Product Communities

Hi there, We would love to see the color coding on the new priorities view either go away entirely or change to something more impactful. Right now the color appears to align with a project, but there are often so many projects on the view that the colors get too similar and make it hard to identify anything with each color (or confusing users that items are from the same project because two colors are too similar).  Our users are finding the project colors distracting and confusing. We would love to see the color coding equate to something impactful like the chosen My Focus option highlights projects as red if the corresponding task/request is marked urgent, orange if primary, etc. or maybe by proximity to the task/issue due date (red if past due, orange if due today, no color or yellow if not due yet, etc) just to name a few options. The main ask is for a hyperlink there, so if the color takes away from that, hyperlinks would be the #1 ask.  Thank you! &#1285

Description - We have had consistent user feedback over the years that creating and managing projects in Workfront is clunky, outdated (compared to other tools out there) and negatively impacts productivity.  Much of this has to do with the UI.  Users complain that there are too many clicks, too much leaving one record page to go to another, load times are slow when you have bigger projects and sometimes it will timeout or won't fully load, causing a lot of rework.   Why is this feature important to you - modern UI's, such as Clickup or Monday.com, to name a few, allow for easy project creation and management with intuitive point-and-click actions.  Quicker and easier creation and management of projects allows our project managers to focus on providing value to our clients and getting projects completed efficiently with clarity for all teams. How would you like the feature to work - take a look at Monday.com and Clickup.  Users have also said upd

It would be great if one could upload a new version of a proof with a document all ready uploaded to Workfront. As of now this is not possible and new versions can only be uploaded from ones device

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide the ability to specify the flags for RegExp in content fragment models for custom validation regex.   This can be a mulit-select combobox offering the following flags:   global insensitive multiline single line (dotall) unicode sticky (screenshot attached, add combobox under custom regex with these options, that would simplify the regex and enable new possibilities) Use-case: We have 2500+ clients that we serve using multi-tenancy. We are using content fragments and headless to deliver that content. We have contractual obligations with a major client that requires us to provide a completely white-labelled experience, from logos to copy. This means that there can be no mention of my company name anywhere in the content. Violations carry a $5M fine. Current/Experienced Behavior: Today, it is not possible to specify these flags, so handling things such as case sensitivity is unmanageable, and matching patterns

If a user has the My Approvals widget set to only take up part of their Home screen or has their browser window size reduced, the issue/task and project name text is not readable. Many users would like to have their My Approvals widget set to only take up ½ of the Home page so that they can quickly see information in another widget next to it.It would be helpful if other items in the widget also adjusted when the widget is resized: remove the image, stack the Approval Stage text, stack the Approve and Reject buttons. This would allow more space for the issue/task and project name text when the window/widget size is reduced.

Description - For Adobe Target personalization and recommendation, there are use cases where we want to minimize KPIs like page load time, errors, agent contacts. It would be great to 1) set a reduction goal in Adobe Target, or 2) (less than ideal) be able to set negative outcomes in  mbox attribute or prop/evars to enable optimizing towards zeroWhy is this feature important to you - We'd like to make more extensive use of Adobe Target Premium feature in digital self-service and show value reducing costs.How would you like the feature to work - You would select an Adobe Analytics metric to optimize, let say agent-assisted chats. In Adobe Analytics, the upward trend is set as "Bad (red)". In Adobe Target, we select select Agent-Assisted Chat as the primary metric and second drop down would appear: "Drive this metric: Up / down" with down preselected based on the analytics setting. ML models would then work to minimize the number of chats an agent need to handle by recommending

Descripción - As I mentioned in this question: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-target-questions/is-there-any-way-to-target-users-based-on-their-continent/td-p/699416#M11265, there is not an easy way to target users based on a whole continent.¿Por qué esta función es importante para usted? - We have global and regional users and clients, so we need to offer proper experiences based on their markets.¿Cómo le gustaría que funcionara la función? - Same dropdown than "Country/region", but having one just for "Continent". Or having all the continents included in the "Country/region" option.Comportamiento actual - Only a few continents available, but no waranties of working properly or in the same way between them.

