Product Communities

It would be nice to allow workers to give workers edit access to custom forms. We have a group of people who need use all the functions like a worker but only need the edit access of a planner.    

Description -Why is this feature important to you -How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour -

Description - Maintain project access permissions (view, contribute, manage), even when a project is recategorized to another portfolio. Why is this feature important to you - My client recently updated their portfolios to better organize their work. The outcome was hundreds of projects being recategorized to different portfolios OR put in a portfolio for the first time. Entire groups and teams of users - including those assigned work in the projects, people whose requests were converted into these projects, and people with whom the projects had been manually shared previously - lost access. It created a massive work stoppage across much of the 1800-person userbase. How would you like the feature to work - Any manually shared project permissions OR those connected to the request that was the catalyst for the project OR people who have tasks assigned in the project are permanently maintained. The integrity of these permissions is critical for work to be done efficiently. No ch

Description: We need an option to select a 12-hour or 24-hour clock for the proofing workflow stage deadline.Why is this feature important to you?Some users are having difficulty understanding the 24-hour clock timing in the proofing workflow stage deadline.How would you like the feature to work?This feature makes it easier for users to understand the deadline time.Current Behavior: It is showing in the 24-hour clock to the proofing workflow stage deadline.for example: 5 p.m. vs. 17:00 

In an A/B/C test with a control experience (eg A) and two test experiences (eg B and C), it would be extremely time saving to be able to create your Experience B (potentially with special variations for your multiple audiences) and then Copy it to start off your version C, making only the specific version C modifications needed to differentiate C from B, rather than starting from a blank slate for each experience.

It's great to be able to use the fields that live on custom objects in Salesforce within our Marketo Smart Lists & Campaigns, but when I want to get an idea of how frequently/where each individual field is used as a constraint or trigger in those lists and campaigns, there is no way to do it on a mass level. You have to look at each use of the entire custom object (which, for one of our custom objects, is hundreds of uses) to see if it uses that constraint or trigger. There should be a way to run a report or access a "used by" list for these constraint and trigger fields on custom objects. 

Description - Allow admins to decide if users can remove widgets set for them on the Home page through layout templates.  Why is this feature important to you - In some setups admins may not need to force users to stay married to certain widgets' presence on the Home page; they may treat widgets as suggestions but not a forced feature present on the page. How would you like the feature to work - It would be great if admins do have access to a feature, either through access levels or layout templates, to allow users to remove widgets set for them through the layout templates.  Current Behaviour - Once the widget is added to a layout template, the user whom the template is assigned to is not able to remove the widget if they wish to.

Description - Allow Admins the ability to hide widgets that are not used by your teams/organizationWhy is this feature important to you - This would allow users to only pick and use widgets that the admin would like them to have available. Also, this would make it easier for training purposes to not have to explain and reiterate to users to not use certain widget types. This would simplify the experience for users and the admin to manage.How would you like the feature to work - Allow option for the admin to hide certain widgets in the layout template settingsCurrent Behaviour - Does not exist; Users see all the widget types that are available

I am the Marketo Admin for our company. This support portal will not let me add myself to open cases or launch a chat. I have some urgent sync issues that need support. Please reply and add me so I can open future tickets. We have ended our service relationship with the 3rd party implementation partner. With as much as we pay for this platform, it should not be this hard to use or get support. Very frustrated.Liz P., VP of Marketing, Coastal Business Intermediaries DBA Agency Brokerage

Each time I create a graph, I take an extra step to remove the anomaly bubbles as we have very few reports/scenarios in which they apply or are helpful. Maybe 1%? I would be very, very grateful if there were a toggle somewhere to turn OFF anomaly detection by default. Or perhaps Adobe could explore turning them off for everyone and see if you get any complaints. 🙂 My company is in media, so our metrics fluctuate significantly based on content available -- NBA Games, Star Wars, etc. etc.@jenla5, pretty please 🙂  

It would be helpful to add the ability to deactivate trigger campaigns in bulk. This would be outside of the traditional deactivation Marketo does after 6 months. Event programs are notorious for having multiple trigger smart campaigns and turning them off after an event in bulk would be very helpful. Additionally, it would be even more helpful if we could set a time limit for our triggers similar to batch campaigns. The same example for an event works here too. We could set the deactivation time for after the event when we know it should be turned off thus streamlining the automation. Trying to remember to turn off some triggers is not efficient and we waste time remembering and turning them off.

