Product Communities

Description -  Use chi-squared to see if actual Adobe Analytics split is stat-sig different than expected from Adobe Target traffic allocation.Why is this feature important to you -The Sample Ratio Mismatch (SRM) test can be used to detect a wide variety of data quality issues that may affect online experiments (aka A/B tests). See https://www.lukasvermeer.nl/srm/microsite/How would you like the feature to work - Pull-in the expected split from Adobe Target. Use chi-squared test to see if actual Adobe Analytics split is stat-sig different than expected from Adobe Target traffic allocation. If confidence is 99% = yellow warning, 99.9% conf = red alert. Because visitors in Adobe Target (profiles) are different than in Adobe Analytics (devices), it might also be helpful to compare the number of treated visitors in Adobe Target reporting to the number of visitors in Adobe Analytics also to help debug when there is an SRM error.Current Behaviour - Create an A4T pane

Description - bring back the ability to clear lazy loaded mboxes and hosts in the UI. This used to exist in the classic interface. We have many inactive mbox and when using the form editor, it's easy to select the wrong mbox. Why is this feature important to you - It will make the interface easier to use and less likely to for new users to target from using the wrong mbox.How would you like the feature to work - add 2 buttons "clear hosts" and "clear mboxes". Clicking the buttons would clear the current lists and we would need to wait for lazy loading to fill the lists again.Current Behaviour - this feature doesn't exist

Description - 1) Add the ability archive audiences and profile scripts in Adobe Target. 2) Add the ability to filter achieved, inactive and active audiences and profile scriptsWhy is this feature important to you - We have hundreds of audiences and profile scripts from both Adobe Target and Adobe Target Classic. We cannot delete Profile Scripts because they are used by in-editable Audiences and Audience can't be deleted because they are used in in-editable campaigns. It makes it hard to find the right profile script, especially if debugging an emergency. How would you like the feature to work:Edit Profile script:  Add an archive/unarchive button with a confirmationProfile Script list: add filter button next to the "Search profile scripts". Clicking the filter button would show the ability to filter on status with 3 checkboxes for active, inactive and archived. Active and inactive would be checked by default and inactive uncheckedFix the STATUS sort: when you click on the head

Description - move multiple reports to a folder at onceWhy is this feature important to you - I have hundreds of reports I need to organize and currently you can move 1 at a time and then it automatically moves you to that new folder vs keeping you where you were in the report list. How would you like the feature to work - Even if I can only drag one report at a time, PLEASE stop it from taking me to the folder I just moved something to. Then I have to navigate back to the my reports page and find the place I was at and it's just so unnecessary and time consuming. I don't need to see the report in the new folder to know that it's there. Ideally, I would love to be able to select multiple reports and move them all to a folder at one time (and then stay on the page I was originally on).Current Behaviour - can only move 1 report at a time and then it navigates you to the new folder and you have to constantly go back, drag report, wait for page to load, go back, wait for page to load,

Description -  Currently, Workfront utilizes the time zone on the user's computer to determine the times and dates for tasks versus the setup time zone within Workfront for the user. It also ignores the time zone schedule of the project. We are finding issues with this in a few locations within Workfront. For example, in the Time Off section, if the user's setup time zone within Workfront is not set to the same time zone as their computer, it will select 2 days when trying to select 1. Another example, if a user is located on the West coast and their computer is set to PST, but their Workfront time zone is set to CST, it will override the CST and use the computer's time zone. This is especially difficult for Planners that are setting up due dates and times for tasks within a project. We'd like Workfront to stop referencing the "computer" time of users and set all users to CST, regardless of where are they are located in the world.  Configuring user accounts with the

Summary:Expand the capabilities of Adobe Launch Data Elements by enabling them to return JavaScript Promises. This feature will allow asynchronous data retrieval and processing directly within Data Element configurations, enhancing flexibility and power for dynamic data handling.Problem Statement:Currently, Adobe Launch Data Elements are limited to storing static or computed values within the confines of Rules. While they are invaluable for capturing and managing data on web pages, their functionality is constrained by synchronous operations. Asynchronous tasks, such as API calls or event-driven data retrieval, require external code, limiting the tool's potential for multisolution integration and Extension Development. Proposed Solution:Introduce exiting functionality with Rules where Data Elements can return JavaScript Promises. This will enable asynchronous operations directly within Data Element configurations, allowing users to handle dynamic and async data retrieval without l

Currently we have to manual block off the weekends in order for our templates to not account for them. We would like to have this as an automatic feature or have something that can rolled out across multiple years

Fusion currently does have the feature to clone an existing data structure from one team to another but the same feature is not available for data stores. This forces users to either manually create the data store or create Fusion scenarios to achieve it. While we feel this feature will be a good to have in the product 

It would be great if schedule exceptions could be added to calendars in the same way as time off. This would eliminate one more manual process on our shared calendars.

