Our Workfront team has evolved and grown over the time since implementation. I am the only one that still retains why we made some of the directional decisions we did when building out our instance.   This has led to some confusion when new people come on board and they suggest a better way of doing...

Our users are currently getting the following error any time they update their timesheet.  It does save the change, but they have to refresh after each entry.    

I'm stuck in a support loop too.

I'm trying to understand the benefit. Is it for display purposes only? I embedded a fillable PDF in a request form, converted it to a project and the filled in fields did not carry over. I could be doing something wrong however.

Yes, they can still access the projects once complete. Christina Christina Jarosz Marketing Project Coordinator, Agency Marketing Pronouns: She/Her/Hers P 215-648-7168 | C 215-435-9412

Following - we've been interested in doing this for a while now. I did some of the pre-work and identified some of our key values and standardized the naming. We haven't quite made the leap yet, mostly because lack of resources.

I believe this still is a limitation but we'd like to enable non-WF users to submit a request via a request queue. We aren't interested in provisioning each user as a stakeholder or auto-provisioning. However, we would like to expand the functionality. Has anyone figured out a workaround? I know you...

We approach it one of two ways: We have an 'ongoing' project that has a bucket of time for each type of work 'Project Management Time Tracking', "Design Time Tracking'. We set these as fixed dates so it spans an entire year (and doesn't fall of anyone's timesheets). We mark the project as complete ...

I'd like to copy the custom form data that's on a project, into a new request (vs. starting a new request and having to input all the data again). Does anyone know if this is possible, or a workaround that will let it happen?

Kevin, as usual, you do not disappoint with your knowledge and thought out reply. I 1000% agree as it relates to Box.com - that's many peoples knee jerk reaction to our mention of a DAM and it's too complicated to get into WHY it would not work...it's just easier to say we're not interested. To tha...