Description - Add support for proofing SCORM files in Workfront Proof.  Ideally; this would use the Workfront Proof application to deliver the SCORM presentation as a dynamic proof allowing individual pages and elements to be marked up and commented upon. Why is this feature important to you - It improves the process for creating customer training documents; improves the way we manage internal operations around creating SCORM files and improves the way we educate or train customers about our companies products and services.  We create a significant amout of educational content at our business units that will be delivered to our customers in SCORM format that needs to be reviewed by Legal and RA in its final format prior to release. How would you like the feature to work - The same way as dynamic proofs for HTML pages but without needing to extract the SCORM file somewhere to host it first. Current Behaviour - SCORM files are not supported by Workfront Proo

Description - I used to work for a software company who implemented a COTS solution with government agencies, and their software had date shortcuts. A user could enter '0' and the field would populate with today's date. Enter a '1' and it would populate tomorrows date. Enter a '-1' and it would populate yesterday's date. The field also accept '2w' (two weeks from now), '2m' (two months from now) and '2y' (two years from now) - these are just examples. A user could enter any number and any qualifier and it would populate correctlyWhy is this feature important to you - Equals less manual date entering. Less clicks = more productivityHow would you like the feature to work - Please see the description field above.Current Behaviour - A user has to enter at least a month and day, the system will populate the current year at least.

Description - Display the page name "Workload Balancer" or "Resource Manager" on browser tab when in the Resource Manager page.Why is this feature important to you - When multiple Workfront tabs are open, they all display the name of the page except for the Resource Manager tab, and I lose track of which tab is displaying the Workload Balancer. How would you like the feature to work - Display the page name "Workload Balancer | Adobe Workfront" or "Resource Manager | Adobe Workfront" on browser tab when in the Resource Manager page.Current Behaviour - It reads "Workfront | Adobe Workfront".

Marketo Measure currently supports the ability to use a custom revenue amount field, but it does not apply to Buyer Attribution Touchpoints (BAT). In order to do this, an automation in the CRM must be set up to duplicate data from the custom revenue field into the bizible2__Bizible_Opportunity_Amount__c. This is a poor design for the CRM to duplicate data and can affect performance in more mature systems. Since MM is already pulling this field for other areas of the system, could the integration be updated so that a custom automation in the CRM is no longer needed?

I have been told there are only 3 display options for the Proofing Menu Item.  1) Everyone sees it2) No-one sees it3) Only System Admins see it. These can only be set by Workfront Support. However, we would like to request the ability to control this in the Layout Templates along with other menu items.  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Format the HTML removing return carriages and white spaces Use-case: Minimize page loading and file system cache disk usage Current/Experienced Behavior: The page loading is affected and more disk space is needed for the cache. Improved/Expected Behavior: Less disk size is needed and pages are faster Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): ALL the AEM, premise and cloud Customer-name/Organization name: This page is AEM based: view-source:https://www.miles-and-more.com/row/en.html   This is NOT AEM based: view-source:https://www.iberia.com/   do your math... Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

  Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to Search for CQ Tags from the Tagging Console Use-case: 1. From the AEM Start page, navigate: Tools > Tagging.2. Attempt to search for a existing cq tag (using the title or description) Current/Experienced Behavior: The search results do not include (the expected) cq tags. Improved/Expected Behavior: The search functionality should return tags that match the provided keywords in the tag title or tag description. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.19 Customer-name/Organization name: Verizon Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description -Per Workfront Support > "For Kanban, tasks from "On Hold" projects typically remain visible on the board because Kanban focuses on continuous delivery and flow. However, for Scrum, tasks do disappear, as Scrum works in fixed sprints, and to maintain workflow, non-active tasks should not be displayed."The reasoning for the difference in functionality does not make sense.  You can not focus on continuous delivery and flow is you cannot work on the card when a project is on hold.  The system prevents you from updating the card, and rightly so.  The Kanban board should not display work that cannot be worked on. Why is this feature important to you -The current behavior is confusing and keeps the board cluttered with work that cannot be worked on.  Unlike the Scrum team where Tasks in an On Hold project drop off the backlog and sprints. How would you like the feature to work -The functionality should mimic the Scrum setup.  If a project is