Description - Adobe recently modified the Fusion API so that it only returns save-events, and not the actual execution logs. Instead, Adobe have implemented a different API that is not accessible to Customers. Why is this feature important to you - This breaks current scenarios that collect eg Warning/Error executions (eg to create a ticket in another tool or alert the support team). This was done without communications to customers and partners.  How would you like the feature to work - I want to be able to search and retrieve execution logs like we used to be able to. In general, removing functionality without announcement and workaround reflects quite negatively on the Product and how change is being implemented.

Description Currently, the search in Launch is barely useful, since it returns a very fluffy set of results, that quite often do not help finding what you are looking for. Quite often, the results just show a "... more" in the results list, but without actually giving you a chance to find what you are looking for.   This leads to developers rather not changing any DE names once in use to not break anything.   It would be awesome to be able to have more search features like "exact match" "regex match" case sensitive yes/no etc. Also, a optional dedicated search detail page that lists all the other results would be great! Ideally with a preview of the match.   Out of this need, external tools like the "Perpetua Digital Launch Assistant" are being developed, just addressing these shortcomings.   Why is this feature important to you Everybody knows you cannot just rename data element in Launch without potentially breaking things. Hence, whenever I want to rename a

Description -see any Thumbnails for PDFs when you upload as Documents Why is this feature important to you -all of our Print output will require a PDF for approval, so having the thumbnails and previews available is imperative for our processes. How would you like the feature to work -By default, PDF is a supported file type for proofing so when you create a proof from PDF files, it will show a preview thumbnail. But you won't see a thumbnail for PDF files within the document lists/ PreviewThumbnails are show for for png, jpeg etc, but not PDF when you upload as Documents to Workfrontuploading a PDF as a “Document” by default doesn’t generate any in-browser preview.  Current Behaviour -If you choose “Document Only” when uploading, Workfront just stores the file—no interactive viewer is generated

Description - It would be nice to be able to see a frame preview on the timeline of a video proof when scrubbing through the video.Why is this feature important to you - It would make it easier for the approvers who are previewing the video to be able to scrub to a certain part of a video. If you could see the frame on the timeline, it would be much easier to click through the video and stop at the point where you need to be.How would you like the feature to work - A simple frame preview that pops up on the timeline when scrubbing through. 

Description - the new bottom-center green and red notification popups do not disappear automatically and instead have to be manually closed via the "X" button on the notification. It would be great if these notifications could disappear after a specified amount of time automatically.Why is this feature important to you - adding too many unnecessary clicks, and the popups end up stacking on top of each other if you neglect to "X" them out. This is especially noticeable when working on a complex report where you have to save and view the report, go back and make another small change, save and view the report again, etc. You can accumulate a lot of notifications in a very short timeframe.How would you like the feature to work - either give us an option in Setup to specify how long the notification should be visible, or set the time limit for us. Current Behaviour - notifications have to be manually closed each time they appear. 

Description - Due to Adobe's limitations on custom schema creation, we need the ability to generate audiences directly from a GCP bucket, similar to CSV import, as automating the CSV process is not possible.Why is this feature important to you - This is essential because we cannot automate the CSV process.How would you like the feature to work - We need the ability to create audiences directly from a GCP bucket, similar to CSV import.Current Behaviour -

過去にLPにYouTube動画埋め込み機能がありましたが、2025年2月1日（PT）をもって、ソーシャルアセット機能を廃止されました。しかし、当該機能は再開させてほしいです。

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Option to easily replicate content on the Prod author and publisher to Stage or Dev Use-case: We want Stage or Dev environment to be in sync with Prod content, to be in more or less same state. Current/Experienced Behavior: At the moment we can use copy content sets, but that is only possible to author instance, and when we copy content set, copied pages or assets dont have the publications status. Improved/Expected Behavior: Copy content sets on author and publish instance, and assets and pages to have the same data from Prod to other stages Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: CSS KRANKEN-VERSICHERUNG AG Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Description - Would like the ability to create templated email sends for automated workflows in proofWhy is this feature important to you - When routing assets to a handful of different companies, we would like the ability to send personalized emails to each company that can be templated and attached to the automated workflow they are on. Currently, you can customize an email when setting up a proof, but this adds a lot of manual work to our team that is setting up the proof to copy and paste a message in, when it could be templated out and drive efficiencies for our team. How would you like the feature to work - For each unique automated workflow, create a section that allows you to tailor email communications that can be saved and are always on when creating a proof with a specific automated workflow.Current Behavior - Does not exist, but you can customize an email upon proof creation.

