Currently when you select an existing comment in PHQ the pointer/line that links to the comment or markup is a very light grey. It's very tough to see, especially on higher-resolution screens.I propose making it red to match the numeric "tags" on the proof. Or, make it configurable by the admin or b...

As Skye stated, this should include:The gigantic ad on the login screen.Any in-system popups: ads for Leap, requests for customer feedback, ads for new features or integrations, etc.I think what peeves me about this is we pay alot of money for systems like Workfront, and while having their logo on i...

Unfortunately this is just one more reason justifying our use of an external database to reconcile financial matters; our various financial and accounting gurus don't trust WF's reporting and assumptions.Definitely upvoting in the hopes that WF gets their fiscal house in order some day.

The hourly rate used is currently only available by back-calculating from Resource Revenue (Resource Revenue / Hours). However, this does not make it easy to tell which rate sheet the hourly rate was pulled from.Ideally, the numbers and rate location behind Resource Revenue should be exposed as fiel...

Also include all varieties like moving a group out of a subgroup, into another subgroup, to the top level, etc.Basically let groups be admin'd alot like tasks.

At least Issue-to-Project you can use templates to pick-up the appropriate custom forms; granted, picking the wrong template is always an issue.However, converting an Issue to a Task means the process is entirely manual.Our use case that cropped-up recently and has become more and more prevalent:Our...

Our task lists are much shorter, so I never would have thought of this kind of "auto collpase"...and wow, what a great idea and a nice QoL suggestion!

Aileen; that *is* what we are looking for, but how is it made available to people who aren't on the proof.? We don't assign Production and Proofreading to proofs, the notification clutter would be extreme. Can they get access via an additional stage and without admin access?

We're currently having a row between our Project Management team and the Production/Proofreading team:One the one hand, the PM team wants to go all-digital with proof routings, including the handling of corrections by the Production and Proofing teams.However, the Production/Proofing teams for years...

We have the problem of Workers not updating their time on a task until past a billing cycle, or accidentally adding time to the wrong task, and then there is just the general idea that a completed task isn't really completed until the project is.This does not inspire reporting confidence and wastes ...