Description -Why is this feature important to you - So earlier we used Confluence JIRA for tracking our tasks. In it we had a dashboard with Calendar, our tasks, status of tasks chart in one dashboard. Calendar report feature addition in Canvas dashboard will give anyone a quick snapshot what's due in a month or a week really quick without checking the details of it. We as a team/ group, certainly missing this feature to be added in the Canvas Dashboard (which is customisable in terms of layout and resizing). Standard Dashboard though have the option to add calendar in it however, it's not customisable and resizable.How would you like the feature to work - We are able to add the Calendar Report in a Canvas Dashboard which has blobs (thick vertical bars of the tasks due on the particular day of a month - for e.g. say 5 tasks are due on 25 Sep'24 there must be 5 blobs, i.e., thick vertical line; say there is 1 task due on 28 Sep so one blob visible)Current Behaviour - Currently, calendar

機能改善要求（RFE）概要： In the current UI, the sidebar cannot be expanded horizontally, preventing the full display of query names. I would like to have the ability to see the full list of query names, perhaps by allowing the sidebar to be expanded horizontally. 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM Release: 2024.7.17098.20240711T134106Z スクリーンショット（ある場合）

ISSUE: PROOF FUNCTIONALITY TAKES FILES OUT OF SOURCE FORMATWhen using the proofing functionality, anything besides a PDF (e.g., Word DOC, Figma FIG, Powerpoint PPT) all get converted to a PDF therefore losing the working file so the agency must continually take feedback from a PDF and go back to the source document (Word DOC, Powerpoint PPT, etc). and reincorporate the feedback, creating room for error and missed feedback versus accepting, declining changes etc. Conversations about the document are essentially happening outside of the working file when we use proofs, creating additional work for the agency team.This creates a scenario where the agency is Referencing to “printed” PDFs to manually cross-transfer comment input back into source document creating risk because the team is working in multiple filesImpact: High impact for all projects, high risk for errors, creating additional work for project management and creativeIdeal solve: documents uploaded as a proof would re

Description - Ability to update the project template association on a projectWhy is this feature important to you - We have built a lot of our content operations reporting based on the project template associate (asset type). How would you like the feature to work - We are currently working on a thought leadership piece that we initially thought was going to be a blog, so we leveraged out blog project template. The content has evolved and is now a full blown Viewpoint piece, which uses a different set of tasks to get to done. So, now the asset type on this piece will not appear correct in any of our content reports. Current Behaviour - We originally created this project: https://experience.adobe.com/#/@cgi/so:cgi-Production/workfront/project/66463d4f00258653b6af4b0d132cfb31/tasks originally using our Blog project template but it's now a Viewpoint. So, this Viewpoint (now) reports as a Blog, even though it's no longer a blog. We now have to create a new project and hope i

We would like to see an option that the whole project is read only after it's completed so new comments can't be left unless the project is reopened by an admin. We have had several users that go into a completed project and want to make changes so they leave a comment in the updates and/or on the proofs and just expect us to know they did that, without any tagging. 

I have noticed that a "Rejection comment" field is available in the Hour schema, but at this time there is no way to add this comment through Workfront interface; this has been confirmed to me by a Workfront support representative. We can add the field in a view, but users have no way to enter information in it! In my company the ability to add a rejection comment is important for the timesheet/hour approval process, and now users are forced to add information to the hour description, mixing the rejection comment with the hour description entered by the hour owner, which is far from the ideal situation.It would be enough to add a textarea in the hour edit window, since it seems that the Workfront database already has the field available, so this should not be a very time-consuming feature to add.Thanks for your attention!Andrea Benfenati