Description - Would like the ability to target different on load messages in Proof and be able to attach them to specific automated workflows.Why is this feature important to you - We would love to be able to have this feature enabled for some users and not all users when viewing a proof. For example, we have external users that need the message and the internal company users do not need the message. Since we are unable to target a specific workflow, all users unfortunately have to see and click to remove this message, which adds another step for the end user and they have found this to be an annoyance since we turned this on recently. Lastly, we have a few different businesses in our instance and it would allow flexibility for different units to control their own messaging.How would you like the feature to work - Be able to create personalized on load messages that you are then able to target to specific proof automated workflows.Current Behavior - Currently you are able to turn on th

Description - We would like the ability to limit commenting to only those tied to the Proof workflow.  Currently you can add ANY proof user to a comment. Why is this feature important to you - As a marketing agency, we work with competitor clients and some users work across clients.  We need the ability to protect proprietary information and protect from inadvertently emailing someone with a similar name at the wrong client.  Our art directors work with many groups and the external emails are only used in Proof.  External clients do have not access to our platform.  So changes to user access would not be an option for us. Also, the Share setting within Proof itself isn't feasible because Partner accounts only seems to work with organizations that also have WF Proof.  How would you like the feature to work - It would be good to have an option within the proof workflow details that restricted users from tagging anyone but the people who are me

I needed to update the calculation on a custom form, but instead of just adding the new code in I have receive an error code stating " Form Number field is used in a multi-form configuration, if you would like to change this formula you will need to remove this field and replace it with a new one containing the desired calculation". Form Number is the custom field I wanted to update, but now I have to create a whole new field, add the modified formula, remove this field from every form it's on, and add the new field back where the old was replaced... but b/c I don't want the name of the field to change I have to do this a second time with the correct name. This is a huge undertaking when every other field updates immediately when an update occurs, not sure why this can't update as well. Even selecting the option of Update Calculation is useless.

I am a power user/resource hog in Fusion. I perform 10s of thousands of operations and frequently need to move around 100s of MBs if files. As such, I run out of your paltry 1GB of memory frequently. I am informed by Support that there is no way to monitor the current memory usage while running a Fusion scenario. And the official answer is "just do less". I argue this is a PRIME case for providing us access to poll the current used memory from within a running scenario. Similar to an Environment variable. This way I would not have to run hard until I hit a brick wall, I could periodically poll the current memory usage and decide if I need to gracefully stop or if I am able to continue on. I am surprised that this doesn't already exist, as it is rather asinine that I can "do anything" in Fusion, but run it hard until it breaks in a non-graceful way. Thank you,Wes-(Very large, multi-milion dollar client)

Can you please add the ability to rearrange the fields on the layout when viewing custom object records?The fields are perhaps arranged according to the order in which they were created, but there are logical groupings that we want to create to make it easier when viewing the records. As it stands, we have date fields that are all over the place, in an order that is not helpful. 

We would like to be able to report on total Planned Hours by Role by Project. Currently if more than one role is assigned to a task in a project, we can't report on the planned hours for each role on the task.  Reporting on this will allow us to better estimate effort hours by role for new projects from prior projects. We cannot use Actual hours as we don't carry worker licenses for all of our users so being able to use Planned Hours would get us closer.   Also, since we are not able to break out Planned Hours for tasks by role, we are also not be able to compare planned hours to actual hours, which is something we are hoping to do as well for those who do have a worker license.   

Description - Currently the three options for individual user proof permission profiles are supervisor (listed 1st), manager (listed 2nd) and administrator (listed 3rd).  Why is this feature important to you - Our team uses proofs actively on all projects.  Each user needs the right access to proof/edit/approve, etc.How would you like the feature to work - I have a few options.  1 -  Switch the word manager to reviewer so someone knows that's the lowest level permission.  2 -Put the options in access order = manager, supervisor, admin.  Option 3 - Add a question mark icon to define these three levels when someone hovers over it.Current Behaviour - I had my designers using the manager setting and there were numerous access issues.  I didn't realize it was the lowest level permission.