Product Communities

DescriptionWhen using the "Update a Record & Attach a Custom Form" module in Fusion, descriptive text fields appear as editable fields in the interface, even though they cannot actually be modified. This is misleading, as descriptive fields are intended to be static and only serve as instructional labels. Their presence in the module creates unnecessary noise and can cause confusion for users who might assume they are modifiable. Why is this feature important to youDescriptive fields are meant to provide guidance and context within custom forms, not to store data. Showing them as editable fields in Fusion is misleading and could result in users spending time trying to modify them, only to realize that the changes do not take effect. This clutters the UI, making it harder to focus on relevant, actionable fields. Removing them from the update module would improve clarity and streamline the user experience. How would you like the feature to workFusion should recognize descri

Description - I want to filter out all the rules and Data elements which I have worked on, so that it is easy to publish those changes(only my changes) or may be add " add all changes done by me" section while building library. Why is this feature important to you - Lot of developers and different teams work simultaneously and building library is tideous as I need to pick rule by rule before adding it to libraryHow would you like the feature to work - Should be able to add filter option on top ( filter by developer, build stage( dev,stage,prod), etc)Current Behaviour - No such filter. There is only way to sort it.

Description - Ability to update tasks from the project task page that allows previous updates to be stored as historical dataWhy is this feature important to you - It will allow project managers to add updates to tasks actively while on Zoom calls. It's less clicks to just add updates from the project page vs having to click on a link then adding an update then returning to the project page to add updates to other tasks.How would you like the feature to work - We would like a field that allows tasks to be updated from the project page without losing previous updates when entering a new update (allows historical updates to still be displayed as it currently is if you click on the Task itself)Current Behaviour - Currently we have a open text field (titled: Last Note: Note Text) that links to the task updates page, we are only permitted to update this field by clicking on the task itself to enter the 'latest update'

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The "cq-msm-lockable" attribute is used to maintain inheritance when configuring MSM locks on page properties. When the inheritance is cancelled, the property-cq:propertyInheritanceCancelled - is added. However, this does not operate on deep properties. Use-case: Data about an event such as local time-zone, address of the event, etc is stored in jcr:content/metadata. We need to cancel inheritance of the page to update localized data. field level inheritance cannot be operated on deep properties.   Current/Experienced Behavior: Cancel inheritance functionality does not work for deep properties. Improved/Expected Behavior: Leverage the cancel inheritance functionality for deep properties. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Version 6.5.10 Customer-name/Organization name: Rockwell Automation Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

We should be able to access the data we input in Smart Lists for programs and smart campaigns. Currently, once a smart campaign or program runs, it is difficult to view all data in a Smart List filter. For example, if I target 10 different states in a filter, I can only hover over the list of states. I could not copy the list without copying the entire program or Smart Campaign.  It creates additional work to recreate an audience if we can't at least copy and paste the information. Cloning the program or smart campaign does not work for all use cases. In addition, using "member of program" does not provide accurate targeting in some cases. For example, if I want to emulate a campaign that happened 6 months ago, our database may have changed greatly since then. "Member of program" would not capture all contacts who would otherwise be eligible for the smart list in this case. 

When a report is added to a project dashboard update the grouping (sum) column to the project's currency and not the system default currency. Example below.  Why is this feature important to you - When a user is needing a sum of multiple currency fields on a project dashboard report it can be confusing to view the project currency and the system default currency conversion in one report.  How would you like the feature to work - when a report is filtered to a project dashboard the grouping sum it will align to the project's selected currency  Current Behavior - the report grouping is shown in the system's default currency. If the project's currency is different it will convert to the system default currency and convert the total. 

On our website and in our apps, we have a lot more traffic on Weekdays than on Weekend days.For some flows/pages we have data alerts.  But defining the level on which we want to be alerted is very difficult.If the level is too low, we won't be alerted if there is an issue on weekdays; if the level is too high, we'll get (unwanted) alerts on Weekend days. In the As Is situation you can (theoretically) add "Weekdays" in the definition on the alert.Eg. I had created an alert for specific pages: if the # of pageViews was 0 on Weekdays (only on Weekdays), I wanted to receive an alert.On Weekdays the alert works fine.  But for each Saturday and Sunday I received an alert saying that the # of pageViews was 0, although this was NOT the case.  It was very confusing. We had plans to create a lot more alerts, a very nice feature of AA, but because of the impossibility to  differentiate the levels to test on between Weekdays and Weekend days, this feature looses a lot

Description - It would be great if the Text Field with Formatting had more standard formatting options available.Why is this feature important to you - Copy and Paste from standard apps do not transfer accurate formatting; in addition, sometimes there is a need to indent or outdent and that is not currently possible. Font size cannot be changed. How would you like the feature to work - More standard formatting options be available.Current Behaviour - Right now formatting options are very limited and do not seem to be standard.