Now that we can create custom objects, it would be very efficient to be able to create custom object flows through flow steps, exactly as we can do with tasks.For each custom object defined in the admin, we would need 3 flow steps:Create (would take all the fields as input)Update (would require the UID + the fields to be updated)Delete (would required the UID)The create/update could also be replaced with 1 upsert one.Obviously, if it's a SFDC custom objects, the fields available would have to be set through mapping.With regards to Marketo custom objects, all fields created in Marketo should be available to be set in the flow steps.All the fields of the custom objects could be set with tokens.Typical usage : I create a custom object : product interest, with a few fields (Time frame, quantities). I Create the same fields at lead level, that I use in a form. Once a lead fills out the form, I create a custom instance and populate the fields with the lead tokens.We should also be able to up

New possible duplicate records could be found by adding new fields or combination of fields in the "Duplicate Fields" filter.Besides the existing ones, we believe the following ones would help detect duplicates:1- Mobile Phone Number2- LinkedIn Profile URL3- Combination of First Name, Last Name and Company NameAnd we understand the level of complexity of doing so should be relatively low.

We would love the ability to limit smart assignments on tasks to only users who have Work/Plan licenses. All of our review/request users also pop up as suggestions, which clutters the smart assignments and sometimes leads to mistakes as the wrong person gets chosen easily. They often even pop up as the first and/or second option where Work/Plan users get pushed down the list. This would speed up time assigning tasks and minimize room for error in assigning an incorrect person.  Thank you! 

Current Behaviour -Presently, when sharing a proof, the proof appears as though it is coming from the user who shares it, as it inserts their email in the 'from' and 'reply-to' sections.How would you like the feature to work -We want better control over the headers and bodies of emails leaving Workfront proof, especially around the 'from' and 'reply-to' fields. This needs to allow us to use proof's email sharing as a 'no-reply' address.Why is this feature important to you -The current method of working increases administrative burden on our teams, as external users respond to the emails directly, rather than adding their comments to the proofs. It also limits who can share proofs with a client, as having non client facing users uploading/sharing proofs can cause confusion, especially if email replies are sent directly to them.

Hi Marketo Team, Currently the MSI package upgrade versions are not covered in the marketo release notes and no intemations are given to the markto admins to plan the MSI package upgrade. Admins have to keep checking the MSI package in the appexchange to plan the upgrade. It will be good if marketo publish the MSI  release schedule dates and versions in advance to all the markto admins. Thanks,Santhosh. S 

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Native AEM Assets Integration with Salsify Use-case: Push assets from AEM DAM to Salsify to syndicate content to retailers. Push assets from Salsify  Current/Experienced Behavior: Manual push of assets from AEM DAM to Salsify, and from Salsify to AEM. Suppliers are providing product assets to SGWS via Salsify. Manually pushing that product content to AEM Dam. For other assets in AEM, manually pushing assets to Salsify via sFTP.  Improved/Expected Behavior: 2-way API integration between Salsify and AEM to push assets to Salsify (based on publish status ideally, but configurable). AEM receives product assets based on status in Salsify. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description - Within the existing Board design, the Intake column does not display the Due date of the Task or Issue on the face of the card until it is brought into a main column. Nor is that column sortable by any of the same options supported for the rest of the columns that have been created, even as a partial solution. This makes it a barrier to user adoption, as they have no way to understand what is being asked of them first without opening each card in the Intake column to find the information. Why is this feature important to you - For any team or individual trying to manage their workflow on a Board, the ability to quickly understand 'what is being asked for first'? is critical to the usability of the Boards. Without that easy visibility, teams may prioritize discussions about items that are not as time sensitive as something later in the list. For any team or individual with more than a handful of work requests, this is simply unrealistic to expect and they are switchin

Description - Currently when viewing the blueprint page you are shown an "install" button and a "details" button. Upon first glance it appears as though this hasn't been downloaded to the system yet. The only way to find out that the Blueprint was installed is to click the "details" button which isn't intuitive for some end users.  Why is this feature important to you - Users are requesting downloads of objects that have already been implemented and don't have a way to see that easily. This causes duplicate work for system administrators. How would you like the feature to work - Instead of "install", once it's installed change the button to something else or add a new button. Current Behaviour - have to click into details to see that it's been downloaded.