Hello,Did you ever figure this out? I have a user recently bombarded with over 125 in-app notifications (not emails) on comments to a proof. None of them were relevant to her, so she mass-deleted them. Based on the settings in her profile and on the proof, it shows Daily Summary only. She is getting...

Thanks Richard,I was fearful this would be the response, but wanted to pose the question to see if I missed something somewhere.

I'm looking at putting together a RACI chart (saved as issues/requests on a project). What I've done thus far:1) Created a custom form for the four RACI fields.2) Created a project with a few placeholder issues and completed the RACI fields (for testing purposes)3) Built an issue report that's filte...

I've got a milestone report for projects to do portfolio planning across all projects. But, I'm being asked if the milestones can roll-up into a single line item on the Gantt chart with icons at each milestone. So, instead of the project header, then subtasks for each milestone, can the project head...

Thanks for the update. Glad I wasn't going crazy and someone else experienced it.

I'm trying to setup a few Reminder notifications with custom HTML email templates. I can get the notifications setup and assigned to that tasks, but when I try to create an email template, I cannot save it. I click the save button but nothing happens. Anybody else had this issue? Anybody have a fix?

On this thought, does anyone know why changing a filter makes the numbering scheme go awry? If I apply the "Critical Path" filter, I have to always click the task number header twice to get them back in order.

I think those people were previously assigned tasks in the project template. When those tasks were reassigned, the old user still stayed in the people section. In project tasks, I'd recommend trying to avoid using specific people and utilize user Job roles or groups instead.

yeah, the first comment is in the proof, there is a response which sends a WF Card to Teams for the original commenter. But the reply, via Teams, doesn't go back to the proof, only the update stream on the document details.

Agreed, however my instance it where a person uses the proof interface to make a comment, then someone responds to that comment. So the initial commenter already knows the content that specific comment is referring to and would like to just be able to comment back via Teams and not have to open the ...