I was speaking to our adobe workfront consultants and they seem to believe there is no way to add a comment with data in it. All we want to do is avoid having to copy from excel, paste in notepad, copy again, format it and then comment. I'd like to be able to simply copy from excel in its original format and it look like that when it is pasted into the updates/comments section. The closest I can get to that is a copy as image and then save the image and then upload the image to the comments.  I would prefer it look like this. No formatting needed just simple, copy and paste.   A1ABAIRPORTPOPULATION1ATL202DFW303MCO404RSW505LAX606JFK70

Description -  Please add a field/claim for user's preferred names that can be populated with SCIM or OIDC/SAML. Why is this feature important to you -  The current implementation requires a given name and family name.  Accounts that are provisioned with SCIM reset any changes the user may make to their name field.  We have employees who go by their middle name, or prefer a different name.  We also have employees from cultures that don't have legal family names which causes issues with the current system that requires a family name.  We are working around this by passing the user's preferred name as the given name and using anon-printable character as the family name, but the non-printable character is causing a bug that is preventing other fields from being modified.  Rahul Yadav from Adobe support says that this is not a bug and everything is working as intended and is refusing to provide support at this point.  It is unclear how usin

When someone gets an update from workfront in their email they may add an attachment. Right now workfront ignores the attachment and you have no idea that there was an attachment. We need attachments from our clients, they are used to submitting attachments via helpdesk. Workaround: We built a flow in Azuqua (Azuqua doesn't handle attachments via gmail yet so it took some extra work but it works) that looks at every email coming in and sends them to workfront. This flow beats workfront by 2-40 minutes in processing the attachments before the update is posted to workfront.

It would be nice to have a template to create a program and all the projects within that program, as well as custom fields at the program level. This would be helpful for campaigns. We could remove the projects that are not applicable for the particular campaign. We could fill in the details for the campaign on the program level custom form. There is no capability to copy programs, so we aren't able to copy a similar program. It has to be all manually re-created.

Description - add option to change font colour in text in updates Why is this feature important to you - it would make it easier to selectively highlight important parts of the update How would you like the feature to work - at least basic selection of colours for the font, e.g. just like in reports, conditional formatting Current Behaviour - all black, only bold can be used as highlight

Description - Ability to map in non XDM compliant parquet files Why is this feature important to you - Source systems are not always producing parquet files which are xdm compliant How would you like the feature to work - Ability to map in parquet files from cloud based source connectors. Current Behaviour - No mapping option is present for parquet source files.

Description - When attempting to mark a Project Complete and there is an open issue or task, popup should at minimum list the task/issue stopping the project from being marked complete. Step better would be why the task/issue is not complete if due to missing approvals, bad dates, or anything else definable. Why is this feature important to you - Just wasted time trying to get close a project. First, all tasks were marked 100% and standard view does not include status so wasted time looking for a task not complete but 100%. Second, once the task was found I could not update the status because it was "Calculated by System", but all subtasks were complete and 100%. Waste more time looking through experience league for what could be stopping, try a number of suggestions with no results. Come to find out Planned start and end dates cannot be the same. Update dates to fixed because ASAP is not changing them. Still the parent task remains open. Thinking I have not found what is stopping

Description - Once you perform a search, you no longer have the ability to adjust what you are searching. Meaning, if you have a typo in your search you have to completely back out of search and restart, rather than being able to click into the search bar again and adjust. Additionally, if you are searching for multiple different items with the same criteria/filters, you have to re-input the criteria/filters for each search, rather than just changing the text in the search bar. Why is this feature important to you - This was a functionality that used to exist and was stripped during new UI implementation. This is a big degradation and requires extra and not standard extra work during search. How would you like the feature to work - The same as the old search functionality - search bar remains visible and editable after performing the initial search Current Behaviour - Search bar disappears once you hit enter/click search