Red Hat uses a variety of Kanban boards to manage work. Many of these boards have different statuses that are unique to each project.The following limitations prevent us from using Kanban boards at scale in Workfront.Cards cannot be moved out of the backlog without physically dragging them.We have projects with hundreds of stories in the backlog. Physically tracking down cards to move them forward after clicking into a card isn’t possible, especially when projects can contain many cards that end users are responsible for moving (see the appendix for details on one such process).We would simply like to be able to move cards out of the backlog from within the card, in the same way something can be moved from “New” to “In-progress” after it's out of the backlog.Kanban boards cannot be filtered, except by the user working on the card.Current tooling allows us to filter within any field and build advanced filters with if/and statements.Statuses can’t be readily customized by Kanban board, e

There is a great help article that shows you how to export a task list with the task hierarchy indented however when you do this you lose the hyperlink on the tasks. It would be great if we could do the export and retain the task hierarchy and the task hyperlink.

The External Lookup custom field should allow for OAuth JWT authentification. This feature is important, because of IT security guidelines.Currently, the external lookup field only allows for basic authentication via key-value pair

Apologies if this exists, but I cannot find it.It would great if you had the ability to link segments to other segments so that if Segment B is dependent on Segment A, and Segment A changes, Segment B would inherit the changes.  See below for a use case in which I think this would be helpful.Use Case: Funnel AnalysisStep 1: I create the following sequential segments.1. Product Page2. Product Page > Cart Add3. Product Page > Cart Add > Cart4. Product Page > Cart Add > Cart > Checkout5. Product Page > Cart Add > Cart > Checkout > OrderStep 2: I create a report using these segments with the visits metrics to create a funnel.This works really well for me.  The challenge I have is that I have 8000 + product categories on my site.   If I want to look at the same funnel for our 'Electronics' category I have to do the following:Re-create each segment and add category logic:1. Product Page (Electronics Segment)2. Product Page (Electronics Segment) > Cart Add (El

Description -Why is this feature important to you - When the new 24.1 Release takes hold for the quarterly updates next week, there are some users that wouldn't normally need to view or edit projects or tasks within Workfront. Currently I am unable to remove Priorities from the menu, even if I change the layout landing page. I would like this to be an option I can choose for each layout. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to remove Priorities from both view option and menu option on certain layouts. Current Behaviour -There is no option to do this.  Thank you for your time, attention, and help with this.   

Currently, users are able to select multiple projects and are able to Add a Custom Form to selected objects such as Projects with a single Save.  (For example... see Add custom form field in screenshot).   Users are apparently unable to do this for Programs. When my company wants to roll out a new form for all existing programs we would have to add the form one by one.  Please enable the ability to add a Custom form while bulk editing Programs.  

Description - Currently, the excel connector in Fusion is only able to map to static files on our computer. There should be an option to "map" to other paths such as if I am watching for files and retrieving on a schedule via SFTPWhy is this feature important to you - This feature is important to me because we place files in a folder for Fusion to watch and pickupHow would you like the feature to work - Excel connector have the ability to "map" to files referenced in earlier modulesCurrent Behaviour - Can only choose static files on our machine

I understand I can change the constraints of a task at the individual task level, or at the project level if I use a template. I would like to be able to set the constraint on a project without using a template, and without doing it individually on tasks. Please add this as an enhancement for future release. For example, I'd like to be able to calculate start date, end date, and duration is these three ways: Duration and Start date = calculate End date (existing functionality)Duration and End date = calculate Start date (existing functionality)Start and End dates = calculate duration (requested functionality)

We send a an hours report to our billing department. The data we send is the summary tab that is grouped by hour type, account and project. The issue with this report is that the summary version of the report puts an unnecessary "Sum:", "Count:", "average:" etc before the actual value. Can the description of the value be headed as either a column heading or another column next to it? The unnecessary descriptor exports to excel in the same cell requiring in the accounting team to manipulate the data so that they can get the actual value.

Have the ability to sort the updates by date added. Have an expand all conversation/updates button, so we can search for specific key words.Have a filterable/sortable subject line for the update.