Came to innovation lab to submit this very thing. We have many views/groupings for specific projects and it is frustrating for the user to have to switch every time they switch projects. I want this something they can either set at a user level for themselves based on the project or in the admin lev...

We have Ref ID on project, task, document, issue, etc. Why is there no Ref ID for Programs? I realize there is Program ID, but this is a much longer string of characters we don't want. This seems like it would be very easy to implement for WF. Help!

Many people want to see their work by project or task status. I've had to create different reports for users so they could see their work grouped by status since the homepage task list grouping options don't offer this. Would be a very easy thing to include Project Status and Task Status as options ...

I know this is an old ticket, but this is still a need for us. We are constantly having to tell people to 'choose their best fit' but this doesn't allow for representation of the many cross-portfolio programs/projects that we have. I am learning there is a new Campaign level coming into the hierarch...

I meant 200 not 2000. 2000 would be great though! : )

We generate reports sometimes with a ton of data, and not being to increase the default view to beyond 2000 rows is a hindrance. Yes, people can click 'see more' and scroll to more pages, but for leadership reports non-savvy users don't always see the ability to do this and think the 2000 rows they ...

Yesss we need this please! There are a handful of innovation lab submissions around this, including one from myself. WORKFRONT - this is a HUGE hindrance to our social team, to the point that we are having to look to other tools instead of WF.

I just came to add the same request, we need more upvotes on this people! We have some very complicated calendar filters and use calendars heavily, and it takes forever to recreate each filter when some have just slight differences.

Anytime someone is assigned to a task in a project, is the project owner or has had a project shared with them, they become in the People section of the project. All good. However, anytime a task is removed, a project owner changes, or any people change on a project, the old users are still in the P...

I went to submit this same idea. This is driving me crazy and is much needed! To go beyond a 'reset' button, I propose the People section dynamically populate based on who is assigned to a task or shared with the project. We have so many times where we pull in a template for a new project, and then ...