Description - When sending a file from Workfront to Assets, the folder path should be "sticky" so that the next time we send a file we don't need to start from the very beginning of the folder path.Why is this feature important to you - This would save many clicks, reduce frustration, and improve efficiency.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to the way it works in the Enhanced Connector. The location of the last file send is the default for the next file send.Current Behaviour - When the User is sending a file to Assets, the user has to start from the very beginning of the Assets folder structure...every time.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently in AEM we have option to use Oauth2 (CQ Mailer SMTP OAuth2 Provider) for email integration with SMTP server, along with SMTP(Day CQ mail service) can we have option to use the Oauth2 with Microsoft graph API Use-case: Due to security reasons some clients won't enable the SMTP authentication for the accounts as those accounts are shared within multiple brands and SMTP AUTH is also being deprecated by Microsoft. So thinking to use the Microsoft graph API for email integration it will use the same access token generated using the Oauth OOTB implementation. Current/Experienced Behavior: Oauth2 integration with SMTP  Improved/Expected Behavior: One more option to have Oauth2 integration with Microsoft Graph API Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Bounteous Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applica

Description -Why is this feature important to you - When creating a field in a custom form and viewing item in Preview mode, items are truncated.   Would like the ability to stretch the field box in order to see everything.  How would you like the feature to work - Be able to stretch the box within the window so items can be viewedCurrent Behaviour - Field box is not very big, so you can't view everything.  Items are cut off.

Description - Allow using the "same field" custom field with "different labels" on various forms. Example below:Field Name: "Select Apps"Label 1 (Form 1): Select Affected AppsLabel 2 (Form 2): Select Top 3 AppsWhy is this feature important to you - Currently, the absence of this functionality leads to duplicate fields, increasing maintenance overhead. For instance, if the "Select Apps" field is a dropdown and I need to add two new values, I have to update every duplicate field individually, which can lead to errors if not updated.How would you like the feature to work - When adding a field to a custom form from the field library, the label should default to blank (or the initially set value). Either way, this should allow users to enter a different label if needed, without overwriting existing labels on other forms.Current Behaviour - If a label is modified on one form, it updates the labels across all forms using the field. This forces users to create duplicate fields and manage them

Description:Parent task constraints in a template should yield the same results when applied to a project. Currently, this is not the case.Why is this feature important?If you need a specific phase of a project (with many child tasks) to start on a particular date, it makes sense to have the ability to set a start date for the entire group of tasks. Task constraints work as expected on parent tasks in projects, so it’s essential that a project template behaves the same way when creating a new project. Consistency between templates and projects is crucial for accurate task planning and scheduling. How would you like the feature to work?Parent task constraints in a template should function the same way they do in a project, ensuring that the template creates the project with consistent, expected results.Current Behavior:Some task constraints on parent tasks in templates are not respected when the template is used to create a project. For example, in a template, I have set a constrai

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Increase the folder depth limitation for the Export Metadata feature in AEM Assets to support folders exceeding 10 levels. Use-case:  Some customers rely on deep folder hierarchies to manage large-scale asset libraries effectively. Their current folder classification system often exceeds 10 levels in depth. The existing limitation prevents the Export Metadata feature from functioning properly for assets stored in these deeper folders, leading to inefficiencies and an inability to extract necessary metadata. Current/Experienced Behavior: When using the Export Metadata feature, it fails to export metadata for assets located in folders deeper than 10 levels. This limitation disrupts workflows for customers with complex folder structures. (Case #E-001458355:  Support Response: I checked the code for AssetMetadataExporterProcess and found that the FULL_TRAVERSAL_DEPTH = 10, which means it only allow 10 levels of depth. 

Description - Our Firm has not been able to use Activity Maps since it was re-engineered to v3 due to our security policy that forces us to modify the extensions guid as software is not permitted to update outside of the Firm. Why is this feature important to you - Adobe Extension is a great tool that makes analytics more accessible to users.  The work around limits its use for some users. How would you like the feature to work - We would like Adobe to allow custom guid so that our users can authenticate using the extension. Current Behaviour -  Authentication is blocked by Adobe as it does not recognize our GUID. 

We would like to understand what combination of events equal to what user actions via CJA Audit logs.The CJA Audit logs help doc https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics-platform/using/cja-privacy/audit-log gives insights on very general things but we want to be able to get more specific information.For example: Project Created: Name = #### will that only show up once per project creation? Project Viewed will show up multiple times for a single view of a project(tested) or on a future date after the actual view. This makes it a bit challenging to extract precise usage insights.What are API_REQUEST? Why is there no User Name against some Action Name in the Audit logs? Description would show: Project Viewed: Project Objects - What are Project Objects?

We are looking to customize "Forward to Friend" feature in Marketo to have the following result, "When the email receiver forwards the received email from Marketo to a friend, the receiver should receive the email with a customized message in subject or in body of the email before forwarded email content"This customization is not currently not available, could you consider adding this in future developments