: null19.03.2026 13:56:52.577 *ERROR* [10.238.22.152 [1773924978316] GET /content/forms/af/FOFO/adaptive-forms/A123-abc/jcr:content/guideContainer.xfajson HTTP/1.1] com.adobe.aemds.guide.service.impl.GuideModelImporterImpl Error in importing Xfa Jsoncom.adobe.aemds.guide.service.GuideException: null at com.adobe.aemds.guide.xfa.XFAJSONTransformer.transform(XFAJSONTransformer.java:104) [com.adobe.aemds.guide.aemds-guide-core:6.0.688] at

Environment : AEM 6.5.21 , Issue do not see the persistent queries. endpoint can be seen on right side, but no persistent queries loaded, even though queries exist at crxde jcr node settings level for this specific project. This issue is on my local aem instance. configuration browser selected all the checkboxes, /content/site/jcr:content pointed to /conf/site where settings folder exist having all persistent queries  

ADOBE MAKES ASKING QUESTIONS TOO DARN HARD.I have been struggling for an hour to understand my problem and THAT IS RIDICULOUS. I made a virtual copy of an image in LR and then chose “edit a copy in PS with lightroom adjustments”. When I sent the image back to LRc, there was no copy made and the new image overwrote the .TIF file original. My original (with Google AI adjustments that cannot be replicated ‘cuz I’m out of usage tokens) is ** COMPLETELY GONE **. I am quite beyond irritated. Yes, I still have the pre-Google raw file, but I am very much not happy. What should I have done?

Three quick questions for AEM teams. Answer whichever applies to you: 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟏: AEM Cloud MigrationIf you had to migrate to Cloud Service tomorrow, how ready would you be?🟢 Ready — fully assessed🟡 Mostly ready — some unknowns🟠 Haven't fully assessed🔴 Not ready — significant technical debt 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟐: Edge Delivery ServicesWhat's your EDS strategy?📋 Already using EDS or Adobe's new Modernization Agent🔍 Evaluating it❓ Haven't started thinking about it🤷 Not sure what EDS is (no judgment — it's new) 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟑: AccessibilityHow confident are you in your AEM site's WCAG/EAA compliance?✅ Fully compliant and tested🔶 Mostly compliant with known gaps⚠️ Haven't done a proper audit🚫 Not on our radar yet Drop your answers in the comments. I'm genuinely curious where the community stands. I'll share the results with my analysis next week. (And yes, I've worked with teams in all four categories on all three questions. No judgment here.) #AEM #AdobeExperienceMana

Hi,I have come across a problem, where the checkbox which is on Static tagged PDF, is not read correctly by screen readers such as voice over.It reads the title, but not if the checkbox is checked /unchecked. The static PDF which is tagged, as cross mark on the check box, but voice over is not able to recognize it and read it aloud. hence it reads only the title of the checkbox. Please note: The static pdf is rendered using outputservice.generatePDF API and is tagged. NVDA screen reader, is reading check box  unavailable  checked  read only, after the title is read aloud. But Voice over and acrobat pro read aloud is not able to recognize this.Anyone seen this issue before.?

Get certified at Summit - we are ready with expanded testing capacity! Full passholders attending Adobe Summit 2026 can get certified for free by passing an on-site certification exam. All exams (except Adobe ColdFusion and Adobe Captivate) will be available. You may take as many different exams as you like, but you may not take the same exam more than once.  Testing hours are April 19-21 @ 9am-5pm PT and April 22 @ 8am-1pm PT. Seating is first-come, first-served. Find us at the Adobe Certification table on the 5th floor of the Venetian.  You must bring your own fully-charged laptop to take advantage of this offer. Free stable and secure Wi-Fi will be provided.  Learn more today! 

👉 Calling all AEM practitioners in the San Francisco Bay Area and beyond ‼️👋We're thrilled to announce the launch of the AEM User Group - Bay Area chapter! Hosted by seasoned AEM experts KrishnaKalyan Gorthi and Mrinal Kumar, this is a community dedicated to passionate AEM users who come together to share best practices, collectively problem solve, and network.This chapter will host in-person and virtual meetings, so there is no shortage of ways to connect with your peers. 🙌Sign up here: https://aem-augs.adobe.com/aemug-bay-area/

We are using the WCM Core component PDF Viewer (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-core-components/using/wcm-components/pdf-viewer) on our site to improve the pdf experience of our customers but we are getting analytics cookies coming along for the ride:acrobatservices.adobe.comdc-api.adobe.iop.typekit.netp13n.adobe.iouse.typekit.netviewlicense.adobe.ioObviously we need to make sure if the users disables analytic cookies in our cookie consent manager that these cookies don’t get dropped.This isn’t a problem for js that we managed in Adobe Tags, we have rules to wire it up to the consent manager but im not sure how to go about wiring up these cookies from this core component.Any ideas?

1. DescriptionWhen an AEM author uses the "Convert to Experience Fragment Variation" action from the page editor, the OOTB servlet ConvertToExperienceFragmentVariation (from bundle com.adobe.cq.cq-experience-fragments) hardcodes the sling:resourceType on the converted component node to:cq/experience-fragments/editor/components/experiencefragment This prevents us from using our custom brand-specific Experience Fragment component during and after conversion. There is currently no extension point, OSGi hook, or request parameter to override this value. . Steps to ReproduceOpen any AEM page in the page editor. Right-click a component (e.g. Hero component). Select "Convert to Experience Fragment Variation". Fill in the conversion dialog and click Submit. Observe the POST request sent to:            /libs/cq/experience-fragments/content/v2/conversion/converterOpen CRXDE Lite and inspect the converted component node. Observe that sling:resourceType is hardcoded to the OOTB value. Expected vs.

Are there recommendations/best practices to manage content as code.One of the team I work with mentioned this as their problem statement “Our code gets deployed through Cloud Manager but our QA cannot test anything yet nor can automated regression tests be triggered through Continuous Test Pipelines because they have to wait until content is authored.”The human element in the process feels like a huge bottle neck in the process as it is hindering immediate feedback loop.I am trying to understand what strategies other enterprises who use AEM have implemented in their SDLC process.For example in a sprint, if the code and content are planned to be delivered together, cant the content creators(BA/Business) be ready with the content that go in with the fragments that get deployed as part of code